Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 28 views

    Table 1: Previous Works For CPT and SPT Correlations

    Uploaded by

    prathmesh
    The table summarizes relationships between cone penetration test (CPT) results and standard penetration test (SPT) results from previous studies for different soil types. The studies presented relationships using equations of the form n = qc/N, where n is a correlation factor, qc is the cone resistance, and N is the SPT blow count. The soil types investigated include sands, silts, clays, and various mixtures, and the reported correlation factors range from 0.2 to 7.0 depending on the soil type and source study.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Table 1: Previous Works For CPT and SPT Correlations

    Uploaded by

    prathmesh
    28 views1 page
    The table summarizes relationships between cone penetration test (CPT) results and standard penetration test (SPT) results from previous studies for different soil types. The studies presented relationships using equations of the form n = qc/N, where n is a correlation factor, qc is the cone resistance, and N is the SPT blow count. The soil types investigated include sands, silts, clays, and various mixtures, and the reported correlation factors range from 0.2 to 7.0 depending on the soil type and source study.

    Original Title

    SPT and qc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The table summarizes relationships between cone penetration test (CPT) results and standard penetration test (SPT) results from previous studies for different soil types. The studies presented relationships using equations of the form n = qc/N, where n is a correlation factor, qc is the cone resistance, and N is the SPT blow count. The soil types investigated include sands, silts, clays, and various mixtures, and the reported correlation factors range from 0.2 to 7.0 depending on the soil type and source study.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    28 views1 page

    Table 1: Previous Works For CPT and SPT Correlations

    Uploaded by

    prathmesh
    The table summarizes relationships between cone penetration test (CPT) results and standard penetration test (SPT) results from previous studies for different soil types. The studies presented relationships using equations of the form n = qc/N, where n is a correlation factor, qc is the cone resistance, and N is the SPT blow count. The soil types investigated include sands, silts, clays, and various mixtures, and the reported correlation factors range from 0.2 to 7.0 depending on the soil type and source study.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    WMCAUS IOP Publishing

    IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 245 (2017) 032028 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/245/3/032028
    1234567890

    Table 1: Previous works for CPT and SPT correlations


    Author(s) Soil Types Relationship
    [2] (De Alencar Velloso Clay and silty clay n = qc / N = 0.35
    D.,1959) Sandy clay and silty sand n = qc / N = 0.2
    Sandy silt n = qc / N = 0.35
    Fine sand n = qc / N = 0.6
    Sand n = qc / N = 1.00
    [3] (Meigh & Nixon 1961) Coarse sand n = qc / N = 0.2
    Gravelly sand n = qc / N = 0.3-0.4
    [4] (Franki Piles, 1960-from Sand n = qc / N = 1.00
    Akça, 2003) Clayey sand n = qc / N = 0.6
    Silty sand n = qc / N = 0.5
    Sandy clay n = qc / N = 0.4
    Silty clay n = qc / N = 0,3
    Clays n = qc / N = 0.2
    [5] (Schmertmann, 1970) Silt, sandy silt and silt-sand n = (qc + fs) / N = 0.2
    mix.
    Fine to medium sand, silty n = (qc + fs) / N = 0.3-0.4
    sand
    Coarse sand, sand with gravel n = (qc + fs) / N = 0.5-0.6
    Sandy gravel and gravel n = (qc + fs) / N = 0.8-1.0
    [6] (Barata et al., 1978) Sandy silty clay n = qc / N * = 1.5-2.5
    Clayey silty sand n = qc / N * = 2.0-3.5
    [7] (Ajayi & Balogun, 1988) Lateritic sandy clay n = qc / N * = 3.2
    Residual sandy clay n = qc / N * = 4.2
    [8] (Chang., 1988) Sandy clayey silt n = qc / N * = 2.1
    Clayey silt, sandy clayey silt n = qc / N * = 1.8
    [9] (Danziger & de Valleso, Silt, sandy silt and silt-sand n = (qc + fs) / N = 0.2
    1995) Fine to medium sand, silty n = (qc + fs) / N = 0.3-0.4
    sand
    Coarse sand, sand with gravel n = (qc + fs) / N = 0.5-0.6
    Sandy gravel and gravel n = (qc + fs) / N = 0.8-1.0
    Silt, sandy silt and silt-sand n = (qc + fs) / N = 0.2
    Silty sand n = qc / N * = 7.0
    [10] (Danziger et al., 1998) Sand n = QC / N * = 5.7
    Silty sand, silty clay n = qc / N * = 5.0-6.4
    Clayey silt n = qc / N * = 3.1
    Clay, silt and sand mixtures n = qc / N * = 1.0-3.5
    Clayey sand and silty clayey n = qc / N * = 4.6-5.3
    Sandy clayey n = qc / N * = 1.8-3.5
    Clay n = qc / N * = 4.5
    [11] (Emrem et al., 2000) Turkey soils n = qc / N = func (D50)
    [4] (Akça, 2003) Sand n = qc / N = 0.77
    Silty sand n = qc / N = 0.70
    Sandy silt n = qc / N = 0.58
    qc / N in MPa
    * qc / N in bar per blow 0.3m

    You might also like