Jedec Standard: N-Channel MOSFET Hot Carrier Data Analysis
Jedec Standard: N-Channel MOSFET Hot Carrier Data Analysis
Jedec Standard: N-Channel MOSFET Hot Carrier Data Analysis
STANDARD
JESD28-1
SEPTEMBER 2001
JEDEC standards and publications contain material that has been prepared, reviewed, and
approved through the JEDEC Board of Directors level and subsequently reviewed and approved
by the EIA General Counsel.
JEDEC standards and publications are designed to serve the public interest through eliminating
misunderstandings between manufacturers and purchasers, facilitating interchangeability and
improvement of products, and assisting the purchaser in selecting and obtaining with minimum
delay the proper product for use by those other than JEDEC members, whether the standard is to
be used either domestically or internationally.
JEDEC standards and publications are adopted without regard to whether or not their adoption
may involve patents or articles, materials, or processes. By such action JEDEC does not assume
any liability to any patent owner, nor does it assume any obligation whatever to parties adopting
the JEDEC standards or publications.
The information included in JEDEC standards and publications represents a sound approach to
product specification and application, principally from the solid state device manufacturer
viewpoint. Within the JEDEC organization there are procedures whereby an JEDEC standard or
publication may be further processed and ultimately become an ANSI/EIA standard.
No claims to be in conformance with this standard may be made unless all requirements stated in
the standard are met.
SI
Inquiries, comments, and suggestions relative to the content of this JEDEC standard or
publication should be addressed to JEDEC Solid State Technology Association, 2500 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22201-3834, (703)907-7559 or www.jedec.org
Published by
JEDEC Solid State Technology Association 2001
2500 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22201-3834
This document may be downloaded free of charge; however JEDEC retains the
copyright on this material. By downloading this file the individual agrees not to
charge for or resell the resulting material.
DON’T VIOLATE
THE
LAW!
CONTENTS
1 Scope 1
2 Applicable Standards 1
5 Data requirements 3
6 Analysis methodologies 3
Figures
-i-
SI
-ii-
(From JEDEC Board Ballot JCB-01-47, formulated under the cognizance of the JC-14.2 Subcommittee
on Wafer-Level Reliability.)
1 Scope
The purpose of this addendum is to provide data analysis examples that may be useful in analyzing
MOSFET n-channel hot-carrier-induced degradation data. This addendum is not a standard but a
reference that suggests possible alternative hot-carrier data analysis techniques.
The examples presented in this document are restricted to dc testing. While devices are often operated
under ac or pulsed conditions, it is beyond the scope of this addendum to predict ac degradations or dc
lifetimes of integrated circuits.
The described analysis examples are restricted to devices of a single gate length and temperature.
Characterization of a semiconductor process over a wide range of gate lengths and temperatures, is
implemented by repeated use of the analysis techniques described within this addendum.
2 Applicable standards
SI
JESD-28, A Procedure for Measuring N-Channel MOSFET Hot-Carrier Induced Degradation Under DC
Stress
JESD-77A, Terms, Definitions, and Letter Symbols for Discrete Semiconductor and Optoelectronic
Devices
The voltage that is applied between the drain contact and the source contact of a MOSFET during stress.
The voltage that is applied between the gate contact and the source contact of a MOSFET during stress.
The current at the drain contact under the MOSFET stress bias conditions VDS,stress and VGS,stress.
The current at the bulk contact under the MOSFET stress bias conditions VDS,stress and VGS,stress.
The drain voltage for the technology under worst case operating condition.
The current at the drain contact under the MOSFET usage bias conditions VDS,use and VGS,use.
The current at the bulk contact under the MOSFET usage bias conditions VDS,use and VGS,use.
The elapsed time for the degradation in a particular measured parameter to reach the failure criterion
(TAR).
It is assumed that the hot electron measurements have been performed according to JEDEC specification
JESD-28. These analysis methods can be applied to degradations in linear transconductance (Gm),
threshold voltage (Vt), linear drain current (IDlin), saturated drain current (IDsat) or other transistor
parameters.
The device is to be stressed using VDS,stress and VGS,stress and the measured parameters are ID,stress
and IB,stress. ID,stress and IB,stress are the initial values of these parameters and are measured at time
equal zero during stress test.
It is also necessary to measure the usage conditions for the MOSFET. In this case the applied bias
conditions are VDS,use and VGS,use and the measured parameters are ID,use and IB,use. An identical
applied nominal bulk voltage should be the used in both the stress and usage measurements.
It is preferable to perform all stressing measurements on transistors with identical widths. However, it is
sometimes necessary to relate degradations in test transistors of various widths. For this reason, the
transistor width W parameter is displayed in most model equations and is not combined with other
constants.
5 Data requirements
For n-channel MOSFET devices the degradation data typically displays power law behavior where the
absolute value of the percentage change Y(t) in a parameter as a function of time t is given by:
A linear regression of log(|Y(t)|) versus log(t) provides the fit coefficients n and C. The time to failure
tTAR of each stressed transistor can be determined by algebraically rearranging Equation 1 to give:
1/ n
Y
t tar = TAR (2)
C
SI
This process is repeated for each stressed transistor, and an individual value tTAR determined.
NOTE LDD devices can saturate during stress and this possibility should be considered when performing data fits
as noted in JESD-28.
6 Analysis methodologies
There are three analysis methods commonly used. Each method has equal validity and are based on the
same carrier heating model. In this model the probability of a carrier achieving enough energy to cause
device damage is directly related to the exponent of the lateral electric field. Each analysis methodology
involves the characterization of several transistors at various stress bias conditions. The objective is to
predict the time for a certain parameter degradation at usage bias condition. The analysis methods are:
Stressing experiments are performed on a number of transistors, each at different stress bias conditions.
A minimum of three stress conditions, with at least five transistors per stress condition is required. For
each transistor, the stress conditions are VDS,stress and VGS,stress and the following parameters are
obtained:
−m
I
ttar I D , stress = HW B , stress (3)
I D , stress
where H and m are fit parameters and W is the transistor width. If measurements are performed on
transistors of equal width, then the quantity W can be combined with the fit parameter H. Rearranging
Equation 3 gives:
−m
ttar I D , stress I
= H B , stress (4)
W I D , stress
t I I
log tar D , stress = log H − m × log B , stress (5)
W I D , stress
A linear regression analysis is performed to obtain fit parameters H and m. Figure 1 displays a plot of this
relationship. According to theory, m should be 3, but values may vary depending on stress conditions and
technology. In a stress experiment with typical stress bias voltage conditions, a moderate variation in
IB,stress/ID, stress results in a large variation in failure times, tTAR. The quantity on the left hand side of
Equation 5 is thus dominated by the failure times tTAR with other terms relatively constant.
Once the constants H and m are determined, the time to failure at usage condition is estimated using
Equation 4 to give:
−m
1 I B , use
ttar ,use = HW (6)
I D , use I D ,use
VDS,stress = 6.5V
7.5V
8.0V
SI
IB , stress
log
ID , stress
Figure 1 — Example data for substrate/drain current ratio method
In this method the stress is performed on a number of transistors, each at a different stress condition
VDS,stress and VGS,stress. For each transistor, the time to reach the failure criteria is obtained (ttar):
where to and B are fit parameters. Figure 2 displays a typical plot showing this relationship. Taking the
natural logarithm of both sides of Equation 7 yields the following relationship:
1
ln t tar = ln t o + B (8)
V DS ,stress
A linear regression analysis of Equation 8 yields the fit coefficients to and B. The failure time ttar,use at
usage bias conditions is found by substituting VDS,use for VDS,stress in Equation 8.
SI
log(tTAR)
1
VD,stress
Again stress experiments are performed on a number of transistors, each at a different stress bias
condition. For each transistor, the stress conditions are VDS,stress and VGS,stress and the following
parameters are obtained:
−b
I B ,stress
t tar = C (9)
W
where C and b are fit parameters, and W is the transistor width. Figure 3 displays this relationship.
Taking the logarithm of both sides of Equation 9 yields the following:
I B ,stress
log t tar = log C − b ⋅ log (10)
W
Again a linear regression is performed on Equation 10 to obtain the fit coefficients C and b.
−b
I B ,use
t tar ,use = C (11)
W
where IB,use/W in brackets is the substrate current per unit width at the usage condition averaged over the
number of stressed transistors.
log(tTAR)
)
SI
IB, stress
log
W
Figure 3 — Example data for the substrate current method