Keep Soil Alive, Protect Soil Biodiversity: Outcome Document

Outcome
document
Keep soil alive,

GLOBAL SYMPOSIUM
protect soil ON SOIL BIODIVERSITY
biodiversity 19-22 April 2021

Cover: ©FAO/ Matteo Sala
©FAO/Matteo Sala
Outcome
document
Keep soil alive, GLOBAL SYMPOSIUM
protect soil ON SOIL BIODIVERSITY
biodiversity 19-22 April 2021
An event co-organized by:
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

GSP| Global Soil Partnership
ITPS | Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils
CBD | Convention on Biological Diversity
UNCCD-SPI | Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
GSBI | Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Rome, 2021
Required citation
FAO, 2021. Keep soil alive, protect soil biodiversity. Global symposium on soil biodiversity,
19–22 April 2021 – Outcome document. Rome, Italy.
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever
on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative (GSBI), Secretariat of the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) or European Commission (EC) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory,
city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of
manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO, GSBI, CBD or EC
in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do
not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO, GSBI, CBD or EC.
© FAO, 2021
Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-
NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode).
Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is
appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The
use of the FAO logo is not permitted. If the work is adapted, then it must be licensed under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If a
translation of this work is created, it must include the following disclaimer along with the required citation: “This translation was not created by the
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original
[Language] edition shall be the authoritative edition.”
Disputes arising under the licence that cannot be settled amicably will be resolved by mediation and arbitration as described in Article 8 of the
licence except as otherwise provided herein. The applicable mediation rules will be the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organi-
zation http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules and any arbitration will be conducted in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the United
Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL).
Third-party materials. Users wishing to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, are
responsible for determining whether permission is needed for that reuse and for obtaining permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims
resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.
Sales, rights and licensing. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through
[email protected]. Requests for commercial use should be submitted via: www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request. Queries regarding
rights and licensing should be submitted to: [email protected].
Cover: ©Andy Murray

Contents
AcknowledgementsIV
AbbreviationsIV
Scientific and organizing committees V
Summary1
Statistics of attendance 3
Background of the global symposium on soil biodiversity 4
Symposium themes, core questions and discussion summary 6
Theme 1. State of knowledge on soil biodiversity 7
Theme 2. Soil biodiversity in action 13
Theme 3. Soil biodiversity shaping the future of food systems 19
From GSOBI21 to mainstreaming soil biodiversity in all sectors: discussion, conclusions and
recommendations20
Conclusions 21
Theme 1: Measuring, assessing and monitoring soil biodiversity 22
Theme 2: Sustainable use/management and conservation of soil biodiversity 23
Theme 3: Economics of soil biodiversity 23
Theme 4: Policies and legal instruments of soil biodiversity 23
References 24
©Andy Murray
III
Acknowledgements
The Organizing Committee and the Scientific Committee would like to express their sincere gratitude
to Member countries, institutions, and individuals for their important contributions to the success of
the symposium. Deepest thanks also goes to the European Commission, the Ministry of Finance of the
Russian Federation, the Swiss Confederation and the Ministry of Economic Affairs of the Netherlands for
their financial support to the symposium.
Abbreviations
AMF | Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
AMR | Antimicrobial resistance
CBD | Convention on Biological Diversity
COP | Conference of Parties
EC |European Commission
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
GSBI | Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative
GSOBI21 | Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity 2021
GSP | Global Soil Partnership
ITPS | Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils
SDGs | Sustainable Development Goals
SOC | Soil organic carbon
SOM |Soil organic matter
SSM | Sustainable Soil Management
UNCCD-SPI | Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
UNCCD| United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
UNFCCC | United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
VGSSM | Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management
WSD | World Soil Day
IV
Scientific and
organizing
committees
This outcome document, “Keep soil alive, protect Special reviewers
soil biodiversity” was prepared and reviewed by Ms Rosa Poch (ITPS)
members of the Scientific Committee (see below)
in their personal capacities. This document is also Ms Zoë Lindo (Western University)
based on the Report of the State of Knowledge Ms Cintia Niva (Embrapa)
of Soil Biodiversity: Status, Challenges and
Potentialities, and is complemented by a book of Mr George Brown (Embrapa)
proceedings, which presents extended abstracts of
the various parallel sessions presented during the
symposium.
Organizing committee
Scientific committee
FAO’s Global Soil Partnership Secretariat
Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils Ms Rosa Cuevas Corona
(ITPS)
Ms Natalia Rodríguez Eugenio
Ms Rosa M. Poch (Chair)
Mr Ronald Vargas
Ms Rafla Attia
Ms Isabelle Verbeke
Ms Lucia Helena Cunha dos Anjos
Ms Giulia Stanco
Ms Megan Balks
Mr Matteo Sala
Mr Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza
Ms Julia Mousquer
Ms Martha Marina Bolanos Benavides
Ms Maria Emiliano
Ms Costanza Calzolari
Mr Hugo Bourhis
Ms Lydia M. Chabala
Mr Fernando García Préchac Convention on Biological Diversity
Mr Mohammad Jamal Khan Ms Caridad Canales
Ms Maria Konyushkova Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative

Mr David Lobb Ms Monica Farfan
Ms Generose Nziguheba Ms Diana Wall
Mr Ashok Patra Science Policy Interface – United Nations
Convention to Combat Desertification
Mr Gary Pierzynski
Mr Barron Or
FAO
Ms Rosa Cuevas Corona
Mr Ronald Vargas
Ms Natalia Rodríguez Eugenio
Mr Edmundo Barrios
V
©Andy Murray
Summary
The Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity
(GSOBI) was jointly organized by the:
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the

United Nations (FAO)
• Global Soil Partnership (GSP) and its

Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils
(ITPS)
• Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
• Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative (GSBI)
• Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations

Convention to Combat Desertification (SPI-
UNCCD)
The Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity was

held virtually on the FAO zoom platform from
19-22 April 2021. It was attended by over 5 000
participants (49 percent women, 51 percent men),
representing more than 160 countries, including
representatives of FAO Members, organizing
institutions, academia, research institutions, the
private sector, civil society, and farmers, as well as
land users working on soil biodiversity and related
fields.
The overall aim of the symposium was to gather

updated scientific knowledge on soil biodiversity,
review the role of soil biodiversity and ecosystem
services in tackling environmental problems and
to drive actions towards the implementation
of the Revised World Soil Charter along with
the Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable
Soil Management and the Protocol for
the Assessment of Sustainable Soil
Management. Specifically, the State of
Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity Report
and the GSOBI21 Symposium
objectives were to provide
evidence to support actions to
protect soil biodiversity and
promote its sustainable use
and management by addressing
the underlying causes of soil
biodiversity loss and enhancing
the implementation of
sustainable practices.
1
The four-day symposium was structured around
three main areas focusing on: Theme 1. State
of knowledge on soil biodiversity; Theme 2.
Soil biodiversity in action; and Theme 3. Soil
biodiversity shaping the future of food systems.
Participants engaged actively by presenting the

results of their research, demonstrating that
there has been a notable progression in the ability
to measure, assess, manage and monitor soil
biodiversity, from a national to a global level, albeit
with the challenge of there being few standard
protocols available. There had also been challenges
in implementing sound policies that integrated
soil biodiversity in the adoption of sustainable soil
management practices by countries.
It was made clear that, going forward, there would

be a need to:
• Strengthen and/or establish national soil

information systems including soil biodiversity
information.
• Provide a set of indicators to measure/monitor

soil biodiversity and soil health.
• Invest in research on soil-borne diseases

and scale-up soil biodiversity responses in
the agricultural sector and in climate change
mitigation and adaptation.
• Recognize soil biodiversity in the Sustainable

Development Agendas.
• Promote targeted research on soil biodiversity

and foster the application/use of these results
in the different sectors.
The recommendations presented in this document

aim to support the development of policies and
actions to encourage the full use of soil biodiversity
in the various land use sectors.
©Andy Murray
2 Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity

Statistics of attendance
Gender balance
9% Ma
| 4 le |
ale 51
%
em
F cipants per Regions
rti
Pa
North Americ
8% a|6
n| 2 %
a
ribb
e
lti-stakeholde Af
ric
eC
a
Mu r me a
e
|1
th
2%
nd
aa
tin
Other | 7%
eric
g
Am
Private sector | 12%

Latin
Asia | 22
Rep. of National Governments | 6%
General public | 7%
Farmers | 6%
%
CSO/NGO representative | 6%
UN agencies and bodies | 4%
Pacific
| 2%
Research and
Academia | 52%
1%
|
ca
fri
A
rth
Eu
rop d No
e|2 an
9% ar East
Ne
Outcome document 3
Background of the II. The promotion of ownership and adaptation
by farmers of integrated soil biological
global symposium management practices as an integral part of
their agricultural and sustainable livelihood
on soil biodiversity strategies.
III. The strengthening of collaboration among

actors and institutions, while mainstreaming
soil health and biological management
In finding solutions to the impacts of a projected into agricultural, land management and
world population growth, the increase in food rehabilitation programmes.
demand, as well as the ever-present need to
eradicate poverty and malnutrition, we will need to
rely more than ever on the sustainable use of soils Since then, some countries have been developing
and the ecosystem services they provide. Reversing legal frameworks and adopting policies dedicated
soil degradation and restoring soil functions and soil to the sustainable utilisation of agrochemicals,
health offer a considerable opportunity to address water protection, pollution prevention and waste
the importance of soil biodiversity in reversing the management. These actions have contributed to
worldwide trend of degradation. some extent to soil protection, as well as consequent
indirect effects on the conservation of different soil
Sustainable soil management can be clearly biodiversity components by addressing specific
identified as a crosscutting approach. It is at the threats (e.g. nitrates, pesticides and invasive alien
heart of several global agendas and international species). However, legal instruments and policies
policy frameworks, including the Sustainable widely adopted and focused on SSM including soil
Development Goals (SDGs) and multi-lateral biodiversity are needed, given its importance in
environment agreements, in particular those related multiples sectors and in ensuring the provision of
to biodiversity (CBD), desertification (UNCCD) fundamental ecosystem services.
and climate change (UNFCCC). Furthermore,
soil biodiversity and sustainable soil management Eighteen years after the launch of the International
(SSM) will be pivotal to the success of the recently Initiative for the Conservation and Sustainable
declared UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Use of Soil Biodiversity, the full potential of soil
(2021-2030). biodiversity has yet to be realised. Scientists
and scientific soil biodiversity networks have
In 2002, at its 6th meeting in Nairobi, the CBD made substantial progress in researching this
decided to establish an International Initiative topic, however, there is a pressing need for the
for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Soil mainstreaming and scaling up of soil biodiversity
Biodiversity, as a cross-cutting initiative within the in order to address the different challenges that
programme of work on agricultural biodiversity. ecosystems and population are currently facing.
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (FAO), together with other In 2018, at the UN Biodiversity Conference held in
relevant organisations, were invited to facilitate and Egypt, the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the
coordinate this initiative. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) invited
FAO to prepare a report on the State of Knowledge of
The International Initiative for the Conservation Soil Biodiversity. Additionally, the COP requested
and Sustainable Use of Soil Biodiversity has three the Secretariat of the CBD, in consultation with
main objectives: FAO under the aegis of the Global Soil Partnership
I. The promotion of awareness raising, (GSP) as well as other interested partners, to review
knowledge and understanding of key roles, the implementation of the International Initiative
functional groups and impacts of diverse for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Soil
management practices on soil biodiversity and Biodiversity.
soil health in different farming systems and During the upcoming COP 15, the Parties to the
agro-ecological and socio-economic contexts. CBD will adopt a Post-2020 Global Biodiversity
Framework towards the achievement of the
2050 Vision of “Living in harmony with nature”.
There is an urgent need for a more integrated and II. Identify knowledge gaps and explore
coherent policy framework, where soil biodiversity opportunities for collaborative research,
protection is incorporated into other sectoral capacity building and technical cooperation.
policies. Managing soil biodiversity has different
components and challenges, making this task III. Identify limitations and opportunities
considerably different from the management of to promote the sustainable use of soil
aboveground biodiversity. biodiversity, knowledge sharing and capacity
building.
During the World Soil Day celebrations in
December 2020, the Report on the State of IV. Present effective and replicable
Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity: Status, Challenges methodologies, techniques, technologies and
and Potentialities, was launched as well as its Summary practices that promote sustainability, with a
for policy makers. This report was the result of an view to upscale those sustainable approaches
inclusive process involving more than 300 scientists to promote soil biodiversity conservation, the
from around the world under the auspices of the sustainable use of its resources and equitable
FAO’s GSP and the Intergovernmental Technical participation in productive landscapes.
Panel on Soils (ITPS), the CBD, the Global Soil
V. Identify policy options to protect soil
Biodiversity Initiative (GSBI) and the European
biodiversity and encourage the adoption of
Commission (EC). The report presents the state
practices that enhance it.
of knowledge on soil biodiversity, describing the
threats and the solutions that soil biodiversity VI. Present national, regional and global initiatives
can provide to problems in different fields. These that support the effective design, planning,
include agriculture, environmental conservation, implementation, monitoring and reporting
climate change adaptation and mitigation, nutrition, of solutions and their contribution to the
medicine and pharmaceuticals, remediation of achievement of the SDGs.
polluted sites as well as many others. It represents
a valuable contribution to raising awareness of the VII. Helping build a broader appreciation of soil
importance of soil biodiversity while highlighting biodiversity and our dependence on the many
its role in finding solutions to today’s global threats. benefits it provides.
In this context, the Symposium outcome will

contribute to the final deliberations and advocate
for the endorsement of the revised plan of action for
the implementation of the International Initiative
for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Soil
Biodiversity, and ultimately, contribute to the Post-
2020 Biodiversity Framework. This Symposium
gave the opportunity to openly discuss and channel
efforts to build bridges between the actions of
different stakeholders that could sometimes be
perceived as fragmented or overlapping.
The main objectives of the symposium were to

fill some critical knowledge gaps and promote
discussion among policy makers, food producers,
scientists, practitioners and other stakeholders
on solutions to live in harmony with nature,
and ultimately, achieve the SDGs through the
conservation and sustainable use of soil biodiversity.
The specific objectives of the symposium were to:
I. Examine the current scientific, technical,

©Andy Murray
indigenous and traditional knowledge on the

role of soil biodiversity on food production,
human health and on sustaining biodiversity
aboveground.
Symposium
themes, core
questions and
discussion
summary
The symposium was organized in different
sessions: a) an opening session with the Heads
of UN organizations and conventions and other
authorities; b) a session of keynote speakers
portraying the status and challenges of soil
biodiversity; c) 6 parallel sessions presenting
research outputs from scientists; d) a poster
session; e) thematic global presentations and
closure session.
The aims of the parallel sessions were to

promote discussion, generate conclusions and
recommendations based on scientific evidence,
define the way forward to prevent and minimize soil
biodiversity loss, and to contribute to the know-
how on assessing, measuring, monitoring, and
sustainably managing soil biodiversity at all levels.
The identification of gaps in knowledge and

regulations has led to the definition of a line of work
for the future. In the lead-up to the symposium,
core questions were developed as well as expected
outcomes to the symposium for each theme, in
order to stimulate discussion and help in identifying
priority actions. Presentations in parallel sessions
set the scene for debating and discussing the main
topics. Finally, plenary sessions were held on the
last day to present the results and the way forward.
The GSOBI21 themes are listed in the next

section, followed by the way forward with the main
discussions, recommendations and conclusions.
Even if treated separately in this document, it
should be emphasized that the three themes are
interrelated.
The answers to the following core questions are the

product of the presentations and discussions during
the Symposium as well as inputs from the State of
Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity Report (FAO et al.,
2020).
©Andy Murray

Theme 1. State of knowledge II. How have technological advances and
traditional and indigenous knowledge
on soil biodiversity supported soil biodiversity discoveries?
Theme 1 aimed to discuss about the latest Sustainable soil management requires sound
discoveries on taxonomic and genetic diversity resource management at the watershed and
of soil organisms, the benefits arising from soil landscape levels and beyond, which in turn requires
biodiversity and the status of the world soil models based on big data generated from soil-
biodiversity, in order to strengthen dialogue water-plant-atmosphere information. In addition,
between all stakeholders. applications need to be developed for the recording
of farming data, linking the information to remotely
Core questions sensed databases and storage of data, and analyzing
big data in order to provide management advice.
I. What recent discoveries have been made on soil Until now, information on soil biodiversity has not
organisms’ taxonomic and genetic diversity yet been included, but once it is aggregated into
and their distribution patterns? these models it may increase management strength,
provided that sufficient knowledge is available
As soil biodiversity is lost, ecosystem functions are regarding the diversity and functions of the soil
reduced (Wagg et al., 2014). With over 40 percent microbiome.
of terrestrial genetic diversity housed below
Artificial intelligence has great potential in the
ground (FAO et al., 2020), the conservation of
assembly of data and the aggregation of information
soil biodiversity is a key component in maintaining
from multiple databases. Novel technologies at
genetic diversity, as well as ensuring optimum
farm and landscape scales could become powerful
soil functioning. Rapid advancements in scientific
tools in promoting the sustainable management
research and technologies have supported the
of soils. Knowledge and technological advances at
taxonomy and discovery of new species of soil
the microscale or macroscale could provide new
biota, their distribution in soils around the world
perspectives on soil functions that may ultimately
and the understanding of their contributions to our
be transferred to novel technologies. The
well-being. However, a large number of species
emerging novel technologies such as metagenomic,
of soil organisms in many regions of the world are
metabolomic, transcriptomic and volatilomic
still waiting to be discovered (Guerra et al., 2020).
approaches provide useful information on soil
Furthermore, the lack of taxonomists for many
biodiversity functions in addition to the taxonomic
soil taxa is a real concern, not only for the future
diversity of the soil microbiome. Advances in meta-
of soil biodiversity research programmes, but also
genomics in identifying soil organisms and linking
in raising awareness of biodiversity loss. Hence,
their structure to their function, coupled with an
simplified methodologies and tools are needed
increase in experiments that manipulate diversity
for soil biodiversity assessment to promote wider
within and across energy channels, trophic groups,
accessibility and use in all regions of the world.
functional groups, taxa and genetic differences
Several contributions in the symposium addressed should help solidify links among agricultural
soil organism taxonomy and distribution. For management (including intensification), soil
instance, Niva et al. (2021), found 6 potentially biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.
new species of enchytraeid in Brazilian Cerrado
Biotechnological methods to describe impacts of
biome and more than 20 different species
agricultural practices on taxonomic and functional
belonging to 8 genera in the region. Syamsudin,
diversity of soil organisms are also advancing.
Kowara and Choesin (2021), collected 43 species
Despite this progress, the importance of soil
of soil protozoa in post-coal mine recovered area in
and the multitude of environmental services that
Indonesia. Sasmita et al. (2021), also in Indonesia,
depend on soil organisms are not well understood
identified 27 major macroinvertebrate taxa (25
by society at large.
families, 21 orders) in Agroforestry systems there.
Environmental DNA (eDNA), a promising tool for Effective and efficient monitoring tools are
detecting global composition of soil eukaryotes, important in recording changes in soil biodiversity
was used by Bellemain et al. (2021), to assess the and establishing databases to link diversity with
degree of restoration of soil quality in polluted soil functions. The “Land Use/Cover Area frame
environments. Outcome document 7
statistical Survey Soil” (LUCAS Soil) is an extensive den Hoogen et al., 2019). The first ever Global
and regular topsoil survey that is carried out across Soil Biodiversity Atlas used informative text,
the European Union to derive policy-relevant photographs and maps to answer and explain
statistics on the impact of land management on the factors influencing the distribution of soil
soil characteristics, including soil biodiversity. organisms, how soil biodiversity supports food
LUCAS Soil represents the largest harmonised production, the pressures affecting soil life and the
open-access dataset of topsoil properties available possible interventions to preserve it (Orgiazzi et
for the European Union. Soil BON supports al., 2016).
the development of a global community for the
observation, understanding and prediction of soil Regarding the human side, the SDG 5 (Gender
biodiversity, being a forum to network groups Equality) and SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic
and advance standardized methods for observing Growth), highlighted women as an important
soil biodiversity, including the integration of member of farming communities around the
information across spatial, temporal and taxonomic world. Women form a major part of agricultural
scales. development with traditional knowledge and skills
in farming being closely tied to the maintenance
Research devoted to the definition of biological and improvement of land productivity (UNCCD,
indicators is making great progress, but the 2019). Women’s contributions also include
development of robust and reliable biological knowledge and respect for soil organisms and
indicators remains a challenge. In England, a their role in supporting farming practices. For
Long Term Monitoring Network is assessing soil example, China assessed the status and trends
properties that include the use of chemotaxonomic of soil biodiversity in various ways, including a
markers (PLFAs) and metabarcoding applied to comprehensive assessment of the status and trends,
some mesofauna samples. The Lazio Region in scientific knowledge, innovations and practices of
Italy financed a monitoring programme using farmers, indigenous and traditional knowledge and
the Biological fertility Index (BFI) to assess the maps (FAO et al., 2020).
degree of biological fertility of soil correlated with
different production systems (Renzi et al., 2017).
The Pavia Province in the Lombardia Region (Italy) III. What is the latest knowledge on the ecosystem
also initiated a monitoring programme, carried services delivered by soil biodiversity?
out by the Joint Research Centre of the European
Commission (JRC) using several biological A wide range of soil organisms including ecosystem
indicators, ranging from BFI to earthworms engineers and beneficial microorganisms like
(Pompili et al., 2006; Beone et al., 2015). mycorrhizal fungi and N2 fixing bacteria (symbionts
in roots) play key roles in providing ecosystem
During the symposium, several presentations services such as soil fertility improvement, soil
focused on the use of different taxa, functions formation and maintenance, nutrient cycling
or integrated tools for measuring soil quality/ and plant primary productivity enhancement
health. A novel technique (SoilBio) based on two (Figure 1). Although a number of tools exist to
soil enzymes (arylsulfatase and beta-glucosidase) assess ecosystem services in the context of land
has been gaining increased recognition and use management, few fully integrate soil biodiversity
by farmers in Brazil (Mendes et al., 2019),while and most are applicable only to developed countries
the QBS-ar (Soil Biological Quality index using (Grêt-Regamey et al., 2017).
microarthropods) has been expanding, particularly
in Europe, but also in other continents (e.g., To overcome these obstacles and to sustain soil
Bolivia; Ledezma et al., 2021). functions at specific levels, knowledge on how soil
food webs respond to specific management and
Regarding global products, a paper on soil restoration regimes under the perspective of global
nematode abundance and functional group climate change is essential. To this end, it is crucial
composition at a global scale was prepared using to focus research on better understanding the links
6 759 georeferenced samples to generate a among biodiversity attributes and soil functions
mechanistic understanding of the patterns of the and ecosystem services (de Vries et al., 2013; See
global abundance of nematodes in the soil and Figure 1), among abiotic properties, soil organisms
the composition of their functional groups (van and climate (Bhusal, Tsiafouli and Sgardelis, 2015;

Orgiazzi and Panagos, 2018) and to develop That said, human activities and interventions play
efficient monitoring tools and maps by up-scaling a critical role on the outcome of soil functioning.
the bio-indication potential to the scales that are Human-induced changes, such as the intensification
important for management decisions (Stone et of land use, can modify soil structure and abiotic
al., 2016; van den Hoogen et al., 2019., Mendes properties as well as the structure, composition and
et al., 2021b). For instance, a soil health index diversity of the soil food web, thereby influencing
integrating soil enzyme activity and soil chemical ecosystem service delivery (Figure 1). Soil health,
fertility has been rapidly adopted by dozens of as well as various SDGs depend on the maintenance
commercial soil analysis laboratories in Brazil to of the four major biodiversity-based soil functions
provide a way of quickly highlighting good and bad (carbon transformation, nutrient cycling, formation
practices (Mendes et al., 2021a and Mendes et al., of soil structure, and biodiversity regulation).
2021b). Unfortunately, all these functions are recognized
as being under threat (Gardi, Jeffery and Saltelli,
2013).
Agriculture Nature
Climate
and forestry conservation
Soil carbon Plant

stocks pathogens
Soil Soil
health Nutrient Soil biodiversity
Ecological
cycling and conservation
vulnerability
fertility value
of soils
Litter Intraspecific
decomposition genetic diversity
Indicators
Soil
respiration Population
abundance
Community
Enzymatic traits of roots
activity
Soil Habitat
aggregation extent
Nutrient Functional
cycling Soil Taxonomic diversity
biomass diversity
Figure 1. Links between essential soil biodiversity variables (EBVs) (outer ring) as prioritized by the global Soil Biodiversi-
ty Observation Network (SoilBON) and policy sectors (top of the figure) through the use of soil ecological indicators (cen-
ter of figure). Thin lines correspond to links between EBVs and soil indicators; thicker lines refer to links between each soil in-
dicator and specific policy sectors. The EBVs for soil systems are proposed as a holistic system approach, where soil organisms
are intertwined with relevant chemical, physical and functional soil properties, contributing to overall societal well-being.
Source: modified from Guerra, et al. (2021).
Outcome document 9
IV. What is the status and projected trends of It is now relatively easy for many environmental
soil biodiversity (global/regional/national variables (such as temperature and land cover) to
levels)? be mapped and monitored for change, using data
collected by remote sensing (satellites). However,
The important role of soil biodiversity in ecosystem these still do not provide direct information on
functioning and the provision of ecosystem services the state of the organisms present (diversity and
can be threatened by human activities as well as populations). These must be derived from case
by natural disasters, although the latter may also studies performed throughout the world in the
be influenced by human-induced changes. These different ecoregions and include a range of taxa,
include deforestation, urbanization, agricultural with distinct functions in soils, so that the risk
intensification, loss of soil organic matter/carbon, to soil biodiversity and function can be better
soil compaction, surface sealing, soil acidification, assessed. In addition, syntheses of available data on
nutrient imbalance, contamination, salinization, the impacts of these threats to soil biota (as many
sodification, desertification, wildfires, erosion potential representative groups/taxa as possible)
and landslides. The State of Knowledge of Soil and support to obtain missing data are needed in
Biodiversity Report (FAO et al., 2020) provided order to produce accurate maps that reflect the
an overview of the potential regional and global true potential impacts of these threats on soil life
threats on soil biodiversity, showing that the worldwide. Much progress has been made in some
most widespread threat to soil biodiversity in the areas, for instance with the adoption of standardized
world was the loss of soil organic matter (SOM) laboratory protocols for the measurement of
and soil organic carbon (SOC), and that this multiple taxa and functions through SOILBON
could be associated with other threats such as (Guerra et al., 2021), though wider geographic
deforestation and agricultural intensification (both representation and range of taxa and functions are
linked with land use change) and with climate desirable. The Global Tea-composition Initiative
change (particularly in tundra). This highlights (Djukic et al., 2021), using standard tea-bags
the importance of sustainable management and as proxy for litter decomposition measurements
conservation practices, in order to maintain this has also promoted an improved understanding of
essential biological resource in soils. local, regional and global impacts of drivers on this
process, although some detritivore macrofauna are
Greater efforts are needed to understand the excluded from the process due to the small mesh-
impacts of multiple direct (such as intensive
size.
land use) and indirect (such as climate change)
anthropogenic threats to soil biodiversity V. How can we best measure, map, monitor and
(Veresoglou, Halley and Rillig, 2015; Orgiazzi report on soil biodiversity? What are the most
et al., 2016). This is of particular importance, as useful indicators organisms?
threats to soil biodiversity do not only co-occur but
can have additive, interactive or synergistic effects, The diversity of soil invertebrates is of particular
reducing soil biodiversity to even lower levels than importance for the provisioning of multiple
what we would expect to find based on single driver ecosystem functions and services across ecosystem
studies (Thakur et al., 2018). Taken together, it types, including soil erosion control and nutrient
is likely that the combined global change factors cycling (Soliveres et al., 2016). With the advent of
reduce biodiversity of native species, while being novel methods, particularly molecular techniques,
partly compensated for by the increasing spread of researchers have been able to move beyond a focus
cosmopolitan species. The combined global change on individual species. Scientists have begun to
effects are predicted to be context-dependent, that show how the hugely diverse soil microbiome is tied
is, differing by biome, organism group and relative to pathogen control, plant health, increased yield
effect on dominant vegetation or its shift. and an increased ability to overcome abiotic stress.
Especially in the last decade, method advances
Unfortunately, the available knowledge of the including molecular sequencing techniques and
impacts of these threats on soil biodiversity and “big data” analytical tools have helped to identify
function is highly variable, depending on the threat species living in soils and their communities.
and the region, as well as the target biota (macro,
meso, or microfauna and microbes, for example).

In order to be able to define which regions of the Research devoted to the definition of biological
world need protection, sufficient information indicators is making great progress, but the
must be available on the status and trends of soil development of robust and reliable biological
biodiversity, including data on as wide a range of indicators remains a challenge. Based on the country
taxa as possible, from as many locations as possible. responses to soil biodiversity survey (FAO et al.,
But, according to the country responses to the 2020), the following examples reflect the effort
soil biodiversity survey1, while some countries of some countries regarding the use of biological
(e.g., Netherlands, United Kingdom of Great indicators in soil quality assessment:
Britain and Northern Ireland, France, etc.) have
established indicators and monitoring tools for soil • In Finland, the estimation of earthworm
biodiversity, the majority of countries still lack the abundance and biodiversity is incorporated
knowledge, capacity and resources to implement soil in the arable soil quality assessment
health principles and adopt best practices for soil tool developed for farmers (“Peltomaan
biodiversity enhancement (FAO et al., 2020). laatutesti”).
Furthermore, few organisms/taxa have been • In the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
analyzed at a global level, mainly due to limited Northern Ireland, earthworms have been
data. For example, the abundance and/or diversity suggested as an indicator for the England
of earthworms and nematodes have been relatively Chemicals Strategy, which seeks to enable
well studied worldwide, and some recent studies society to enjoy the benefits from chemistry
have even produced global maps, although sampling in a safe sustainable way. Furthermore, in
has been clearly geographically biased towards England, the Long Term Monitoring Network,
the Northern hemisphere, particularly European a small network of 37 National Nature
countries (Philips et al., 2019; van den Hoogen Reserves has been assessed for soil properties,
et al., 2019). However, most of the other soil including phospholipid-derived fatty acids
invertebrates, including soil-dwelling larval stages (PLFAs), terminal restriction fragment length
of flying insects that represent a major biodiversity polymorphism (T-RFLP) and mesofauna, with
pool in terrestrial ecosystems, have been woefully some of the mesofauna samples being subject
neglected in biodiversity databases and assessments, to metabarcoding.
as well as in conservation actions and policies
• Germany reported that there are as yet,
(Eisenhauer, Bonn and Guerra, 2019).
no nationally implemented indicators for
Studies have identified taxonomic groups that may evaluating soil biodiversity related to the
serve as potential indicators to assess the sustainability respective services/threats. However, there
of agricultural soil management and to monitor trends are numerous debates about how such
in soil condition and functions over time (Paula et al., indicators could be defined.
2014; Kaiser et al., 2016; Trivedi et al., 2016). For
• France reported that regarding ecotoxicology
example, Rutgers et al. (2019) predicted relative soil
and soil pollution, the country is managing
biodiversity in several European countries using six
polluted sites, the use of organic wastes in
biological soil attributes and five chemical soil attributes
agriculture and fertilizers, soil improvers,
together (i.e., total organic carbon, total nitrogen, total
and pesticides commercial authorization
phosphorous, pH, clay content, abundance, Shannon
procedures. The genetic diversity has
diversity index and richness of earthworms, microbial
been catalogued in maps, by monitoring
biomass and bacteria). Soil microarthropods like
and a country atlas. Regarding projects,
Collembola and Acari have also been useful as biological
the AgroEco-Sol has provided transfer of
indicators of soil quality and of anthropisation, including
technology and expertise to agricultural
urbanization and contamination. The QBS-ar index
development actors in order to develop a soil
(Soil Biological Quality index using microarthropods)
microbiology analysis chain with indicators.
is an expeditious and inexpensive index that may
The Agence de l’Environnement et de la
represent a good first step to evaluate soil condition in
Maîtrise de l’Énergie is funding research on
degraded and natural landscapes (Menta et al., 2018).
the evaluation of impacts of polluted sites on
1 The main objective of the soil biodiversity survey was to present the state of assessments that countries had reported on the level of their current
knowledge of soil biodiversity, identifying the main drivers responsible for any negative impact on below-ground biodiversity over the last ten years and
provide information on how the soil biodiversity has been monitored.
Outcome document 11
ecosystems (including soil organisms) and • The Netherlands reported on the Biological
on the development of soil bioindicators to Indicator for Soil Quality within the
assess polluted sites. France also reported Netherlands Soil Monitoring Network.
information systems at different levels: within However, national monitoring terminated
the scientific interest group “Soil” (in French, in 2014, with capacity and expertise being
GIS Sol – groupement d’intérêt scientifique reduced or lost. Recently, a more limited set of
“Sol”), the soil monitoring network (RMQS indicators has been defined and will be further
– réseau de mesure de la qualité des sols) developed for practical application. The
looking at soil microbes at the national level ambition is to include organic matter (total and
(ECOMIC-RMQS) and global soil biodiversity labile), bacterial and fungal biomass, nematode
for Brittany (RMQS-BIODIV). diversity and earthworm number and diversity
(Hanegraaf et al., 2019).
• The Republic of Moldova has a partially
developed assessment system with indicators, The recently established Soil BON will be
criteria, statistical parameters and scales of soil coordinating the gathering of soil biodiversity data
biota. comprehensively and over extended periods of time
in a selected number of sites worldwide, using a
• The Italian Society for Soil Sciences (SISS) has selected number of taxa and functions (Guerra et
established a working group on soil biological al., 2021). An internationally recognised standard
monitoring through microarthropods (QBS- protocol will be applied at each site, in order to
ar), which has organised three workshops on monitor biodiversity and functions, generating the
the topic and is divided into eight subgroups so-called Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs);
(with approximately 60 participants). It has the key parameters for measuring biodiversity.
also established the School of Soil Biodiversity These will feed into the Group on Earth Observations
and Bioindication to spread the knowledge Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON),
on biodiversity of soil and its importance on established in 2005; a global initiative that aims to
sustainable soil management. improve the acquisition, coordination and delivery
of biodiversity observations and related services to
users including decision-makers and the scientific
community.
©Andy Murray

Theme 2. Soil biodiversity in are not the same in all ten of the world’s ecoregions
(classified according to WWF: Olson et al., 2001).
action The ecoregions with the highest number of threats
are the deserts and dry shrublands, tropical and
Theme 2 aimed to review the role and the subtropical grasslands, and the temperate broadleaf
application of soil biodiversity in the field. Experts and mixed forests (Table 1).
presented effective and replicable methodologies,
techniques, technologies and practices that Invasive species also represent an important threat,
promote the conservation and sustainable use particularly in Mediterranean and temperate forests
of soil biodiversity. The overall view was to and tundra. Terrestrial invasive species can arise
upscale those sustainable approaches to improve from any level of biological organization ranging
productivity, accelerate biodiversity conservation from viruses and microbes (bacteria and fungi) to
along with the sustainable use of its resources, as invertebrates, plants, and mammals. Non-native
well as guaranteeing the equitable participation in soil invertebrates can have dramatic negative
productive landscapes. impacts on native plants, the litter layer, microbial
communities and soil animals.
Core questions
The most widespread threats to soil biodiversity
I. What are the main drivers of soil biodiversity worldwide are the loss of SOM and SOC (food
loss and what are the consequences? How do for the soil biota), deforestation and agricultural
losses vary across environments? Can loss of intensification (Table 1), both of which affect SOM
soil biodiversity be reversed?
stocks.
Biodiversity losses can negatively affect the supply Agricultural intensification also affects the specific
of ecosystem services, such as food and fibres, functions soil animals perform:
water quality, biodiversity conservation, nutrient
cycling, soil structure formation, among others. • Soil tillage causes loss of larger soil fauna and
There are important regional differences in the disruption of soil food webs and fungal hyphal
relevance and role of threats to soil biodiversity networks.
and functioning, depending on various abiotic and
• The misuse or overuse of fertilizers may have a
human factors. These include climate, the extent of
negative impact on soil microbial communities
industrialization, the area of different types of native
and fauna.
vegetation, and anthropogenic land uses (especially
urbanization, agriculture and forestry), as well as • Large shifts in pH caused by lime application
the level of protection of soil resources, among impose stress on native microorganisms,
others (FAO et al., 2020). According to expert affecting their growth and reducing ecosystem
opinion, the main threats to soil biodiversity and resilience to disturbance.
function are not the same in the six world regions
(FAO et al., 2020): Asia, South West Pacific, Latin • Monocultures limit the presence of beneficial
America and Caribbean, North America (excluding bacteria, fungi and insects, contributing to
Mexico), Europe and sub-Saharan Africa. No ecosystem degradation and facilitating the
inputs from specialists were received for Eurasia, spread and expression of soil-borne diseases.
North Africa and the Near East. Furthermore, they
Outcome document 13
Table 1. Threats to soil biodiversity in global Ecoregions
Ecoregion Main threats

Deforestation
Tropical and subtropical forest
Agricultural intensification
Deforestation
Loss of SOM and SOC
Tropical and subtropical grassland Soil compaction and sealing
Fire
Erosion and landslides
Urbanization
Land degradation
Mediterranean forest, woodland and shrubland
Fire
Invasive species
Agricultural intensification
Montane grassland and shrubland
Loss of SOM and SOC
Loss of SOM and SOC
Salinization and sodification
Land degradation
Desert and dry shrubland
Fire
Erosion and landslides
Climate change
Deforestation
Urbanization
Temperate broadleaf and mixed forest Agricultural intensification
Loss of SOM and SOC
Invasive species
Temperate grassland Agricultural intensification
Fire
Temperate and boreal coniferous forest
Invasive species
Loss of SOM and SOC
Tundra Climate change
Invasive species
Boreal Forests/Taiga Deforestation
The impact of these threats on soil biodiversity has studies focusing on arbuscular mycorrhizae (fungal
been widely assessed using bioindicator taxa and functional groups) found that they would contribute
functions; conversely, bioindicators have also been to the optimization of agroecosystems, recovery
used to assess recovery of biodiversity and function of highly anthropised areas and conservation of
in soils. However, global and regional syntheses, natural ecosystems in Colombia (Landínez-Torres,
together with comparisons based on actual data Solveig and Nicola, 2021).
for threats and indicator taxa and/or functions
are still needed. Several contributions in the Sofo and Ricciuti (2021) demonstrated that the
symposium addressed threats and their impacts on adoption of sustainable agronomic practices (Smng
soil biodiversity/function, as well as the recovery system) nearly tripled the abundance of earthworms
of biodiversity and function in soils after soil while the abundance of other soil macrofauna
amelioration practices or the adoption of improved doubled. Hallam (2021) highlighted that boosting
management techniques. earthworm populations would be a worthwhile
practice to ensure successful and sustainable land
For instance, the Soil Biological Quality based on reclamation and soil quality improvement.
soil arthropods (QBS-ar index) is used to investigate
the soil biological quality in the Veneto region Huerta Lwanga et al. (2021) observed that
of Italy. This served to identify reference values glyphosate and its residue AMPA concentrations
according to different land uses and to highlight in soils were higher in soybean fields -remaining
soil degradation or pollution (Pocaterra and in the soil even years after being applied- than in
Ragazzi, 2021). According to a recent report, most maize and other non-managed areas in Yucatan,
Mexico. Both compounds are inversely correlated next decades. Sustainable intensification (SI) is a
with the number of morphospecies and abundance term that has increasingly been used to describe the
of macroinvertebrates. agricultural production systems that will be needed
to feed a growing global population whilst ensuring
Niva et al. (2021) included Enchytraeidae adequate ecosystem service provision (Franks,
density and the generic composition in two 2014). This means that agricultural productivity
phytophysiognomies of Cerrado Biome in needs to increase, while the provision of ecosystem
the monitoring of soil biological quality, soil services -such as the provision of habitats for
biodiversity loss and sustainability of production biodiversity, clean water and air, nutrient cycling
systems. and climate change mitigation- are not affected and
Christmann (2021) demonstrated that Pollinator- are even improved.
Loss-Syndrome also fuelled the deterioration of In 2015, food-system emissions amounted to 18
soil biodiversity, therefore conservation measures gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent per year globally,
for soil biodiversity and combating erosion would representing 34 percent of total greenhouse gases
be hampered without pollinators. (GHG) emissions. The largest contribution (71
percent) came from agriculture and land use/
The participatory learning action (PLA) not only
land-use change activities (Crippa et al., 2021).
helped sustain and increase soil biodiversity, but
According to Cassman and Grassini (2020), a
also helped in production diversity, since a farmer’s
50 percent yield increase on existing farmland
choice of tools and techniques had an enormous
in tandem with a 50 percent decrease in negative
influence on the factory of life, as observed by
environmental externalities would provide useful
Sharma and Joshi (2021).
initial targets for establishing national SI research
The re-carbonisation of Chilean soils using Pinus portfolios. The required science must come from
radiata roofs enhanced SOC sequestration that a wide array of disciplines including basic and
was fixed in ranges of 22 to 44 tonnes / ha, playing applied sciences that extend well beyond traditional
a fundamental role in the nutrition and fertility agricultural sciences to embrace computer and
of forest soils while promoting soil biodiversity computational sciences (including ‘big data’
(Francke-Campaña, 2021). analytics), landscape ecology, and molecular
biology to name a few.
Houšková, Bušo and Makovníková (2021) assessed
good agricultural practices, showing the positive Studies across different agricultural systems
effect that these practices had on soil moisture provide compelling evidence that soil biodiversity
content, biodiversity and soil structure stability, can directly support agricultural production and
concluding that these findings could be used for environmental integrity. The link between soil
further studies determining other methods of biodiversity and the primary soil functions of carbon
sustainable soil use. transformation, nutrient cycling and soil structure
required for plant productivity are clear (Figure
Ortega (2021) focused on developing and testing 1). In achieving our goals of reconciling high food
different diversified cropping systems under low- yields associated with high-intensity agriculture
input practices in order to increase land productivity with agricultural practices that protect and promote
and crop quality, thus combating the adverse effects soil biodiversity, the recommendations are also
of agricultural intensification. clear. No or minimum till practices that minimize
soil physical disturbance are required alongside
II. How can soil biodiversity support the inter- and multi-cropping systems that provide
transformation of agricultural systems toward
more diverse food production, enhance plant-soil
achieving sustainable intensification?
interactions and prevent soil erosion (compared to
fallow). Agricultural systems also benefit from the
Today, farmlands dominate 38 percent of the
addition of organic amendments that enhance soil
global land surface and the demand for agricultural
carbon, help retain moisture, and are reservoirs
commodities is projected to increase from 70 to 100
for nutrients, while soil biodiversity can act as
percent by 2050 (Zabel et al., 2020). Agricultural
production is driven by economic growth; therefore, biofertilisers when applied as biological inoculants.
pressure on agricultural systems will increase in the
Outcome document 15
III. How can soil biodiversity support the One The provisioning of safe and nutrient-rich plants
Health approach? and clean water for consumption is directly linked
to the quality of the soil system, as well as our
The health of animals, people, plants, soils and ability to produce sustainable agricultural crops,
the environment is interconnected. The One and supports the SDGs 1, 2, 3 and 6 (No Poverty,
Health is an integrated approach that recognizes Zero Hunger, Good Health and Well-Being, and
this fundamental relationship and ensures that Clean Water and Sanitation). Soil biodiversity also
specialists in multiple sectors work together to underpins supporting and regulating services like
tackle health threats to animals, humans, plants and soil formation and the prevention of erosion, climate
the environment. change mitigation through carbon sequestration
and pest management that facilitate Sustainable
The One Health priorities include:
Cities and Communities where access to clear air
• The strengthening, monitoring, surveillance and water improves human health. In addition,
and reporting systems at all levels to prevent cultural ecosystem services, such as the provision of
and detect animal and zoonotic disease a sense-of-place, aesthetic relief or inspiration, as
emergence and control disease spread. well as enhancing social relationships and security,
can all reduce stress and improve human health.
• Understanding risk factors, including Finally, soil holds the potential for combating
socioeconomic and cultural contexts, for antimicrobial resistance and fungicide/herbicide/
disease spill over from wildlife to domestic insecticide resistance.
animals and humans, in order to prevent and
manage disease outbreaks. IV. What are the currently successful
methodologies, techniques, technologies and
• Developing capacities at all levels for better practices in place that promote soil biodiversity
coordination and information-sharing among conservation, sustainable use of its resources
institutions and stakeholders. and equitable participation in productive
landscapes? How can we upscale biodiversity-
• Reinforcing veterinary and plant health based solutions and other sustainable
infrastructure, as well as safe food and animal approaches?
production practices from farm to table.
There are many tools available for the assessment
• Increasing the capacities of the food and of soil biodiversity that can monitor and therefore
agriculture sectors to combat and minimize the promote conservation – the challenge may be to
risks of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). select the best ones for each situation among too
many options. Many different tools exist, from
• Promoting food safety at national and expensive, ‘deep’ sequencing techniques that
international levels. generate large amounts of data, to simpler, faster,
FAO also promotes Sustainable Agri-food systems more cost-effective tools such as enzyme assays
to transform and reorient agriculture towards and visual assessments for microbial biomass and
climate resilience and sustainability. FAO views ratios. Biotechnological methods that describe
biodiversity as the basis of food security and the impacts of agricultural practices on taxonomic
promotes its sustainable use for food security, and functional diversity of soil organisms are also
human well-being and development worldwide. advancing. Gene markers can also be used for
It hosts the Commission on Genetic Resources specific functions such as carbon cycling and soil
for Food and Agriculture and the International aggregation. Equally, we still need appropriate
Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food species-level bioindicators such as nematodes, soil
and Agriculture. Both aim to reach international arthropods, and earthworms in order to observe and
consensus on policies for the sustainable use and monitor how well the system is ‘operating’. We also
conservation of genetic resources for food and need to be using the appropriate methodologies,
agriculture. as well as the appropriate statistical tools for the
data, which have become easier through increased
Soil biodiversity has a direct impact on our health by collaborations, open access databases and global
boosting the nutrient content of our food, protecting repositories.
us from foodborne illness, and modulating our
immune response (FAO et al., 2020).
The adoption of agricultural systems based on networks to evolve over time through multi-level
plant diversification such as agroforestry (Sasmita selection.
et al., 2021), associated (or not) with syntropic
agriculture (Andrade, Pasini and Rubio-Scarano, • Maintain host plant continuity by planting
2020) or synecoculture (Funabashi, 2021), mycotrophic cover crops or perennial crop
mainly by small holder farmers, and crop-livestock varieties.
integrated systems, shows that biodiversity
• Add spatial or temporal diversity through crop
conservation practices have become increasingly
rotation, intercropping, or other polyculture
common around the world, including in the tropics.
practices.
However, studies measuring the conservation/
improvements of soil biodiversity in these
agricultural systems are still needed at all levels VI. What are the most effective knowledge sharing
(microbiota and fauna). and capacity building approaches to raise
awareness on the better use of soil biodiversity
V. What kind of actions should be taken to into agricultural practices?
prevent and control the introduction of non-
indigenous plants, animals, microorganisms, The successful use of scientific knowledge by
genes and diseases that could negatively impact farmers relies on transforming scientific findings
the different components of soil biodiversity? into easy to understand information and readily
available tools. Open access to information and
Soil biodiversity is part of an integrated living global data repositories, alongside accessible
system driven by mutualisms and complex food education programs are also important components
webs, in which humans also participate. A healthy of knowledge sharing, and together may provide
soil is a dynamic system with a diverse and complex new opportunities for employment to people who
assemblage of soil organisms whose interactions span boundaries between science and policy,
determine functional capacity. The integrity of soil science and education, and science and industry.
biodiversity in all of its many facets, and not only Citizen science initiatives have also proven
some components of it, must be preserved. successful in transferring scientific research results
to stakeholders, such as policy makers, farmers and
The following preventive activities are key to
the general population.
promoting soil health:
• Promote on-farm use of beneficial soil VII. What are the methodologies, techniques,
microorganisms for biological control of technologies and practices in place to monitor
pests and diseases and enhancement of plant antimicrobial residues in soil and their impact
nutrition. on biodiversity and antimicrobial resistance?
• Monitor traditional and artisanal methods for

Soil pollution and antimicrobial resistance
sourcing of indigenous microorganisms by
constitute a serious threat to belowground
smallholder farmers and evaluate efficiency of
biodiversity. Its loss or modification negatively
their use.
impacts above-ground biodiversity and human
• Avoid monocultures and promote crop wellbeing as soil contaminants and antimicrobial
rotations, green manure, cover cropping, resistance bacteria can enter the food-web.
manure and compost application,
The soil is the recipient of a spectrum of antimicrobial
agrobiodiversity, syntropic agriculture, etc.
residues and antimicrobial resistance genes and
• Promote the use of biofertilisers. bacteria that we release in the environment. Some
soil-dwelling heterotrophic bacteria use antibiotics
• To reduce fertiliser inputs, develop as a carbon source (Dantas et al., 2008), implying
mycotrophic crop varieties that substitute that their activity might decrease the antibiotic
fertiliser supplementation for symbiotic residue concentrations in soil environments.
nutrient uptake. The effects of antibiotic resistance genes and
bacteria on soil biodiversity have been investigated
• Reduce tillage to maintain the fine-scale (Martinez 2009; van Goethem et al., 2018) and
spatial structure necessary for intact hyphal
Outcome document 17
several studies have emphasized the importance While soil biodiversity is essential to ecosystem
of antibiotic resistance genes for bacterial functions and services, it remains a largely
ecophysiology at the ecosystem level. In addition unexplored area and understanding it is key to
to promising discoveries of new antibiotics from providing for our future health, wellbeing and food
highly diverse soil microbial communities, soil security as well as that of our planet.
biodiversity holds other potentialities for medical
practice. For example, the biodiversity of soil
viruses offers the promise of bacteriophage therapy
for alternative treatment of bacterial infections in
humans and plants.
©Andy Murray

Theme 3. Soil biodiversity and participatory work with farmers and relevant
stakeholders to define indicators and testing areas
shaping the future of food in order to formulate policies.
systems Emerging policies and development of new
regulations on soil protection at all levels are an
Theme 3 aimed to discuss legislation, policies, opportunity to introduce soil biodiversity indicators
international frameworks and financial (see item V of Theme I), as long as they are tested
mechanisms for mainstreaming soil biodiversity and validated.
across government and society, reducing the
direct pressures, promoting sustainable use and A widespread adoption of biodiversity-friendly soil
improving the status of soil biodiversity through management practices (see item V of Theme 2),
safeguarding ecosystems, genetic diversity and the such as the application of biofertilisers, will only
functions and services provided by them. be achievable through standardisation and quality
control, in order to minimise the risk of misuse that
Core questions would lead to negative counteracting effects for the
users.
I. What are the contributions of soil biodiversity The One Health Approach should always be adopted
to implement policies addressing sustainability as the basic frame for any policy development
challenges including the SDGs? fostering soil biodiversity.
Soil biodiversity is critical for soil functioning and

food production but has been largely ignored in III. What are the economic incentives, subsidies
global, regional and national policies including and financial mechanisms that could support
those that address land management, food soil biodiversity and sustainable production?
security, climate change, biodiversity conservation Can they be realigned, and how?
and land degradation. This is very much down
to the differences between belowground and At present there are few regions that receive financial
aboveground biodiversity, with policies aimed at incentives to support adoption of sustainable soil
aboveground biodiversity failing to ensure the management including soil biodiversity. Some
protection of soil biodiversity. Therefore, policies examples include the provision of partial subsidies
and legal frameworks are urgently needed that for Indian farmers to buy biofertilisers, coupled
specifically value and protect soil biodiversity. with state-supported biofertiliser quality control.
The management of soil biota provides common But a methodology for the economic valuation
ground for achieving the SDGs, and could form of soil biodiversity is still missing, despite the
the basis for the conservation of many endangered enormous complexity of the soil ecosystem and the
plants and animals. This aspect could and should incomplete or lack of knowledge around many of
be considered or highlighted in future biodiversity the ecosystem services it provides.
policies and initiatives.
The development of such mechanisms will be
strengthened as long as research on site-specific
II. How can we bring soil biodiversity concerns soil biodiversity indicators advances. They will be
into agricultural sectors and cross-sectoral more effective when included in the One Health
mainstreaming approaches (such as land Approach.
tenure, landscape management, ecosystem
rehabilitation, food security and nutrition,
small holders and family farmers, public health
and forestry)?
Particular actions that have proved to be effective for

mainstreaming soil biodiversity are the promotion
of urban and peri-urban agriculture, demonstration
plots and monitoring networks in agricultural areas
Outcome document 19
From GSOBI21 to starting to use soil biodiversity in different areas
such as agriculture, food safety, bioremediation,
mainstreaming soil climate change, pest and disease control and human
health. Some regions, like the European Union,
biodiversity in all have set up action plans for sustainable production,
sectors: discussion, consumption and growth in order to become the

first climate-neutral region in the world by 2050;
conclusions and healthy soils and soil biodiversity are important
components of the European Green Deal. In
recommendations addition, some national institutions, research
centres, networks, universities and schools
are starting to include soil biodiversity in their
Discussion summary programmes. Some of them are also conducting
research on technological innovations as well
We define soil biodiversity as the variety of life as on traditional and agroecological approaches
belowground, from genes and species to the related to soil biodiversity use and conservation
communities they form, as well as the ecological (e.g. research, practical application, assessment,
complexes to which they contribute and to indicators and monitoring).
which they belong, from soil micro-habitats to
landscapes. Soil biodiversity is essential for most
of the ecosystem services provided by soils, which The State of Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity
benefit soil species and its multiple interactions Report (FAO et al., 2020) and other knowledge
(biotic and abiotic) in the environment. Soil products developed by initiatives such as the GSBI
biodiversity also supports most surface life forms and Soil BON, highlight that knowledge of soil
through the increasingly well understood links biodiversity is growing due to recent technological
between above and belowground. For humans, advances and awareness of its value. But despite the
the services provided by soil biodiversity have substantial progress in current knowledge about
strong social, economic, health and environmental the global distribution of soil biodiversity and its
implications (FAO et al., 2020). The important role functions (Crowther et al., 2019; van den Hoogen
that soil biodiversity plays in ecosystem functioning et al., 2019), about new taxa, novel technologies,
and the resulted services can be threatened by powerful environmental remediation tools,
unsustainable human activities, climate change as approaches (syntropic farming, synecoculture,
well as human-induced natural disasters. etc.), artificial intelligence and molecular tools,
only around 1 percent of soil organisms have so far
been identified and soil biodiversity loss remains
Despite the clear importance of soil biodiversity one of the main global threats in many regions of
in the provision of essential ecosystem services for the world (FAO, 2015).
human well-being, its proper use and management
is yet to be fully realised. It is only just over a decade
ago that initiatives and research networks were Nature-based solutions offer the best route to
established to contribute to the know-how for the achieve human well-being, tackle climate change and
conservation, use and sustainable management of protect our living planet. Yet, nature is in crisis. We
soil biodiversity. These include the establishment are losing species at a rate a thousand times greater
of the International Initiative for the Conservation than at any other time in recorded human history
and Sustainable Use of Soil Biodiversity in 2002, and one million species face extinction (Dasgupta,
the establishment of the Global Soil Biodiversity 2021). We must take advantage of this momentum
Initiative in 2011 and the Global Soil Partnership and the great interest and concern that exists about
in 2012, together with the publications of the soil biodiversity loss, to implement sound policies
Global Soil Biodiversity Atlas in 2016, and the and actions for the conservation, management and
State of Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity in 2020.
sustainable use of soil biodiversity.
Since then, soil biodiversity has started to emerge
as an alternative solution to global challenges and
not only as an academic field. Some countries are
Conclusions • Novel technologies (metagenomic,
metabolomics, transcriptomic and volatilomic),
providing useful information on microbial
functions in addition to taxonomic diversity.
The GSOBI21 brought together participants
from the organizing institutions, FAO Members, • Artificial intelligence for the assembly of
academia, the private sector, civil society and data and the aggregation of information from
farmers, as well as scientists and land users working multiple databases.
on soil biodiversity and related fields. Their
common goal was to contribute to the know-how on • Discovery of new taxa.
assessing, measuring, monitoring, and sustainably • New approaches towards reduction of
managing soil biodiversity at all levels. Over 5 000 agrochemical inputs and sustainable
participants from more than 160 countries attended soil management (syntropic farming,
the GSOBI21, reflecting the great interest in the synecoculture, etc.).
subject.
• Integral use of organisms such as microbes
Scientists from around the globe were active in (bioaugmentation), plants (phytoremediation)
presenting the results of studies describing the and earthworms (vermiremediation) as
current state of soil biodiversity, the gaps for powerful environmental remediation tools, and
its sustainable use and management, and the
risks posed to food production, human health, • Overall awareness on the value of ecosystem
sustaining biodiversity aboveground, climate services provided by soils and soil biodiversity.
change mitigation and environmental remediation.
They analysed and discussed the limitations and However, and despite these advances, soil
opportunities in promoting the sustainable use of biodiversity still needs to:
soil biodiversity, and the use of novel technologies
• Be recognized by all the Sustainable
in an applied and research way. National, regional
Development Agendas including the Global
and global initiatives/networks presented their
Biodiversity Framework post-2020 (with clear
actions to support the sustainable management and
targets and indicators).
monitoring of soil biodiversity.
• Be strengthened in targeted research and its
Experts at the symposium recognised that there is
implementation in all sectors be reinforced.
convincing scientific evidence that the loss of soil
biodiversity and its habitats poses a global threat to • Be prioritized in knowledge development
food security and food safety, nutrition and human actions (most biota remains unknown and un-
health, biological control of pests and diseases named).
(more than ever during the global pandemic),
climate change mitigation/adaptation, nature- • Be better monitored (lack of data/information,
based solutions, (re-)emergence of zoonotic standard protocols, geographical balance, soil
diseases and life on earth. information systems).
Furthermore, experts at the symposium recognized • Be better analysed (enhance capacity

that there had been notable progress in soil development in new methods, tools and
biodiversity in: strength fields like taxonomy), and
• National/regional/global initiatives and • Be sustainably used and managed: incentives

networks. or payments for ecosystem services provided
by soils should be established; ecosystem
• Greater computing power. restoration should include soil biodiversity/
soil health as its basis; bioremediation
• Machine learning approaches.
should be scaled-up to address soil pollution;
• Molecular tools to describe unknown investment in research on soil-borne diseases
biodiversity (eDNA, PLFAs, tRFLP, etc.). and scaling-up of soil biodiversity responses
in the agricultural sector and climate change
mitigation/adaptation, soil health (including
Outcome document 21
biological indicators) should be mainstreamed An open call for experts on soil biodiversity and
into the One Health Approach, agri-food other interested stakeholders will be made to
systems, microbiome, and AMR. join the network and its different working groups
in relation to the four themes (i.e. monitoring,
After GSOBI21, the FAO’s Global Soil Partnership management, economics, and policies).
is committed to facilitate the execution of
the implementation Plan of the International
Initiative for the Conservation and Sustainable
Use of Soil Biodiversity and the implementation Theme 1: Measuring,
of this Outcome document “Keep soil alive,
protect soil biodiversity”. Key activities in the assessing and monitoring
implementation of this Outcome document will soil biodiversity
be the establishment of the Technical Network
on Soil Biodiversity (NETSOB) and its four Recommendation 1: Establishment of the
working areas; the establishment of the Global Global Soil Biodiversity Observatory
Soil Biodiversity Observatory (GLOSBO); the
establishment of expert working groups to develop The main objective of the Global Soil Biodiversity
guidelines, booklets, field manuals and action Observatory (GLOSBO) will be to strengthen
plans, to contribute to the know-how on assessing, knowledge in all soil biodiversity groups (microbes,
measuring, monitoring, and sustainably managing micro, meso, macro and megafauna). The GLOSBO
soil biodiversity at all levels. areas of work should include/strengthen: taxonomy,
novel technologies for species identification and
Countries, national focal points, and quantification, standard operating procedures
especially decision-makers are encouraged (SOPs), soil biodiversity mapping, soil health
to use this outcome document and move into indicators, bioremediation, restoration of degraded
implementation of the recommendations at all soils, and soil microbiome.
levels.
Recommendation 2: Development of guidelines
Recommendations for measuring, assessing and monitoring
(MAM) soil biodiversity
Main recommendation: Execute the
Implementation Plan of the International The main objective of the MAM soil biodiversity
Initiative for the Conservation and Sustainable guidelines will be to provide the latest knowledge on
Use of Soil Biodiversity and the implementation how to measure, assess and monitor soil biodiversity
of this Outcome document “Keep soil alive, data/information in a harmonized approach. The
protect soil biodiversity” guidelines should include ad hoc standard field
and laboratory protocols for measuring biological
Under the umbrella of the International Initiative activity and biological diversity (including novel
for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Soil technologies), ad hoc standard protocols for
Biodiversity (from the CBD), a Technical Network mapping soil biodiversity at farm and national scale
on Soil Biodiversity (NETSOB) will be established (with an emphasis on hot spots and not studied
as part of the GSP technical networks. The main areas) and ad hoc standard protocols to analyse soil
objective of the NETSOB will be to strengthen the biodiversity data/information.
data, knowledge, and capacities for supporting the
conservation and sustainable use of soil biodiversity. Recommendation 3: Development and
The network will address four main themes: Theme implementation of a capacity-building
1 on measurement, assessment and monitoring of programme on soil biodiversity including
soil biodiversity; Theme 2 on sustainable use/ national assessments, monitoring, good
management and conservation of soil biodiversity; management practices and restoration
Theme 3 on the economics of soil biodiversity; and
Theme 4 on policies and legal instruments related This applies to all UN members in need of such
to soil biodiversity. capacity. Priority should be given to countries
lacking national information on soil biodiversity
and using global datasets with focus on areas where
data is missing.

Theme 2: Sustainable Theme 3: Economics of soil
use/management and biodiversity
conservation of soil
Recommendation 6: Development of the
biodiversity methodology for the economic valuation of soil
Recommendation 4: Development of a field biodiversity
manual on soil biodiversity management that The main objective of the methodology is to
addresses soil biodiversity loss/conservation provide indicators for the economic valuation of the
The main objective of the field manual on soil ecosystem services provided by soil biodiversity.
biodiversity management will be to strengthen the The economic valuation will be addressed to
knowledge on how to manage/use soil biodiversity policymakers, project developers, environmental
in a sustainable way. The field manual will be economists and researchers. The methodology
addressed to farmers and project developers and should built on the results of a global questionnaire
should contain the best available sustainable soil on the state of the art of economic valuations of
management (SSM) practices to manage/conserve ecosystem services and economic valuation of the
soil biodiversity, including “science-based case ecosystem services provided by soil biodiversity,
studies”. This field manual should be the basis for and of the negative externalities produced by the
the capacity-building programme mentioned in agricultural sector.
recommendation 3.
Recommendation 5: Development of a
technical booklet about the main soil-borne
Theme 4: Policies and
diseases legal instruments of soil
The main objective of the technical booklet will be biodiversity
to identify the main soil-borne diseases and how to
prevent and combat them. The technical booklet Recommendation 7: Performance of an
will be addressed to farmers and project developers assessment of effective policies and legal
and should contain the main soil-borne diseases per instruments to control soil biodiversity loss
region, including case-studies.
The main objective of this recommendation will be
to assess policies and legal instruments to control
soil biodiversity loss at national, regional and
global levels and identify best practices to scale up
and replicate successful examples. The assessment
should initiate with a global stocktaking exercise on
the state of the art of policies and legal instruments
to control soil biodiversity loss, to analyse major
gaps in the development/implementation of
policies regarding the control of soil biodiversity
loss at global, regional and national levels and to
feed the SoiLEX database.
Outcome document 23
©Andy Murray
References de Vries, F.T., Thébault, E., Liiri, M., Birkhofer,
K., Tsiafouli, M.A., Bjørnlund, L., Bracht,
H., et al. 2013. Soil food web properties explain
ecosystem services across European land use
Andrade, D., Pasini, Felipe., & Rubio-Scarano, systems. In: Proceedings of the National Academy
F. 2020. Syntropy and innovation in agriculture. of Sciences, 110: 14296–14301.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,
45: 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Djukic, I., Kepfer-Rojas, S., Kappel Schmidt,
cosust.2020.08.003 I., Steenberg Larsen, K., Beier, C., Berg, B.,
Verheyen, K., et al. 2021. The Tea Composition
Beone, G.M., Cenci, R.M., Guidotti, L., Sena, initiative: Unleashing the power of international
F., & Umlauf, G. 2015. Indagine conoscitiva della collaboration to understand litter decomposition.
qualità e dello stato di salute dei suoli lombardi Soil Organisms, 93 (1): 73-78.
(Progetto Soil). JRC Technical Reports. ISBN:
978-92-79-47101-8. Eisenhauer, N., Bonn, A., & Guerra, C.A. 2019.
Recognizing the quiet extinction of invertebrates.
Bhusal, D.R., Tsiafouli, M.A., & Sgardelis, Nature Communications, 10:50. https://doi.
S.P. 2015. Temperature-based bioclimatic org/10.1038/s41467-018-07916-1
parameters can predict nematode metabolic
footprints. Oecologia, 179: 187-199. https:/ doi. FAO, ITPS, GSBI, CBD & EC. 2020. State of
org//10.1007/ s00442-015-3316-4. knowledge of soil biodiversity - Status, challenges
and potentialities, Report 2020. Rome, FAO.
Bellemain, E., Bonin, A., Pierron, M., & https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1928en
Baptist, F. 2021. Using environmental DNA
to assess global soil biodiversity and build a soil Francke-Campaña, S. 2021. Re-carbonization
quality bioindicator. In: FAO. 2021. Proceedings of soils with intensive agricultural use with the
of the Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity presence of pine forests and provision of fungal
2021. Rome (in press). ecosystem services (suilus luteus and suilus
granulatus). Chilean experiences. In: FAO. 2021.
Christmann, S. & Lhomme, P. 2021. Regard Proceedings of the Global Symposium on Soil
and protect ground-nesting bees as part of soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).
biodiversity. In: FAO. 2021. Proceedings of the
Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity 2021. Franks, J.R. 2014. Sustainable intensification: A
Rome (in press). UK perspective. Food Policy, 47:71-80. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.04.007
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D.,
Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N., & Leip, Funabashi, M. 2021 Kinetic Diversity Indices
A. 2021 Food systems are responsible for a third for the Characterization of Topsoil Formation in
of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Natural and Augmented Ecosystems. In: FAO.
Food. 2:198–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/ 2021. Proceedings of the Global Symposium on
s43016-021-00225-9 Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).
Crowther, T.W., Van Den Hoogen, J., Wan, J., Gardi, C., Jeffery, S., & Saltelli, A. 2013. An
Mayes, M.A., Keiser, A.D., Mo, L., Maynard, estimate of potential threats levels to soil biodiversity
D.S., et al. 2019. The global soil community in EU. Global Change Biology, 19: 1538–1548.
and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12159.
365(6455): eaav0550.
Cassman, K.G., & Grassini, P. 2020. A global
Dantas, G., Sommer, M.O., Oluwasegun, R.D., perspective on sustainable intensification research.
& Church, G.M. 2008. Bacteria subsisting on Nature Sustainability, 3:262-268. https://doi.
antibiotics. Science, 320(5872): 100-103. org/10.1038/s41893-020-0507-8
Dasgupta, P. 2021. The Economics of Biodiversity:

The Dasgupta Review. (London: HM Treasury).

Grêt-Regamey, A., Sirén, E., Brunner, S.H., & Ledezma, S., Rodriguez-Fernández, J. I., Orsag,
Weibel, B. 2017. Review of decision support tools V., & Nina-Peña, P.T. 2021. First evaluation in
to operationalize the ecosystem services concept. South America of the “Soil Biological Quality Index
Ecosystem Services, 26: 306–315. QBS-ar”: a pilot study in the Bolivian Amazon. In:
FAO. 2021. Proceedings of the Global Symposium
Guerra, C. A., Heintz-Buschart, A., Sikorski, J., on Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).
Chatzinotas, A., Guerrero-Ramírez, N., Cesarz,
S., Beaumelle, L. et al. 2020. Blind spots in global Lwanga, E.H., Beirot, N., Bin, Z., Zornoza,
soil biodiversity and ecosystem function research. R., Pinzari, F., Orru, L., Ros, M., Özbolat, O.,
Nature Communications, 11:3870. https://doi. Sevilla, E.L., Ortega, R., Miralles, I., Riksen,
org/10.1038/s41467-020-17688-2 M., Gertsen, H., Peters, P., Ritsema, C., &
Geissen, V. 2021. Earthworms and microbial
Guerra, C.A., Bardgett, R.D., Caon, L., diversity under conventional and organic farms.
Crowther, T.W., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Interaction with actual and inherited pesticides. In:
Montanarella, L., Navarro, L.M., et al. FAO. 2021. Proceedings of the Global Symposium
2021. Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil on Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).
biodiversity. Science, 371 (6526): 239-241.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd7926. Martinez, J.L. 2009. Environmental pollution
by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance
Hallam, J., Holden, J., Robinson, D.A., Mrabet, determinants. Environmental Pollution, 157(11):
R., & Hodson, M.E. 2021. Soil biodiversity and 2893-2902.
physico-hydraulic function: How earthworm and
plant root interaction contribute to ecosystem Mendes, I.C., Souza, L.M., Sousa, D.M.G.,
services? In: FAO. 2021. Proceedings of the Global Lopes, A.A.C., Reis Junior, F.B., Lacerda,
Symposium on Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in M.P.C., & Malaquias, J.V. 2019. Critical limits
press). for microbial indicators in tropical Oxisols at
post-harvest: The FERTBIO soil sample concept.
Hanegraaf, M., van den Elsen, E., de Haan, J., Applied Soil Ecology, 139, 85-93. https://doi.
& Visser, S. 2019. Bodemkwaliteitsbeoordeling org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.02.025
van landbouwgronden in Nederland - indicatorset
en systematiek, versie 1.0. Rapport WPR, (795). Mendes, I.C., Sousa, D.M.G., Chaer, G.M.,
https://doi.org/10.18174/498307 Junior, F.B.R., Lopes, A.A.C., Dantas, O.D., &
de Souza, L.M. 2021a. Soil bioanalysis: a simple
Houšková, B., Bušo, R., & Makovníková, and effective tool to access and interpret soil
J. 2021. Good agricultural practices help to health. In: FAO. 2021. Proceedings of the Global
restore sustainable biodiversity. In: FAO. 2021. Symposium on Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in
Proceedings of the Global Symposium on Soil press).
Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).
Mendes, I.C., Sousa, D.M.G., Dantas, O.D.,
Kaiser, K., Wemheuer, B., Korolkow, V., Lopes, A.A.C., Junior, F.B.R., Oliveira, M.I.,
Wemheuer, F., Nacke, H., Schöning, I., Daniel, & Chaer, G.M. 2021b. Soil quality and grain yield:
R., et al. 2016. Driving forces of soil bacterial A win–win combination in clayey tropical oxisols.
community structure, diversity, and function in Geoderma, 388, 114880.
temperate grasslands and forests. Scientific Reports,
6: 33696. Menta, C., Conti, F., Pinto, S., & Bodini, A. 2018.
Soil Biological Quality index (QBS-ar): 15 years of
Landínez-Torres, A.Y., Solveig, T.S., & Nicola, application at global scale. Ecological Indicators,
L. 2021. The biodiversity of soil microfungi in 85: 773-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Colombia. In: FAO. 2021. Proceedings of the ecolind.2017.11.030
Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity 2021.
Rome (in press).
Outcome document 27
Niva, C.C., Marchão, R.L., Pulrolnik, K., Pompili, L., Mellina, A. S., Benedetti, A., &
Alexandre, D., Malaquias, J.V., Alcantara, Bloem, J. 2006. Microbial indicators for assessing
D.R.F de O., Bezerra Guedes, A.E.C., Durães, biological fertility status of soils. In: R. M. Cenci, &
N., & Schmelz, R.M. 2021. Enchytraeids in two F. Sena eds., Biodiversity bioindication to evaluate
phytophysiognomies of Brazilian Cerrado. In: soil health, pp. 46-54. Scientific and Technical
FAO. 2021. Proceedings of the Global Symposium Research Series No. EUR 22245. Ispra, Italy.
on Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).
Renzi, G., Canfora, L., Salvati, L., & Benedetti,
Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, A. 2017. Validation of the soil Biological Fertility
E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G. V. N., Index (BFI) using a multidimensional statistical
Underwood, E.C., D’amico, J.A., et al. 2001. approach: A country-scale exercise. CATENA,
Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map 149: 294-299.
of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial
ecoregions provides an innovative tool for Rutgers, M., van Leeuwen, J.P., Vrebos, D., van
conserving biodiversity. BioScience. 51 (11). Wijnen, H.J., Schouten, T. & de Goede, R.G.M.
2019. Mapping Soil Biodiversity in Europe and the
Orgiazzi, A., Bardgett, R.D., Barrios, E., Behan- Netherlands. Soil Systems, 3: 39.
Pelletier, V., Briones, M.J.I., Chotte, J.L., De
Deyn, G.B., et al. 2016. Global Soil Biodiversity Sasmita, N., Komara, L. L., HardyPurba, J.
Atlas. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the & Yuniti, I. 2021. Soil Macrofauna Biodiversity
European Union. 176 pp. in Paraserianthes falcataria and Morus alba Plant
Agroforestry in Bali Island. In: FAO. 2021.
Orgiazzi, A. & Panagos, P. 2018. Soil biodiversity Proceedings of the Global Symposium on Soil
and soil erosion: It is time to get married. Global Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).
Ecology and Biogeography, 27: 1155– 1167.
Sharma, D., & Joshi, J. 2021. Participatory
Ortega, R., Soria, R., Rodriguez-Berbel, N., Learning Action is Important for Community
Sánchez, B., Comeau, A.M., Özbolat, O., Action to improve soil-biodiversity. In: FAO.
Zornoza, R., & Miralles, I. 2021. Intercrop 2021. Proceedings of the Global Symposium on
management as a tool to increase soil fungal Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).
diversity on rainfed almond cultivations. In: FAO.
2021. Proceedings of the Global Symposium on Soliveres, S., van der Plas, F., Manning, P.,
Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press). Prati, D., Gossner, M.M., Renner, S.C., Alt, F.,
et al. 2016. Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels
Paula, F.S., Rodrigues, J.L., Zhou, J., Wu, L., is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature,
Mueller, R.C., Mirza, B.S., Pellizari, V.H., et 536: 456–459 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/
al. 2014. Land use change alters functional gene nature19092
diversity, composition and abundance in Amazon
forest soil microbial communities. Molecular Sofo, A., & Ricciuti, P. 2021. Litter
ecology, 23(12): 2988-2999. decomposition and organic matter turnover by
soil fauna in a sustainably managed olive grove. In:
Phillips, H.R.P., Guerra, C.A., Bartz, M.L.C., FAO. 2021. Proceedings of the Global Symposium
Briones, M.J.I., Brown, G., Ferlian, O., on Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).
Gongalsky, K.B., et al. 2019. Global distribution
of earthworm diversity. Science, 366(6464): 480- Stone, D., Ritz, K., Griffiths, B.G., Orgiazzi,
485. https://doi.org/10.1101/587394 A. & Creamer, R.E. 2016. Selection of
biological indicators appropriate for European
Pocaterra, F., & Ragazzi, F. 2021. Monitoring soil monitoring. Applied Soil Ecology, 97: 12-22.
Soil Biological Quality in the Veneto region. In: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.005.
on Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press). Syamsudin, T.S., Kowara, L. L., & Choesin,
D. N. 2021. Soil Protozoa diversity at coal post-
mining area at different age of reclamation. In:
on Soil Biodiversity 2021. Rome (in press).

Thakur, M.P., Phillips, H.R.P., Brose, U., de Van Goethem, M.W., Pierneef, R., Bezuidt,
Vries, F., Lavelle, P., Loreau, M., & Mathieu, J. O.K., Van De Peer, Y., Cowan, D.A. &
2019. Toward an integrative understanding of soil Makhalanyane, T.P. 2018. A reservoir of
biodiversity. Biological Reviews, 95(2): 350-364. ‘historical’ antibiotic resistance genes in remote
pristine Antarctic soils. Microbiome, 6(1): 40-52.
Thakur, M.P., Reich, P.B., Hobbie, S.E.,
Stefanski, A., Rich, R., Rice, K.E., Eisenhauer, Veresoglou, S.D., Halley, J.M. & Rillig,
N., et al. 2018. Reduced feeding activity of soil M.C. 2015. Extinction risk of soil biota. Nature
detritivores under warmer and drier conditions. Communications, 6: 8862.
Nature Climate Change, 8(1): 75.
Wagg, C., Bender, S.F., Widmer, F. & van der
Trivedi, P., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Heijden, M.G.A. 2014. Soil biodiversity and soil
Anderson, I.C. & Singh, B.K. 2016. Response community composition determine ecosystem
of soil properties and microbial communities to multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National
agriculture: implications for primary productivity Academy of Sciences, 111(14): 5266-5270.
and soil health indicators. Frontiers in Plant Science,
7: 990. Zabel, F., Delzeit, R., Schneider, J. M.,
Seppelt, R., Mauser, W., & Václavík, T. 2019.
UNCCD. 2019. A Manual for Gender-Responsive Global impacts of future cropland expansion
Land Degradation Neutrality Transformative and intensification on agricultural markets and
Projects and Programmes. UN Women. biodiversity. Nature Communications, 10: 2844.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10775-z
van den Hoogen, J., Geisen, S., Routh, D.,
Ferris, H., Traunspurger, W., Wardle, D.A.,
de Goede, R.G.M., et al. 2019. Soil nematode
abundance and functional group composition at a
global scale. Nature, 572: 194–198. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41586-019-1418-6
©Andy Murray
Outcome document 29
©FAO/Matteo Sala
GLOBAL SYMPOSIUM
ON SOIL BIODIVERSITY
19-22 April 2021
The Global Soil Partnership (GSP) is a globally recognized mechanism established in 2012. Our mission is to
position soils in the Global Agenda through collective action. Our key objectives are to promote Sustainable
Soil Management (SSM) and improve soil governance to guarantee healthy and productive soils, and support
the provision of essential ecosystem services towards food security and improved nutrition, climate change
adaptation and mitigation, and sustainable development.
Thanks to the financial support of

CB6005EN/1/08.21
©FAO, 2021
Ministry of Economic Affairs of the

Netherlands
Ministry of Finance of the
Russian Federation

Keep Soil Alive, Protect Soil Biodiversity: Outcome Document

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Keep Soil Alive, Protect Soil Biodiversity: Outcome Document

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Keep Soil Alive, Protect Soil Biodiversity: Outcome Document

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Outcome

Keep soil alive,

biodiversity 19-22 April 2021

biodiversity 19-22 April 2021

An event co-organized by:

FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Cover: ©Andy Murray

Scientific and organizing committees V

Background of the global symposium on soil biodiversity  4

Symposium themes, core questions and discussion summary 6

Theme 1. State of knowledge on soil biodiversity  7

Theme 2. Soil biodiversity in action  13

Theme 3. Soil biodiversity shaping the future of food systems 19

Theme 1: Measuring, assessing and monitoring soil biodiversity 22

Theme 2: Sustainable use/management and conservation of soil biodiversity 23

Theme 3: Economics of soil biodiversity 23

Theme 4: Policies and legal instruments of soil biodiversity 23

AMR | Antimicrobial resistance

CBD | Convention on Biological Diversity

COP | Conference of Parties

FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

GSBI | Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative

GSOBI21 | Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity 2021

GSP | Global Soil Partnership

ITPS | Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils

SDGs | Sustainable Development Goals

SOC | Soil organic carbon

SOM |Soil organic matter

SSM | Sustainable Soil Management

UNCCD-SPI | Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification

UNCCD| United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification

UNFCCC | United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

VGSSM | Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management

WSD | World Soil Day

Mr Mohammad Jamal Khan Ms Caridad Canales

Ms Maria Konyushkova Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative

• Food and Agriculture Organization of the

• Global Soil Partnership (GSP) and its

• Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)

• Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative (GSBI)

• Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations

The Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity was

The overall aim of the symposium was to gather

Participants engaged actively by presenting the

It was made clear that, going forward, there would

• Strengthen and/or establish national soil

• Provide a set of indicators to measure/monitor

• Invest in research on soil-borne diseases

• Recognize soil biodiversity in the Sustainable

• Promote targeted research on soil biodiversity

The recommendations presented in this document

2 Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity

Private sector | 12%

III. The strengthening of collaboration among

In this context, the Symposium outcome will

The main objectives of the symposium were to

I. Examine the current scientific, technical,

indigenous and traditional knowledge on the

Scientific and organizing committees V

Background of the global symposium on soil biodiversity 4

Symposium themes, core questions and discussion summary 6

Theme 1. State of knowledge on soil biodiversity 7

Theme 2. Soil biodiversity in action 13

Theme 3. Soil biodiversity shaping the future of food systems 19

Theme 1: Measuring, assessing and monitoring soil biodiversity 22

Theme 2: Sustainable use/management and conservation of soil biodiversity 23

Theme 3: Economics of soil biodiversity 23

Theme 4: Policies and legal instruments of soil biodiversity 23