HW5 Sol

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Math347, Spring 2018, Homework #5, Solution

Due to Wednesday, February 28, 2018

HW 5.1. Determine whether S is bounded and determine sup(S) and inf(S), if


they exist.
a) S = {x : x2 < 5x}
Solution: We find S = (0, 5). Then inf(S) = 0 and sup(S) = 5.
We can use definition to verify this, using conditions (1) and (2’).

b) S = {x : 2x2 < x3 + x}.


Solution: We find S = {x : x > 0 and x 6= 1} = (0, 1) ∪ (1, ∞).
We can use definition to verify that S is bounded below with inf(S) = 0.
But it it is not bounded above and thus S does not have the least upper bound.

HW 5.2. If a set S ⊆ R contains one of its upper bound, show this upper bound
is the supremum of S.
Proof: Assume that u is an upper bound of S and u is contained in S. Then
1) u is an upper bound for S (this is given).
2) if M 0 is an upper bound of S, we have u ≤ M 0 since u is an element in S.
By definition, this shows that u is the least upper bound of S.

HW 5.3. Let S ⊆ R be nonempty. Show that if u = sup(S), then for every number
n ∈ N the number u − n1 is not an upper bound of S, but the number u + n1 is an
upper bound of S.
Proof: First let us show: u − n1 is not an upper bound of S. Since u − n1 < u, if we
assume that u − n1 is an upper bound of S, then u is NOT the least upper bound
of S, a contradiction. This shows that u − n1 is not an upper bound of S (for any
n ∈ N).
Next, we show: n + n1 is an upper bound of S. Since u is an upper bound of S,
we have s ≤ u < u + n1 for all s ∈ S. This shows that u + n1 is an upper bound of
S.

HW 5.4. Let S be a bounded set in R and let S0 be a nonempty subset of S.


Show that
inf(S) ≤ inf(S0 ) ≤ sup(S0 ) ≤ sup(S).
Proof: Let ∅ = 6 S0 ⊆ S be bounded subsets of R. Then for any s0 ∈ S0 , we have
s0 ∈ S and thus s0 ≤ sup(S). This shows that sup(S) is an upper bound of S0 .
Since sup(S0 ) is the least upper bound of S0 , we must have
sup(S0 ) ≤ sup(S).
Similarly, for any s0 ∈ S0 , we have s0 ∈ S and thus s0 ≥ inf(S). This shows that
inf(S) is a lower bound of S0 . Since inf(S0 ) is the greatest lower bound of S0 , we
have
inf(S) ≤ inf(S0 ).
Since inf(S0 ) ≤ sup(S0 ), we get
inf(S) ≤ inf(S0 ) ≤ sup(S0 ) ≤ sup(S).
1
2

HW 5.5 If S = { n1 − 1
m : n, m ∈ N}, find inf(S) and sup(S).
1
Solution: Consider n = 1, 2, · · · , we get sequences {1 − m }, { 12 − m
1
}, · · · . We see
that 1 is an upper bound, and we claim that sup(S) = 1. We only need to verify
condition (2’) given in definition: For any u < 1, we have  = 1 − u > 0. It is known
1
from the Archimedean property that there exists m ∈ N such that m < 1 − u, or
1
equivalently, u < 1 − m . Therefore, any u < 1 is not an upper bound of S. This
shows that sup(S) = 1.
Considering m = 1, 2, · · · , we get sequences { n1 − 1}, { n1 − 12 }, · · · . It is clear
that −1 is a lower bound of S. For any −1 < v, we get v + 1 > 0 and thus there
exists a positive integer n ∈ N such that n1 < v + 1. It follows that we get n1 − 1 ∈ S
such that n1 − 1 < v. This shows that inf(S) = −1.

HW 5.6. Let (an ) and (bn ) be two bounded seuqences. Show that
sup(an + bn ) ≤ sup(an ) + sup(bn ).
Proof: For each n ∈ N, we have
an ≤ sup(an ) and bn ≤ sup(bn ).
Then an + bn ≤ sup(an ) + sup(bn ). This shows that sup(an ) + sup(bn ) is an upper
bound of (an + bn ). Since sup(an + bn ) is the the least upper boundand of (an + bn ),
we get
sup(an + bn ) ≤ sup(an ) + sup(bn ).
Remark: In this case, we can find two bounded sequences an = (−1)n−1 and
bn = (−1)n such that
sup(an + bn ) = 0 < sup(an ) + sup(bn ) = 2.

You might also like