Alternatives To Animal Testing

BASIC-EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
CONCEPT PAPER
IN
PRACTICAL RESEARCH II
Grade 11, Humss B

Group 4
Leader:
Rashelle Badel
Co-Leaders:
Phoemela Shane Cuevas
Secretary:
Yshin Delos Santos
Member:
Lyka Rodriquez
Jerome Espina
Sandara Caunin
ALTERNATIVE TO ANIMAL TESTING
INTRODUCTION
Alternatives to animal testing are often less expensive, faster, and more reliable. Substituting
human experiments for animal tests does not imply putting human patients at risk. It also does
not imply a halt to medical advancement. Any experimental experiment or procedure in which a
live animal is required to experience something that is likely to cause them discomfort, misery,
pain, or long-term damage is considered an animal test. Animal trials are not the same as sending
your pet to the veterinarian. Animals used in laboratories are intentionally injured, not for their
own benefit, and are normally slaughtered at the conclusion of the experiment.
As seen in the recent film "Save Ralph," rabbits are used to research cosmetic
ingredients. Ralph is a tester, one of thousands of rabbits and other species used each year in
government-mandated chemical poisoning testing for products and their ingredients. Animal
experiments include inhaling poisonous gases from mice and rodents, force-feeding poisons to
puppies, and dripping corrosive substances into rabbits' sensitive eyes. And if a substance is
harmful to animals, it will also be sold to people.
Rather than killing animals, cell cultures may be used for research. Human cells have the
same benefits in culture as animal cells in that different cell types and tissues can be used and it
has also been used to develop novel small devices such as "organs-on-chips." These can be used
to research biological and disease processes instead of animals. Animals have no room in
laboratories. They are usually sterile, indoor environments where the animals are forced to live in
cages, with no freedom of movement or influence over their lives.
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

The vast majority of experimental animals are euthanized (killed) before or during the
procedure. There are no reliable figures on how many animals are euthanized in labs each year.
Animal research laboratories often dispose of not only animals, but also potentially hazardous
materials, food waste, and a range of supplies used during the testing process. Furthermore,
animal experimentation has a negative effect on water and air safety. If some believe that
experimentation on animals is acceptable, others still think it's incorrect, because the animals are
still a life and there are many alternative methods that can be studied, such as cell culture.
Animal experiments are harmful to our society even if the products they test become successful.
The positive effect of this is from experimental vaccines and drugs to transplant treatments, and
blood transfusions, animal science has aided us in making life-changing discoveries. As a result,
millions of lives have been saved or changed .The aim of this research was to ascertain the
results of animal testing and what would happen to them if it did or did not benefit and whether it
is beneficial or simply detrimental because some of the animals being studied are dying.
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

The researchers wanted to have an alternative tester instead of using animals to test some
cosmetics products. Instead of using animals as test subjects, researchers would use cell culture
to save animals from harm and death because some mice, rodents, rabbits, and guinea pigs tester
are suffer through assessments for skin irritation, eye irritation, and any kind of toxicity in these
cosmetic product studies. As a result, the animal can suffer serious injury or even death. To save
animals, researcher need to put a stop to this, and science needs to find an option that can be
tested without harming the animals.
Animal experiment should be prohibited because it violates the rights of animals, induces
discomfort and distress to the laboratory animals, and other methods of testing chemical toxicity
exist. Humans cannot excuse torturing and killing thousands of animals each year to conduct
laboratory tests or research drugs in the name of making life easier for themselves. Animals
should be treated with dignity and reverence, and this right is violated when animals are abused
for selfish human benefit.
FRAMEWORK
A. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Many people are aware that the testing of different cosmetic products causes animals. These
concepts will make identify the effects and impact of testing cosmetic products to animals testing
cosmetic products on animals.
B.CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT
 The researcher will  The researchers will  The data that is

be conducting a first conduct a pre- gathered will be the
study on the impact survey to determine conclusion of the
of animals testing. whether animal research conducted
testing should be which aims to know
discontinued and the impacts of
what alternatives to testing cosmetic
animal testing exist. product to animals.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
1. What is the profile of the respondents?
1.1 Name
1.2 Age
1.3 Gender
2. Does animal testing is helpful.
3. Does animal testing are good for animals?
4. Is there a significant effect of animal testing on animals?
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The study the researcher will be conducting will be significant endeavor in determining
the effectiveness of the effects and impact of alternative to animal testing.
Teachers- This study may serve as the way for teachers to determine the students who don’t
know about the alternatives to animal testing so they can help the students to improve their
learning.
Family - The study is significant to the family because it may help to know and aware about the
alternative to animal testing
Future researcher - It would help the future researcher that are interested in this study it will
serve as they basis and their background about their research.
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION
Since the study will cover the impacts alternative to animal testing, the following will describe
the scope and the delimitation of the study. The study will focus on G-11 students of Trace
College.

Alternatives To Animal Testing

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Alternatives To Animal Testing

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Alternatives To Animal Testing

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BASIC-EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Grade 11, Humss B

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

 The researcher will  The researchers will  The data that is

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

1. What is the profile of the respondents?

2. Does animal testing is helpful.

3. Does animal testing are good for animals?

4. Is there a significant effect of animal testing on animals?

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

SCOPE AND DELIMITATION

You might also like