1.1 Background of The Study
1.1 Background of The Study
1.1 Background of The Study
Similarly, Khan and Jain have defined that (1990) “The ratio analysis is defined as the systematic
use of ratio to interpret the financial performance so that the strength and weakness of firm as
well as its historical performance and current financial condition can be determined.”
In the word of Van Horne (1994) “Financial ratio can be derived from the balance sheet and the
income statement. They must be analyzed on a comparative basis. Ratio may also be judged in
comparison with those of similar firms in the same line of business and when appropriate, with
an industry average and we can look to future progress in this regard.”
A comparative study of financial performance is a basic process, which provides information on
profitability, liquidity position, earning capacity, efficiency in operation, sources and use of
capital, financial achievement and status of the companies. These information will help to
determine the extent of efficiency and effectiveness of the company in respect of deploying
financial resources in the profitable manner.
Review of Empirical Research
Prior to this study, the several researchers have found various studies regarding financial
performance of commercial and joint venture banks. In this study, only relevant subject maters
are reviewed which are as follows: -
A thesis conduct by Shakya , Suman (2010) in “Financial Performance Of Nepal SBI Bank
Limited And Everest Bank Limited.” analyzed different ratio of NSBIBL and EBL for the period
of five years till fiscal year 2008. Here, in some cases the liquidity position of EBL is slightly
stronger where as in some cases the ratio of NSBIBL is higher. It concludes that liquidity
position of these two banks is sound. NBBL has better utilization of resource in income
generating activity than EBL. They are on decreasing trends while interest earned to total assets
and return or net worth ratio of EBL is better than NSBIBL. It seems overall profitability
position of EBL is better than NSBIBL and both banks are highly leveraged.”
Kishor Poudel (2002)., in his thesis paper “Liquidity and investment position of Joint Venture
Commercial Banks in Nepal” has made an attempt to evaluate liquidity and investment of joint
venture banks special reference to Everest Bank Ltd and NABIL Bank Ltd. He has concluded
that liquidity position of EBL is better than that of NABIL’s. Growth rate of investment is higher
in EBL than NABIL. He further found that the banks do not have constant and consistent
liquidity and investment policy. There is no standard and uniform rate or ratio for maintaining
4
liquid assets by the commercial banks. A commercial bank at its own judgment may decide to
maintain an appropriate level of liquid assets. So he has recommended exploring such investment
and to increase its investment on share and debenture and the bank should have laid down policy
for timely review of portfolio and to maintain risk and return.
analyzing and interpreting the purpose of comparative financial performance or appraisal of two
JVBs.