The Perils of Indifference Analysis

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that indifference can make problems worse, and that people must fight against indifference in order to maintain their humanity.

Wiesel uses logos, pathos, ethos, parallel structure, anaphora, and asyndeton to appeal to logic, emotion, and emphasize his message that indifference is harmful.

Wiesel builds his credibility by sharing his first-hand experiences as a Holocaust survivor and by respecting others even if he disagrees with them.

Begley 1

Leah Begley

Mrs. Gonet

Sinclair Comp 1101

20 April 2021

The Grim Reality of Disdain

When one does not actively try to change something, it means that they agree with a

situation, while when one does try to change something, it means that they disagree with the

situation. The separation comes when a person sees something which creates destruction for

someone else and refuses to acknowledge the presence of said problem. On April 12, 1999, a

Holocaust surviver gave a speech in the Millennium Lecture series to explain how this problem

has directly affected his life. In Elie Wiesel’s speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” he uses logos,

pathos, ethos, as well as several other rhetorical devices to effectively explain how an indifferent

person can make a problem worse rather than correct it.

Wiesel uses logos while he addresses the American people. While speaking about

treacherous times in history, he mentions the assassinations of “Gandhi, the Kennedys, Martin

Luther King, Sudat, [and] Rabin,” (par. 5). He makes these allusions primarily to pull the

listeners in to hear the horrors that happened in our history. This list also uses ethos because it

refers to major authority figures in our history. It shows that things continue to happen as long as

no one puts a stop to them. Later, while speaking about indifference, he states that

“etymologically, the word means “no difference,”” (par. 6). This literal, direct statement of

information challenges the rest of the speech, as it appeals more to fact instead of emotion like

the majority of the address. It makes the listener understand that he wants them to realize that
Begley 2

indifference does not evoke a response out of people. While he uses logos many times, he

appeals to the emotions of his listeners far more.

Elie Weisel uses pathos, an appeal to emotion, to further institute the idea that

indifference can tear down a society. He says that when someone acts indifferent to someone

else’s problems, “their lives [become] meaningless,” (par. 8). The negative connotation of

“meaningless” saddens the listener because no one wants to feel insignificant. This enforces his

idea that indifference can create bigger problems through making the listener identify with the

person feeling made worthless. Later, he talks about the “depressing tale of the St. Louis,” (par.

19). His choice of wording this tragedy shows the listener how he feels about it, evoking that

same feeling in them. This catastrophe shows the audience the horrors of what happens when one

acts indifferent to a situation. After logos and pathos comes ethos.

Elie Weisel has an abundance of ethos as an orator and as a person. As he describes in

this speech, the indifferent people around during the time of the Holocaust contributed to his

suffering as a boy. He explains the horrors he saw first hand and builds his credibility through

referencing his past experiences. He knows the detrimental effects of indifference because he

witnessed them firsthand as a victim of it himself. He builds the trust of his listeners through

referring to his peers and authorities as equals and respecting people even though they did things

he does not agree with. His audience of Americans, hopeful for the future, listens as he explains

the downfalls of indifference.

Even more rhetorical devices include parallel structure, anaphora, and asyndeton. He says

that “So much violence, so much indifference,” while talking about the genocide at Auschuwitz

(par. 6). This repetition of grammatical form increases the likelihood that a listener understands

the horrors described and applies them to their life by addressing the problems they see. Later,
Begley 3

while talking about hatred, Weasel says “You fight it. You denounce it. You disarm it” (par. 11).

The use of a specific type of repetition, anaphora, helps to emphasize the idea that indifference

does not help a situation and makes his speech more memorable to his audience. Finally, as he

brings up forgotten people, he mentions “the political prisoner in his cell the hungry children, the

homeless refugees,” (par. 12). The omission of conjunctions in this sentence adds a dramatic

effect to his words and emphasizes the gravity of the situation at hand-- not recognizing the

struggles of people around the world.

These rhetorical devices and appeals influence the listener to believe and agree with what

Elie Weisel says in “The Perils of Indifference.” The use of ethos, pathos, logos, and rhetorical

devices helps to enforce his beliefs and purpose of this speech. People see the horrors of others

and look over them because the problems serve as an inconvenience and annoyance to them.

Sometimes it seems easier to ignore a problem rather than to exterminate it, but in order to keep

their humanity, a person must resist that urge.


Begley 4

Work Cited

Weisel, Elie. “The Perils of Indifference.” Millennium Lecture Series, 12 April 1999, White

House, Washington, D.C.. Keynote Address. Historyplace.com.

http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/wiesel.htm. Accessed 16 April 2021.

You might also like