ALS Consumerpreference
ALS Consumerpreference
ALS Consumerpreference
net/publication/312044663
CITATIONS READS
0 301
4 authors, including:
Kumaravelu Natarajan
Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University
54 PUBLICATIONS 47 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Serma Saravana Pandian A on 04 January 2017.
Consumer Preferences for Various Dairy Products in Chennai Metro City, Tamil
Nadu
SHILPA SHREE, J., A. SERMA SARAVANA PANDIAN, K. N. SELVAKUMAR AND N. KUMARAVELU
Department of Animal Husbandry Economics
Madras Veterinary College, Vepery,
Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Key words Consumer Preferences, Dairy Products, Based on this, income group classified into low (below
Chennai City. Rs. 20,000), medium (Rs. 20,001 – Rs. 40,000) and high
(above Rs. 40,000). Tabular and percentage analysis was
Dairying in India has come forth as an important sub- used to assess the consumer preference for dairy products
sector with an encouraging growth rate of five per cent in Chennai city.
over the years. It also plays a significant role in changing Garret’s Ranking Technique:
the social and economic status of people in India by
Garret’s ranking technique was adopted to analyse
providing a subsidiary source of income. At present, the
the reasons for the preference of the dairy products by
leading light of dairy world is India, which occupies the
household consumers in the study area. A list of reasons
first position in milk production with a production level of
was given to the consumers to rank it (1 to 7). The reasons
127.90 million tones of milk in 2011-12 (Basic Animal
are taste, satisfaction, bulkiness, quality, availability,
Husbandry Statistics, 2013). The per capita availability of
nutrition value and low market price. The order of merit
milk increased from 130 grams per day in 1950-51 to 290
given by the respondents was converted into the ranks by
grams per day in 2011-12 (Basic Animal Husbandry
using the following formula
SHREE et al., Consumer Preferences for Various Dairy Products in Chennai Metro City, Tamil Nadu 11017
Table 1. Preferences of sample households towards various dairy products (No. of households)
Milk products
Income
sRegions Milk Total number
groups Curd Ghee Butter Paneer Cheese Khoa Ice cream
of households
45 45 33 40 44
45
Low (30.00)a (30.00)a (26.40)a …… …… …… (29.41)a (29.53)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (73.33)b (88.89)b (97.78)b
59 59 54 35 24 13 54 59
59
Middle (39.33)a (39.33)a (43.20)a (52.24)a (53.33)a (46.43)a (39.71)a (39.60)a
(100.00)b
North (100.00)b (100.00)b (91.53)b (59.32)b (40.68)b (22.03)b (91.53)b (100.00)b
region 46 46 38 32 21 15 42 46
46
High (30.67)a (30.67)a (30.40)a (47.76)a (46.67)a (53.57)a (30.88)a (30.87)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (82.61)b (69.57)b (45.65)b (32.61)b (91.30)b (100.00)b
150 150 125 67 45 28 136 149
150
Overall (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (83.33)b (44.67)b (30.00)b (18.67)b (90.67)b (100.00)b
43 43 34 37 41
43
Low (28.67)a (28.67)a (27.20)a ……. …… …… (27.61)a (27.89)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (79.07)b (86.05)b (95.35)b
70 70 59 44 32 16 62 69
70
Middle (46.66)a (46.66)a (47.20)a (62.86)a (62.75)a (55.17)a (46.27)a (46.94)a
(100.00)b
Central (100.00)b (100.00)b (84.29)b (62.86)b (45.71)b (22.86)b (88.57)b (98.57)b
region 37 37 32 26 19 13 35 37
37
High (24.67)a (24.67)a (25.60)a (37.14)a (37.25)a (44.83)a (26.12)a (25.17)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (86.49)b (70.27)b (51.35)b (35.14)b (94.59)b (100.00)b
150 150 125 70 51 29 134 147
150
Overall (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (83.33)b (46.67)b (34.00)b (19.33)b (89.33)b (98.00)b
36 36 24 30 36
36
Low (24.00)a (24.00)a (18.90)a …… ……. …… (22.22)a (24.16)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (66.67)b (83.33)b (100.00)b
71 71 63 40 26 19 65 70
71
Middle (47.33)a (47.33)a (49.60)a (62.50)a (52.00)a (52.78)a (48.15)a (46.98)a
(100.00)b
South (100.00)b (100.00)b (88.73)b (56.34)b (36.62)b (26.76)b (91.55)b (98.59)b
region 43 43 40 24 24 17 40 43
43
High (28.67)a (28.67)a (31.50)a (37.50)a (48.00)a (47.22)a (29.63)a (28.86)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (93.02)b (55.81)b (55.81)b (39.53)b (93.02)b (100.00)b
150 150 127 64 50 36 135 149
150
Overall (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (84.67)b (42.67)b (33.33)b (24.00)b (90.00)b (99.33)b
124 124 91 107 121
124
Low (27.56)a (27.56)a (24.14)a …… …… …… (26.42)a (27.19)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (73.39)b (86.29)b (97.58)b
200 200 176 119 82 48 181 198
200
Middle (44.44)a (44.44)a (46.68)a (59.20)a (56.16)a (51.61)a (44.69)a (44.49)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (88.00)b (59.50)b (41.00)b (24.00)b (90.50)b (99.00)b
Overall
126 126 110 82 64 45 117 126
126
High (28.00)a (28.00)a (29.18)a (40.80)a (43.84)a (48.39)a (28.89)a (28.32)a
(100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (87.30)b (65.08)b (50.79)b (35.71)b (92.86)b (100.00)b
450 450 377 201 146 93 405 445 450
Overall (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)a (100.00)b
(100.00)b (100.00)b (83.78)b (44.67)b (32.44)b (20.67)b (90.00)b (98.89)b
Figures in parentheses indicate; a – Per cent to total across rows within columns; b – Per cent to total across columns within rows.
11018 Advances in Life Sciences 5(23), 2016
2 Satisfaction 53.07 III 55.63 II 58.70 II 67.87 III 63.45 II 62.43 II 55.62 III 55.56 III
3 Bulkiness 29.10 VII 37.24 VII 37.12 VI 50.85 VII 35.45 VI 33.26 VI 38.38 VII 31.33 VII
4 Quality 49.52 IV 47.86 IV 55.35 III 68.56 II 51.23 III 53.55 III 61.58 II 60.32 II
6 Nutritious
value 69.12 I 48.56 III 37.62 V 55.52 V 41.22 V 44.10 V 43.42 V 39.94 V
7 Low price 38.47 VI 46.39 VI 35.56 VII 51.26 VI 30.23 VII 30.98 VII 42.56 VI 37.24 VI
SHREE et al., Consumer Preferences for Various Dairy Products in Chennai Metro City, Tamil Nadu 11019