Adorno NewGrove
Adorno NewGrove
Adorno NewGrove
In 1927, again under the supervision of Hans Cornelius, Adorno submitted his
Habilitationsschrift, a critique of Kantian idealism which showed the increasing
influence of Marx and Freud (Der Begriff des Unbewussten in der
transzendentalen Seelenlehre, 1927, published 1973); it was not accepted. In
1931, now under Paul Tillich, he submitted a second Habilitationsschrift, a
critique of Kierkegaard's existentialist argument for ‘subjective
inwardness’ (Kierkegaard: Konstruktion des Ästhetischen, published 1933).
This was successful and he joined the philosophy department of the University
of Frankfurt and also became associated with the Institute for Social
Research, of which Max Horkheimer had just become director. His first large-
scale article on music, ‘Zur gesellschaftlichen Lage der Musik, which
appeared in 1932 in the first issue of the institute's journal, Zeitschrift für
Sozialforschung, put forward an extensive sketch for a sociology of music. In
the late 1920s and early 30s he was involved in an intensive correspondence
and public debates with Krenek on free atonality and serialism, and on
problems of form, genre and material in the music of the early 20th century
(Briefwechsel, 1974). At the same time he was engaged in developing a
theory of musical performance with the violinist Rudolf Kolisch.
When the Nazis came to power in 1933, Adorno's right to teach at the
University of Frankfurt was withdrawn. Initially he moved to Berlin to be with
his future wife, Gretel Karplus; his circle of acquaintances there included Kurt
Weill, Lotte Lenya, Bertolt Brecht, Hanns Eisler, Otto Klemperer, Siegfried
Kracauer, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch and Moholy-Nagy. In 1934 he went
into exile, first to England, where he began to study for an Oxford DPhil (it was
never completed). He continued to concentrate on the aesthetics of music,
producing the essay ‘Über Jazz’ in 1936 and, as an outcome of an intensive
correspondence with Benjamin, his long article ‘Über den Fetischcharakter in
der Musik und die Regression des Hörens’ (1938). In 1937 he married Karplus
and in 1938, at Horkheimer’s invitation, they moved to the USA. There Adorno
became a full member of the Institute for Social Research, which had moved
to New York. From 1938 to 1941 he collaborated with the sociologist Paul
Lazarsfeld on the Princeton Radio Research Project, doing empirically
orientated research on radio listeners (‘The Radio Symphony’, Radio
Research 1941, 1941), popular music (‘On Popular Music’, with George
Simpson, Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences, 1941), and later, at the
New School for Social Research, he collaborated with Eisler on a film music
project, Composing for the Films (in its original American edition under Eisler's
name alone, 1947). In 1941 he moved to Los Angeles, where he worked with
Horkheimer on Dialektik der Aufklärung (1947). He also collaborated with R.
Nevitt Sanford on the Berkeley Public Opinion Study and with Thomas Mann
as commodity at the level of its form, while in the process alienating itself from
its public, and a regressive, assimilated music that uncritically accepts its
commodity character, in the process becoming absorbed by the culture
industry as entertainment. Adorno's position has been criticized on the one
hand as theoretical mouthpiece for the aesthetics of the Second Viennese
School and its heirs, and on the other hand as élitist avant-garde rejection of
popular culture. A detailed and critical reading of his work, however, reveals a
nuanced and complex theoretical approach of relevance to a wider range of
musical contexts.
WRITINGS
BIBLIOGRAPHY