“A STUDY ON CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR

COCA COLA IN RULER AREA”

Under the Guidance of: Submitted By:

1
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The objective of the project is to know the consumers preferences for Cola Drinks, to
study the Market Potential of COCA COLA and The report contains a brief introduction
of Coca Cola. The company COCA COLA has interests in various sectors and they
provide consistent quality products to meet our costumer’s requirement worldwide.

This report clearly mentions objective of the study and the research methodology utilized.
both primary data and secondary data. The data collection method used is structured non
disguised questionnaire in which the types of questions used are open ended, multiple
choice and close ended.

The report contains a detailed view of the tasks, which have been undertaken to analyze
the market of COCA COLA. Various sets of questionnaire have been prepared to know
the PREFERENCES of consumers about the COCA COLA. Some of the research areas
are Delhi, Ghaziabad. This project reveals one of the important findings like more and
more displays of the window hiring and can be given to the retail outlets as it has been
said that “JItna Dikhega Utna Bikega”. To increase its consumption, more schemes like
‘Seasonal Schemes’ and other schemes can be given to the consumers.
A detailed survey of the consumers was carried to find out their preferences for COCA
COLA. The details of the methodology are stated below.

Areas are Delhi, Ghaziabad research design: Exploratory and descriptive. Sources of
information are primary and secondary data. Data collection method structured non
designed questionnaire.

Types of questions used open ended, multiple choice and close ended. Sampling method
is random sampling.

In this study I found that most of the consumers prefer PEPSI as their 1st preference and
then COCA COLA.

2
LITERATURE REVIEW:

1-A study of factors responsible for brand preference in fmcg sector”

The purpose of this paper is the study of factors responsible for brand preference in
fmcg products, increasing competition, more due to globalization, is motivating many
companies to base their strategies almost entirely on building brands. Brand preference
means to compare the different brands and opt for the most preferred brand. This brand
preference is influenced by various factors.
According to this study many factors were find out for preferring a brand like
Brand persona
Brand constancy
Brand loftiness
Brand value.
In the identification of factors affecting the brand preference, it was concluded that brand
persona is the most effective factor that affects the brand preference. This brand persona
deals with the personality aspects or the external attributes of brand, thus it can be said
that consumer prefer any brand by looking at the external attributes of a brand.

-journal of ims vol 5 no.1, jan-june 2008

2-Colour and flavour rule consumer preferences: Study

The intensity of colour and the flavour are the key drivers behind consumer
acceptance of beverages, says a new study involving DANONE. But
packaging and labelling are not as important for winning over
consumers, according to findings published in the journal Food
Quality and Preference, The study involved consumers at different
stages of development and highlights the importance of adopting a
“sensory marketing approach,” said the researchers from French
research organisation Adriant, the University of Rennes 1,
DANONE R&D, and Institute Paul Bocuse.
“Companies need to continuously innovate to maintain market leadership,” wrote the
researchers. “When the market is overloaded the challenge consists in creating innovative
products able to attract and satisfy consumers.” “This experiment showed the feasibility
of the proposed multi-sensory design method based on mixed qualitative and quantitative
approaches.” The study also demonstrates the importance of flavour and colour selection
for new products.
The global flavours market was been valued at some US$18bn in 2006 (Business
Insights). Meanwhile, the value of the international colourings market was estimated at
around $1.15bn in 2007 (€731m), up 2.5 per cent from $1.07bn (680m) in 2004,
according to Leatherhead Food International (LFI). Natural colours now make up 31 per

3
cent of the colourings market, compared with 40 per cent for synthetics, according to
LFI.

Bombarding the senses

By choosing to formulate a new beverage, the researchers noted that the new product
would need to be differentiated by improving the sensory characteristics.
Four factors were identified for the formulation: four colour intensities), three
flavourings, two label types (soft versus hard), and two pack sizes (standard versus
oversize). By using both quantitative (hedonic testing) and qualitative (focus groups)
approaches, the researchers found that “the main factors which drive consumer
preference for this concept are colour intensity and flavouring”. Indeed, colour intensity
accounted for 43 per cent and flavour 32 per cent of the consumers’ overall liking. “Pack
size and label type are taken into account by the consumer to a lesser extend,” they
added. “This methodology of a qualitative screening associated to a conjoint analysis on
relevant sensory attributes has shown good performances to fit consumers’ expectation: it
has now to be reproduced, as every brand, concept and product is a unique combination
designed for a specific consumer group,” concluded the researchers

Source: Food Quality and Preference

Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 719-726
By Stephen Daniells, 07-Oct-2008

3- Taste or health: A study on consumer acceptance of cola drinks

This study examined the relative contributions of taste and health considerations on
consumer liking and purchase intent of cola drinks. Eight types of commercial cola drinks
were evaluated by 305 adult consumers who also completed a brief questionnaire on food
habits. Data were analyzed using factor analysis. Results revealed that purchase intent of
cola drinks was strongly related to degree of liking and to several key sensory attributes
including saltiness, drinks flavor and greasiness. These variables emerged as the first
factor in the analysis, suggesting that consumers perceive these characteristics as being
most important in their choice of cola drinks. Factor 2 described a health dimension and
was related to respondents' attitudes toward fat in the diet. Factor 3 comprised two
remaining sensory attributes (color and crunchiness), which apparently were of minor
importance to the respondents. These data suggest that in spite of current concern about
reducing dietary fat, health remains secondary to taste in the selection of cola drinks for
consumers in this population.

Source-Beverly J. Tepper and Amy C. Trail Journal of Food Science and

Technology, 15 September 1998

4
 4- PAIRED PREFERENCE TESTS USING PLACEBO PAIRS AND DIFFERENT
RESPONSE OPTIONS FOR Cola Drinks, ORANGE JUICES

ABSTRACT
Preference tests were performed for varieties of cola drinks, orange juices and using three
response protocols: the traditional paired preference test with the "no preference" option,
a 9-point hedonic scale and a 6-point hybrid hedonic/purchase intent scale. The different
stimuli to be assessed were presented in pairs, but putatively identical stimuli were also
presented as a "placebo" pair. Performance on the placebo pair with identical stimuli
provided a measure of the hidden demand characteristics of the test protocol. The
presentation of the different pairs provided a measure of preference accompanied by such
hidden demand effects. Comparison between the two allowed a better measure of
preference per se. The order of presentation of the identical and different pairs did show
occasional slight evidence of contrast effects. For the placebo "identical" pairs, a majority
of consumers reported false preferences. Liking questions with the hedonic and hybrid
scales elicited fewer false preferences than preference questions with the paired
preference protocol. Yet, the effects tended to be slight. The 6-point hedonic/purchase
intent scale exhibited the fewest false preferences in the placebo condition, and this was
because of its fewer categories rather than any cognitive strategy change elicited by its
different labels.

Source-Davis Woman’s

Journal of Food Science and Technology, July 31, 2007

5-“consumer awareness and consumption pattern of food products”

This paper aims to investigate the degree of brand awareness of various food products in
relation to background and education of the household, the consumption pattern of
various food products consumed by respondents in the light of their areas, income levels
and education. a sample of200 respondents comprising 100 form rural area and 100 from
urban area were taken. Data are analyzed with the help of mean.SD,co –efficient of
variance-test and f-test.

The finding of this study reveals that there is low degree of brand awareness in rural
areas, whereas there is a moderate degree of brand awareness in urban India. The highly
educated rural and urban respondents have high degree of brand awareness for many food
products, and the less educated rural and urban respondents have low degree of brand
awareness for many food products.

- Journal of ims vol 3 no.1, jan-june 2007

5
3.COMPANY PROFILE

6
3. COMPANY PROFILE

Douglas N. Daft was elected chairman, Board of Directors, and chief executive officer

of The Coca-Cola Company on February 17, 2000. Mr. Daft is the 11th chairman of

the Board in the history of the Company. Mr. Daft, 60, joined the Company in 1969 as

planning officer in the Sydney, Australia office. He held positions of increasing

responsibilities throughout Asia and in 1982 was named vice president of Coca-Cola

Far East Ltd.

In December 1988, Mr. Daft was named president of the North Pacific Division and

president of Coca-Cola (Japan) Co., Ltd. He moved to the Company's Atlanta

headquarters in 1991 to assume the responsibility of president of the Pacific Group

and in 1999 his responsibilities were expanded to include the Company's Africa

Group, and Schweppes Beverage Division, as well as the Middle and Far East Group.

Mr. Daft was elected president and chief operating officer of The Coca - Cola

Company in December 1999. He serves on the boards of Sun Trust Banks, the Boys

& Girls Clubs of America, Catalyst, the CERGE-EI Foundation(Center for Economic

Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute) in the Czech Republic, the

Lauder Institute for Management and International Studies at the University of

Pennsylvania, the Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum, the

Grocery Manufacturers of America, the British - American Chamber of Commerce,

the G100, the Woodruff Arts Center, the Commerce Club, and the McGraw-Hill

Companies. Mr. Daft is a trustee of Emory University, the American Assembly and the

Center for Strategic & International Studies. He is also a member of The Trilateral

7
Commission, The Business Council, and The Business Round table. Mr. Daft received a

bachelor's degree in mathematics from the University of New England and a post-

graduate degree in administration from the University of New South Wales. He

holds an honorary doctorate in international law from Thunderbird, The American

Graduate School of International Management.

HISTORY OF COLA

The cola industry has phenomenal possibilities for rocketing profit growth inspite of the

sign of relief heaved by the manufacture at the abrupt sensational termination of coca

cola monopoly the tastes of cola is by no means extinguished the coca. Cola have a status

symbol to it..., generated by the sub standard, penetrated, advertising and extensive

distribution network.

Total soft drink segment is growing at the rate of 10% per year still if international

standard area considered the per capita consumption of three serving in rock bottom, less

than even our neighbors’ Pakistan and Bangladesh, where it is four more as much. So

with kind of a market potential coke entered in India in 1991 after the permissions of

setting up Britico Food company to coke was granted by the government in Pune in 1992

the plant was established for is deducted then the bottle are taken out of the line and

Cleaned again or rejected.

The most important step is the mixing of drink concentrate dissolved in the soft water the

sugar syrup at the same time. Carbon dioxide is passed in the drink to produce a fizz.

After the crowing of the bottle the crown contains the manufacturing data batch number

and Time.

8
4. PRODUCT PROFILE

9
 INDIAN PRODUCT RANGE

Flavour Ingredients Pack Product Company

Cola Cola Flavour 200Ml. Coke, Coca-Coal
carbonated water 300Ml. Thumsup
sugar 500Ml.
1 Litre
1.5 Litre Pepsi Pepsi
2 Litre
Orange Orange Flavour + 200Ml. Fanta Coca-Cola
Carbonated 300Ml.
Water+ Sugar 500Ml.
1 Litre
1.5 Litre Mirinda Pepsi
2 Litre
Fruit Juice Mango Pulp+ 250 ML Maaza Coca-Cola
Treated water+
sugar Slice Pepsi
Cloudy Lemon Flavour + 200Ml. Limca Coca-Cola
Lemon Carbonated 300Ml.
Water+ Sugar 500Ml.
1 Litre
1.5 Litre Mirinda Lemon Pepsi
2 Litre
Clear Lemon Flavour+ 200Ml. Sprite Coca-Cola
Lemon Carbonated Water 300Ml.
+ Sugar 500Ml.
1 Litre 7’Up
1.5 Litre Dew Pepsi
2 Litre

10
5. INTRODUCTION OF RESEARCH
WORK

11
INTRODUCTION OF THE RESEARCH WORK

This report attempts to study the marketing mix keeping in mind the current market
situation. Besides, this report also studies the customer feedback about the COCA COLA.
Thus it can be said that there are two broad goals of the research i.e. TO STUDY THE
CONSUMERS PREFERENCE FOR COCA COLAas a whole and other to CREATE A
TOP OF MIND AWARENESS OF COCA COLA. The research work was done through
the collection of primary data and secondary data by a common questionnaire through the
market survey technique.
Thus; based on our research, we have made some conclusions and suggestions to make
the performance of COCA COLA amongst all players better.

12
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

• To study the consumers preferences for Coca Cola.

• To know the percentage of males and females that are aware about bingo

• To know which brand’s advertisement mostly people have seen.

• To know the reason to buy cola drinks.

• To know why was the advertisement being noticed by the consumer?

• To create a top of mind awareness about COCA COLA in DELHI, GHAZIABAD

by providing the information to consumers.

13
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A detailed survey of consumers was carried out to find out their preferences for COCA
COLA the details of the methodology are stated below:

AREAS:

DELHI (GK-1, GK-2, LAJ PAT NAGAR, NEHRU NAGAR, SAKET)

GHAZIABAD (Gandhi Nagar, Kavi Nagar, Raj nagar, shastri nagar,

kaushambi)

Type of Research : • Exploratory Research

• Descriptive resarch
Research Question
• Consumer preferences for bingo
Sampling technique • Convenience sampling
Sample Size : • 800
Samplings Areas : • Delhi,Ghaziabad
Primary Data : • Responses through
questionnaires
• Conducted personal interviews
with the respondents .
Secondary Data : • Websites .
• News papers
research tools chi square test
friedman test

14
 6. ANALYSIS AND
FINDINGS

1. GENDER OF THE CONSUMER?

15
 m a le
49% 51%
fe m a le

Fig 1

Valid Male 406 51.0 51.0 51.0

Female 394 49.0 49.0 100.0
Total 800 100.0 100.0
Cumulati Table1
Frequ Perce Valid ve
ency nt Percent Percent
Out of 800
consumers, 51% are males and only 49% are females.

2. AGE GROUP OF THE CONSUMER?

16
 3%
13%

34% BELOW 15
16-25

22% 26-35
36-45
46 & ABOVE

28%

Fig2
MAXIMUM numbers of people surveyed are BELOW 15 YEARS

3. OCCUPATION OF THE CONSUMER?

17
 Frequen Valid Cumulativ
cy Percent Percent e Percent
Valid Profession
100 13.0 13.0 18.0
al
Businessm
75 9.0 9.0 22.0
an
Service 210 26.0 26.0 48.0
Student 390 49.0 49.0 97.0
Any other 25 3.0 3.0 100.0
Total 800 100.0 100.0 100.0

Table2

3% 13%

9% P ROFE S S IONA L
B US INE S S M A N
S E RV ICE M A N
49%
S TUDE NTS

26% A NY OTHE R

Fig3

OUT OF 800 PEOPLE 13%are professionals, 9%are businessman, 26%are

serviceman, and 49% are students.

4. NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASE COLD DRINKS ?

18
 Frequen Valid Cumulativ
cy Percent Percent e Percent
Valid Yes 774 97.0 97.0 97.0
No 26 3.0 3.0 100.0
Total 800 100.0 100.0

Table 3

3%

yes
no

97%

Fig4

Out of 800 respondents, 97% of consumers buy COLD DRINKS and only
3%of them do not buy

5. COLD DRINKS PEOPLE BUY?

19
 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid COKE
151 18.8 18.8 18.8
PEPSI
142 17.75 17.75 36.55
7 UP
96 12 12 48.55
SPRITE
89 11.12 11.12 59.67
FANTA
69 8.6 8.6 68.27
MAZZA
67 8.3 8.3 76.57

THUMSUP 186 23.2 23.23 100.0

Total
800 100.0 100.0

Table4

19%
23%
COKE
PEPSI
7 UP
SPRITE
8% 18% FANTA
MAZZA
9% THUMSUP

11% 12%

Fig5
19% respondents prefer COKE, 18% prefer PEPSI, 12% 7UP, 11 % of them
preferSPRITE, 9%FANTA, 8% prefer MAZZA, and 23% prefer
THUMSUP.

6. REASON TO PURCHASE COALA DRINKS?

20
 Frequen Valid Cumulativ
cy Percent Percent e Percent
Valid Brand
160 20.0 20.0 20.0
name
Taste 204 25.0 25.0 45.0
Brand
53.
ambassad 88 8.0 8.0
0
or
packaging 158 10.0 10.0 63.0
Easy
66 16.0 16.0 79.0
avialability
Price 124 20.0 20.0 99.0
Any other 100.
8 1.0 1.0
0
Total 800 100.0 100.0
Table 5
TASTE

8% 1% BRAND NAME
25%
11%
PACKAGING

PRICE
15%
BRAND
20% AMBASSADOR
EASY
20% AVIALABILITY
ANY OTHER

Fig6
25%people purchase COLD DRINKS because of TASTE,
20% people purchase COLD DRINKS because of BRAND NAME,
20% people purchase COLD DRINKS because of PACKAGING,
15% people purchase COLD DRINKS because of PRICE ,
11% people purchase COLD DRINKS because of BRAND
AMBASSADOR
8%people purchase COLD DRINKS because of EASY AVILABILITY
1%people purchase COLD DRINKS because of ANY OTHER REASON
7. PEOPLE HAVE SEEN THE ADVERTISEMENT OF COLD
DRINKS

21
 Frequen Valid Cumulativ
cy Percent Percent e Percent
Valid Yes 782 98.0 98.0 98.0
No 18 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

Table 6

2%

yes
no

98%

Fig7

Out of 800 consumers 98% have seen the ADVERTISEMENT and only 2%
have not seen the ADVERTISEMENT of any cola drinks

8. ADVERTISEMENT PEOPLE REMEMBER THE MOST?

22
 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid COKE
189 27.0 27.0 27.0
PEPSI
188 28.0 28.0 55.0
7 UP
84 16.0 16.0 71.0
SPRITE
48 21.0 21.0 92.0
FANTA
32 4.0 4.0 96.0
MAZZA
78 3.0 3.0 99.0

Total THUMSUP 181 1.0 1.0 100

Total 800 100 100

Table 7

23% 23%
COKE
PEPSI
7 UP
SPRITE
10% FANTA
MAZZA
4% 23% THUMSUP
6%
11%

Fig8
23% people remember the advertisement of COKE
23% people remember the advertisement of.PEPSI
11% people remember the advertisement of 7UP
6% people remember the advertisement of SPRITE
4% people remember the advertisement of FANTA
10%people remember the advertisement of MAZZA
23%people remember the advertisement of.THUMSUP

9. REASON TO REMEMBER THE ADVERTISEMENT?

23
 Frequen Valid Cumulativ
cy Percent Percent e Percent
Valid Creativity 194 24.0 24.0 24.0
Brand
ambassad 196 25.0 25.0 49.0
or
Idea of
delivering 90 11.0 11.0 60.0
message
Frequency
204 25.0 25.0 85.0
of add
Logical
116 15.0 15.0 100.0
reason
Total 100 100.0

Table 8
CREATIVITY

15% BRAND
24% AMBASSADOR

IDEA OF
DELIVERING THE
25% MESSAGE
FREQUENCY OF
25% ADD
11%
LOGICAL
REASON

Fig9

24% people remember the advertisement because of CREATIVITY.

25% people remember the advertisement because of BRAND
AMBASSADOR
11% people remember the advertisement because of THEIR IDEA OF
DELIVERING THE MESSAGE.
25%people remember the advertisement because of FREQUENCY OF
ADD.15% people remember the adverisement because of LOGICAL
REASON.
COLA DRINK PEOPLE BUY

24
1.CHI-SQUARE TEST
connections

Observed N Expected N Residual

COKE
151 114.3 105.7
PEPSI
142 114.3 -101.3
7 UP
96 114.3 -26.3
SPRITE
89 114.3 75.7
FANTA
69 114.3 63.7
MAZZA
67 114.3 -84.3

THUMSUP 186 114.3 -110.3

Total
800

Table 9
Test Statistics

Connections
Chi-Square(a) 447.260
Df 6
Asymp. Sig. .000
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 114.3.
Table 10

HO-there is no significance difference between the preferences of consumers regarding

the COLD DRINKS?

25
H1-there is a significance difference between the preferences of consumers regarding the
COLD DRINKS?

IF H0 <.05 OUR null Hypothesis is rejected and in this case H0 IS

REJECTED.
THAT means consumers preferences for Drinks are different.

151 RESPONDENTS buy COKE, 142 buys PEPSI, 96 7UP, 89 consumers prefer
SPRITE, 69 prefer FANTA chips, 67 prefer MAZZA, and only 186 of them prefer
THUMSUP

ADVERTISEMENT PEOPLE REMEMBER THE MOST

2. CHI-SQUARE TEST

26
 ADVERTISEMENT

Observed N Expected N Residual

COKE
189 133.3 -45.3
PEPSI
188 133.3 -67.3
7 UP
84 133.3 30.7
SPRITE
48 133.3 -9.3
FANTA
32 133.3 75.7
MAZZA
78 133.3 15.7

THUMSUP 181
Total

Table 11
Test Statistics

connections
Chi-Square(a) 101.905
df 5
Asymp. Sig. .000
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 133.3.

Table 12

HO-there is no significance difference between the advertisements

27
H1-there is a significance difference between the advertisements

IF H0 <.05 OUR null Hypothesis is rejected and in this case H0 IS

REJECTED.
THAT means consumers remember different different
advertisements.

189 people remember the advertisement of COKE, 188 people remember the
advertisement of PEPSI, 84 people remember the advertisement of7UP,48 people
remember the advertisement ofSPRITE,32 people remember the advertisement of
MAZZA, AND 181 people remember the advertisement of THUMSUP.

REASON TO PURCHASE A COLD DRINK.

28
3. FRIEDMAN TEST
Ranks

Mean Rank
packaging
5.11

Brand
6.00

taste
6.90

Easy avialability
2.00

ambassador
3.00

Price
3.99

Other
1.01

Table 13
Test Statistics(a)

N
800

Chi-Square
4718.549

df
6

Asymp. Sig.
.000
a Friedman Test

Table 14
H0- there is no significance difference between all the factors.
H1-there is a significance difference between all the factors.

29
IF H0 <.05 OUR null Hypothesis is rejected and in this case H0 IS REJECTED.
THAT means consumers prefer any mobile connection on the basis of certain
factors.

In this case as
The mean rank of taste IS 6.90 MEANS most of the consumers purchase drinks because
the taste.

AND the mean rank for EASY AVAILABILITY is 2.00 (AFTER ANY OTHER
FACTOR) THAT means CONSUMERS don’t care about EASY AVAILABILITY while
purchasing COLD DRINKS

THE SEQUENCE OF

THEIR PURCHASING PREFERENCE IS…………………

TASTE
BRAND NAME
PACKAGING
PRICE
BRAND AMBASSADOR
EASY AVIALABILITY
ANY OTHER

REASON TO REMEMBER THE ADVERTISEMENT

4. Friedman Test

30
 Ranks

Mean Rank
Creativity
3.91

Brand ambassador
4.23

Idea of message
1.10

Frequency of add
4.62

Logical reason
2.43

Table 15
Test Statistics(a)

N
800

Chi-Square
4626.647

df
6

Asymp. Sig.
.003

a Friedman Test
Table 16 .

H0- there is no significance difference between all the factors TO REMEMBER THE
ADVERTISEMENT.
H1-there is a significance difference between all the factors TO REMEMBER THE
ADVERTISEMENT

31
IF H0 <.05 OUR null Hypothesis is rejected and in this case H0 IS
REJECTED.THAT means consumers remember the advertisement of any COLA
DRINK because of some factors, In this case as

the mean rank of FREQUENCY OF THE ADVERTISEMENT IS 4.62 MEANS most of

the consumers remember the advertisement because the frequency of the add,

AND the mean rank for idea of delivering the message is 1.10 THAT means
CONSUMERS don’t care about the idea of delivering the message.

MAJOR FINDINGS

1. Out of 800 consumers, 51% are males and only 49% are females.

2. Maximum number of people surveyed is below 15 years

32
3. Out of 800 people 13%are professionals, 9%are businessman, 26%are
serviceman, and 49% are students.

4. Out of 800 respondents, 97% of consumers buy cold drinks and only
3%of them do not buy.

5.19% respondents prefer coke, 18% prefer pepsi, 12% 7up, 11 % of them
prefersprite, 9%fanta, 8% prefer mazza, and 23% prefer thumsup

6.25%people purchase cold drinks because of taste,20% people purchase

cold drinks because of brand name,20% people purchase cold drinks
because of packaging,15% people purchase cold drinks because of price ,
11% people purchase cold drinks because of brand ambassador 8%people
purchase cold drinks because of easy avilability1%people purchase cold
drinks because of any other reason.

7. Out of 800 consumers 98% have seen the advertisement and only 2%
have not seen the advertisement of any chips

8.23% people remember the advertisement of coke, 23% people remember

the advertisement of.pepsi, 1% people remember the advertisement of 7up,
6% people remember the advertisement of sprite, 4% people remember the
advertisement of fanta, 10%people remember the advertisement of mazza,
and 23% people remember the advertisement of.thumsup

9.24% people remember the advertisement because of creativity.

25% people remember the advertisement because of brand ambassador,11%
people remember the advertisement because of their idea of delivering the
message.,25%people remember the advertisement because of frequency of
add.15% people remember the advertisement because of logical reason.

8. SUGGESTIONS

On the basis of above study following suggestions can be given:

33
 • Perform a detail demand survey at regular interval to know about the unique
needs and requirements of the customer.
• The company should make hindrance free arrangement for its customers/retailers
to make any feedback or suggestions as and when they feel.

• The company should focus to bring some more flavours and variety of schemes
rather then bring second and repeat same old one. It is always better to be first
than being better.
• The company must be aware of and keep at least the latest knowledge of its
primary competitors in market and try to make a perfect anticipated efforts to
meet the same
• The company should also use time to time some more and new attractive system
of word of mouth advertisement to keep alive the general awareness in the whole
market as a whole.
• The company should be always in a position to receive continuous feedback and
suggestions from its customers/ consumers as well as from
• The market and try to solve it without any delay to establish its own good
credibility..

• The visibility of any product plays an important role in making the customer,
aware about it and is vital for the growth and development of any product.

• For their advertisement they can also introduce a brand ambassador, because most
of the consumers remember advertisement because of their brand ambassador.

• A strong watch should be kept on distributors also, because in some cases they are
found to be cheating the retailers and affecting the goodwill of the BRAND.

9. CONCLUSION
During the course of the project I realized that the customer willingly answered the
closed end questions.

34
From the analysis of the data collected and from the experiences I have reached the
following conclusions:
COKE is most popular amongst its users mainly because of its TASTE, BRAND NAME,
INNOVATIVENESS Thus it should focus on good taste so that it can capture the major
part of the market. But most of the consumers prefer THUMSUP as their 1st preference,
then COKE
We come to the conclusion that visibility affects the sales of project in a very special
way. And in terms of the advertisements lays is lacking behined,.mostly consumers
remember the advertisement because of the frequency of add and brand ambassadors
,creativity.
After acquiring a new customer, there is lot of importance of its retention also. This can
be done only by providing extra flavors and good taste
In today’s scenario, customer is the king because he has got various choices around him.
If you are not capable of providing him the desired result he will definitely switch over to
the other provider. Therefore to survive in this cutthroat competition, you need to be the
best. Customer is no more loyal in today’s scenario, so you need to be always on your
toes.

We feel that there is cutthroat competition between COKE,PEPSI,THUMSUP so to be on

top of mind of the customers they need to do something outstanding every time

10. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

35
 • Some of the respondents refused to fill the questionnaires.

• The responses may vary as some people did not want to come up with real
answers.

• The people were busy in their own work so they might not have given actual
responses..

• Limitation of time.

• The survey is conducted only in few areas of Delhi, Ghaziabad; hence the results
may vary in other parts of the cities.

• Small sample size.

• And like any other research the limitation of personal bias of respondents limits
the scope of the study.

The findings are based on the survey conducted in the month of DECEMBER and
JANUARY; the results may vary in other months.

11. BIBLIOGRAPHY

36
TEXT BOOKS:

Kotler Philip, “Marketing Management”, Pearson Education.

Beri G.C, “Marketing Research”, Third Edition.

Cooper Donald R. & Shindler Pamela S, “Business Research Methods”

Tata McGraw-Hill Edition Eighth.

Schiffman Leon G. & Kaunk Leslie Lazar, “Consumer Behavior” Pearson Education,

Eighth Edition.

Magazines and journals

4 p’s

Eonomic Times

WEBSITES:www.Coca cola.com

www.pepsi.com

SEARCH ENGINE :www.google.co.in

ANNEXURE
QUESTIONNAIRE

37
1.NAME: ………………………………..
GENDER- MALE FEMALE
ADDRESS ……………………………

OCCUPATION
PROFESSIONAL
BUSINESSMAN
SERVICE
STUDENT
ANY OTHER

2. AGE : 15-20 21-35

36-45 46-55
55 AND ABOVE

3. DO you drink coca cola?

Yes No

4. Which cola drink do you prefer most?

COKE
PEPSI
7UP
SPRITE
FANTA
MAZA
THUMSUP

5. About Cola drink what do you like the most?(PLEASE RATE

THEM from 1-6)
BRAND NAME
TASTE
EASY AVAILABILITY
PACKAGING
PRICE
BRAND AMBASSADOR
ANY OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

38
6. Have you seen any advertisement of ANY Cola drinks?
Yes No

7. Advertisement of which Cola drinks do you remembers the most?

COKE
PEPSI

7 UP

SPRITE

FANTA

MAZZA

THUMSUP

8. What attracted you in the advertisement?( PLEASE RATE THEM

from 1-3)
CREATIVITY
BRAND AMBASSADOR
IDEA OF DELIVERING THE MESSAGE
FREQUENCY OF ADD
LOGICAL REASON

9. Have you decided to purchase any connection after watching the

advertisement?
Yes No

ANY SUGGESTIONS:::::::::::::
……………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………

39
STUDY ON- CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR coke

40