Labile or Inert?

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Labile or inert?

Labile – a compound that undergoes reactions with a relatively high rate of


substitution
Inert – a compound that undergoes reactions with a slow rate of substitution
Inert is a relative term, t1/2 > 1 min at 25 oC

3 main factors that affect the whether a complex is labile or inert:

1. Size: Smaller metal ions tend to be more inert as ligands are held more
tightly.
2. Charge on Metal: The greater the charge on a metal ion in a complex,
the greater the tendency towards the complex being inert
3. Number of d electrons and configuration
Octahedral geometry d-electron configuration: labile or inert?
# of d-electrons /
Reactivity Notes
configuration
d1 Labile N/A
d2 Labile N/A
d3 Inert N/A
d4 Low Spin Inert N/A
d4 High Spin Labile Especially labile as it is structurally distorted by the Jahn-Teller effect.
d5 Low Spin Inert N/A
d5 High Spin Labile N/A
d6 Low Spin Inert N/A
d6 High Spin Labile N/A
d7 High Spin Labile N/A
d8 Square Planar Inert For d8 and above low spin is the same as high spin.
d8 Intermediate This configuration is intermediate, especially with weak field ligands.
Like d4 H.S. this configuration is especially labile as it is distorted by
d9 Labile
Jahn-Teller effect.
d10 Labile N/A
Trans-effect vs Trans-influence
Trans-influence – If “A” forms a very strong sigma-bond to the metal, it competes for the
metal orbitals with the leaving group, “X,” thus weakening the M–X bond

Trans-influence determined by sigma-donor strength (basicity):

R3Si – > H – > H3C – , NC – > olefin, CO > R3P > NO2– > I – > Br – > Cl – > H3N > HO – > H2O

Trans-effect – A strongly sigma-donating and/or pi-accepting group “A” will greatly


increase the reaction rate relative to a weak sigma-donor/poor pi-acid “A.” Factors that
dominate the trans-effect include:
1. Ground state weakening of M–X bond (trans-influence)
2. Stabilization of the presumed 5-coordinate intermediate

Taking into account BOTH trans-influence and pi- effects:

NO+ > CO > CN – > PR3, H – > H3C – > Ph – > NO2 –, I – > Br – > Cl – > py, H2O, HO –, NH3
Inner Sphere Reactivity
Metal Centered – gain or loss of ligands
1. Ligand substitution
2. Oxidative addition
3. Reductive elimination
4. Nucleophilic displacement
5. Transmetallation

Ligand Centered – modification of ligands


1. Migratory insertion
a) Carbonyl insertion
b) 1,2–insertion
2. Hydride elimination
3. Abstraction
Monsanto Acetic Acid Process
Olefin hydroformylation
At each step give:
1. Type of reaction
2. Oxidation state
3. d-electron count
4. Total electron count
Chauvin mechanism for olefin metathesis

At each step give type


of reaction

You might also like