Unit I Highway Planning and Alignment
Unit I Highway Planning and Alignment
Unit I Highway Planning and Alignment
Ancient Roads
The first mode of transport was by foot. These human pathways would have
been developed for specific purposes leading to camp sites, food, streams for drinking
water etc. The next major mode of transport was the use of animals for transporting both
men and materials. Since these loaded animals required more horizontal and
vertical clearances than the walking man, track ways emerged. The invention of wheel in
Mesopotamian civilization led to the development of animal drawn vehicles. Then it
became necessary that the road surface should be capable of carrying greater loads. Thus
roads with harder surfaces emerged. To provide adequate strength to carry the wheels, the
new ways tended to follow the sunny drier side of a path. These have led to the
development of foot-paths. After the invention of wheel, animal drawn vehicles were
developed and the need for hard surface road emerged. Traces of such hard roads were
obtained from various ancient civilization dated as old as 3500 BC. The earliest authentic
record of road was found from Assyrian empire constructed about 1900 BC.
Roman roads
1
The earliest large scale road construction is attributed to Romans who constructed
an extensive system of roads radiating in many directions from Rome. They were a
remarkable achievement and provided travel times across Europe, Asia minor, and north
Africa. Romans recognized that the fundamentals of good road construction were to
provide good drainage, good material and good workmanship. Their roads were very
durable, and some are still existing. Roman roads were always constructed on a firm -
2
formed subgrade strengthened where necessary with wooden piles. The roads were
bordered on both sides by longitudinal drains. The next step was the construction of the
agger. This was a raised formation up to a 1 meter high and 15 m wide and was
constructed with materials excavated during the side drain construction. This was then
topped with a sand leveling course. The agger contributed greatly to moisture control in
the pavement. The pavement structure on the top of the agger varied greatly. In the case of
heavy traffic, a surface course of large 250 mm thick hexagonal flag stones were provided.
A typical cross section of roman road The main features of the Roman roads are that they
were built straight regardless of gradient and used heavy foundation stones at the bottom.
They mixed lime and volcanic puzzolana to make mortar and they added gravel to this
mortar to make concrete. Thus concrete was a major Roman road making innovation.
French roads
The next major development in the road construction occurred during the regime
of Napoleon. The significant contributions were given by Tresaguet in 1764 and a typical
cross section of this road. He developed a cheaper method of construction than the
lavish and locally unsuccessful revival of Roman practice. The pavement used 200 mm
pieces of quarried stone of a more compact form and shaped such that they had at
least one flat side which was placed on a compact formation.
Smaller pieces of broken stones were then compacted into the spaces between
larger stones to provide a level surface. Finally the running layer was made with a layer
of 25 mm sized broken stone. All this structure was placed in a trench in order to keep
the running surface level with the surrounding country side. This created major drainage
problems which were counteracted by making the surface as impervious as possible,
cambering the surface and providing deep side ditches.
He gave much importance for drainage. He also enunciated the necessity for
continuous organized maintenance, instead of intermittent repairs if the roads were to be
kept usable all times. For this he divided the roads between villages into sections of such
length that an entire road could be covered by maintenance men living nearby.
British roads
The British government also gave importance to road construction. The British
engineer John Macadam introduced what can be considered as the first scientific road
construction method. Stone size was an important element of Macadam recipe. By
empirical observation of many roads
, he came to realize that 250 mm layers of well compacted broken angular stone
would provide the same strength and stiffness and a better running surface than an
expensive pavement founded on large stone blocks. Thus he introduced an economical
method of road construction.
The mechanical interlock between the individual stone pieces provided strength and
stiffness to the course. But the inter particle friction abraded the sharp interlocking faces
and partly destroy the effectiveness of the course. This effect was overcome by
introducing good quality interstitial finer material to produce a well-graded mix. Such
mixes also proved less permeable and easier to compact.
The length of roads envisaged under the Nagpur plan was achieved by the end of it,
but the road system was deficient in many respects. The changed economic, industrial
and agricultural conditions in the country warranted a review of the Nagpur
plan. Accordingly a 20-year plan was drafted by the Roads wing of Government
of India, which is popularly known as the Bombay plan. The highlights of the plan
were:
Width of the carriage way or the width of the pavement depends on the width of the
traffic lane and number of lanes. Width of a traffic lane depends on the width of the
vehicle and the clearance. Side clearance improves operating speed and safety. The
maximum permissible width of a vehicle is 2.44 and the desirable side clearance for
single lane traffic is 0.68 m. This require minimum of lane width of 3.75 m for a single
lane road .However, the side clearance required is about 0.53 m, on either side and 1.06
m in the center. Therefore, a two lane road require minimum of 3.5 meter for each lane
The desirable carriage way width recommended by IRC is given in Table
Importance of Kerbs
Kerbs indicate the boundary between the carriage way and the shoulder or
islands or
footpaths.
Right of way (ROW) or land width is the width of land acquired for the road, along its
alignment. It should be adequate to accommodate all the cross-sectional elements of the highway
and may reasonably provide for future development. To prevent ribbon development along
highways, control lines and building lines may be provided. Control line is a line which represents
the nearest limits of future uncontrolled building activity in relation to a road. Building line
represents a line on either side of the road, between which and the road no building activity is
permitted at all. The right of way width is governed by:
Width of formation: It depends on the category of the highway and width of roadway and road
margins.
Height of embankment or depth of cutting: It is governed by the topography and the vertical
alignment.
Side slopes of embankment or cutting: It depends on the height of the slope, soil type
etc. Drainage system and their size which depends on rainfall, topography etc.
Sight distance considerations : On curves etc. there is restriction to the visibility on the inner side
of the curve due to the presence of some obstructions like building structures etc
Reserve land for future widening: Some land has to be acquired in advance anticipating future
developments like widening of the road.
The importance of reserved land is emphasized by the following. Extra width of land is available
for the construction of roadside facilities. Land acquisition is not possible later, because the land
may be occupied for various other purposes (buildings, business etc.)
The normal ROW requirements for built up and open areas as specified by IRC is given in Table
12:4 A typical cross section of a ROW is given in Figure 12:4.
Alignment
The position or the layout of the central line of the highway on the ground is called the alignment.
Horizontal alignment includes straight and curved paths. Vertical alignment includes level and
gradients. Alignment decision is important because a bad alignment will enhance the
construction, maintenance and vehicle operating costs. Once an alignment is fixed and
constructed, it is not easy to change it due to increase in cost of adjoining land and construction of
costly structures by the roadside.
Requirements
The requirements of an ideal alignment are
The alignment between two terminal stations should be short and as far as
possible be straight, but due to some practical considerations deviations may be
needed.
The alignment should be easy to construct and maintain. It should be easy for
the operation of vehicles. So to the maximum extend easy gradients and curves should
be provided.
It should be safe both from the construction and operating point of view
especially at slopes, embankments, and cutting. It should have safe geometric
features.
The alignment should be economical and it can be considered so only
when the initial cost, maintenance cost, and operating cost are minimum.
Factors controlling alignment
We have seen the requirements of an alignment. But it is not always possible to satisfy all these
requirements. Hence we have to make a judicial choice considering all the factors.
The various factors that control the alignment are as follows:
1.Obligatory points: These are the control points governing the highway alignment.
These points are classified into two categories. Points through which it should
pass and points through which it should not pass. Some of the examples are:
o Bridge site: The bridge can be located only where the river has straight and
permanent path and also where the abutment and pier can be strongly founded. The
road approach to the bridge should not be curved and skew crossing should be
avoided as possible. Thus to locate a bridge the highway alignment may be
changed.
o Mountain: While the alignment passes through a mountain, the various
alternatives are to either construct a tunnel or to go round the hills. The suitability
of the alternative depends on factors like topography, site conditions and
construction and operation cost.
o Intermediate town: The alignment may be slightly deviated to connect an
intermediate town or village nearby.
These were some of the obligatory points through which the alignment should pass. Coming to the
second category, that is the points through which the alignment should not pass are:
Religious places: These have been protected by the law from being acquired
for any purpose. Therefore, these points should be avoided while aligning.
Very costly structures: Acquiring such structures means heavy compensation
which would result in an increase in initial cost. So the alignment may be deviated not to
pass through that point.
Lakes/ponds etc: The presence of a lake or pond on the alignment path
would also necessitate deviation of the alignment.
2. Traffic: The alignment should suit the traffic requirements. Based on the origin- destination data
of the area, the desire lines should be drawn. The new alignment should be drawn keeping in view
the desire lines, traffic flow pattern etc.
3. Geometric design: Geometric design factors such as gradient, radius of curve, sight distance etc.
also govern the alignment of the highway. To keep the radius of curve minimum, it may be required
to change the alignment. The alignments should be finalized such that the obstructions to visibility
do not restrict the minimum requirements of sight distance. The design standards vary with the
class of road and the terrain and accordingly the highway should be aligned.
4. Economy: The alignment finalized should be economical. All the three costs i.e. construction,
maintenance, and operating cost should be minimum. The construction cost can be decreased
much if it is possible to maintain a balance between cutting and filling. Also try to avoid very high
embankments and very deep cuttings as the construction cost will be very higher in these cases