Law of Evidence Syllabus
Law of Evidence Syllabus
Law of Evidence Syllabus
ODISHA] SEMESTER VI
LAW OF EVIDENCE
Course Structure
LAW OF EVIDENCE
INDEX
1. Mechanical data.
2. Object.
3. Objectives.
4. Teaching Learning Methodology.
5. Evaluation System
● Measurement
● Evaluation of Application
6. Dispute Resolution.
7. Annexure I: Detailed Syllabus.
8. Annexure II: Readings.
[KIIT SCHOOL OF LAW, KIIT UNIVERSITY,
ODISHA] SEMESTER VI
LAW OF EVIDENCE
MECHANICAL DATA
LAW OF EVIDENCE
OBJECT
OBJECTIVES
This course assembles the Principles and Practices of the Law Of Evidence.
The objectives of the present course shall be: -
LAW OF EVIDENCE
The method to achieve these goals will be the lecture method, case study method
supplemented with journal articles, and discussions in the class.
Evaluation System
Measurement:
The performance of the students will be assessed on the basis of 100 marks out of which
end-term examination will be of 50 marks, mid-term examination will be of 30 marks
and internal examination will be of 20 marks.
Evaluation:
Dispute Resolution
In case of any dispute, it will be resolved as per the prescribed rules of the KIIT
University.
[KIIT SCHOOL OF LAW, KIIT UNIVERSITY,
ODISHA] SEMESTER VI
LAW OF EVIDENCE
Annexure – I
Syllabus Structure:
LAW OF EVIDENCE
Module – III: Admissions & Confessions
Definition of Admission, Forms of Admission
Persons whose Admissions are Relevant & Against Whom Admission may be Proved,
Evidentiary Value of Admissions
Definition & Evidentiary Value of Confession
Extra Judicial Confession, Confession caused by Threat, Confession to Police &
Confession of Co-accused,
Evidence by Accomplice
Case Laws:
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu [(2005) 11 SCC 600]. - Admission
Pakala Narayan Swami v. Emperor, AIR 1939 PC 47 - Confession
Palvinder Kaur v. State of Punjab, AIR 1952 SC 354 - Confession
Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor, AIR 1947 PC 67 - Section 27
Mohd. Inayatullah v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1976 SC 483 - Section 27.
Aghnoo Nagesia v. State of Bihar, AIR 1966 SC 119 - Section 25.
Module IV:Dying Declaration, Relevancy of Judgments and Character
Dying declarations - [The justification for relevance of dying declaration under Section
32 (1)].; The judicial standards for appreciation of evidentiary value of dying
declarations
Admissibility of judgments in civil and criminal matters (Section 43); “Fraud” and
“Collusion” (Section44)
Character when relevant; In Civil & Criminal Cases
Case Laws:
Queen Empress v. Abdullah, (1885) ILR 7 All 385 - Dying Declaration
Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 22 - Dying Declaration
P.V. Radhakrishna v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2003 SC 2859 - Principle of Dying
Declaration
State of Karnataka v. Shariff, AIR 2003 SC 1074 - Dying Declaration to Police
LAW OF EVIDENCE
Presumptions - (Kinds of Presumptions), Presumption as to Dowry Death, Presumption
as to Legitimacy.
Expert opinion (Forensic Evidence: - DNA Test, Narco-analysis. Brain-Mapping and
BEOS Test)
Oral and documentary evidence (Primary and Secondary Evidence)
Rules relating to Burden of proof
Estoppel, Promissory Estoppel
Privileged Communications
Case laws:
Ram Narain v. State of U.P. AIR 1973 SC 2200 - Section 45
Selvi v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 7 SCC 263 - Narco- Analysis
Rohit Shekhar v. N.D. Tiwari and Anr.(2012) 12 SCC 554 - DNA Test
Goutam Kundu v. State of W.B. AIR 1993 SC 2295 - Section 112.
R.S. Madnappa v. Chandramma, AIR 1965 SC 1812 - Estoppel
M.C. Verghese v. T.J. Ponnan, AIR 1970 SC 1876 - Section 122
State of U.P. v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SC 865 - Section 123
LAW OF EVIDENCE
Annexure – II (Readings)
Books:
LAW OF EVIDENCE
22. All England Reporter
Online Resources:
23. Manupatra
24. Lexis and Nexis
25. Westlaw
Movie: "Adam's Rib" (Katharine Hepburn, Spencer Tracy, 1949) "Disorder in the
Court"(3Stooges, 1939). "My Cousin Vinny;" "The Caine Mutiny"
(Humphrey Bogart, 1954) "The Rainmaker" (Matt Damon, 1997), "A
Few Good Men" (Tom Cruise, Demi Moore, 1992), Wild in the Country
(Elvis Presley). Kramer Vs. Kramer (Dustin Hoffman) Gandhi (Richard
Attenborough)