Francisco Joaquin Vs Hon. Franklin Drilon

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

FER GRACE CATAYLO NIAGA JD I

FRANCISCO G. JOAQUIN, JR., and BJ PRODUCTIONS, INC vs


HONORABLE FRANKLIN DRILON, GABRIEL ZOSA, WILLIAM
ESPOSO, FELIPE MEDINA, JR., and CASEY FRANCISCO
(GR No. 108946, JANUARY 28, 1999)

FACTS:
Petitioner BJ Productions, Inc. (BJPI) is the holder / grantee of
Certificate of Copyright No. M922, dated January 28, 1971, of Rhoda and
Me, a dating game show aired from 1970 to 1977. On June 28, 1973,
petitioner BJPI submitted to the National Library an addendum to its
certificate of copyright specifying the show’s format and style of
presentation.
Upon complaint of petitioners, information for violation of PD No.
49 was filed against private respondent Zosa together with certain officers of
RPN 9 for airing It’s a Date. It was assigned to Branch 104 of RTC Quezon
City. Zosa sought review of the resolution of the Assistant City Prosecutor
before the Department of Justice.
On August 12, 1992, respondent Secretary of Justice Franklin M.
Drilon reversed the Assistant City Prosecutor’s findings and directed him to
move for the dismissal of the case against private respondents.
Petitioner Joaquin filed motion for reconsideration but such was
denied.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the format or mechanics or petitioner’s television
show is entitled to copyright protection?
RULING:
The Court ruled that the format of the show is not copyrightable. Sec.
2 of PD No. 49, otherwise known as the Decree on Intellectual Property,
enumerates the classes of work entitled to copyright protection. The
provision is substantially the same as Sec. 172 of the Intellectual Property
Code of the Philippines (RA 8293). The format or mechanics of a television
show is not included in the list of protected works in Sec. 2 of PD No. 49.
For this reason, the protection afforded by the law cannot be extended to
cover them.
Copyright, in the strict sense of the term, is purely a statutory right. It
is a new independent right granted by the statute and not simply a pre-
existing right regulated by the statute. Being a statutory grant, the rights are
only such as the statute confers, and may be obtained and enjoyed only with
respect to the subjects and by the person and on terms and conditions
specified in the statute.
The Court is of the opinion that petitioner BJPI’s copyright covers
audio-visual recordings of each episode of Rhoda and Me, as falling within
the class of works mentioned in PD 49. The copyright does not extend to the
general concept or format of its dating game show. Mere description by
words of the general format of the two dating game shows is insufficient; the
presentation of the master videotape in evidence was indispensable to the
determination of the existence of a probable cause.
A television show includes more than mere words can describe
because it involves a whole spectrum of visuals and effects, video and audio,
such that no similarity or dissimilarity may be found by merely describing
the general copyright / format of both dating game shows.

You might also like