Practical Research 1: Quarter 3, LAS 8: Presenting Written Literature Review
Practical Research 1: Quarter 3, LAS 8: Presenting Written Literature Review
Practical Research 1: Quarter 3, LAS 8: Presenting Written Literature Review
11
Practical Research 1
Quarter 3, LAS 8:
Presenting Written Literature Review
PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1
Grade 11 Quarter 3 – LAS 8: PRESENTING WRITTEN LITERATURE REVIEW
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work of the Government
of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or office wherein the work is
created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such agency or office may, among
other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names, trademarks, etc.)
included in this book are owned by their respective copyright holders. Every effort has been exerted to
locate and seek permission to use these materials from their respective copyright owners. The publisher
and authors do not represent nor claim ownership over them.
I. INTRODUCTORY CONCEPT
Without a detailed outline created prior to writing, a researcher cannot begin a literature
review. An outline presents a coherent and logical review and saves time and effort in the long
run.
II. LEARNING SKILLS FROM THE MELCs
After completing this activity sheet, you shall be able to present written review of literature
(CS_RS11-IIIf-j6).
III. ACTIVITIES
Directions: Read the text and study the outline below. Then, answer the questions that follow.
It is necessary for a researcher to identify how the writer of the article define the topic
and the presented themes and patterns on the paper. Study them carefully in order to create
an outline. After identifying themes and patterns, a researcher can sort the references under
appropriate headings. Once done, writing the discussion may commence.
Below is an outline for a literature review. Note that the term THEME used below is “a
broad word or phrase that synthesizes a narrower group of related findings” (Jackson, A., n.d.).
II. Theme A
a. Overview of characteristics of the theme (commonalities, differences,
nuances)
b. Sub-theme – narrow but grouped findings related to the theme
1. Start a paragraph with an argument sentence. This sentence (a) makes it clear to the
reader what conclusion you have reached about the material in the paragraph, and (b)
reinforces the fact that you are presenting a review of the literature, not merely a factual
report.
Examples:
a. The most robust and compelling finding for men and women who commit suicide is the
high prevalence of psychiatric illness.
b. Depression is highly prevalent among women who die by suicide.
c. Among women who die by suicide, alcohol abuse is also highly prevalent.
d. Whether the risk of suicide is affected by economic status is an area of extensive
exploration.
e. Specific types of employment may confer greater suicide risk. (Chaudron & Caine, 2004,
pp. 128-129).
3. Provide adequate detail. There should be enough detail about the reviewed literature to
support the conclusions drawn in order to avoid misleading the reader. Some typical issues
are: (a) generalizing on the basis of only one study, especially if it is very limited, and (b)
comparing studies without noting significant differences in, for example, the size and nature
of the study population, the method, and any other relevant factors.
4. Avoid repetitive style. Avoid beginning every sentence with a citation e.g. Jones’ (2002)
study found…. Green et al.’s (2004) research revealed…. Smith and Brown’s (2009) findings
showed….
Passive Voice: The participants were surveyed by Jones (2002), and it was found that…
Active Voice: Jones (2002) surveyed the participants and found…
Questions: Below are paragraphs taken from a literature review (Szpunar, 2020). Read them
and explain what is wrong in the first example and what is right in the second example.
Example 1
Richards finds that internet use is linked with greater political knowledge. People have
generally high levels of internet use (M = 8.28), but low levels of political knowledge (M =
3.25). However, the more hours people spent online, the more they knew. Richards also
finds that internet usage is linked with higher voting rates. The sample of the study was 250
people. Spencer finds that television is associated with less political knowledge, as well as a
lower chance of voting.
Example 2
IV. EVALUATION
Submit a detailed outline of literature review of your research. Be guided by the Rubrics
found in Part V.
www.rcampus.com
VII. REFERENCES
freepik. (n.d.). Teenager studying cartoon illustration. https://www.freepik.com/premium-
vector/teenager-studying-cartoon-illustration-student-preparing-exams-e-reading-ebooks-
archive-pupil-sitting-with-laptop-books-stack-isometric-clipart-distance-learning-education_
10659507.htm
iRubric: Literature Review Outline Rubric (Draft and Final). (n.d.). Literature Review Outline
Rubric (Draft and Final) https://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=F4B8CB&sp=yes&.