See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/326506437

Methane Generation from Cow Dung with the Aid of a Termitic Enzyme Using a
Locally Fabricated Bio-Digester

Article · January 2015

CITATIONS READS

0 767

2 authors, including:

Kayode H. Lasisi
Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
33 PUBLICATIONS   48 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Waste Management View project

Renewable Energy View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Kayode H. Lasisi on 22 July 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 3 Issue 5, Sep - Oct 2017
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS

Methane Generation from Cow Dung with the Aid of a

Termitic Enzyme Using a Locally Fabricated Bio-Digester
Kayode Hassan Lasisi1, Olanrewaju Adebayo Ojomo2
1,2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.

Abstract:
Energy is one of the most fundamental of human needs and it drives human life, and is extremely
crucial forcontinued human development. This paper presents the findings of a research that was carried
out to determine the generation of biogas from cow dung using a low cost fabricated bio-digester. A
cylindrical drum of capacity 100 litres was used as bio-digester and fed with 40 kg of cow dung mixed
with warm water in proportions of 2:1. Also, calcium hydroxide (Ca (OH)2) was incorporated into the
experiment to remove the carbon(iv)oxide from the biogas produced and termitic enzymes solution to
acceleratethe biogas yield. Results from this study shows that the digestion of cow dung resulted in an
appreciable biogas yield. Comparing this result with sample of cow dung mixed with warm water in the
ratio 1:1 and taking into account the natural state of the waste when collected for experiment, it is of
considerable range when compared with the standard values. Ultimately, digestion of cow dung is one
way of addressing the problem of insufficient energy supply in developing countries.

Keywords — Energy, Biogas, Cow dung, Bio-digester, Digestion, Developing Countries.

Introduction years to stabilize the sludge produced by municipal

The world population continues to increase rapidly, treatment plants while the methane gas has been
while energy consumption is increasing as well used as a source of fuel heating or operating a
(Sözer and Yaldız, 2006). Also, the use of generator. Until recently, anaerobic digestion has
advanced forms of energy, such as electricity, has been considered too costly to be economically
improved the quality of public lives around the feasible for treating animal wastes. However, as the
world. However, majority of the people living in costs of energy and fertilizers continue to increase,
developing countries do not easily access such the economics of anaerobic digestion on the farm
forms of energy and, therefore, they entirely will become more attractive. Consequently,
depend on solid fuel forms like wood to meet their anaerobic digestion presents us with the unique
basic needs such as cooking and lighting.According method of not only treating the animal waste but
to GTZ (2007), cooking accounts for about 90% of also reducing one’s dependence on the supply of
all household energy consumption in developing fossil fuels (James, 2002).
countries. At the same time Okure (2005) observed
Anaerobic digestion is a process by which
that over 60% of the total wood produced in
environmentally hazardous organic wastes from
developing countries citing Uganda as an example
municipal, agricultural and industrial sources may
is used as wood fuel in form of either charcoal,
be stabilised. The treatment has many side benefits,
especially in the urban areas, or firewood mostly in
most notably the production of methane-rich biogas
the rural areas.The scientific principles of
anaerobic digestion with its production of methane which can be used to generate electricity and heat.
gas are well known. It has been employed for many Anaerobic digestion is performed by a consortium
of micro-organisms. In the absence of oxygen the

ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 135

 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 3 Issue 5, Sep - Oct 2017

anaerobic bacteria break down organic matter Termites are a large and diverse group of insects
producing methane and carbon dioxide. Several consisting of over 2600 species worldwide. With
other methods of dealing with organic wastes exist, over 664 species (Wanyonyiet al. 1984), Africa is
including aerobicdigestion, direct application to by far the richest continent in termite diversity
land and combustion. These methods either utilize (Eggleton 2000). Methane is produced in termites
the available biomass as a fertilizer or a fuel, but as part of their normal digestive process.
not both as is the case with anaerobic digestion. Methanogenic (Methane producing) bacteria are
found abundant in the guts of termites.They are
Biogas is a gas produced by anaerobic digestion (in source of bio-fuel (methane gas) which is a
the absence of oxygen) of organic material, largely renewable and sustainable source of energy
comprised of methane (about two-thirds). Biogas is (Akinmusereet al., 2017).
often called "marsh gas" or "swamp gas" because it
is produced by the same anaerobic processes that A biogas production system must be specially
occur during the underwater decomposition of designed and requires regular attention by someone
organic material in wetlands (IBA, 2016) Biogas familiar with the needs and operation of the
originates from bacteria in the process of bio- digester. Associated manure handling equipment
degradation of organic material under anaerobic and gas utilization components are also required.
(without air) conditions. Biogas is a colourless, The digester does not remove significant nutrients
flammable gas produced via anaerobic digestion of and requires environmentally responsible manure
animal, plant, human, industrial and municipal storage and handling system. A well designed and
wastes amongst others, to give mainly methane operated digester will require modest daily
(50-70%), carbon dioxide (2040%) and traces of attention and maintenance. The care and feeding of
other gases such as nitrogen, hydrogen, ammonia, a digester is not unlike feeding a cow or a pig, it
hydrogen sulphide, water vapour etc. It is responds best to consistent feeding and the
smokeless, hygienic and more convenient to use appropriate environmental for temperature and
than other solid fuels (Maishanuet al., 1990).The anaerobic- oxygen free conditions. The earlier a
natural generation of biogas is an important part of problem in operation is identified, the easier it is to
the biogeochemical carbon cycle. Methanogens fix and still maintain productivity (Corral and
(methane producing bacteria) are the last link in a Argelia, 2007). This paper therefore aims at
chain of micro-organisms which degrade organic generating methane gas from cow dung with the
material and return the decomposition products to aid of a termitic enzyme using a locally fabricated
the environment. In this process biogas is bio-digester.
generated, a source of renewable energy
(Energypedia, 2016). Justification of the Study
The use of fossil fuels as primary energy source has
Raw materials for biogas fermentation such as cow led to global climate change, environmental
dung, poultry waste, water hyacinth, straw, weeds, degradation and human health problems
leaf, human and animal excrement, domestic (Adeniranet al., 2014). In developing countries like
rubbish and industrial solid and liquid wastes are Nigeria, Libya, Ghana etc. which rely on fossil
easily available. Biogas production systems have fuels as their main energy source, with time the
several benefits, such as eliminating greenhouse crude oil which was discovered at a particular point
gas, reduction of odor, betterment of fertilizer and in time may eventually come to an end
production of heat and power. Usually efficiency of unexpectedly. Therefore, an alternative means of
biogas plant varies with the type of digester, the generating energy is imperative so as not to put all
operating conditions, and the type of material one’s egg in one basket as a nation as it has been
loaded into the digester. established that renewable energy resourcesappear
to be one of the efficient solutions to the problems
resulting from theuse of fossil fuels (Hankisham

ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 136

 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 3 Issue 5, Sep - Oct 2017

and Sung, 2003). A significant body of research disc, washer, thermometer, bowl and bucket,
that has been published both formally and recently stirrer, motorcycle rubber tyre tube, iron clips, steel
discussed largely on biogas production from tape, measuring cylinder, boiler, spatula, beaker,
different animal wastes either as a sole waste or as gas cylinder. Waste and chemical used are Cow
a co-digestion with other wastes among which cow dung, Calcium Hydroxide Ca(OH)2, Distilled water
wastes took quite a great portion. Ofoefule et al. and Tap water.
(2010) in his research on biogas production from
paper waste and its blend with cow dung observed Experimental Procedures
that blending the paper waste with cow dung or any The bio-digester was initially constructed with the
other animal waste give sustained gas flammability following components namely digestion chamber,
throughout the digestion period of the waste. slurry inlet and outlet, gas outlet and cover and
Godiet al. (2012) who worked on the effect of cow stirrer.
dung variety on biogas production concluded that Each of these components as constructed can be
from the varieties of cow dung used, the White seen in Plate 1 to Plate 4.
Fulani, a predominant variety in Nigeria and the
West-African sub-region has the highest percentage
of biogas. He further opined that the methane from
this breed can be used to ameliorate the energy
crisis, improve standard of living, generate
employment and reduce incidences of deforestation
in developing countries. It has also been reported
that cow dung coming from a rumen animal is
known to contain the native microbial flora that
aids in faster biogas production and it is a very
good starter for poor producing feedstock’s
(Misiand Forster, 2001, Yadvikaet al., 2004,
Ofoefule et al., 2010). All these therefore leaves
room for more research to be done on biogas Plate 1: The Digestion Chamber
production using cow dung with an accelerated
enzymes gotten from termites to improve biogas
yield as applied in this research.
Methodology
This research was a laboratory based work; hence,
majority of the facilities in the water and
environmental laboratory of the Federal University
of Technology, Akure, Nigeria were utilized.At the
inception of this research, local materials used in
fabricating the bio-digester were procured from the
Oba’s market in Akure. The materials acquired for
the bio-digester are 100litres drum, two 2½ inches
adaptors, half-length of 2½ inches pipe, one length
of ¾inch pipe, control valves of different sizes, a
white keg, uPVCAbro gum and a silicon
sealant(Doctor fix), gas hose and 45º angle elbows. Plate 2: The Slurry Inlet and the Outlet
Other tools and apparatus used are hacksaw,
soldering iron, steel rod, bolts and nuts, grinding

ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 137

 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 3 Issue 5, Sep - Oct 2017

measured into a conical flask and 1000cm3 of

distilled water added to it, thoroughly mixed. The
conical flask was filled to ⅔ of it and the
concentration used was calculated as
3
0.014mol/cm .
Extraction of Enzyme from Termites and its
Application
From earlier works carried out by Hoda-Rahimi
(2015), it was observed that enzymes from termite
can serve as a catalyst to hasten and increase
methane production. The process of extracting
enzyme from termite was then incorporated into
this research to aid the production of biogas from
cow dung and to increase the yield of the biogas
that will be produced. The processes taken to
Plate 3: The Gas Outlet with the fixed Cover achieve this are as follows.
Live termites were caught from their termitarium
and then brought to the laboratory for further work.
They were subjected to anaerobic condition for
four days to put them to death, after which their
heads were then separated from their bodies using a
forceps. Their bodies were then sterilized using
alcohol (ethanol) and they were crushed inside a
mortar and pestle. Warm water was then added to
the grinded termites, stirred, and filtered. The
filtrate which is the prepared enzymes was then
added to the waste in the digester.
Experimental Set-up
The bio-digester that was used for the work was
firstly constructed. After, the cow dung was poured
Plate 4: The Stirrer Mechanism into a bucket and 40 kg of it was weighed using a
mass weighing balance, the waste was then mixed
The waste (cow dung) used was collected from a with warm distilled water. The mixing ratio
private agricultural farm along Igoba- Ado road, adopted for this work is 1: ½ (i.e. the waste to
Ondo State. In the course of the collection of the water ratio is 40 kg of waste to 20 litres of distilled
waste, necessary health precaution was taken by water). The mixing of the waste and water was
wearing hand gloves and nose mask. done inside a container with a rod to form slurry
which was then gently fed into the digester through
Preparation of Calcium Hydroxide Solution to the inlet. After feeding the digester, gas hose was
Remove Other Gases. connected from the bio-digester to the collecting
As methane is being produced from the digestion cylinder jar. Firstly, a hose was connected from the
of the waste, other gases such as carbon (iv) oxide pipe of the gas outlet to the inlet of the conical
and hydrogen sulphide, are also produced. Such flask which contain the solution of the prepared
gases have to be removed with an appropriate calcium hydroxide and this was done to remove the
prepared solution of calcium hydroxide thereby carbon (iv) oxide and other minute gases produced
leaving only methane gas. 500g of Ca(OH)2 was alongside with the methane gas. After, another hose

ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 138

 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 3 Issue 5, Sep - Oct 2017

which serves as the outlet was connected to the keg times. The results are presented and discussed in
from the conical flask, the hose being held fixed Figures 1 to 5.
with a candle wax to prevent leakages. The
calibrated keg was allowed to rest with its side and During the fermentation period (i.e. when the dung
the gas was collected via the upwarddelivery gas was allowed to decompose) after feeding the bio-
method. Finally, a gas hose was connected to the digester, no biogas was produced. The fermentation
cylinder gas jar from the calibrated keg (Plates 5 period takes twenty days which seems long. This
and 6). definitely can be explained by the feeding
composition of cow because cows feed mainly on
fibrous material which takes a longer time to break
down by micro-organisms. This finding is in
conformity to that, from the works of Babatola
(2008) in Akure, and Ukpai and Nnabuchi (2012)
in Abakaliki, both in Nigeria. Also, Ozoret al.
(2014) agreed to their observations.
The plots of the cumulative change in methane
produced against the number of days and the
biogas produced for each day against the number of
days are presented in Figures 1, 2 and 3.

Volume of Methane 700

Plate 5: The Experimental Set-up (Front view) Produced (ml) 600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 5 10 15 20
Number of Days

Figure 1: Plot of Methane Gas Generated for the

First 15 Days after Fermentation

800
Volume of Methane

Plate 6: The Experimental Set-up (Rear View)

Produced (ml)

600
Results and Discussion 400
The experimental set-up was for 65 days. The
temperatures of both the bio-digester placed at the 200
back of the laboratory and the laboratory room 0
were taken everyday and their averages were
calculated. Also, noticeable changes in the biogas 0 5 10 15 20
produced were recorded every 15 days afterthe Number of Days
initial fermentation period of 20 days for three

ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 139

 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 3 Issue 5, Sep - Oct 2017

Figure 2: Plot of Methane Gas Generated for the reduction of organic matter for temperatures
Second 15 Days after Fermentation ranging between 20ᵒC and 30ᵒC while for Figure 5,
the temperature change are characterised by three
thermal zones of microbial activity, namely,
psychrophilic, mesophilic, and the thermophilic.
Reactions rates are slowest in the psychrophilic
zone and turn out to be the highest in the
800 thermophiliczone. Conversely, digestion stability is
Methane Produced (ml)

least stable in the thermophilic zone; sudden

600 changes will cause the digestion process to be upset
Cum. Volume of

more quickly and the recovery to be more rapid

400 than in the mesophilic or psychrophilic zones. The
converse is true for the other two zones. Also,
200 methanogenic bacteria are very sensitive to sudden
0 temperature changes and therefore digestion
temperature should be maintained at a constant
0 5 10 15 20 level to ensure operational stability.
Number of Days
1

Cum. Volume of Methane

Figure 3: Plot of Methane Gas Generated for the 0.8
Last 15 Days
Produced (ml)
0.6
It could be observed that there was an increment in 0.4
the methane generated for the first four days, two
0.2
days, and three days as shown in Figures 1, 2, and
3 respectively which later decreases and again 0
increases over a considerable range which was 20 25 30 35
achieved by the introduction of the enzyme into
the waste after the fermentation period to Avarage Temperature (ᵒC)
accelerate the rate of production of the methane
gas. This observation is similar to that of Hoda- Figure 4: Plot of the Cumulative Volume of
Rahimi (2015). Therefore, we can infer that the Methane Produced against Average Temperature
enzyme usedaffects the rate of biogas yield. during Fermentation.

Effect of Temperature on Methane Gas Yield 2000

Cum. Volume of Methane

Figures 4 and 5 present the plots of the cumulative

volume of methane gas produced against average 1500
Produced (ml)

temperature. Figure 4 presents the plot of the

cumulative volume of methane gas produced 1000
against average temperature for the fermentation
500
stage while Figure 5 shows for the methane
production stage. 0
From Figures 4 and 5, it was observedthat 20 25 30
temperature directly affects the digestion process
Average Temperature (ᵒC)
by controlling microbial growth rates in Figure 4.
This observation is similar to that of Otunet al.
(2015).This shows the rate differences for the

ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 140

 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 3 Issue 5, Sep - Oct 2017

Figure 5: Plot of Cumulative Volume of Methane National Development. 2nd International

Gas Produced against Average Temperature Conference held at Federal University of
Technology, Akure, Nigeria, 11th – 13th
Conclusion July. Pages 526– 531.
From the experiment, the total methane yielded is
1570 ml and the total biogas yield is 2300 ml. From Babatola, J.O. (2008).Comparative study of biogas
this result, it could be said that methane is 68% of yield pattern in some animal and household
the total composition of biogas generated from cow wastes. African Research Review, 2(4):54-
dung. The standard percentage range of methane 68.
permitted for cow dung is 40 - 70% as
recommended by the United State Environmental Corral, M. and Argelia, M., (2007). Biogas
Protection Agency. production via anaerobic digestion of high
solids livestock manures, PhD thesis, New
Recommendations Mexico State University, 593-599.
Based on the research, the following
recommendations are hereby made; Eggleton, P.(2000) Global patterns of termite
Bio-digesters that are not too expensive to diversity In: Abe, T ,Bignell, D. E. and
construct should be made for household Higashi, M. (eds), Termites: Evolution,
usage to improve the standard of living of sociality, symbioses, ecology Dordrecht, the
families that can’t afford buying fossil fuel Netherlandsǁ Kluwer Academic Publishers,
e.g. kerosene. 25–51.
Deep and further research should be done Energypedia (2016). Biogas Basics. Available at
on getting alternative ways of extracting www.energypedia.info/wiki/biogas_biogas.
enzymes from termites to aid and facilities Accessed on the 22nd March, 2016.
maximum biogas production.
Further researchshould also beconducted to Godi, N. Y. Zhengwuvi, L. B. Salihu, A. and
evaluate the effects of input materials on the Kamtu, P. (2013). Effect of cow dung
characteristics of biogas because it may variety on biogas production.Journal of
uncover new trends related to Mechanical Engineering Research Vol.
biogasproduction efficiency and constituent 5(1), pp. 1-4,
quality. GTZ (2007): Eastern Africa Resource Base: GTZ
Online Regional Energy Resource Base:
Regional and Country Specific Energy
References Resource Database: I - Energy Technology
Adeniran,A. K., Ahaneku, I. E., Itodo, I. N and Hankisham, S and Sung, S. (2003) Cattle waste
Rohjy, H.A (2014).Relative effectiveness of treatment and class. A biosolid production
biogas production using poultry wastes and using temperature phased anaerobic
cow dung. AgricEngInt: CIGR Journal digester. Advanced Environmental
.16(1):126-132 Research. 7:710-70,
Akinmusere, O. K., Babatola, J. O., Lafe, O. and Hoda-Rahimi, M S (2015) Effect of Termite Gut
Ajayi, O. E. (2017) Termite-Methane Microbe TAV on Methane Production from
Production, Gut Microbes and Wastes: A Municipal Solid Waste Degradationǁ M.Sc
Review.Proceeding of the 2017 Annual Thesis, TheUniversity of Texas at Arlington
Conference of the School of Engineering
and Engineering Technology (SEET): Indian Biogas Association (2016). Fertilizing
Innovative and Adaptive Technology for Energy: What is Biogas? Available at

ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 141

 International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 3 Issue 5, Sep - Oct 2017

www.biogas-india.com/biogas.html. Ukpai, P. A. and Nnabuchi, M. N. (2012).

Accessed on the 12nd February, 2016. Comparative study of biogas production
from cow dung, cow pea and cassava
James, A.M. (2002). Managing livestock wastes, peeling using 45 litres biogas digester.
AVI Publishing Company, INC, Westport, Advances in Applied Science Research. 3
Connecticut. (3):1864-1869.
Maishanu, S. M., Musa, M. Sambo, A. S. (1990). Wanyonyi, K, Darlington, J P E C and Bagine, R K
Biogas Technology the output of Sokoto N (1984): ―Checklist of the species of
Energy Research Centre Nigerian Journal termites (Isoptera) recorded from east
of Solar Energy, 9 183-194. Africaǁ Journal of East African Natural
History Society, 181:1–10.
Misi, S. N., and Forster, C. F. (2001) Batch co-
digestion of multi-component agro wastes. Werner, K. and Uta, P. (2002).’Biogas Digest
Bioresource Technology, 80:19-28. volume 1’Information and Advisory Service
on Appropriate Technology (ISAT) and
Ofoefule, A. U., Uzodinma, E. O., and Anyanwu,
Household Energy Appropriate
C. N. (2010). Studies of the effect of
Technologies (HEAT) GmbH.
Anaerobic Digestion on the Microbial
Flora of Animal Wastes and Digestion and Yadvika,S. Sreekrishnan,T. Kohl,R. S. Rana,V.
Modeling of Process Parameters.Trends in (2004) Bioresource Technology, 95 (2004)
Applied Sciences Research, 5:39-47. 1-10.
Okure M. (2005), Bio-fuel Lecture Notes(Un-
Published), Faculty of Technology,
Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Otun T.F, Ojo O.M, Ajibade F.O. and Babatola,
J.O. (2015). Evaluation of Biogas
Production from the Digestion and Co-
digestionof Animal Waste, Food Waste and
Fruit Waste.International Journal of Energy
and Environmental Research. Vol.3, No.3,
pp.12-24.
Ozor, O. C. Agah, M. V. Ogbu, K. I. Nnachi, A.
U. Udu-ibiam, O. E. andAgwu, M. M.
(2014). Biogas Production Using Cow
Dung from Abakaliki Abattoir in South-
Eastern Nigeria. International Journal of
Scientific & Technology Research 3(10):
237 - 239
Sözer, S., and Yaldız, O. (2006). A research about
the biogas production from cattle manure
and whey mixtures.Akdeniz University,
Agriculture Faculty Periodical, 19(2), pp.
179-183.

ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 142

View publication stats