Marijuana Clemency Letter To President Biden

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 25
At a glance
Powered by AI
The letter urges President Biden to grant a full pardon to those with federal convictions for non-violent marijuana offenses in order to remedy racial injustices and advance public safety and economic prosperity.

The letter argues that a pardon would remedy racial injustices in the 'war on drugs' and that incarcerating people for marijuana is a misuse of resources given most Americans now oppose prohibition and half have used marijuana.

The letter argues that federal marijuana convictions not only result in incarceration but make it difficult for those convicted to get jobs, housing and education and limit their constitutional rights, putting the American Dream further out of reach.

September 14, 2021

President Joseph R. Biden, Jr.


The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20500

RE: Pardon for Federal Marijuana Offenders

Dear Mr. President:

We write in support of your strong leadership on criminal justice reform in the United States.
We share your goals of a more just and fair society that lives up to the promises made in the
Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. We believe, as you do, that real and
lasting public safety can only be achieved by fulfilling those promises.

For these reasons, we urge you to exercise your authority as the chief law enforcement officer
and the sole decision-maker on clemency under the U.S. Constitution to grant a full, complete,
and unconditional pardon to all persons subject to federal criminal or civil enforcement on the
basis of non-violent marijuana offenses.

As you know, the federal “war on drugs”1 has crushed many souls and countless futures, while
spreading intolerable levels of mistrust and dysfunction between minority communities and those
sworn to protect them.2 Although the war impacts individuals of all races, the effects of drug
prohibition—from surveillance and arrest, to trial and conviction, to incarceration and reentry
into society—are felt most keenly by the poor, the powerless, and people of color.3 Reckoning
with these harms is a critical civil rights issue, which must proceed with what Dr. King
memorably described as the “fierce urgency of now.”4

This resolve is witnessed today in both red and blue states, from coast to coast, as the American
people call for an end to marijuana prohibition. Whatever one thinks of other drugs and other
defendants, incarcerating marijuana offenders in federal prisons is a misuse of our nation’s
resources and grossly hypocritical, given that a clear majority of Americans oppose marijuana
prohibition and about half admit to using the drug during their lifetime.5 It also stands against
the arc of history and the principle of federalism: nearly three-quarters of the states have now
abandoned the federal government’s blanket criminal ban in favor of safe, regulated legal access
to marijuana for adults and/or those with qualifying medical conditions.6

The harms of incarceration are obvious, but the pains of federal marijuana convictions transcend
prison walls, making it more difficult for someone to get a job, access affordable housing, and
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 2

receive an education.7 A conviction can forever limit an individual’s constitutional rights and
can put the American dream further out of reach for an entire family.

Enough is enough. No one should be locked up in federal prison for marijuana. No one should
continue to bear the scarlet letter of a federal conviction for marijuana offenses.

We know you share our concerns. In November 2019, during a Democratic Primary Debate, you
stated: “I think we should decriminalize marijuana, period. And I think everyone—anyone who
has a record—should be let out of jail, their records expunged, … completely zeroed out.”8 On
the eve of your election, you reaffirmed “my commitment to you,” the American people, to
“decriminalize marijuana and automatically expunge prior marijuana convictions.”9 You were
right then, and you remain right today.

Relief from the federal war on marijuana would not only be just, it would also be good policy by
advancing public safety and economic prosperity.10 A general pardon poses a low risk to the
American public by expunging records and releasing the last remaining prisoners of federal
marijuana prohibition. Those who will have their sentences commuted comprise a small
percentage of the federal prison population and are incarcerated only for non-violent marijuana
offenses.11 All other beneficiaries of a categorical pardon represent an even lower risk, since
these people are already living peacefully among their neighbors.12

A general pardon of all federal marijuana offenders would also be consistent with the
Constitution and past practices. Presidents from both political parties have issued categorical
grants of clemency when circumstances warranted it. In 1974, President Ford established a
program of conditional clemency for Selective Service Act violators.13 In 1977, President Carter
issued a categorical pardon to all Selective Service Act violators, closing the book on a costly
and painful war.14 You have the power to do the same for the federal war on marijuana.

We appreciate that the Biden-Sanders Task Force recommendations speak to these issues,15 and
we recognize that expungement of harmful convictions is an important part of the healing
process. By your act of constitutional grace, a general clemency will send a clear and powerful
message that our country is truly taking a new course on criminal justice policy and practice.

Thank you for your leadership in reforming criminal justice and advancing public safety in
America today.

Sincerely,

Weldon Angelos Erik Luna

on behalf of 150+ artists, athletes, producers, lawmakers, law enforcement officials,


academics, business leaders, policy experts, reform advocates, and other professionals
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 3

LIST OF SIGNATORIES

ENTERTAINMENT

MUSIC

Drake
Four-Time Grammy Award-Winning Recording Artist (credits include 11x Platinum Single
“God’s Plan” & 8x Platinum Single “Hotline Bling”); Actor; Producer; Entrepreneur

Killer Mike
Rap Artist - Founding member of rap duo “Run the Jewels,” Performed Grammy winning song
“The Whole World” with Outkast; Political Activist – Recipient of the first ever Billboard
Change Maker Award, created to recognize an artist or group that speaks truth to power through
their music and celebrity

Tory Lanez
Grammy-nominated, Multi-Platinum Rap Superstar/Singer/Songwriter/Record Producer;
Founder – Canadian record label and management company One Umbrella

Ty Dolla $ign
Rapper/Singer/Songwriter/Musician/Record Producer – Currently with Atlantic Records, known
for his songs "Paranoid,” "Or Nah," and "Blasé" as well as writing contributions to "Loyal" by
Chris Brown, "Post to Be" by Omarion featuring Brown and Jhené Aiko and “FourFiveSeconds”
by Rihanna

T.I.
Three-Time Grammy-Award Winning Rapper; CEO - Grand Hustle Records; Actor – credits
include ‘Get Hard’ with Will Ferrell and Kevin Hart

2 Chainz
Grammy-Award Winning Recording Artist – songs ‘No Lie,’ ‘Birthday Song,’ and ‘I’m
Different’ listed in top 50 of Billboard top 100

Baby Bash
Grammy-Nominated Recording Artist – song ‘Cyclone’ landed on Billboard charts

Dame Dash
Co-Founder – Roc-A-Fella Records with Jay Z; Co-Creator – Rocawear Clothing; Founder –
Dame Dash TV

Dante Thomas
Platinum-selling Recording Artist – credits include international hit single “Miss California”
featuring Pras
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 4

Dave East
Rapper – album reached #9 on Billboard 100, featuring Wiz Khalifa and Chris Brown;
Songwriter; & Actor (starred in file ‘Beats’ featured on Netflix)

Freeway
Rapper – Roc Nation Label, member of rap group State Property, has worked alongside Jay-Z on
multiple projects

Gunna
Rapper – Best known for his collaborations with Lil Baby and Young Thug, second studio album
Wunna debuted atop the Billboard 200.

Jackboy
Rapper – presently signed to Empire/Sniper Gang, known for his collaborations with Kodak
Black, music career began with virality on YouTube

John Forté
Grammy Award-Winning Record Producer – classically trained violinist, worked with multi-
platinum group ‘The Fugees’; Rapper

Kodak Black
Rapper – Currently with Atlantic Records, second album Dying to Live (2018) peaked at number
one on the Billboard 200, single “Zeze” (featuring Travis Scott and Offset) peaked at number 2
on the Hot 100; Philanthropist

Lil’ Baby
Rapper – Currently with Motown Records, named ‘Artist of the Year’ at the 2020 Apple Music
Awards, nominated for three Grammy Awards, two American Music Awards and two MTV
Video Music awards

Lil Yachty
Rapper – Signed a joint venture record deal with Quality Control Music, Capitol Records, and
Motown Records, all four of his albums have charted within the top 20 of the Billboard 200

Mutulu “M-1” Olugbala


Rapper – Member of hip-hop group Dead Prez; social impact artist & global force connector;
Co-founder, Urban Aroma

Loon
Rapper – best known for his association with Sean Combs's Bad Boy Records; featured artist on
Combs's 2002 hits "I Need a Girl (Part One)" and "I Need a Girl (Part Two)"; Criminal Justice
Reform Advocate with Jay Z’s REFORM Alliance)

Meek Mill
Grammy-nominated Recording Artist – single “Going Bad” rose to number 6 on Billboard Hot
100; Criminal Justice Reform Advocate – created the REFORM alliance with Jay-Z
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 5

Russ
Rapper/Songwriter/Record Producer – platinum record There’s Really a Wolf, multi-platinum
singles ‘What They Want’ and ‘Losin Control’

Mopreme Shakur
Member of Tupac Shakur’s Rap Group Thug Life

Jason Flom
Founder & CEO of Lava Records; Former CEO of Virgin Records; Former Chairman & CEO of
Atlantic Records; Former Chairman & CEO of Capitol Music Group

Pierre “Pee” Thomas


CEO – Quality Control Music, credits include groundbreaking acts such as Migos, Lil’ Yachty,
and Rich the Kid

Quavo
Rapper/Record Producer – Co-founder and front man of hip-hop trio “Migos,” solo album Quavo
Huncho peaked at number 2 on the Billboard 200

Stalley
Rapper – Independent artist, most recent mixed tape ‘Savage Journey to the American Dream’
reached 100K downloads in the first week, was nominated for BET Hip Hop Awards for “Best
Mixtape Category”

Stevie J
Grammy Award-Winning Record Producer – production credits include Puff Daddy’s No Way
Out album & Notorious B.I.G.’s Life After Death album and Mariah Carey’s Butterfly album;
Reality TV Star – Cast member on Love & Hip Hop: Atlanta

Tee Grizzley
Rapper – released debut single "First Day Out" through YouTube gaining over two million views
in less than three weeks leading to a record deal with 300 Entertainment and Atlantic Records

E.D.I. Mean
Rapper; Actor – member of 2Pac’s legendary rap group The Outlawz; appeared on over 60
Million Records Sales Worldwide; credits include appearances on Me Against the World, All
Eyez On Me, Makaveli, Still I Rise, Until The End of Time, and Better Dayz

Waka Flocka Flame


Rapper – became a mainstream artist with the release of his singles “O Let's Do It,” “Hard in da
Paint,” and "No Hands" (featuring Roscoe Dash and Wale) which peaked at number 13 on the
US Billboard Hot 100; Reality TV Start – For Love & Hip Hop: Atlanta

Young Noble
Rapper; Actor; Member of 2Pac’s Legendary Rap Group The Outlawz; (credits include
appearances on Makaveli, Still I Rise, Until The End of Time, Better Dayz & All Eyez On Me the
Movie); Appeared on over 60 Million Records Sales Worldwide
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 6

Young Buck
Rapper – former member of 50 Cent’s G-Unit, album Straight Outta Cashville debuted at
number 3 on the Billboard 200 with about 361,000 copies sold in the first week and has since
been certified Platinum; Music Executive – heads own record label Cashville Records

Young Scooter
Rapper – affiliated with Freebandz and 1017 Brick Squad Records, mixtape Street Lottery was
certified gold on popular mixtape site DatPiff and was placed at number 24 on SPIN's 40 Best
Hip-Hop Albums of 2013; CEO – Black Migo Gang

SPORTS

Deion Sanders
NFL Hall of Famer – Super Bowl champion with the San Francisco 49ers and Dallas Cowboys
(also played for Atlanta Falcons, Washington Redskins, Baltimore Ravens); Former MLB player
– outfielder for New York Yankees, Atlanta Braves, Cincinnati Reds, and San Francisco Giants

Kevin Garnett
NBA Hall of Famer – NBA Champion with the Boston Celtics, first player in NBA draft (1995,
4th overall) selected directly out of high school since 1975

Badou Jack
Professional Boxer – World Champion in Two Weight Classes (WBC Super-Middleweight Title
and WBA Light-Heavyweight Title)

Al Harrington
Former NBA Player – forward/center for the Indiana Pacers and six other NBA teams; former
amateur National Player of the Year

Stephen Jackson
Former NBA Player – NBA Champion with the San Antonio Spurs, shooting guard/small
forward with six other NBA teams; Civil Rights Activist

Julio Jones
NFL Player – Wide receiver for the Tennessee Titans, reached 10,000 receiving yards faster than
anyone in NFL history in 2011, played 10 seasons with the Atlanta Falcons (was the first to be
named ‘All-Pro’ for the Falcons in 2015)

J.R. Smith
Former NBA Player - NBA Champion with the Cleveland Cavaliers and Los Angeles Lakers,
shooting guard with the Denver Nuggets and New York Knicks, 2012-13 NBA Sixth Man of the
Year

John Wall
NBA player – Point guard for the Houston Rockets, played 10 seasons with the Washington
Wizards, five-time NBA All-Star, first overall pick in 2010 NBA Draft
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 7

Keone Kela
MLB Player – Pitcher for San Diego Padres, previously played for the Texas Rangers and
Pittsburgh Pirates

FILM & FASHION

Brad Furman
Director/Producer/Writer - credits include The Lincoln Lawyer (2011), The Infiltrator (2016),
Justin Bieber: What Do You Mean? (2015)

Louis Lombardi
Actor – credits include roles on Sopranos, Fox’s TV Series 24, Natural Born Killers

Jeremy Meeks
Fashion Model; Actor

Marc Levin
Award-winning Producer/Director – credits include Slam (1998) Chasing the Thunder (2018),
Thug Life in D.C. (1998), television show Brick City won Peabody Award, received three Emmy
Awards (1988, 1989, 1999) and the 1997 DuPont-Columbia Award

Michael “Big Hollis” Goldstein


Co-Founder of the Weldon Project; Music Producer; Filmmaker (credits include Matthew
McConaughey’s movie Lincoln Lawyer)

ADVOCATES

Weldon Angelos
President, The Weldon Project; Co-Founder, MISSION [GREEN]; Music Producer (including
credits with Snoop Dogg and 2Pac’s Outlawz); sentenced to 55 years’ imprisonment for federal
marijuana offenses; released in 2016 and granted full presidential pardon in 2021

Brittany K. Barnett
Co-Founder, Buried Alive Project; Attorney; Entrepreneur

Grover Norquist
President, Americans for Tax Reform

Nkechi Taifa
President, The Taifa Group, and Convener of the Justice Roundtable; Senior Fellow, Center for
Justice, Columbia University; Former Advocacy Director for Criminal Justice, Open Society
Foundations (2002-2018); Founding Director, Equal Justice Program, Howard University School
of Law (1996-2002); Former Legislative Counsel, American Civil Liberties Union (1991-1996)
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 8

Mark Holden
Senior Vice President (ret.), Koch Industries, Inc.; Chairman, Board of Directors, Americans For
Prosperity

Pat Nolan
Director Emeritus – American Conservative Union Foundation’s Center for Criminal Justice
Reform (now the Nolan Center for Justice); Former President – Justice Fellowship (Prison
Fellowship’s program on criminal justice reform); one of the founders of the modern criminal
justice reform movement

Amy Povah
Founder – CAN-DO Clemency

Doug Deason
Philanthropist; Businessman; Criminal Justice Reform Advocate

Alice Johnson
Author – After Life: My Journey from Incarceration to Freedom; Public Speaker; Criminal
Justice Reform Advocate; President Trump Clemency Recipient

Shaleen Title
Distinguished Cannabis Policy Practitioner in Residence, Drug Enforcement and Policy Center,
The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, and Former Commissioner, Massachusetts
Cannabis Control Commission

Katie Sinquefield
Philanthropist

Brandon Bolton
Director of Social Equity, Project Mission Green; Founder, United Core Alliance

Corvain Cooper
Advocate; 40 Tons Chief Ambassador

Connor Boyack
President – Libertas Institute, Named ‘Most Politically Influential’ by The Salt Lake Tribune;
Author – best known for ‘The Tuttle Twins’

Dale Sky Jones


Drug policy reformer; Chancellor, Oaksterdam University

Todd Scattini
Advocate; Lieutenant Colonel (Ret.) – United States Army

Donte Westmoreland
Social Justice & Social Equity Advocate, Last Prisoner Project
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 9

BUSINESS LEADERS

Kyle Kazan
American businessman/Venture capitalist/Real estate investor; CEO – Glass House Group;
former police officer – Torrance Police Department

Michael “Big Mike” Straumietis


Founder & CEO of Advanced Nutrient; Philanthropist; Founder, Humanity Heroes

Nick Kovacevich
CEO, Greenlane Holdings, Inc.

Kellen O’Keefe
President & CEO, Flower One; Advisor to Cookies, Old Pal, and GPen

Jason Beck
Business Executive; Advocate

GOVERNMENT

ELECTED OFFICIALS

Gary Johnson
29th Governor of New Mexico, 1995-2003 (Republican); Libertarian Party Nominee for U.S.
Senate (2018); Libertarian Party Nominee for President of the United States (2012 & 2016)

Joe Cunningham
U.S. Representative, South Carolina 1st District (2019-21); Candidate for Governor of South
Carolina

Peter Kinder
Lieutenant Governor of Missouri (2004-2016); Missouri State Senator (1992-2004)

Eddie Melton
Senator – Indiana State Legislature; Former Social Worker and National Leader in Youth
Mentoring – helped implement President Obama’s “My Brother’s Keeper” initiative

Ross C. (Rocky) Anderson


Mayor – Salt Lake City, Utah (2000–2008); Presidential Candidate – Justice Party (2012)

Jason Stewart
Mayor, City of Cool Valley, MO

Majority Leader Kimberly A. Lightford


Illinois State Senate (Dist. 4)
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 10

Minority Leader John Rizzo


Missouri State Senate (District 11)

Assistant Minority Leader Brian Williams


Missouri State Senate (District 14)

Rep. Joe Adams


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 86)

Rep. Carol Ammons


Illinois State House of Representatives (Dist. 103)

Rep. Marlon Anderson


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 76)

Rep. LaDonna Appelbaum


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 71)

Sen. Lauren Arthur


Missouri State Senate (District 17)

Sen. Doug Beck


Missouri State Senate (District 1)

Rep. Richard Brown


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 27)

Rep. Ingrid Burnett


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 19)

Rep. Doug Clemens


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 72)

Rep. Jo Doll District


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 83)

Rep. Willie Dove


Kansas State House of Representatives (Bonner Springs)

Jacob Flores
Commissioner – Parks & Recreation Department, San Bernardino (CA)

Rep. Mary Flowers


Illinois State House of Representatives (Dist. 31)

Rep. LaShawn Ford


Illinois State House of Representatives (Dist. 8)
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 11

Rep. Ron Hicks


Missouri State House of Representative (District 102)

Sen. Jeff Irwin


Michigan State Senate (D-19), 2019-Present; Missouri State House of Representatives (D-53),
2010-2017

Sen. Adriane Johnson


Illinois State Senate (Dist. 30)

Sen. Connie Johnson


Oklahoma State Senate (Holdenville)

Rep. Michael Johnson


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 23)

Rep. Ashley Bland Manlove


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 26)

Rep. Bridget Walsh Moore


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 93)

Sen. Angela Mosley


Missouri State Senate (District 13)

Rep. Barbara Phifer


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 90)

Rep. Crystal Quade


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 132)

Sen. Greg Razer


Missouri State Senate (District 7)

Sen. Steven Roberts


Missouri State Senate (District 5)

Sen. Jill Schupp


Missouri State Senate (District 24)

Rep. Jeff Shipley


Iowa State House of Representatives (Fairfield)

Sen. Barbara Anne Washington


Missouri State Senate (District 9)
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 12

Rep. Emily Weber


Missouri State House of Representatives (District 24)

Aaron Wojciecheowski
Councilman, Oskosh, Wisconsin (2021-Present); County Board Supervisor, Winnebago County,
2016-2020

David Woody
County Clerk – Clinton County, Missouri; Republican Candidate for Missouri State House
District 8

LAW ENFORCEMENT & CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Kevin H. Sharp
Former U.S. District Court Judge (M.D. Tenn.)

Bill Nettles
U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina (2010-2016) – launched the Stop and Take a
New Direction (STAND) program to divert street-level drug dealers facing federal charges into
rehabilitation)

Barry Grissom
U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas (2010-2016) – worked to enhance communal relations
with law enforcement and fight human trafficking; Former Member of Attorney General’s
Advisory Committee

Patrick Hamacher
Assistant Prosecutor, Saint Louis Circuit Attorney's Office (2011-2018)

Rocky Kingree
Former Prosecutor – Carter County (MO)

Kim Kowalski
Former Detective and Officer – St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department

Wesley Bell
St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney, 2019-Present; Ferguson, Missouri City Council, 2015-
2018

Gamal Castile
Former Police Officer – Columbia (MO) Police Department

Deputy Chief Stephen Downing (Retired)


Los Angeles Police Department
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 13

Major Neill Franklin (Retired)


Law Enforcement Action Partnership

Lieutenant Diane Goldstein (Retired)


Executive Director Law Enforcement Action Partnership

Jamie Haase
Former Special Agent – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Speaker – Law
Enforcement Against Prohibition

Chris Hammann,
Police Chief – New Haven (MO) Police Department; Army Veteran

Chief Larry A. Kirk (Retired)


Old Monroe Police Department, Missouri

Captain Leigh Maddox (Retired)


Maryland State Police

Deputy Nick Morrow (Retired)


Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department

Captain Sonia Pruitt (Retired)


Founder – The Black Police Experience

Nate Bradley
Wheatland Police Office (2002-2006 & 2008-2009); Sutter County Sheriff’s Department Deputy
County Official (2006-2008); Executive Director, Cannabis Consumers Policy Council (2015-
Present)

Inge Fryklund
Former Assistant State’s Attorney – Cook County, IL

Mike Sharp
Former Sheriff – Jackson County (MO); Former President – Missouri Sheriff's Association

Bishop Mark Tolbert


Pastor – Victorious Life Church; Member – Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners

Darren White
Sheriff – Bernalillo County Sheriff (2003-2009); Cabinet Secretary – New Mexico Department
of Public Safety (1995-1999)

Richard Van Wickler (Retired)


Superintendent of Corrections – Cheshire County, NH
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 14

ACADEMICS

Albert W. Alschuler
Julius Kreeger Professor Emeritus of Law and Criminology, University of Chicago Law School

Jody Armour
Roy P. Crocker Professor of Law, University of Southern California Law School

Rachel E. Barkow
Vice Dean, Charles Seligson Professor of Law, and Faculty Director of the Center on the
Administration of Criminal Law, New York University School of Law

Shima Baradaran Baughman


Associate Dean of Faculty Research & Development, Presidential Scholar and Professor of Law,
University of Utah College of Law

Valena Beety
Professor of Law and Deputy Director of the Academy for Justice, Arizona State University
Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Douglas A. Berman
Newton D. Baker-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law and Professor of Law; Executive Director of
the Drug Enforcement and Policy Center, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law

Richard J. Bonnie
Harrison Foundation Professor of Medicine and Law, Professor of Psychiatry and
Neurobehavioral Sciences, and Director of the Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy,
University of Virginia

Paul Butler
The Albert Brick Professor in Law, Georgetown University; Author of Let’s Get Free: A Hip-
Hop Theory of Justice

I. Bennett Capers
Professor of Law and Director of the Center on Race, Law & Justice, Fordham University

Jennifer M. Chacón
Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law

Gabriel J. Chin
Edward L. Barrett Chair in Law and Martin Luther King, Jr. Professor of Law, University of
California, Davis

Frank Rudy Cooper


William S. Boyd Professor of Law and Director of the Program on Race, Gender, and Policing,
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 15

Angela J. Davis
Distinguished Professor of Law, American University

Jeffrey A. Fagan
Isidor and Seville Sulzbacher Professor of Law and Professor of Epidemiology, Columbia
University

Henry F. Fradella
Professor and Associate Director, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State
University; Affiliated Faculty, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law;
Executive Director, Western Society of Criminology

Brandon L. Garrett
L. Neil Williams, Jr. Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Center for Science and
Justice, Duke University

David A. Harris
Sally Ann Semenko Endowed Chair and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of
Law

Elizabeth Hinton
Associate Professor of History, Department of History and the Department of African American
Studies, Yale University; Professor of Law, Yale Law School

Shon Hopwood
Associate Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center

Douglas Husak
Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, Rutgers University

Sam Kamin
Chauncey G. Wilson Memorial Research Chair and Professor of Law, University of Denver
College of Law

Alex Kreit
Assistant Professor of Law; Director of the Center on Addiction Law & Policy, Northern
Kentucky University Salmon P. Chase College of Law

Erik Luna
Amelia D. Lewis Professor of Constitutional & Criminal Law; Faculty Director of the Academy
for Justice, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law

Ben McJunkin
Assistant Professor of Law and Associate Director of the Academy for Justice, Arizona State
University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 16

Tracey L. Meares
Walton Hale Hamilton Professor and a Founding Director of the Justice Collaboratory, Yale Law
School

Robert A. Mikos
LaRoche Family Chair in Law and Professor of Law, Vanderbilt University Law School

Alexandra Natapoff
Lee S. Kreindler Professor of Law, Harvard Law School

Ashley Oddo
Associate Director of the Academy for Justice, Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor
College of Law

Mark Osler
Robert & Marion Short Distinguished Chair in Law and Professor of Law, University of St.
Thomas; Assistant United States Attorney (1995-2000)

Eve Brensike Primus


Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law, University of Michigan

Michael Serota
Vis. Ass’t. Professor of Law and Associate Director of the Academy for Justice, Arizona State
University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law; Director of the Criminal Justice Reform Lab

Christopher Slobogin
Milton Underwood Professor of Law, Vanderbilt University Law School

Stephen F. Smith
Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame

Cassia Spohn
Foundation Professor of Criminology and Director of the School of Criminology and Criminal
Justice, Arizona State University; Affiliated Faculty, Arizona State University Sandra Day
O’Connor College of Law

Michael Tonry
McKnight Presidential Professor of Criminal Law and Policy, and Director of the Institute on
Crime and Public Policy, University of Minnesota Law School; Scientific Member of Germany’s
Max Planck Society

* Affiliations provided for identification only


Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 17

Notes and References

Note 1. The drug war literature is both broad and deep. Modern reference works (e.g., casebooks,
edited collections, symposia) on marijuana and the law include: DOUGLAS A. BERMAN & ALEX KREIT,
MARIJUANA LAW AND POLICY (2020); CONTEMPORARY HEALTH ISSUES ON MARIJUANA (Kevin A. Sabet
& Ken C. Winters eds., 2018); ROBERT A. MIKOS, MARIJUANA LAW, POLICY, AND AUTHORITY (2017);
Symposium, Marijuana Laws and Federalism, 58 B.C. L. REV. 857-1084 (2017); JOHN HUDAK,
MARIJUANA: A SHORT HISTORY (2016); Symposium, Disjointed Regulation: State Efforts to Legalize
Marijuana, 50 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 573-895 (2016); Symposium, Marijuana, Federal Power and the
States, 65 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 505-794 (2015); Symposium, The Road to Legitimizing Marijuana:
What Benefit at What Cost?, 43 MCGEORGE L. REV. 1-167 (2012); ROBIN ROOM ET AL., CANNABIS
POLICY: MOVING BEYOND STALEMATE (2010); POT POLITICS: MARIJUANA AND THE COSTS OF
PROHIBITION (Mitch Earleywine ed., 2006); MARTIN BOOTH, CANNABIS: A HISTORY (2003); MITCH
EARLEYWINE, UNDERSTANDING MARIJUANA: A NEW LOOK AT THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE (2002).
For reference works on drugs and drug prohibition more generally, see GERALD F. UELMEN & ALEX
KREIT, DRUG ABUSE AND THE LAW SOURCEBOOK (2021); GLEN R. HANSON ET AL., DRUGS AND
SOCIETY (14th ed. 2020); JAMES A. INCIARDI & KAREN MCELRATH, THE AMERICAN DRUG SCENE:
READINGS IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT (7th ed. 2014); STEVEN BELENKO & CASSIA SPOHN, DRUGS, CRIME,
AND JUSTICE (2014); NAT’L RESEARCH COUNCIL, UNDERSTANDING THE DEMAND FOR ILLEGAL DRUGS
(Peter Reuter ed., 2010) [link]; THOMAS BABOR ET AL., DRUG POLICY AND THE PUBLIC GOOD (2009);
DRUGS IN AMERICA: A DOCUMENTARY HISTORY (David Musto ed., 2002); NAT’L RESEARCH COUNCIL,
INFORMING AMERICA’S POLICY ON ILLEGAL DRUGS: WHAT WE DON’T KNOW KEEPS HURTING US
(Charles F. Mansky et al. eds., 2001) [link].

Note 2. See, e.g., Aimee Ortiz, Confidence in Police Is at Record Low, Gallup Survey Finds, N.Y.
TIMES (Aug. 12, 2020) [link]; Anthony A. Braga et al., Race, Place, and Effective Policing, 45 ANN. REV.
SOC. 535, 535-43 (2019) (describing and analyzing poor relations between police and minority
communities); NANCY LA VIGNE ET AL., URBAN INST., HOW DO PEOPLE IN HIGH-CRIME, LOW-INCOME
COMMUNITIES VIEW THE POLICE? (2017) [link] (survey of police-community relations in high-crime,
high-poverty neighborhoods); Tracey L. Meares, The Path Forward: Improving the Dynamics of
Community-Police Relationships to Achieve Effective Law Enforcement Policies, 117 COLUM. L. REV.
1355 (2017) (describing sociological, psychological, and historical research on police-minority
community relations); Tom R. Tyler, Policing in Black and White: Ethnic Group Differences in Trust and
Confidence in the Police, 8 POLICE Q. 322 (2005) (discussing minority citizens’ low trust and confidence
in law enforcement and the resulting impact on their willingness to interact with police); Ronald Weitzer
& Steven A. Tuch, Racially Biased Policing: Determinants of Citizen Perceptions, 83 SOC. FORCES 1009
(2005) (study finding minority citizens perceive police prejudice as widespread and very common in their
cities). See generally FINAL REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT’S TASK FORCE ON 21ST CENTURY POLICING 9-18
(2015) [link] (describing minority citizens’ lower level of confidence in law enforcement and advocating
community trust and legitimacy as the first pillar of good policing).

Note 3. On this issue, “[w]riting only for myself, and drawing on my professional experiences,” U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor spoke truth to power:
[I]t is no secret that people of color are disproportionate victims of [police] scrutiny. For
generations, black and brown parents have given their children “the talk”—instructing
them never to run down the street; always keep your hands where they can be seen; do
not even think of talking back to a stranger—all out of fear of how an officer with a gun
will react to them.
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 18

By legitimizing the conduct that produces this double consciousness, [we say] that
your body is subject to invasion while courts excuse the violation of your rights. It
implies that you are not a citizen of a democracy but the subject of a carceral state, just
waiting to be cataloged.
We must not pretend that the countless people who are routinely targeted by police
are “isolated.” They are the canaries in the coal mine whose deaths, civil and literal, warn
us that no one can breathe in this atmosphere. They are the ones who recognize that
unlawful police stops corrode all our civil liberties and threaten all our lives. Until their
voices matter too, our justice system will continue to be anything but.
Utah v. Strieff, 136 S. Ct. 2056, 2070-71 (2016) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting). See generally Jeffrey Fagan,
Race and the New Policing, in 2 REFORMING CRIMINAL JUSTICE: POLICING 83 (Erik Luna ed., 2017)
[link]; David A. Harris, Racial Profiling, in id. at 117; Devon W. Carbado, Race and the Fourth
Amendment, in id. at 153; L. Song Richardson, Police Use of Force, in id. at 185; Paul Butler, Race and
Adjudication, in 3 REFORMING CRIMINAL JUSTICE: PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCESSES 211 (Erik Luna ed.,
2017) [link]; Cassia Spohn, Race and Sentencing Disparity, in 4 REFORMING CRIMINAL JUSTICE:
PUNISHMENT, INCARCERATION, AND RELEASE 169 (Erik Luna ed., 2017) [link].
Our nation’s ongoing crisis of race and criminal justice almost inevitably implicates the drug war.
See, e.g., Brian D. Earp et al., Racial Justice Requires Ending the War on Drugs, 21 AM. J. BIOETHICS 4
(2021) [link] (essay by academics marshalling evidence for ending drug prohibition, with an emphasis on
racial justice concerns); ACLU, A TALE OF TWO COUNTRIES: RACIALLY TARGETED ARRESTS IN THE ERA
OF MARIJUANA REFORM (2020) [link] (report on racial disparities in arrests for marijuana possession);
ALEXANDRA NATAPOFF, PUNISHMENT WITHOUT CRIME: HOW OUR MASSIVE MISDEMEANOR SYSTEM
TRAPS THE INNOCENT AND MAKES AMERICA MORE UNEQUAL 149-70 (2019) (documenting widespread
racial disparities and discrimination throughout the misdemeanor system, exemplified and driven heavily
by marijuana enforcement); MICHELLE ALEXANDER, THE NEW JIM CROW: MASS INCARCERATION IN THE
AGE OF COLORBLINDNESS (2010) (arguing modern criminal justice, especially drug prohibition, operates
in a manner similar to segregation). This is perhaps unsurprising as a matter of history, given that racial
prejudice and fear helped spark the drug war, including marijuana prohibition. A century ago, Mexican
immigrants became associated with marijuana and were vilified as a source of crime and violence. “From
a survey of contemporary newspaper and periodical commentary,” two leading scholars concluded that,
among the major influences on marijuana bans, “[t]he most prominent was racial prejudice.” Richard J.
Bonnie & Charles H. Whitebread II, The Forbidden Fruit and the Tree of Knowledge: An Inquiry into the
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition, 56 VA. L. REV. 971, 1011 (1970). A particularly
egregious example was provided by a newspaper account of the Montana state legislature’s process in
criminalizing marijuana.
There was fun in the House Health Committee during the week when the Marihuana bill
came up for consideration. Marihuana is Mexican opium, a plant used by Mexicans and
cultivated for sale by Indians. “When some beet field peon takes a few rares of this
stuff,” explained Dr. Fred Fulsher of Mineral County, “He thinks he has just been
elected president of Mexico so he starts out to execute all his political enemies. I
understand that over in Butte where the Mexicans often go for the winter they stage
imaginary bullfights in the ‘Bower of Roses’ or put on tournaments for the favor of
‘Spanish Rose’ after a couple of whiffs of Marijuana. The Silver Bow and Yellowstone
delegations both deplore these international complications.” Everybody laughed and the
bill was recommended for passage.
Id. at 1014-15 (quoting Montana Standard). Professors Bonnie and Whitebread summarized the
impact of race and racism as prompts for marijuana prohibition:
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 19

The early laws against the cannabis drugs were passed with little public attention.
Concern about marijuana was related primarily to the fear that marijuana use would
spread, even among whites, as a substitute for the opiates and alcohol made more
difficult to obtain by federal legislation. Especially in the western states, this concern
was identifiable with the growth of the Mexican-American minority. It is clear that no
state undertook any empirical or scientific study of the effects of the drug. Instead they
relied on lurid and often unfounded accounts of marijuana’s dangers as presented in
what little newspaper coverage the drug received. It was simply assumed that cannabis
was addictive and would have engendered the same evil effects as opium and cocaine.
Apparently, legislators in these states found it easy and uncontroversial to prohibit use
of a drug they had never seen or used and which was associated with ethnic minorities
and the lower class.
Id. at 1021-22. See also DAVID F. MUSTO, THE AMERICAN DISEASE: ORIGINS OF NARCOTIC CONTROL
219-23 (3d ed. 1999) (describing racial prejudice in pursuit of marijuana prohibition); PAUL BUTLER,
LET’S GET FREE: A HIP-HOP THEORY OF JUSTICE 45 (2009) (quoting early twentieth-century Texas state
senator: “All Mexicans are crazy, and this stuff [marijuana] is what makes them crazy.”). The perceived
threat of marijuana—including the hysterical “reefer madness” it purportedly triggered—neatly
conformed with popular prejudices, inspired marijuana bans in most states, and helped push Congress to
pass the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 (Pub. L. No. 75-238, 50 Stat. 551), which would become the basis for
the federal war on marijuana. See Bonnie & Whitebread, Forbidden Fruit, supra, at 1036-37; United
States v. Sanchez. 340 U.S. 42 (1950) (describing Marihuana Tax Act’s operation and upholding law
despite its prohibitive effect). Cf. ISAAC CAMPOS, HOME GROWN: MARIJUANA AND THE ORIGINS OF
MEXICO’S WAR ON DRUGS (2012) (historical study of marijuana prohibition from the perspective of
Mexico).
Racially tinged decision-making in the drug war continued in subsequent decades, although perhaps
concealed by acceptable rationales. In the early 1970s, considerations of race and class were part of the
political calculus in launching a new and explicit “war on drugs.” According to journalist Dan Baum, one
of the President’s top aids, John Ehrlichman, said that the Nixon Administration had “two enemies: the
antiwar left and black people.”
We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting
the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then
criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their
leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the
evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.
Dan Baum, Legalize It All: How to Win the War on Drugs, HARPER’S MAG., Apr. 2016, at 22 [link]. But
see Hilary Hanson, Nixon Aides Suggest Colleague Was Kidding About Drug War Being Designed to
Target Black People, HUFFINGTON POST (Mar. 25, 2016) [link]. See also David A. Sklansky, Cocaine,
Race, and Equal Protection, 47 STAN. L. REV. 1283, 1291-96 (1995) (describing the role that race played
in enacting the notorious disparity in federal sentencing between crack cocaine and powder cocaine).
Two final points deserve mention: Even if we gave the drug war’s architects the benefit of the doubt
and assumed race was not a (primary) motivating factor in decision-making, they would still be
accountable for their “malign neglect” of prohibition’s devastating impact on people of color, which was
foreseeable to anyone who thought about it. MICHAEL TONRY, MALIGN NEGLECT: RACE, CRIME, AND
PUNISHMENT IN AMERICA (1995); see also MICHAEL TONRY, PUNISHING RACE: A CONTINUING
AMERICAN DILEMMA (2011). And even if the driver of disparate enforcement turns out to be class rather
than race—resulting from differences in drug distribution markets, for instance—we are not thereby
absolved of responsibility for the consequences. “[I]n a society where racial division is all too real,
decisions that have no racial cause may still have a very powerful racial meaning,” admonished the late,
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 20

great Harvard Law Professor Bill Stuntz. “[I]n a world where communities are divided along class and
race lines, one divide tends to produce the other.” William J. Stuntz, Race, Class and Drugs, 98 COLUM.
L. REV. 1795, 1812, 1825 (1998).

Note 4. See, e.g., Georgia Keohane, MLK, Civil Rights and The Fierce Urgency of Now, TIME (Jan.
19, 2015) [link] (noting origin of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s words and related civil rights debate).

Note 5. See Jeffrey M. Jones, Nearly Half of U.S. Adults Have Tried Marijuana, GALLUP (Aug. 17,
2021) [link]; CTR. FOR BEHAV. HEALTH STAT. & QUALITY, SAMHSA: SUBSTANCE ABUSE & MENTAL
HEALTH SERVS. ADMIN., 2019 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH DETAILED TABLES:
TABLE 1.25B (2019) [link] (survey finding roughly half of all adults admit to using marijuana during their
lifetime); MARIST COLL. INST. FOR PUB. OP., YAHOO NEWS & MARIST POLL: WEED AND THE AMERICAN
FAMILY 8 (April 17, 2017) [link] (poll finding a majority of respondents admit trying marijuana and
support marijuana legalization); Ted Van Green, Americans Overwhelmingly Say Marijuana Should Be
Legal for Recreational or Medical Use, PEW RSCH. CTR. (Apr. 16, 2021) [link]; Megan Brenan, Support
for Legal Marijuana Inches Up to New High of 68%, GALLUP (Nov. 9, 2020) [link].

Note 6. See State Medical Marijuana Laws, NAT’L CONF. OF STATE LEGISLATORS (June 9, 2021)
[link]. See also Alex Kreit, Marijuana Legalization, in 1 REFORMING CRIMINAL JUSTICE:
CRIMINALIZATION 115 (Erik Luna ed., 2017) [link] (providing overview and analysis of legalization).
State efforts to end marijuana prohibition can be explained and justified by federalism, a system of
government enshrined in the Constitution by enumerating the powers of Congress, see U.S. CONST. art. I,
§8—and then making clear that other powers were “reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Id. amend. X. Under federalism, the national government’s powers would be “exercised principally on
external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce,” without interfering with a state’s
core activities, “which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the
people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.” THE FEDERALIST No. 45, at
292-93 (James Madison) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961). Among the areas that the Framers sought to reserve
to the states was “the ordinary administration of criminal and civil justice.” FEDERALIST No. 17, at 120
(Alexander Hamilton). The Constitution itself mentions only a handful of crimes, all of which are
consistent with the design and limits of federalism. See U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl. 6 & 10 (counterfeiting,
piracy, felonies on the high seas, offenses against the law of nations); U.S. CONST. art. III, §3 (treason).
“States possess primary authority for defining and enforcing the criminal law,” the Supreme Court has
noted. When federal law displaces state policy judgments, it threatens a “change in the sensitive relation
between federal and state criminal jurisdiction.” United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 561 n.3 (1995).
There are numerous arguments in favor of federalism: “It assures a decentralized government that
will be more sensitive to the diverse needs of a heterogenous society; it increases opportunity for citizen
involvement in democratic processes; it allows for more innovation and experimentation in government;
and it makes government more responsive by putting the States in competition for a mobile citizenry.”
Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 458 (1991). When people are unable to bear their home state’s
approach to public policy, federalism allows them to vote with their feet, so to speak, by moving to
another state. These benefits are thwarted by federal interference with state criminal justice systems,
which inevitably implicate norms and values that vary by jurisdiction. Such interference also jeopardizes
the “principal benefit” of federalism—as “a check on abuses of government power” and a “protection of
our fundamental liberties”—where “a healthy balance of power between the States and the Federal
Government will reduce the risk of tyranny and abuse from either front.” Gregory, 501 U.S. at 458.
Marijuana prohibition emasculates federalism, amassing too much power in too few hands—those of
federal drug enforcement—to impose on the states a major criminal justice policy that stands in
opposition to the affected citizenry’s decision to decriminalize or legalize marijuana. In the past, federal
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 21

drug enforcement even engaged in war-like offensives in support of marijuana prohibition—for instance,
heavily armed agents would swoop into rural areas, like “an assault on an enemy prison camp in
Vietnam,” to raid purported marijuana grow operations. RADLEY BALKO, RISE OF THE WARRIOR COP:
THE MILITARIZATION OF AMERICA’S POLICE FORCES 110 (2013). More recently, the DEA responded to
state medical marijuana laws by raiding marijuana dispensaries and prosecuting medical marijuana
providers, even when they were in full compliance with state and local law. See, e.g., Alex Kreit,
Reflections on Medical Marijuana Prosecutions and the Duty to Seek Justice, 89 DENV. U. L. REV. 1027,
1034-35 (2012).
One particularly pathetic raid involved a collective hospice, located on a farm in Santa
Cruz, California, that had “approximately 250 member-patients who suffer from HIV or
AIDS, multiple sclerosis, glaucoma, epilepsy, various forms of cancer, and other serious
illnesses.” Consistent with state law and only pursuant to a physician’s recommendation,
the hospice “assists seriously ill and dying patients by providing them with the opportunity
to cultivate marijuana plants for their personal medicinal use and to produce marijuana
medications collectively used by [hospice] members to alleviate their pain and suffering.”
During the raid, between 20-30 DEA agents “forcibly entered the premises, pointed
loaded firearms at the [farm owners], forced them to the ground, and handcuffed them.”
One of the owners—who herself used medical marijuana to control seizures resulting
from a traumatic head injury—was driven away in her nightgown. Another patient, a
paraplegic woman suffering from polio, “was told to stand up to be hancuffed; when she
could not do so, she was handcuffed to her bed.” The drug agents remained at the hospice
for eight hours, “seizing 167 marijuana plants [and] many of the [hospice] members’
weekly allotments of medicinal marijuana.” When state and local officials condemned the
raid, the DEA gave a response evincing anti-humanitarian indifference: “No one in the
United States is allowed to distribute illegal drugs, period.”
Erik Luna, Drug War and Peace, 50 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 813, 880-81 (2016) (quoting Cty. of Santa Cruz
v. Ashcroft, 279 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (N.D. Cal. 2003), and RANDOLPH J. GERBER, LEGALIZING
MARIJUANA: DRUG POLICY REFORM AND PROHIBITION POLITICS (2004)).
Although the Supreme Court upheld the federal crackdown on state medical marijuana—see
Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005) (rejecting Commerce Clause challenge); United States v. Oakland
Cannabis Buyers’ Coop., 532 U.S. 483 (2001) (rejecting necessity defense for medical marijuana)—
Justice Clarence Thomas recently questioned the Court’s jurisprudence in this area:
Whatever the merits of Raich when it was decided, federal policies of the past 16 years
have greatly undermined its reasoning. Once comprehensive, the Federal Government’s
current approach is a half-in, half-out regime that simultaneously tolerates and forbids
local use of marijuana. This contradictory and unstable state of affairs strains basic
principles of federalism and conceals traps for the unwary…. If the Government is now
content to allow States to act “as laboratories” “and try novel social and economic
experiments,” then it might no longer have authority to intrude on “[t]he States’ core
police powers ... to define criminal law and to protect the health, safety, and welfare of
their citizens.” A prohibition on intrastate use or cultivation of marijuana may no longer
be necessary or proper to support the Federal Government’s piecemeal approach.
Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United States, 594 U. S. ___ (2021) (Thomas, J.) (statement on denial of
petition for writ of certiorari) [link]. See also MARIJUANA FEDERALISM: UNCLE SAM AND MARY JANE
(Jonathan H. Adler ed., 2020) (discussing various federalism-related issues arising from marijuana
legalization); Robert A. Mikos, On the Limits of Supremacy: Medical Marijuana and the States'
Overlooked Power to Legalize Federal Crime, 62 VAND. L. REV. 1421 (2009). To be clear, the federalism
of which Justice Thomas speaks is not the illegitimate façade of “states’ rights” invoked in the past as an
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 22

apologia for slavery and then for Jim Crow, and duly weaponized in the penal codes of the segregated
south. Instead, this is the federalism that helps shield minority communities from federal drug warfare
when it’s waged in spite of the peaceful resolutions brokered by states and localities.

Note 7. See, e.g., RICHARD GLEN BOIRE, CTR. FOR COGNITIVE LIBERTY & ETHICS, LIFE SENTENCES:
COLLATERAL SANCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH MARIJUANA OFFENSES (2007) [link] (describing myriad
collateral consequences of marijuana convictions); Gabriel J. Chin, Race, the War on Drugs, and the
Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction, 6 J. GENDER RACE & JUST. 253 (2002) (describing
collateral consequences of drug convictions and their disparate impact on people of color). See generally
Gabriel J. Chin, Collateral Consequences, in 4 REFORMING CRIMINAL JUSTICE: PUNISHMENT,
INCARCERATION, AND RELEASE 371 (Erik Luna ed., 2017).

Note 8. Democratic Debate Transcript, NBC NEWS (Nov. 20, 2019) [link].

Note 9. Joe Biden on Decriminalizing Marijuana, YOUTUBE (Oct. 27, 2020) [link]. In fact, the
decriminalization of marijuana, the release of federal marijuana offenders, and the expungement of
federal marijuana convictions were part of your bold plan to reform criminal justice:
Decriminalize the use of cannabis and automatically expunge all prior cannabis use
convictions. Biden believes no one should be in jail because of cannabis use. As
president, he will decriminalize cannabis use and automatically expunge prior
convictions. And, he will support the legalization of cannabis for medical purposes, leave
decisions regarding legalization for recreational use up to the states, and reschedule
cannabis as a schedule II drug so researchers can study its positive and negative impacts.
The Biden Plan for Strengthening America’s Commitment to Justice, JOEBIDEN.COM [link].

Note 10. See J.J. Prescott & Sonja B. Starr, Expungement of Criminal Convictions: An Empirical
Study, 133 HARV. L. REV. 2460 (2020) [link] (empirical study finding that beneficiaries of expungement
have extremely low subsequent crime rates and experience a sharp upturn in their wage and employment
trajectories); Michael Mueller-Smith, The Criminal and Labor Market Impacts of Incarceration (unpub.
man. Aug. 18, 2015) [link] (empirical study finding incarceration increases the frequency and severity of
recidivism, worsens labor market outcomes, and increases dependence on public assistance). See
generally Rachel E. Barkow, Clemency and Presidential Administration of Criminal Law,
90 N.Y.U. L. REV. 802 (2015) (arguing for clemency as a mechanism to ensure that enforcement reflects
the President’s priorities and values, and to ensure that federal law enforcement does not contradict those
views, and noting clemency can be used as “a wholesale matter to correct applications of law across a
range of cases that share certain attributes”).

Note 11. According to the most recent data, there are fewer than 3,000 federal prisoners serving time
for marijuana offenses. See U.S. SENTENCING COMM’N, QUICK FACTS: FEDERAL OFFENDERS IN PRISON
(Mar. 2021) [link] (listing 65,370 federal inmates for drug crimes, 4.1% of whom were incarcerated for
marijuana); see also U.S. SENTENCING COMM’N, QUICK FACTS: MARIJUANA TRAFFICKING OFFENSES
(June 2021) [link]. See generally FED. BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. DEP’T OF JUSTICE, INMATE STATISTICS:
OFFENSES (2021) [link]. Some of these federal inmates would be ineligible for release from prison,
because they’re also serving time for a non-marijuana offense. Other inmates might be ineligible because
their marijuana-related offenses involved acts or threats of violence, a potential limitation on clemency. If
you were to adopt a “non-violent” requirement or similar prerequisites for clemency eligibility, criteria
would need to be developed to determine which federal inmates would be eligible for release. Whatever
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 23

the complexities of this task, however, they are entirely resolvable and should not delay the achievement
of justice. After all, real lives are at stake.
Consider, for instance, the case of Luke Scarmazzo. From 2004-2006, Luke owned and operated a
medical marijuana dispensary in Modesto, California, with his friend Ricardo Montes, all pursuant to
California’s Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (codified as CAL. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 11362.5).
Although other medical marijuana dispensaries operated throughout California at the time, Luke and
Ricardo were prosecuted in federal court, and in 2008, they were sentenced to over 20 years in prison. In
January 2017, after serving nine years, Ricardo had his sentence commuted by President Obama. Luke
wasn’t as fortunate: His petition for commutation was denied without explanation, and he remains in
federal prison to this day. During a White House briefing, Press Secretary Jen Psaki responded to a
question on Luke’s case by reiterating your position in support of medical marijuana. See Press Briefing
by Press Secretary Jen Psaki, WHITEHOUSE.GOV (Apr. 20, 2021) [link]. Mr. President, you have the
power to correct the injustices left unaddressed by prior administrations.
Consider also the case of Terrell “Ralo” Davis, an Atlanta rapper and acclaimed recording artist who
is facing up to eight years in federal prison for marijuana-only offenses. Although a large quantity of
marijuana was involved (over 400 lbs.), Ralo’s offenses were entirely non-violent. By contrast, every
single day marijuana entrepreneurs and businesses across the country openly violate the exact same
federal statue under which Ralo was prosecuted and sentenced—yet they avoid the wrath of federal drug
enforcement. In the words of fellow rapper Killer Mike: “At a time where so many young White people
and others are capitalizing off marijuana’s new legitimacy, to see this brother sit and suffer is sickening.
He is a real one and helped his community and now he is hostage of the state.” @KillerMike, Twitter
(Feb. 21, 2020) [link]. Ralo has paid a high price in terms of his career opportunities, his personal
resources, his family’s wellbeing, and, of course, his freedom. Wherever the equities may lie, Mr.
President, Ralo surely doesn’t deserve to rot in federal prison at a time when “reefer madness” is finally
waning in American criminal law.

Note 12. Although unnecessary to justify clemency, it’s worth noting here that marijuana does not
cause crime and violence (but marijuana prohibition does!). A century ago, prohibitionists made wild-
eyed claims of marijuana destroying a user’s sense of morality and law-abiding tendencies, or even
endowing the user with the ability to commit horrible acts of violence. The “father of the drug war”—
Harry Anslinger, the first Commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics—testified that “in some cases
one cigarette might develop a homicidal mania, probably to kill his brother,” and “all the experts agree
that the continued use leads to insanity.” Taxation of Marihuana: Hearings on H.R. 6906 Before the
Comm. on Finance of the U.S. Senate, 75th Cong. 14 (1937). See also id. at 6 (“Under the influence of
this drug the will is destroyed and all power of directing and controlling thought is lost…. Inhibitions are
released. As a result of these effects, many violent crimes have been and are being committed by persons
under the influence of this drug.”) (comments of Clinton Hester, Ass’t Gen. Counsel, Treasury Dept.); id.
at 11-12, 14; (offering horror stories); Taxation of Marihuana: Hearings on H.R. 6385 Before the Comm.
on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, 75th Cong. 22-23, 37, 45, 123-24 (1937) (similar);
JAMES SWARTZ, SUBSTANCE ABUSE IN AMERICA: A DOCUMENTARY AND REFERENCE GUIDE 18 (2012)
(quoting a police chief’s “daily experience” with marijuana users who were “very violent, especially
when they become angry and will attack an officer even if a gun is drawn on him,” and claiming that
“under the influence of this weed they have enormous strength and it will take several men to handle one
man while, under ordinary circumstances, one man could handle him with ease”). Perhaps such
arguments could be spun as mere hyperbole from the previous century. But see, e.g., Hearings on H.R.
6385, supra, at 92 (testimony of Dr. William C. Woodward of the American Medical Association,
questioning factual basis of arguments). Today, however, these claims would be hard to believe as a
matter of common experience and unsupported as a matter of science.
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 24

A causal link between marijuana use and non-prohibitionist crimes and violence has never been
proven. See, e.g., OFFICE OF NAT’L DRUG CONTROL POL’Y, IMPROVING THE MEASUREMENT OF DRUG-
RELATED CRIME iv, 9, 15, app. A (2013) [link] (reviewing studies and finding that marijuana use does not
cause violent or property crimes); Klaus A. Miczek et al., Alcohol, Drugs of Abuse, Aggression, and
Violence, in 3 UNDERSTANDING AND PREVENTING VIOLENCE: SOCIAL INFLUENCES 377, 401 (Albert J.
Reiss & Jeffrey A. Roth eds., 1994) (“all major reviews of the literature on cannabis and human
aggression and violence during the past two decades conclude that cannabis has no effect on or actually
decreases various indices of aggression”). See also Bernard E. Harcourt & Jens Ludwig, Reefer Madness:
Broken Windows Policing and Misdemeanor Marijuana Arrests in New York City, 1989-2000, 6 J.
CRIMINOLOGY & PUB. POL’Y 165 (2007) (study finding no good evidence that aggressive marijuana
arrests were associated with reductions in serious, violent, or property crimes, and instead suggesting such
arrests actually increased crime); Philip H. Smith et al., Couples’ marijuana use is inversely related to
their intimate partner violence over the first 9 years of marriage, 28 PSYCH. ADDICT BEHAV. 734 (2014).
See generally Jeffrey A. Miron, Drug Prohibition and Violence, in 1 REFORMING CRIMINAL JUSTICE:
INTRODUCTION AND CRIMINALIZATION 99, 106-07 (Erik Luna ed., 2017) [link] (summarizing studies
finding little or no causal link between drug use and violence); Shima Baradaran, Drugs and Violence, 88
S. CAL. L. REV. 227 (2015) (critiquing claims of a connection between drugs and violence).
Conversely, there is little evidence that decriminalization or legalization of marijuana generally
increases crime. See, e.g., Ruibin Lu, et al., The Cannabis Effect on Crime: Time-Series Analysis of Crime
in Colorado and Washington State, 38 JUST. Q. 565 (2021) (study finding marijuana legalization in
Colorado and Washington has had no or minimal effect on violent and property crimes); JULIAN MORRIS,
REASON FOUND., DOES LEGALIZING MARIJUANA REDUCE CRIME? (Sept. 2018) [link] (reviewing studies
and concluding that marijuana legalization does not increase crime); Shana L. Maier et al., The
Implications of Marijuana Decriminalization and Legalization on Crime in the United States, 44
CONTEMP. DRUG PROBS. 125 (2017) (study finding marijuana legalization does not increase violent or
property crimes); Edward M. Shepard & Paul R. Blackley, Medical Marijuana and Crime: Further
Evidence from the Western States, 46 J. DRUG ISSUES 122 (2016) (similar); Robert G. Morris et al., The
Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on Crime: Evidence from the State Panel Data, 1990-2006, PLOS
ONE, Mar. 2014, at 1 (similar). See also Davide Dragone et al., Crime and the Legalization of
Recreational Marijuana, 159 J. ECON. BEHAV. & ORG. 488 (2019) (study finding marijuana legalization
reduced certain violent and property crimes); Jeffrey Brinkman & David Mok-Lamme, Not in My
Backyard? Not So Fast: The Effect of Marijuana Legalization on Neighborhood Crime, 78 REG. SCI. &
URB. ECON. 103460 (2019) (study finding reduction in neighborhood crime from the opening of legal
marijuana dispensaries).
This doesn’t mean there are no negative consequences from the abuse of marijuana. See, e.g., Paul J.
Larkin, Jr., Cannabis Capitalism, 69 BUFF. L. REV. 215, 255-66 (2021) (describing risks of addiction and
roadway fatalities); NAT’L ACADS. OF SCI., ENG’G & MED., THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF CANNABIS AND
CANNABINOIDS: THE CURRENT STATE OF EVIDENCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESEARCH (2017)
(evaluating health consequences). Acknowledging the risks, however, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek
Murtha recently stated: “I don’t think there is value to individuals or to society to lock people up for
marijuana use. I don’t think that serves anybody well…. [I]n terms of our approach to marijuana, I worry
when we don’t let science guide our process in policy-making.” Surgeon General: No value to locking
people up for marijuana use, CNN.COM (July 18, 2021) [link]. In reality, the vast majority of those who
use marijuana do so without destructive consequences for themselves or for others, and instead live
productive, otherwise crime-free lives. See, e.g., JACOB SULLUM, SAYING YES: IN DEFENSE OF DRUG
USE (2003). See also DOUGLAS N. HUSAK, DRUGS AND RIGHTS (1992) (critiquing inflated claims of
drug-use harms and arguing adults have a right to drugs). Marijuana prohibition is thus a perfect example
of an exaggerated response by federal law enforcement—who quite literally “make a federal case out of
Letter in Support of Commuting
Federal Marijuana Offenses
Page 25

it,” see, e.g., Gene Healy, Making a Federal Case Out of Almost Everything, REASON.COM (Dec. 17,
2004) [link]—effectively overriding state and local decisions to decriminalize or legalize marijuana.

Note 13. See Proclamation No. 4313: Program for the Return of Vietnam Era Draft Evaders and
Military Deserters, 39 Fed. Reg. 33,293 (Sept. 16, 1974) [link]; Exec. Order No. 11803, 39 Fed. Reg.
33,297 (Sept. 16, 1974) [link]; Exec. Order No. 11804, 39 Fed. Reg. 33,299 (Sept. 16, 1974) [link]. See
also U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CLEMENCY BOARD, REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT (1975) [link]; U.S.
COMPTROLLER GENERAL, THE CLEMENCY PROGRAM OF 1974: REPORT TO THE CONGRESS (1977) [link];
Mark Osler, Clemency, in 4 REFORMING CRIMINAL JUSTICE: PUNISHMENT, INCARCERATION, AND
RELEASE 419, 425-27 (Erik Luna ed., 2017) [link] (describing President Ford’s clemency board).

Note 14. Proclamation No. 4483: Granting Pardon for Violations of the Selective Service Act, 42
Fed. Reg. 4391 (Jan. 21, 1977) [link]. These acts of clemency by Presidents Ford and Carter can serve as
a model for ending the federal war on marijuana. See “Draft Proclamation and Executive Order Granting
Pardon for Certain Violations of the Controlled Substances Act” (attached).

Note 15. Biden-Sanders Unity Task Force Recommendations, JOEBIDEN.COM [link].

You might also like