.Resumen Del Tema MIO

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

1. Introduction.

2. Key insights on language and communication.

2.1. Early models of linguistic communication.

2.2. Structural linguistics and Generative Grammar.

2.3. Language and speech.

2.4. Criticism of Structural Linguistics and Generative Grammar.

2.5. Contemporary developments.

2.6. Present-day: The message-model of linguistic communication.

3. Main characteristics of verbal language as a means of communication.

3.1. The double-sided nature of the linguistic sign.

3.2. Arbitrariness and conventionality.

3.3. Double articulation of language.

4. Spoken language.

4.1. The natural-sound source.

4.2. Interactions and transactions.

5. Written language.

5.1. Prestige of writing. Its influence upon the oral medium.

5.2. Correspondence between sound and graphic symbol.

6. Study of a communicative situation.

6.1. Oral versus written communication.

6.2. Elements in a communicative situation.

6.3. Functionality. Function and functions of language.

7. Conclusions.

8. Bibliography.
 

1. INTRODUCTION.
If a language is defined as a tool or artefact used for the purpose of
communication, it seems obvious that there are many types of languages in
the world. From animal ways of communication up to sophisticated techniques
such as Morse code, Braille, computer languages, etc.
Semiotics studies the behaviour of signs within a community. Thus, it deals
with all sorts and means of communication: railway and road traffic signs,
sailing codes, advertising codes, colour, acoustic codes, television and film
codes, etc.

Languages can be classified according to the senses they involve. For example,
animal communication relies heavily on all senses: sight, hearing, smell, taste
and touch. The more sophisticated a language becomes, the more it specialises
in its appeal to the senses. For example, Braille involves basically the sense of
touch, Morse consists basically of sound, and so on.

Human communication, broadly considered, involves all senses. However,


human communication by means of verbal language relies on hearing and, as
an artificial but useful development, on sight.

In this sense, Linguistics must be understood as the study of human verbal


language. That is, it is only one part of the study of that higher category which
is Communication.

The production of specific sounds associated to concepts abstracted from


reality, and the fact that the combination of this small set of sounds can
produce an infinite number of messages, are the two essential principles that
make human verbal language probably the most perfect means of
communication that we can conceive of.

It is probably the most perfect; by no means the only one. Human


communication, as we have hinted above, involves a lot more: body language,
drawing and painting, all the semiotic codes mentioned above, touch, smell,
taste, codes from different sciences and disciplines… .

So, what is Communication? Simply, the connection and interaction of an entity


or individual with the outer world.

How does it happen? By producing, perceiving and interpreting one of more


sets or systems of signs shared by a community.

Human verbal communication takes place by using a common system of


sounds and written symbols. There are lots of different human verbal
languages in the world, different codes for different communities, but all of
them share the core characteristics of human language.
 

2. KEY INSIGHTS ON LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION.


2.1. Early models of linguistic communication.
Philosopher John Locke wrote in 1691 that “(…) besides articulate sounds, it was
further necessary that man should be able to use these sounds as signs of
internal conceptions; and to make them stand as marks for the ideas within his
own mind, whereby they might be made known to others and the thoughts of
men’s minds be conveyed from one to another. (…) The comfort and advantage
of society not being to be had without communication of thoughts, it was
necessary that man should find out some sensible signs, whereby those
invisible ideas, which his thoughts are made up of, might be made known to
others.”

 
2.2. Structural Linguistics and Generative Grammar.
“The starting point of the circuit is in the brain of one individual, for instance A,
where facts of consciousness which we shall call concepts are associated with
representations of linguistic signs or sound patterns by means of which they
may be expressed. Let us suppose that a given concept triggers in the brain a
corresponding sound pattern. This is an entirely psychological phenomenon,
followed in turn by a physiological process: the brain transmits to the organs of
phonation an impulse corresponding to the pattern.
 

2.3. Language and speech.


Otherwise, this model of linguistic communication makes a distinction between
what people actually say, their overt verbal behaviour, ‘speech’, la parole in
Saussure’s terminology, and la langue, ‘language’, which is the system of
arbitrary conventions assumed to underlie and direct verbal behaviour.
 

2.4. Criticism of Structural Linguistics and Generative


Grammar.
Now, if that is indeed the right way to look at language, then of course it follows
that the material circumstances in which linguistic activity takes place are of no
significance

2.5. Contemporary developments.


Discourse Analysis works with real samples: oral and written acts of
communication, texts of all kinds. The study of such materials provides
statistics of the use of terms, discourse markers, rhythm, frequency, etc. It
elaborates commentaries on how texts can be classified, on their intention, on
how meaning is constructed and negotiated, on how implication or
understatement work… This analysis focuses on discourse features such as
coherence, cohesion and texture, which are built on elements like substitution,
ellipsis, conjunction, deixis, repetition (anaphora and cataphora)…

 
2.6. Present-day: The message-model of linguistic
communication.
It is certainly not for want of current interest in communication. On the
contrary, in various fields during the past ten years, both verbal and non-verbal
mechanisms of communication have attracted a great deal of new research.
However, the various strands of that research have been pursued to a large
extent sporadically and independently.

3. MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF VERBAL LANGUAGE AS A


MEANS OF COMMUNICATION.
3.1. The double-sided nature of the linguistic sign.
A linguistic sign, roughly speaking a ‘word’, consists of two sides or components
of its nature.

3.2. Arbitrariness and conventionality.


Linguistic signs are symbols, not icons or tokens. By saying that the linguistic
sign is arbitrary and conventional, we mean that their nature is symbolic, that
is, the relationship or correspondence between the signifier and the signified in
any given linguistic sign is not based on a natural or obvious connection.

3.3. Double articulation of language


This is a simple and, at the same time, a key feature. It is the mere fact that
language consists essentially of two basic units:

On the one hand, we have the phoneme (sound unit), that can be defined as
the smallest linguistic unit without meaning, but able to produce a difference in
meaning.

4.SPOKEN LANGUAGE
4.1. The natural-sound source
This view of the beginning of human speech is based on the concept of ‘natural
sounds’. The suggestion is that primitive words could have been imitations of
the natural sounds which early men and women heard around them. The fact
that all modern languages have some words with pronunciations which seem
to echo naturally occurring sounds could be used to support this theory.
 

4.2. Interactions and transactions


In developing speech, humans have obviously incorporated versions of
naturally occurring sounds such as bow-wow. They have also incorporated cries
of emotional reaction, such as Wow,  and Ugh,  and accompany much of their
speech with body language.
 

5.WRITTEN LANGUAGE
5.1. Prestige of writing. Its influence upon the oral medium
We experience probably the larger part of the language we use through the
visual medium. Writing has certain prestige over the verbal source. Normally, it
is perceived as permanent, more reliable and more correct. However,
historically, the only reason for the existence of writing is the representation of
oral language.

5.2. Correspondence between sound and graphic symbol


All languages show some degree of inconsistency between the spoken and the
written forms. For example, in Spanish we find problems or lack of
correspondence especially in the use of b-v, g-j, c-q-k, h.
However, in the case of English, inconsistency seems to be the rule rather than
the exception.

6. STUDY OF A COMMUNICATIVE SITUATION.


6.1. Oral versus written communication.
6.2. Elements in a communicative situation.
The  addresser (transmitter, sender, speaker…) sends a message to the addressee
(receiver, hearer, listener…). In order to be operative, that is, meaningful, the
message requires, in the first place, the reference to a context (situation, object),
which must include surrounding reality and/or some necessary knowledge
shared by the participants. In the second place, the message requires
a code common to the participants. Finally, it requires a contact (channel), a
physical channel and a psychological connection between the addresser and
the addressee through which they can set up and keep communication.
 

6.3. Functionality. Function and functions of language.


Karl Bühler distinguishes three functions:

Relationship message-transmitter: function: expression

Relationship message-addressee: function: appeal

Relationship message-context: function: representation


 

7. CONCLUSIONS.
Language is a tool employed by human beings to communicate and interact
with each other. This is not the sole function of language, but it is surely its
most important one.  
Communication through the medium of spoken language is concerned with
the conveying of concepts by means of vocal noises. In written language,
humans use the visual medium to represent those oral sounds.

Although communication among human beings by means of language has


been a focal topic of study and inquiry since the very beginnings of formal
education, a global theory of communication has not been elaborated yet to
the satisfaction of experts and users alike.

The sheer volume, complexity and ever-changing nature of the subject may be
the reason why, today, in spite of all that has been written on the subject, there
is still an academic gap in the place where a science of human communication
ought to be.

As language teachers, this should be one of our central concerns, at least for its
relation to our daily practice, to the extent that the process of teaching and
acquiring or learning a language is only as good as the communicative goals it
is able to achieve and develop. 
 

8. BIBLIOGRAPHY.
 Chomsky, N. Aspects of the theory of Syntax. Cambridge,
Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1965.
 Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London
Edward Arnold, 1985.
 Jakobson, R. “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics”, Thomas A.
Sebeok, Style in Language, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1960.
 Lockwood, D. Introduction to Stratificational Linguistics. Michigan
State University, 1972.
 Love, N. The Foundations of Linguistic Theory. Selected Writings of
Roy Harris. Edited by Nigel Love. Routledge. London & New York,
1990.
 Saussure, Ferdinand de. (Translated and annotated by Roy
Harris). Course in General Linguistics (First published in 1916).
Duckworth, London, 1983.
 Widdowson, H. G. Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford,
Oxford University Press, 1978.
 Yule, G. The Study of Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press, 1996.

You might also like