Risk Based Investment Decisions: Case: Merck & Company: Evaluating A Drug Licensing Opportunity
Risk Based Investment Decisions: Case: Merck & Company: Evaluating A Drug Licensing Opportunity
Risk Based Investment Decisions: Case: Merck & Company: Evaluating A Drug Licensing Opportunity
Discovery 5,000-10,000
screened
(2-10 Years)
Phase I 5
enter clinical testing
20-80 healthy volunteers used to
determine safety and dosage
Phase II
100-300 patient volunteers used
to look for efficacy and side effects
Phase III
1,000-5,000 patient volunteers used to monitor
adverse reactions to long-term use.
FDA Review/
Approval
Additional
Post-marketing Testing
14
Davanrik’s Potential
Cash Flows
Phase I Phase II Phase III
(clinical testing)
Chance of 60% Depression: 10% Depression: 85%
success Weight loss: 15% Weight loss: 75%
Both: 5% Both: 70%
Depression: 15%
Weight loss: 5%
Both: 10%
15
Davanrik’s Potential
Cash Flows
Depression only Weight loss only Both
Cost to launch $250 million $100 million $400 million
Commercialization $1.2 billion $345 million $2.25 billion
present value
All cash flows are expressed as after-tax present values discounted to time zero,
including capital expenditures
Present value is calculated as the after-tax present value of 10 years worth of
cash flows from the drug discounted back to today. It was believed that after 10 years,
the drug had very little value to the company since it would be ‘off its patent’ by then
(and thus a terminal value of zero was used in the calculations)
16
Value of Licensing to Merck
• Source of compounds without risk, cost, and product
development time of the discovery phase
• Marshal a compound through phase testing by levering its
expertise in the administrative and scientific requirements
of the FDA process
• Bring the product to the market place rapidly, making most
of the limited time under patent protection
• Cash flow in form of initial and milestone payments and
sales royalties
• Focus on its competitive advantage and develop new
compounds because of expert support in FDA approval
20
Decision Alternatives
Decision Alternatives
Both
Failure
22
Phase III: Success
Phase I: Failure
Do not License
Phase III: Success
85%
Phase II: Depression
10%
Phase III: Failure
15%
Phase III: Success
25%
Phase I: Success Phase III: Success
Both
60% 70%
5%
Phase III: Failure
Phase II: Failure 10%
70%
Phase I: Failure
40%
Do not License
Phase III: Success
85% -$250
Phase II: Depression
10%
-$200 Phase III: Failure
15% -$0
Phase III: Success
25% -$0
Phase I: Success Phase III: Success
Both
60% -$40 70% -$400
5% -$100
Phase III: Failure
Phase II: Failure 10% -$0
70% -$0
Phase I: Failure
40% -$0
Do not License
-$0
Phase III: Success
85% -$250 $1,200
Phase II: Depression
10%
-$200 Phase III: Failure
15% -$0
Phase III: Success
25% -$0
Phase I: Success Phase III: Success
Both
60% -$40 70% -$400 $2,250
5% -$100 $345
Phase III: Failure
Phase II: Failure 10% -$0
70% -$0
Phase I: Failure
40% -$0
Do not License
-$0
Phase III: Success
85% 5.10%
Phase II: Depression
10%
Phase III: Failure
0.90%
15%
Phase III: Success
75%
6.75%
Phase II: Weight Loss
5%
Phase III: Failure
Phase II: Failure
0.30%
10%
70% 42%
Phase I: Failure
40%
40%
Total = 100%
Do not License
Phase III: Success
85% -$250 $1,200 $680
Phase II: Depression
10%
-$200 Phase III: Failure
-$270
15% -$0
Phase III: Success
5% -$100 $345
Phase III: Failure
Phase II: Failure
-$570
10% -$0
Do not License
-$0
Phase III: Success
85% -$250 $1,200 $34.7
Phase II: Depression
10%
-$200 Phase III: Failure
-$2.4
15% -$0
Phase III: Success
5% -$100 $345
Phase III: Failure
Phase II: Failure
-$1.7
10% -$0
70% -$0-$29.4
Phase I: Failure
-$12.0
40% -$0
Total = $14.0
Do not License
-$0
Davanrik’s Probability
Davanrik Failure Probability
Phase Fail Probability – Fail Probability
Per Phase Total
I 40% 40.00%
II 60% x 70% 42.00%
III – Depression 60% x 10% x 15% 0.90%
III – Weight Loss 60% x 15% x 25% 2.25%
III – Dual Indication 60% x 5% x 10% 0.30%
Total 85.45%
33
Expected Value of Royalty Payments to LAB
Gross CF Royalty Probability Expected
(%) (%) Royalty
Depression – Independent Claim $1263 5 5.10 $3.22
Weight Loss – Independent Claim 363 5 6.75 1.23
Depression – Dual Claim 1263 5 0.45 0.28
Weight Loss – Dual Claim 363 5 0.15 0.03
Dual Claim 2368 5 2.10 2.49
Total 14.55 7.25
34
Capital Budgeting Techniques
• Traditional – Non risk based - Non-discounting techniques
• Pay Back Period (PBP)
• Accounting Returns on Investment (ARR)
• Modern – Non risk based - discounting techniques
• Net Present Value (NPV)
• Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
» Multiple IRR
» Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)
• Present value Index (PI)
• Equivalent Annuity (EA)
Non risk based techniques assumes that all projects were assumed to be equally risky,
acceptance of any project would not alter the firm’s overall risk
38
Capital Budgeting Techniques
• Risk based techniques
• Sensitivity analysis
• Scenario analysis
• Certainty equivalent model
• Decision tree analysis
• Break even analysis
• Simulation
• Risk adjusted discount rate
• Real options
39