Judicial Affidavit: Republic of The Philippines Municipal Trial Court

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

FOURTH JUDICIAL REGION


MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT
Batangas City

MAURA SANTOS y MORENO


LAURA SANTOS y MORENO, CIVIL CASE NO. CV-1019
Plaintiffs,
-versus- - for-

ISKO DOMAGOSO y TOLONGGES UNLAWFUL DETAINER


Defendant. WITH DAMAGES

x-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT
(MAURA M. SANTOS)

I, Maura M. Santos, of legal age, Filipino Citizen, with residence at


Brgy. Bolbok, Batangas City, after having been sworn to in accordance with
law, deposes;

Atty. _______________ (hereinafter ________) took my judicial


affidavit on ________ at ______________, Batangas City. This Judicial
Affidavit is in English, a language known to me.

Atty. _______ offers my testimony to prove the following:

1. I am the plaintiff of the above entitled case;

2. That I am the legal wife of Arsenio Santos evidenced by herein


attached Marriage Contract (Annex A);

3. That as wife of Arsenio Santos, I am his legal heir, together with our
children Lorna M. Santos and Dante Santos;

4. That Arsenio Santos and I am the registered owner of the parcel of


land located in Brgy. Bolbok, Batangas City with an area of 529
square meters as evidenced by Transfer Certificate Title 1234 and
declared for taxation purposes in the Office of the City Assessor of
Batangas City under Tax Declaration No. 11-11-20121440 (Annex B);

5. That upon inquiry with the Register of Deeds of Batangas City on


January 2, 2019 for the Extrajudicial Settlement among the heirs, the
said Transfer Certificate Title has already been cancelled and a new
title, herein attached, has been issued in favor of one Dante Santiago
(Annex C);
6. That the parcel of land has been transferred to Dante Santiago by
virtue of a Deed of Sale dated December 2, 2011 in a transaction
undertaken between Dante Santos and the former in the amount of
One Million Pesos (PhP1,000,000.00) (Annex D);

7. That the Deed of Sale was purportedly signed by Spouses Arsenia


and Maura Santos and was executed on March 15, 2012 notarized by
Atty. Edwin M. Fortun;

8. That the I did not sign any Deed of Sale involving the subject property
nor was privy to any transactions between my son Dante Santos and
Dante Santiago;

9. That my husband Arsenio Santos already died on December 1, 2010


evidenced by herein attached death certificate making it utterly
impossible for him to sign the Deed of Sale (Annex E);

10. That I have confirmed with Ferdinand Robredo and Leni Marcos
whose signatures appeared allegedly as witnesses to the execution of
Deed of Sale that they have not, in any way, witnessed the execution of
the said document nor have affixed their signatures in any document
pertaining to the transactions between Dante Santos and Dante
Santiago;

11. That in order to examine and prove the falsity of the signatures
appearing in the Deed of Sale, I secured the services of NBI Agent
Firma D. Checker, a forensic handwriting expert, of the Forgery
Division who identified the signatures of Arsenio Santos, Ferdinand
Robredo and Leni Marcos to be fake and forged and the signature of
Dante Santiago to be the only true and authentic signature in the
document as reflected in Agent Checker’s report (Annex F);

12. That my daughter and I approached the defendant Dante Santiago


and demanded him to reconvey or cause the reconveyance of the
subject property;

13. That despite repeated demands, Dante Santiago did not reconvey
nor caused the reconveyance of the subject property;

14. That the subject complaint has gone through barangay conciliation
proceedings, however no settlement was reached;

15. That I secured services of a counsel for the sole purpose of this
litigation in the amount of Two Hundred Thousand Pesos
(PhP200,000.00) representing the acceptance and preparation fees
and Ten Thousand Pesos (PhP10,000.00) as court appearance fee.
I shall further testify on other matters, material and relevant to my
action and identify and cause the marking of documentary exhibits.

Below is my judicial affidavit proper:

Question 1 (hereinafter “Q”): What is your name and other


circumstances of identity:
Answer 1 (hereinafter “A”): I am Maura M. Santos, of legal age, Filipino
Citizen, single and with residence at Brgy. Bolbok, Batangas City.

Q2: What is your occupation?


A2: I am a retired government employee of the Municipal Administrator’s
Office of the Municipal Government of Bauan, Batangas.

Q3: Are you the legal wife of Arsenio Santos?


A3: Yes, Atty.

Q4: Do you have any proof showing that you are the wife of Arsenio
Santos?
A4: Yes, Atty.

Q5: What is your proof?


A5: I have a copy of our Marriage Certificate to prove that we have been
married.

Q6: Are you the registered owner of the parcel of land located in Brgy.
Bolbok, Batangas City with an area of 529 square meters
A6: Yes, Atty. My husband and I owns the land.

Q7: Do you have any proof of said ownership?


A7: Yes, Atty. Transfer Certificate Title 1234 and declared for taxation
purposes in the Office of the City Assessor of Batangas City under
Tax Declaration No. 11-11-20121440.

Q8: When did you learn that the said property has been sold to a certain
Dante Santiago?
A8: Last January 2, 2019, my daughter Lorna and I inquired in the
Register of Deeds of Batangas City for the Extrajudicial Settlement
of Arsenio estate among the heirs. We found out that the said
Transfer Certificate Title has already been cancelled and a new
title, herein attached, has been issued in favor of one Dante
Santiago.

Q9: How was the said property transferred to Dante Santiago?


A9: It was transferred through the execution of a Deed of Sale in favor of
Dante Santiago as buyer and Arsenio Santos and Maura Santos
as seller in the amount of One Million Pesos (PhP1,000,000.00).
Q10: Were you aware of the execution of this Deed of Sale?
A10: No, Atty. I was not aware. I did not sign any Deed of Sale involving
the subject property nor was privy to any transactions between my
son Dante Santos and Dante Santiago.

Q11: Who are the witnesses of the said Deed of Sale?


A11: It was purportedly signed by Spouses Arsenia and Maura Santos
on March 15, 2012 and notarized by Atty. Edwin M. Fortun with
witnesses Ferdinand Robredo and Leni Marcos.

Q12: Did your husband Arsenio Santos sign the Deed of sale?
A12: No Atty. It is impossible for my husband to sign the Deed of Sale
because he already died of cardiac arrest on December 1, 2010
evidenced by a death certificate.

Q13: Where you able to verify the veracity and authenticity of the
signatures affixed in the Deed of Sale?
A13: Yes, Atty. I secured the services of NBI Agent Firma D. Checker, a
forensic handwriting expert, of the Forgery Division. She identified
the signatures of the Arsenio Santos, Ferdinand Robredo and Leni
Marcos as fake while the signature of the buyer Dante Santos as
authentic.

Q14: After learning these circumstances, what did you do?


A14: My daughter and I went to the house of Dante Santiago and
explained to him the situation. We demanded him to reconvey or
cause the reconveyance of the subject property.

Q15: How did Dante Santiago respond to your demand?


A15: Despite our repeated demands, Dante Santiago did not reconvey
nor caused the reconveyance of the subject property. He did not
cooperate nor conversed with us regarding the problem.

Q16: So when he was adamant in reconveying the property to you, what


did you do?
A16: I approached a lawyer, Atty. I approached you so I can know what
further legal steps to take.

Q17: Then what happened?


A17: I brought the matter to the Barangay as per your advise Atty.

Q18: Was there a conciliation proceeding at the barangay?


A18: Yes Atty. He was summoned together with my son Dantes Sanros
and the Punongbarangay mediated between us, however, no
settlement was reached.

Q19: Then what happened?


A19: Punongbarangay ___________ issued and signed a Certificate to
File Action and advise us to bring the matter to court.
Q20: When you decided to litigate and bring this matter to the court, did
you acquire the services of a lawyer?
A20: Yes, I secured your services Atty.

Q21: Do you have proof that you acquired my services?


A21: An Official Receipt in the amount of Two Hundred Thousand Pesos
(PhP200,000.00) for acceptance fee, and a contract signed by me
stating that I have to pay Ten Thousand Pesos (P10,000.00) per
your appearance.

Q35: I am showing to you Official Receipt No. 112211 in the amount of


Ninety Thousand Pesos (P90,000.00) marked as Annex D. Is this
the receipt you are referring to?
A35: Yes Atty.

Q36: Now, I am showing to you a document entitled Contract of


Engagement marked as Annex D-1, is this the contract you are
referring to?
A36: Yes Atty.

Q37: Final question, Ma’am, were you forced, threatened or promised a


reward for this testimony?
A37: No Atty.

NO FURTHER QUESTION.

MAURA M. SANTOS
Affiant
SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me in Batangas City on
September 20, 2021, affiant showing her competent proof of identity, to
wit: Drivers License. 543210.

ZYREEN KATE B. CATAQUIS


Counsel for the Plaintiff
IBP No. 101993, Oriental Mindoro
PTR No. 123456-2021, Calapan City
Roll of Attorneys No. 1019
MCLE COMPLIANCE NO. 987654321
June 2, 2021
SWORN ATTESTATION OF THE LAWYER WHO CONDUCTED OR
SUPERVISED THE EXAMINATION OF THE WITNESS.

The undersigned ATTY. ZYREEN KATE B. CATAQUIS, of legal age,


married, and with law office address at Cuta, Batangas City, under oath,
deposes and states:

1. She is the Legal Counsel for the plaintiff in the above-entitled case;

2. She  faithfully  recorded  or  caused  to  be  recorded  the questions 
she  asked  and  the corresponding  answers  that  the above-named
witness gave;

3. Neither she nor any other person then present or assisting her
coached the witness regarding the latter's answers; and

4. She conducted the examination of the witness at her law office


located at Cataquis Law Office, Cucat Building, Cuta, Batangas City.

Batangas City, September 20, 2021.

ZYREEN KATE B. CATAQUIS


Counsel for the Plaintiff
IBP No. 101993, Oriental Mindoro
PTR No. 123456-2021, Calapan City
Roll of Attorneys No. 1019
MCLE COMPLIANCE NO. 987654321
June 2, 2021

            SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me in Batangas City on


September 20, 2020, affiant showing his/her competent proof of identity, to
wit: IBP ID NO. 101993.

STEVEN SEAGAL BROSNAN


Notary Public
IBP No. 1516216, Batangas
PTR No. 4467564-2020, Batangas City
Roll of Attorneys No. 8758
MCLE COMPLIANCE NO. 875843793/
June 12, 2021     

You might also like