Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 49 views

    Hypothesis Testing

    Uploaded by

    PRANAY
    The document compares the performance of two car models, Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32, across 20 samples each based on mileage and top speed. A hypothesis test is conducted to determine if the sample means for mileage and top speed differ significantly from the hypothesized specifications for each model. For Rocinante 36, the p-values for mileage (0.0822) and top speed (0.4316) are greater than the significance level of 0.05, so the null hypothesis that performance meets specifications cannot be rejected. Similarly for Marengo 32, p-values of 0.1342 and 0.373 exceed 0.05, so its performance is also found to meet hypothesized specifications.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Hypothesis Testing

    Uploaded by

    PRANAY
    49 views13 pages
    The document compares the performance of two car models, Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32, across 20 samples each based on mileage and top speed. A hypothesis test is conducted to determine if the sample means for mileage and top speed differ significantly from the hypothesized specifications for each model. For Rocinante 36, the p-values for mileage (0.0822) and top speed (0.4316) are greater than the significance level of 0.05, so the null hypothesis that performance meets specifications cannot be rejected. Similarly for Marengo 32, p-values of 0.1342 and 0.373 exceed 0.05, so its performance is also found to meet hypothesized specifications.

    Original Description:

    Random Motors

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document compares the performance of two car models, Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32, across 20 samples each based on mileage and top speed. A hypothesis test is conducted to determine if the sample means for mileage and top speed differ significantly from the hypothesized specifications for each model. For Rocinante 36, the p-values for mileage (0.0822) and top speed (0.4316) are greater than the significance level of 0.05, so the null hypothesis that performance meets specifications cannot be rejected. Similarly for Marengo 32, p-values of 0.1342 and 0.373 exceed 0.05, so its performance is also found to meet hypothesized specifications.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    49 views13 pages

    Hypothesis Testing

    Uploaded by

    PRANAY
    The document compares the performance of two car models, Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32, across 20 samples each based on mileage and top speed. A hypothesis test is conducted to determine if the sample means for mileage and top speed differ significantly from the hypothesized specifications for each model. For Rocinante 36, the p-values for mileage (0.0822) and top speed (0.4316) are greater than the significance level of 0.05, so the null hypothesis that performance meets specifications cannot be rejected. Similarly for Marengo 32, p-values of 0.1342 and 0.373 exceed 0.05, so its performance is also found to meet hypothesized specifications.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 13

    Rocinante 36 Marengo 32

    Top Top
    Mileage speed Mileage speed
    Car No. (km/ltr) (km/hr) Car No. (km/ltr) (km/hr) Specifications
    1 21.2 151.9 1 15.04 211.3 Price
    2 21.79 147.6 2 15.41 207 Manufacturing cost
    3 21.87 145.6 3 15.43 206.2 Mileage
    4 22.71 136.1 4 15.92 213.4 Top speed
    5 22.52 139.7 5 15.2 204.2
    6 21.41 146.1 6 15.22 208.7
    7 22.71 139.6 7 14.6 200
    8 21.71 143 8 14.41 210.9
    Hypothesis Testing :
    9 19.95 136.4 9 14.79 208.5 We will be using the t-statistic method since th
    10 20.65 146.6 10 14.81 214.2 choosen to be 95%.
    11 22.86 139.9 11 15.61 215.8 By studying the the problem statement it is not
    12 21.12 136.6 12 15.76 215.8 performing worse than expected, then it is an in
    13 22.8 148.5 13 14.97 215.2
    In this scenario, the Null hypothesis is assumed
    of the same.
    14 20.89 143.4 14 14.71 218.7
    15 22.49 134.2 15 15.55 208
    16 20.94 140.5 16 15.19 212.2
    17 20.37 137.8 17 15.36 219.7
    18 22.72 135.1 18 15.93 216.4 Rocin
    19 20.54 138.8 19 14.54 205.8
    20 21.14 132 20 14.76 209
    Null Hypothesis

    Alternate Hypothesis

    Sample Size
    Confidence Level
    Significance Level

    Hypothesised Mean
    Sample Mean
    Sample Standard
    Deviation
    Standard Error of
    Mean
    ( S.E ) = Sample
    Standard Deviation /
    Sqrt(sample Size)
    Degrees of Freedom
    [ df = n-1 ]
    T-statistic = ( Sample
    Mean - Hypothesised
    Mean )/S.E.
    p- value
    Result
    Rocinante36 Marengo32
    ₹ 700,000 ₹ 4,100,000
    ₹ 600,000 ₹ 3,300,000
    22 km/litre 15 km/litre
    140 km/hr 210 km/hr

    Testing :
    using the t-statistic method since the sample size is less than 30. We will calulate the value of P-value and compare it with the significa
    be 95%.
    g the the problem statement it is noted "If the cars are performing better than expected, then the engineer wants to revise the specificatio
    worse than expected, then it is an indication that more investment is needed in the design to improve their performance. "
    ario, the Null hypothesis is assumed to their top speed and the mileage as exactly as what the specifications were determined and the alt
    .

    Rocinante 36

    H0: Mileage = 22km/litre


    H0: Top Speed = 140km/hr

    Ha: Mileage ≠ 22km/litre


    Ha: Top Spped ≠ 140km/hr

    20
    95%
    0.05

    Mileage (km/ltr) Top Speed ( km/hr)


    22 140
    21.6195 140.97

    0.927290762326 5.39815758043037

    0.207348517947 1.20706473030981

    19 19

    -1.835 0.803602305363576
    0.0822 0.4316
    The Milage p-value (0.0822) Is more than ⍺ (0.05). We fail to reject the
    Null Hypothesis in this case.
    The Top Speed p-value (0.4316) which is greated than ⍺ (0.05). Hence,
    we fail to reject the Null Hypothesis.
    Hence we fail to reject the both the null hypothesis.
    P-value and compare it with the significance level. The confidence level is

    engineer wants to revise the specifications. However, if they are


    prove their performance. "
    pecifications were determined and the alternate hypothesis will be opposite

    Marengo 32

    Null Hypothesis Milage H0 is 15km/litre


    Top Spped H0 is 210km/hr

    Alternate Hypothesis Milage Ha is not 15km/litre


    Top Spped Ha is not 210km/hr

    Sample Size 20
    Confidence Level 95%
    Significance Level 0.05

    Mileage (km/ltr) Top Speed ( km/hr)


    Hypothesised Mean 15 210
    Sample Mean 15.1605 211.05
    Sample Standard
    Deviation 0.45880250309 5.14633236801756
    Standard Error of
    Mean
    ( S.E ) = Sample
    Standard Deviation /
    Sqrt(sample Size) 0.102591358516 1.15075490096947
    Degrees of Freedom
    [ df = n-1 ] 19 19
    T-statistic = ( Sample
    Mean - Hypothesised
    Mean )/S.E. 1.564459251949 0.912444517173397
    p-value 0.1342 0.373
    Result
    The Milage p-value (0.1342) Is more than ⍺ (0.05) hencewe fail to
    reject the Null Hypothesis. Also the Top Speed p-value (0.373) which is
    greated than ⍺ (0.05) hence we fail to reject the Null Hypothesis.
    Hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
    Rocinante 36 Marengo 32
    Top Top
    Mileage speed Mileage speed
    Car No. (km/ltr) (km/hr) Car No. (km/ltr) (km/hr) Specifications Rocinante36
    1 21.2 151.9 1 15.04 211.3 Price ₹ 700,000
    2 21.79 147.6 2 15.41 207 Manufacturing cost ₹ 600,000
    3 21.87 145.6 3 15.43 206.2 Mileage 22 km/litre
    4 22.71 136.1 4 15.92 213.4 Top speed 140 km/hr
    5 22.52 139.7 5 15.2 204.2
    6 21.41 146.1 6 15.22 208.7
    7 22.71 139.6 7 14.6 200
    8 21.71 143 8 14.41 210.9
    9 19.95 136.4 9 14.79 208.5 Hypothesis Testing :
    10 20.65 146.6 10 14.81 214.2 We will be using the t-statistic method since the samp
    be 95%.
    11 22.86 139.9 11 15.61 215.8
    By studying the the problem statement it is noted "If t
    12 21.12 136.6 12 15.76 215.8 than expected, then it is an indication that more invest
    13 22.8 148.5 13 14.97 215.2 In this scenario, the Null hypothesis is assumed to the
    14 20.89 143.4 14 14.71 218.7
    15 22.49 134.2 15 15.55 208
    16 20.94 140.5 16 15.19 212.2
    17 20.37 137.8 17 15.36 219.7
    18 22.72 135.1 18 15.93 216.4
    19 20.54 138.8 19 14.54 205.8
    20 21.14 132 20 14.76 209
    Marengo32
    ₹ 4,100,000
    ₹ 3,300,000
    15 km/litre
    210 km/hr

    statistic method since the sample size is less than 30. We will calulate the value of P-value and compare it with the significance level. The c

    oblem statement it is noted "If the cars are performing better than expected, then the engineer wants to revise the specifications. However, if
    s an indication that more investment is needed in the design to improve their performance. "
    ull hypothesis is assumed to their top speed and the mileage as exactly as what the specifications were determined and the alternate hypothe

    Marengo 32

    Null Hypothesis Milage H0 is 15km/litre


    Top Spped H0 is 210km/hr

    Alternate Hypothesis Milage Ha is not 15km/litre


    Top Spped Ha is not 210km/hr

    Sample Size 20
    Confidence Level 95%
    Significance Level 0.05

    Mileage (km/ltr) Top Speed ( km/hr)


    Hypothesised Mean 15 210
    Sample Mean 15.1605 211.05
    Sample Standard
    Deviation 0.45880250309 5.14633236801756
    Standard Error of
    Mean
    ( S.E ) = Sample
    Standard Deviation /
    Sqrt(sample Size) 0.102591358516 1.15075490096947

    Degrees of Freedom
    [ df = n-1 ] 19 19
    T-statistic = ( Sample
    Mean - Hypothesised
    Mean )/S.E. 1.564459251949 0.912444517173397
    p-value 0.1342 0.373

    Result
    The Milage p-value (0.1342) Is more than ⍺ (0.05) hencewe fail to reject
    the Null Hypothesis. Also the Top Speed p-value (0.373) which is
    greated than ⍺ (0.05) hence we fail to reject the Null Hypothesis.
    Hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
    ompare it with the significance level. The confidence level is choosen to

    nts to revise the specifications. However, if they are performing worse

    were determined and the alternate hypothesis will be opposite of the same.

    You might also like