See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/338400753

Perception of Vendors on Informal Lending Institutions

Article · December 2019

DOI: 10.22161/ijaems.512.8

CITATIONS READS
0 1,819

1 author:

Kim Edward Santos Santos

Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
15 PUBLICATIONS   25 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Kim Edward Santos Santos on 28 January 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-5, Issue-12, Dec-2019]
https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.512.8 ISSN: 2454-1311

Perception of Vendors on Informal Lending

Institutions
Kim Edward S. Santos
Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines
[email protected]

Abstract— Informal lending is one of the Philippines ' most common sources of funding for households. The study
described the perception of vendors towards informal lending in terms of cost, discretion, patience, humanity or
sympathy, and reliability. Survey questionnaire was used in the study. The researcher used likert-scale type
questionnaire and analyzed it through statistical data treatment such as mean and weighted mean.The findings of
the study are as follows: in terms of cost, informal lending adds investment to business; in terms of discretion,
informal lending greatly helps the business; in terms of patience, payment usually is given on the agreed date; in
terms of sympathy or humanity, apology seems to be effective in not meeting the agreed date; and in terms of
reliability, the ease of access to informal lending.
Keywords— Informal Lending, Perception, Cost, Patience, Sympathy or Humanity, Discretion, Business,
Reliability.

I. INTRODUCTION results indicate that treatment group loan borrowers reported

Informal lending is one of the Philippines ' most common lower income, an impact more pronounced in the lowest
sources of funding for households. In relation, Fuwa et al. percentile of income.
(2015) stated that formal financial institutions are largely In Philippine rice-growing towns, rice merchants and farmer
underdeveloped within developing economies and, as a borrowers dominate the informal credit market as stated by
result, informal lending serves as a significant medium for Nagarajan et al. (1995).Thus, Briones (2007) concluded that
credit access.Mansuri (2007) further stated that informal informal lending reflects that borrowing responses should be
lenders with market or capital exposure frequently find it a major concern in the implementation of finance cost
attractive to assign loan provision to downstream lenders recovery policies.
with a knowledge or compliance advantage when dealing
with individual borrowers. II. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Zapata (2006) concluded that less trained, married and/or This research will be based on the study of Catherine Cross,
large-scale households are more likely to borrow from Community Service Training Programme, University of
informal lenders. Ferrer (2017) enumerated that certain Natal entitled on “Decision factors involved from a clear
causes included diminished spouses ' ability to earn family pattern. It is mentioned that community seems to evaluate
income, poor home wealth and significant mortgage debt, potential lenders on five criteria which is cost, discretion,
inadequate ability to manage money and financial planning, patience, sympathy or humanity, and reliability.” These
and high incidence of illicit use of credit. factors will be the consideration to this study.
Dula and Grego (2017) concluded that although the This research will help lending institution especially to the
characteristic of their company is informal, the supply of vendors of Cabanatuan City to determine the proper
goods and services on the market and the local economy comprehension of informal lending and the problems to be
complements consumer activities.It is also important to encountered in solving using the factors. In this study they
understand as concluded by Floro (2017) the personal will know the advantages of borrowing in lending institution,
relationship between lenders and borrowers because it also and how it helps them.
has an influence on other markets, in addition to its effect on
the credit transaction. Further, Römer (2017) found that

www.ijaems.com Page | 659

 International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-5, Issue-12, Dec-2019]
https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.512.8 ISSN: 2454-1311

III. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY Table 2. Perception about Discretion

The study describedthe perception of vendors on informal ITEMS WM VI
lending institutions be described in terms of: cost, discretion, It's not hard to pay everyday on my
2.99 Agree
patience, sympathy or humanity, and reliability. borrowed money.
I will repay informal lending because
3.19 Agree
IV. METHODOLOGY it benefits me greatly.
The study used descriptive method as it describes I borrowed money from informal
the present condition. The main objective of the study is to Strongly
lending becauseit greatly helps my 3.33
explore the causes of particular phenomenon. It further Agree
business.
concern with the condition or relationship that exists; Informal lending helps with my
practices that prevail; and beliefs and processes that are 3.03 Agree
livelihood.
going on; effects that being felt or trends that are developing. I balance my income and expensesto Strongly
(Cohen, Manion, Morrison, 2002) 3.25
allocate payment for my debt. Agree
The researcher used likert-scale type questionnaire (Vagias, Average Weighted Mean 3.16 Agree
2006) and analyzed it through statistical data treatment such
as mean and weighted mean. Table 3 showed that in terms of Patience, the statement, “I
pay on the agreed date of payment” which has the highest
V. RESULTS weighted mean with 3.43 and interpreted as “Strongly
Table 1 showed that in terms of cost, the statement, Agree.”
“Informal lending has a great impact on my business because Table 3. Perception about Patience
it adds to my investment” has the highest weighted mean
with 3.65 and interpreted as “Strongly Agree.” ITEMS WM VI
Strongly
I pay on the agreed date of payment. 3.43
Table 1. Perception about Cost Agree
STATEMENT WM VI I always wait for the collector to arrive Strongly
3.28
Informal lending has a great impact on 3.65 Strongly on the date of payment. Agree
my business because it adds to my Agree Strongly
I pay based on our agreement terms. 3.26
investment. Agree
I have enough business income avail 3.31 Strongly I pay in advance of our agreed date of Strongly
3.36
informal lending. Agree payment. Agree
I agree with the borrower's interest 3.26 Strongly Strongly
Average Weighted Mean 3.33
ratein informal lending because it's Agree Agree
reasonable in terms of time length.
I am encouraged to borrow money in 3.46 Strongly Table 4 showed that in terms of Sympathy or Humanity, the
informal lending because of my Agree statement, “I apologize whenever I cannot pay for our agreed
emergency business needs. date of payment.” which has the highest weighted mean with
I favor that when I did not pay the 3.31 Strongly 3.36 and interpreted as “Strongly Agree.”
debtone of my assets would be taken. Agree Table 4. Perception about Sympathy or Humanity
Average Weighted Mean 3.40 Strongly ITEMS WM VI
Agree
I tell the cause of the delay of Strongly
3.33
payment to the collector. Agree
Table 2 showed that in terms of discretion,the statement, “I
The collector and I treat each
borrowed money from informallending becauseit greatly 3.17 Agree
other well.
helps my business,” which has the highest weighted mean
Every time I miss paying, I ask
with 3.33 and interpreted as “Agree.” Strongly
for consideration with the 3.35
Agree
collector.

www.ijaems.com Page | 660

International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-5, Issue-12, Dec-2019]
https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.512.8 ISSN: 2454-1311

I apologize whenever I cannot pay Strongly [5] Floro, S. L. (2019). Informal credit markets and the new
3.36 institutional economics: The case of Philippine agriculture.
for our agreed date of payment. Agree
Routledge.
Strongly
Average Weighted Mean 3.30 [6] Fuwa, N., Kajisa, K., Lucio, E., Piza, S. F., & Sawada, Y.
Agree
(2015). Hyperbolic Discounting and an Induced Informal
Credit Institution by a New Technology: A Case of Debit
Table 5 showed that in terms of Reliability, the statement, “It Card Pawning in the Philippines.
is easy to borrow money from informal lending without [7] Nagarajan, G., Meyer, R. L., &Hushak, L. J. (1995).
formal requirements” which has the highest weighted mean Segmentation in the informal credit markets: the case of the
with 3.41and interpreted as “Agreed.” Philippines. Agricultural Economics: The Journal of the
International Association of Agricultural Economists, 12(968-
Table 5. Perception about Reliability 2016-75741), 171-181.
[8] Römer, U., Weber, R., Mußhoff, O., &Turvey, C. G.
ITEMS WM VI
(2017). Truth and consequences: Bogus pipeline experiment
In times of emergency, Informal 3.34 Strongly in informal small business lending (No. 1702).
lending is very reliable. Agree Diskussionsbeitrag.
Informal lending helps the people 3.38 Strongly [9] Mansuri, G. (2007). Credit layering in informal financial
without enough credentials to loan Agree markets. Journal of Development Economics, 84(2), 715-730.
money. [10] Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors.
clemson international institute for tourism. & Research
It is easy to borrow money from 3.41 Strongly
Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism
informal lending without formal Agree
Management, Clemson University.
requirements. [11] Zapata, N. (2006). Credit decision and rationing rules: a study
In terms of business matters, informal 3.19 Agree of informal lenders in the Philippines. Philippine Management
lending is realiable. Review, 13, 117-126.
Average Weighted Mean 3.33 Agree

VI. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

Generally, the respondents were satisfied with the aim of
informal lending institution but they still need to gain more
knowledge about this institution. The findings of the study
are as follows: in terms of cost, informal lending adds
investment to business; in terms of discretion, informal
lending greatly helps the business; in terms of patience,
payment usually is given on the agreed date; in terms of
sympathy or humanity, apology seems to be effective in not
meeting the agreed date; and in terms of reliability, the ease
of access to informal lending.

REFERENCES
[1] Briones, R. (2007). Do small farmers borrow less when the
lending rate increases? The case of rice farming in the
Philippines.
[2] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research
methods in education. routledge.
[3] Dula, R. M., &Grego, M. P. (2017). Informal Loan Trap:
Bombay 5-6 and its Effect on Micro-Entrepreneurs in
Tacloban City, Philippines. IMTFI Final Report.
[4] Ferrer, J. C. (2017). Caught in a Debt Trap? An Analysis of
the Financial Well-being of Teachers in the Philippines. The
Normal Lights, 11(2).

www.ijaems.com Page | 661

View publication stats