OB Case Study
OB Case Study
OB Case Study
ASSIGNMENT
SUBMITTED TO -: SUBMITTED BY -:
NIHAL YADAV
Q1
SOL 1
The main reason behind protecting the senior employee of the
company was chairman did not have any plans and upgradation
ideas to grow further, As the chairman was familiar with the senior
employee and he believes that they are the reason for the growth of
the company. The company runs on old policies and technology from
earlier whose motive to earn profit only and ignoring modification. if
we look from the perspective of the chairman of MIS Yes, it is right
on the part of the chairman to protect the senior employee, thereby
causing the problem to the new MD.As trust in them was mainly
affect that to secure them. But from the viewpoint of the new MD
and organizational need, steps should be taken to replace an old
senior employee with a new skilled person who has adequate
knowledge about a complex situation.
Q2
SOL 2
That’s not right its completely false that the chairman, not over-
rewarding long service certificate, the chairman have a policy for the
senior employee of giving long service certificate and reward to all
those who completed 20 years of service in the company. When Mr
Kumar observes that it is not given in the right criteria then he
instructs that it must be given to the person who deserves it.
Several employees were belonging to the same category of which
Mr. Thakur belongs, who was not happy with the decision of the new
MD’s policy. Thus conflict occurs against the new MD by a senior
employee in front of the chairman to not to accept these new
policies.
Q3
SOL 3
The senior employee is over-reacting to the changes as until Mr.
Kumar come along, Mr. Thakur had enjoyed the position of the head
of the training division, though there were no other training apart
from apprenticeship training, as Mr. Kumar tolerated him with the
hope that Mr. Thakur would reconcile himself to the changes. But he
continued to behave the same way, so this shows how employee
over-reacts to the situation of changes in the organization.
Q4
SOL 4
The changes in the organization Yes the new MD prepare the ground
for introducing them, as the new government policy there were
several new competitors to MIL arise. The MD felt that now there
was a strong need and urgency to bring in changes in the
organization. The new MD has to make it possible to take such
changes rapidly, and thus these situations create n environment of
making hasty himself. He looks such cases as on priority basis and
trying to bring such changes so the company face the challenges and
meet the requirement of the complex environment but these
changes are not possible without the involvement of chairman and
the chairman was with the senior employee and thus in result to MD
to remove himself from the position and company also.
Q5
SOL 5
The senior employee has the full skill to cope up with changes and as
the requirement of new skilled employee occur while observation
was done by Mr. Kumar. Mr. Kumar instructs the chairman about to
replace a senior employee who does not have adequate knowledge
but the chairman ignore it because if he believes that the handwork
of the senior employee is sufficient to meet the future requirement
and thus Mr. Kumar failed to make changes but for the future
perspective they need to change only those employee who did not
have such required skill and knowledge.
Q6
SOL 6
The assumption of the training manager that ‘over-protection is the
root cause of trouble’ so it is right the observation of Mr. Thakur
implies that new policy should bring changes to face competition.
Although it is an old company which beliefs in hard work and thus
replacing an old senior employee with a new employee would not
bring such changes and modification in the company and they start
protecting the senior employee. They were also over-paid. To
increase productivity they need to set up better plans and adopt
them by recruiting a new skilled employee. If there is allowed to
replace them then there would not be such a problem and it brings
efficiency and effectiveness also. They need to understand that only
hard work does not make such modification to the company. As
taking actions against Mr. Thakur and category of his employee start
conflict and in reply senior employee continue to behave the same as
Mr. Thakur behave and that was the main problem of the company.