Meyyappan 2019 IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 561 012064

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS You may also like


- Investigation of silicon grain structure and
Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Silica electrical characteristics of TFTs fabricated
using different crystallized silicon films by
fume and Pumice stone in Developing Light atmospheric pressure micro-thermal-
plasma-jet irradiation
Shohei Hayashi, Seiji Morisaki, Takahiro
Weight Concrete Kamikura et al.

- A new method for large-eddy simulations


To cite this article: PL Meyyappan et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 561 012064 of clouds with Lagrangian droplets
including the effects of turbulent collision
T Riechelmann, Y Noh and S Raasch

- Mechanical Properties of Lightweight


Concrete Using Class F Fly Ash as a
View the article online for updates and enhancements. Partial Replacement for Ordinary Portland
Cement
I M A K Salain

This content was downloaded from IP address 157.45.30.158 on 04/02/2022 at 07:48


ICMSMT 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 561 (2019) 012064 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/561/1/012064

Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Silica fume and


Pumice stone in Developing Light Weight Concrete

PL Meyyappan*, R Sutharsan and M AhamedAzik Ali


Department of Civil Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education,
Krishnnakoil, 626126, India

E-mail: *[email protected]

Abstract. The major challenge in the recent construction sector is to design the building with the cost
effective manner. In order to address this issue, self weight of the structural member has to be reduced
considerably, and then simultaneously the dimensions will be minimized. This will be only by means
of introducing light weight concrete (LWC). Different light weight aggregates are used by the past
researches to reduce the density. This study is planned to achieve the properties of LWC in considering
the importance to enhance the strength factors. Hence, in this experimental investigation, the influence
of the silica and pumice stone is studied on the various partial and full replacement levels. The
specimens are casted based on the arrived mix proportion and tested against compression, split tension
and flexure. The test result shows 0.6 to 0.7 times the strength achieved of the conventional concrete
for this developed LWC mix proportion. A considerable improvement is seen in the strength
parameters by the presence of 5 % silica fume.

1. Introduction
Aprime concern in the construction industry is to bring down the cost of the buildings in a feasible
ways but without the negotiation its mechanical and performance properties. In this regard, it is only
probable by reducing the dead loads of the structures and thereby some savings in the foundations,
materials and reinforcements in reducing the dimension of the columns, footings and other load
bearing elements [1,2,4,6,7,11]. This necessitate is to be addressed in the light weight concrete
(LWC). The density of the LWC is considerably made low than the conventional concrete and it is in
the limit of 1200 kg/m3- 1850 kg/m3 with incorporating the light weight aggregate either partially or
completely [4,5,8,9,12]. The various researchers used expanded shale, clay, slate, foamed slag,
sintered fly ash, vermiculite, expanded perlite, pumice stone, expanded glass, polystyrene beads etc as
light weight aggregates in the concrete [2,6,8,9,12]. Out of that aggregates, pumice stones has greater
advantage in performing better in the properties like thermal conductivity, freezing/thawing, non-toxic
and acoustical [2, 6, 12]. In many research studies, shows that the LWC might have strength only 45
% to 55 % compressive strength. Hence it is important that the properties of LWC should be attained
with some increase in the strength factor with the use of eco-friendly pumice stones. Therefore, in this
paper an attempt is made to develop the light weight concrete and also to enhance the strength
properties by adding 5 % silica fume content along with the different replacement levels of coarse
aggregate by pumice stones.

2. Materials Used
The following materials were used for this experimental study:

2.1. Cement
Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) of 43 grade confirming to the standards of IS: 8112-2013. Its
specific gravity is 3.12.

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
ICMSMT 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 561 (2019) 012064 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/561/1/012064

2.2. Fine Aggregate


M- Sand is used as a fine aggregate with the specific gravity of 2.88. It is related to zone II of IS 382 –
2016. Its fineness modulus is 2.76.

2.3. Coarse Aggregate


Coarse aggregate of size 12.5 mm with a specific gravity of 2.8 is used. Its fineness modulus is 4.6.

2.4. Fly ash


Class C flyash with a specific gravity 2.76 obtained from Tuticorin Thermal Power Station is used for
the replacement of cement in different levels.

2.5. Pumice stones


Pumice stones of gravity 0.92 g/cm3 are used and its specific gravity is found to be 0.95.

2.6. Admixture
Silica fume of specific gravity 2.34 is used as a mineral admixture.

2.7. Water
Potable drinking water is used for mixing LWC and curing purpose.

3. Experimental Study
The mix design arrived for this experimental study is 1 (C) : 1.37 (FA) : 2.24 (CA) : 0.42 (W/c). The
experimental investigation involves in evaluating the mechanical characteristics of the developed light
weight concrete based on the coarse aggregate replacement levels in 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% by
pumice stones along with 5 % silica fume in the arrived mix design. 18 Cube specimens of standard
dimension of 150 mm (length), 150 mm (breadth) and 150 mm (depth) were casted as per the mix
ratio for the compression test, 18 cylinder specimens of size 150 mm (diameter) and 300 mm (height)
for split tension test and 18 prism specimens of size 100 mm (breadth), 100 mm (Width) and 500 mm
(length) for flexure test were casted and allowed in water curing as shown in figure 1. The cube
specimens and cylinder specimens were tested for the 28 days strength in the CTM. The prisms
specimens were tested in the UTM under two point loading.

(a) (b) (c)


Figure 1. (a) - (b) Casting of specimens (c) Specimens under curing

2
ICMSMT 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 561 (2019) 012064 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/561/1/012064

(a) (b) (c)


Figure 2. (a) - (c) Experimental set up for testing hardened properties of LWC

4. Results and Discussions


Table 1 shows the test results conducted to examine the strength properties of compression, spit
tension and flexure of the developed light weight concrete in the various replacements levels from
0%, to 100% of pumice stones in the coarse aggregate content along with the 5 % addition of silica
fume. In this study, the average density of the conventional concrete is found to be 2600 kg/m 3 and it
is distinct clear that, the average density is brought down to 1600 kg/m3 by the significant effect of the
pumice stones in different replacement levels in to the coarse aggregate. For conventional concrete,
the strength of compression, split tension and flexure is found to be 32.07 N/mm2, 4.13 N/mm2 and
8.21 N/mm2 respectively. The presence of 5 % silica fume in the cement proportion will slightly
enhance the binding property of the concrete. Thereby the compressive strength is increase with a
gaining factor of 7 %. Similarly, both the strength of split tension and flexure is slightly increased by
means of 5 % in comparable with the conventional concrete.

The presence of 25 % of pumice stone in the concrete, makes the reduction of average density (2300
kg/m3) is 12 % of the density of conventional concrete but it is still not come to the range of light
weight concrete. However, in that instance, the compression strength had diminished to 30.60 N/mm2,
tensile strength reduced to 3.55 N/mm2 and flexural strength reduced to 6.85 N/mm2. Further if the
presence of pumice stone is increased 50 %, the density is in the border of light weight concrete and
conventional concrete and reduction rate is around 20 %. For this trial, there will be a further
reduction in the strength parameters of 20 % in compression and around 40 % in flexure and split
tensile test due to the consequence of improper bonding between the binding material and filler
material. In replacement of coarse aggregate to pumice stones by 75 % will results in bringing down
the density level to around 1850 kg/m3. This assures that, the corresponding trial is performing light
weight concrete basic requirements in the reduction of density as 30%. The increase in the
replacement levels of pumice stones is adversely affecting the strength of the concrete. The presence
of pumice stones is showing the inverse proportional character to the strength parameters and
proportional character to the declining level of density.

If the pumice stones are completely replacing the coarse aggregate (100%), the density is only 1600
kg/m3 which assure that, it lies well within the range of LWC requirements in the reduction rate of
around 40%. The declining trend in the strength parameters is continuing up to 45% for compressive
strength and around 65% to 75% for split tensile and flexure strength. This may be owing to the
influence of aggregate bonding nature and bonding strength in between cement paste and aggregates.
The tensile strength ranges from 12% to 24% of its compressive strength for the conventional
concrete and this ranges reduced to 12 % to 24% for the lower density concrete (light weight
concrete) as reflected in figure 3.

3
ICMSMT 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 561 (2019) 012064 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/561/1/012064

Table 1.Test results on hardened LWC for different replacements levels for Pumice stones
Replacements Avg.
Avg. Split Avg.
(%) Avg. Compression Split Flexure
Compression tension Flexure
Specimen Density strength tension strength
Silica Pumice strength strength strength
(kg/m3) (N/mm2) strength (N/mm2)
fume stones (N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2)
(N/mm2)
32.44 3.97 8.3
CC 0 0 2600 3222 32.07 4.13 4.13 8.25 8.21
31.56 4.29 8.1
33.78 5.29 8.5
CC SF 5 0 2600 34.44 34.43 4.45 4.39 8.75 8.71
35.11 4.45 8.9
31.16 3.5 6.95
SF 25 5 25 2340 29.79 30.60 3.5 3.55 6.85 6.85
30.86 3.66 6.75
25.33 2.38 4.85
SF 50 5 50 2080 25.66 25.73 2.54 2.54 4.7 4.7
26.22 2.7 4.65
22.22 1.9 3.55
SF 75 5 75 1820 2267 22.64 2.06 2.08 3.43 3.44
23.33 2.28 3.35
17.33 1.43 2.1
SF 100 5 100 1600 17.78 19.92 1.59 1.69 2.05 2.03
18.67 1.75 1.95

35
Strength parameter s (N/mm2)

30
25
20
Compressive Strength
15
Split tensile strength
10
Flexural strength
5
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Replacement levels of Pumice stones

Figure 3.Relationship between strength and replacement levels of pumice stones

5. Conclusions
The subsequentfindings are arrived in this experimental investigation,
1. Addition of pumice stones yields the results of density as 1600 kg/m 3 which is 40 % less than
the conventional concrete (2600kg/m3) which confirms the development of light weight
concrete.
2. The additional content of 5 % of silica fume shows increase on the strength parameters
around 5 % to 7 % which will arrest the micro pores of concrete as filler material and helps in
attaining better workability.

3. The developed light weight concrete has compressive strength in the range of 60% to 70% of
the conventional concrete strength. The reduction in the strength may be due to lacking of

4
ICMSMT 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 561 (2019) 012064 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/561/1/012064

bonding strength between the cement paste and aggregate interface.


4. To increase the strength criteria for the light weight concrete, the addition of silica fume can
be extended from 5 % to 20 %. If required, fly ash can be along with that.

Acknowledgements
Authors wishing to acknowledge the physical support given by Mr. R. Anand, Mr. S. Anand Ganesh
and Mr. T. Arumugam throughout this experimental study.

References

[1] SwamyR N and G H1984Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams made with
Fly ash Coarse AggregatesInt. J. of Cement Com. and Lt. Wt. Conc. 6pp189-196

[2] Hassanpour M, Shafigh P and MahmudHB2012Lightweight Aggregate Concrete


FiberReinforcement–A ReviewConst. and Building Mat. 37 pp452-461

[3] ChanYW and ChuS H2004Effect of Silica Fume on Steel FiberBond Characteristics in
Reactive Powder ConcreteCement and Conc. Res. 34 pp1167-1172

[4] DuzgunO A, Gul R and Aydin A C2005Effect of Steel Fibers on the Mechanical
Properties of Natural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Mat. Letters 59 pp3357-3363

[5] Shafigh P, Jumaat M Z and Mahmud 2010Mix Design and Mechanical Properties of Oil
Palm Shell Lightweight Aggregate Concrete: AReview Int. J. of the Phy. Sci. 5 pp2127-
2134

[6] LibreN A, Shekarchi M, Mahoutian M andSoroushian P2011Mechanical Properties of


Hybrid FiberReinforced Lightweight Aggregate Concrete made with Natural
PumiceConst.and Building Mat. 25 pp2458-2464

[7] BeaucourA L, OrtolaS, DumontetH and Cabrillac R2009Influence of Volume Fraction


and Characteristics of Lightweight Aggregates on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete
Const.and Building Mat.23 pp2821-2828

[8] Demirboga R and Gul R 2003 The Effects of Expanded Perlite Aggregate, Silica fume
and Fly ash on the Thermal Conductivity of Lightweight Concrete Cement and Conc.
Research 33 pp723-727

[9] Wongkeo W andChaipanich A2010 Compressive Strength, Microstructure and Thermal


Analysis of Autoclaved and Air Cured Structural Lightweight Concrete made with Coal
bottom ash and Silica fume Mat. Sci.andEngg527 pp3676-3684

[10] Minapu L K, Ratnam M V and Rangaraju U 2013 Experimental Study on Light Weight
Aggregate Concrete with Pumice Stone, Silica fume and Fly ash as a Partial Replacement
of Coarse Aggregate Int. J. Inno. Res. of Engg and Tech.3 pp18130-18138

[11] Devi Pravallika B, VenkateswaraRao K 2016 The Study on Strength Properties of Light
Weight Concrete using Light Weight Aggregate Int. J. Sci. Research 5 pp1735-1739

5
ICMSMT 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 561 (2019) 012064 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/561/1/012064

[12] Hossain K M A2004 Properties of volcanic pumice based cement and lightweight
concrete Cement and Conc.Research 34 pp283-291

You might also like