Harley - Mapa e Arte Dutch 16 Century
Harley - Mapa e Arte Dutch 16 Century
Harley - Mapa e Arte Dutch 16 Century
Abstract The history of Dutch cartography in the sixteenth rejected approaches which separate society from aesthet
century is often explained in terms of the opposition between ics, and have abandoned the concept of value-free knowl
cartography as Art and cartography as Science. It is our conten edge.
tion that this polarization is flawed, based as it is an artificial In the words of Fredric Jameson, the nineteenth-centu
divide fully established only in the nineteenth century. Between ry polarization of a n and science has limited our "ideo
these extremes lies a conceptual vacuum which hides the ideo logical consciousness, [marking] the conceptual point
logical meaning of the map. Our alternative is to see maps as beyond which that consciousness cannot go, and be
a form of power-knowledge. tween which it is condemned to oscillate."4 Our alter
Cartography, like painting, is the record of a subjective native is to characterize maps as a form of "power-knowl
domain. Map-makers classify and select knowledge to be pres edge" in Foucault's sense, 5 a power that is "omnipres
ented or to be omitted; they state their own involvement in a ent." 6 Such a standpoint helps us better to read maps as
complex world. Our contention is that maps can also become humanly constructed images of the world, and as possess
active agents, helping to impose a reality they pretend merely ing a reflexive role within the context of early modern
to mirror. society.7