TOK Essay Example A: Student Work
TOK Essay Example A: Student Work
TOK Essay Example A: Student Work
Are disputes over knowledge claims within a discipline always resolvable? Answer this
question by comparing and contrasting disciplines taken from two AOKs.
Disputes over knowledge claims within disciplines constantly arise as man constantly
pushes the boundaries of our knowledge. Disputes arise when facts within the domain are either
unexplainable or contradictions exist between propositions. Discussing whether disputes over
knowledge claims are always resolvable would shed more light on how to go about addressing
future disputes, and important factors to consider when faced with contradictory claims. In this
essay, theoretical and practical disputes will be discussed. Theoretical disputes are differing
knowledge claims, arrived at using prior theories and unsubstantiated by empirical evidence.
Practical disputes refer to contradictions between claims that are formulated from empirical
data. 'Resolvable' is the act of dismissing or reconciling conflicting claims. In this
essay, the discipline of Physics from the Natural Sciences and the discipline of
Psychology from the Human Sciences will be compared and contrasted to justify the
perspective that the resolvability of a dispute within a discipline largely depends on the
nature of the dispute.
In the area of Physics, the Cassin is claimed that the Earth was a prolate spheroid - a
sphere that is elongated at the ends. Whereas Newton deduced that the distance to the Earth's
centre was slightly greater at the equator, and therefore, theorised that the Earth was an oblate
spheroid- a sphere squashed at its poles and swollen at the equator. This dispute was eventually
resolved by the Lapland and Peru geodetic expeditions, where researchers measured the precise
1 Andersen, H., & Hepburn, 8. (2015, November 13). Scientific Method. Retrieved August 5, 2018, from
ht1ps://plato.stanford.cdu/cntrics/scientific-meU1od/#Con