The Role of The Village in Vietnamese Politics
The Role of The Village in Vietnamese Politics
The Role of The Village in Vietnamese Politics
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Pacific Affairs.
http://www.jstor.org
265
266
SOMEobservers
oftheVietnamese thatpeacecouldberestored
scenecontend
iftheFrenchwouldencourage an over-allreversion tothetraditionalinstitu-
tionsof thecountry. The facts,however, do notsupport sucha contention:
therootcausesof thepresent stateofaffairs are notadministrative or poli-
ticalsomuchas cultural andeconomic innature.
The Frenchare inclinedto writehistory fromofficial records,thusrun-
ningtheriskof attaching toomuchimportance to official
ordersinsteadof
investigating theiractualresults in thefield.History thusconceived is really
littlemorethana recordof intentions. And,although Frenchintentions in
thematters underdiscussion havebeenexpressed mostexcellently,thecon-
creteresultsare surelymoresignificant. Whyis it thatnoneoftheirplans
concerning ruralorganization, alwaysso wiselymotivated even though
sometimes contradictory in effect, has everproducedtheexpectedresults?
One explanation, acceptedin certainof the conservative and traditionally
anti-French Vietnamese circleson whichFrenchpolicytodayis partlyde-
pendent, interpretsFrenchcommunal policyas a deliberateattempt to curb
thecouncilsof notablesbybringing themevermorecloselyunderFrench
administrative control. If theFrenchat first alteredand thenabolishedthe
traditionalstatusof the councils,theirpurpose, according to thesecritics,
was to convertthe councilsintoinstruments of theirown. If theFrench
subsequently changedtheirtacticsyetagainand restored powertothecoun-
cils,thatwas simply in ordertosecurean evenfirmer gripon themthrough
a return to traditionalforms whichtheFrenchnowrecognized to be more
In anyevent,
effective. theFrenchfailure in thisrespectwouldbe duetonon-
cooperation on thepartofthenotables in thefaceofunreasonable demands.
At firstsightthisargument seemstocontaina grainoftruth. The French
did indeedgain controlof thecouncilsof notables, and did burdenthem
withever-mounting responsibilitiesuntiltheybecameaccountable fora great
varietyof things:fortaxcollections and laborrecruiting fordifferent pur-
poses;forprevention of damageto transportation and communications in-
and equipment;
stallations forcareofforestlands; forsuppression ofalcohol
smuggling; and so forth.'
1 An extreme-leftist
sourcehas describedthe steeprise in local tax assessmentsin the fol-
lowing terms:"Between I890 and I896 directtaxes doubled. BetweenI896 and 1898 they
increasedby one-halfagain. The villageshad no alternative
but to accepttheseincreasesbecause
therewas nobodyto whomtheycouldprotest."
267
Repatriate in Japan
Organizations
REPATRIATES fromtheformerJapaneseoverseasterritories constitute
an
importantelementin postwarJapanand a key to certainaspectsof the Jap-
anese attitudetowardthe Occupationand the lost war. The organizations
whichtheyjoin afterreturninghome indicatein some measurethe degree
of successof theirrehabilitation and theirattitudestoward conditionsin
Japan.Their importancein the presentpoliticalscene is evidencedby the
attentionaccordedthemby the politicalparties,which,in an effortto en-
listthe supportof the large numberof votersinfluenced by them,have ad-
vocatedvariousrepatriate-assistanceprograms.
The end of the PacificWar found 6,6oo,oooJapanesesubjects(half of
whom were in the armed services) outside Japan Proper. To repatriate
thesemillionsto an alreadyover-crowded countrywould havebeen a gigantic
task underordinarycircumstances; fora countryjust defeatedin war and
underan Occupationwhosepolicieswerenotyetclear,itseemedan impossible
one. Yet it was accomplished,and remarkablyquickly.
Allied policywas to repatriateall Japanesefrom"GreaterEast Asia", ex-
ceptingthose whose technicaland professionalskills were needed until
suitablenativereplacements could be trained.The programwas administered
almostwhollyby the Japanese,underthe supervisionof the SupremeCom-
manderforthe Allied Powersand of the governments concerned.
The firstphase of the programcenteredon China, whichwas anxiousto
have the214 millionJapanesein itsterritory removedas speedilyas possible.
272