Assignment 3. R1911D9792010. Yonela Rose Phandliwe

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

World Englishes

Yonela Rose Phandliwe


R1911D9792010
History of the English Language (19254)
Evi Apostolou
17 August 2020
The History of English language has been divided in different segments. Historians had
different views on the periods of history. Major changes that occurred showed the differences
that took places during the different periods. The essay will distinguish the differences and
their classification on the development of the English language within the different centuries.
Taavitsainen, Nevalainen, Pahta, and Rissanen (2000) states that division of language
narratives into discrete periods, at that point , answers to an old fundamental drive, a longing
to have fields of study delimited so that it is conceivable to realize what has a place where,
and whether one's object of study is "extremely" an example of whatever one should
consider. As indicated by Nevalainen and Traugott (2012) it standard to consider English
regarding periods and to compose this history either "on a level plane" or "vertically". The "
level methodology" conceives English as far as Old, Middle, Early Modern, and Present-Day
English. "Center" zones of phonetic examination, for example, language structure,
morphology, phonology, lexis, and some of the time semantics are talked about inside the
time of level methodology. The "vertical" approach, on the other hand, ordinarily investigates
change through time inside one center is . The two methodologies accept two things: one is
that phonetics areas are moderately measured and discrete, and the other is that periods are
generally fixed.

Las (2000) on Nevalainen and Traugott (2012) brings up, periodization is consistently
traditional, fake, and subject to various intrigue, questions, and strategies. He proposes a grid
of semantics factors that might be utilized to show similitudes and contrasts among messages,
taking into consideration clustering’s to rise as different focuses in time. A more customary
way to deal with periods is to recognize recorded and social occasions, as in The Cambridge
History of the English Language (Hogg 1992-2001). For, instance, the "starting" of Middle
English might be related with impacts of the Norman Conquest in 1066 and the "starting" of
(Early) Modern English with the foundation of Caxton's print machine in 1476.
Lauralee (1999) The International Encyclopedia of Linguistics divides the history of English
into three periods: Old English, Anglo-Saxon from 700 to 1100 AD, Middle English from
1100 to 1500 AD, and Modern English or New English from 1500 to the present .Old English
was a highly inflected language. The four dialects during the Old English period were
Kentish in the southeast, West Saxon in the south and southwest, Mercian in the Midlands,
and Northumbrian above the Humber River. Old English morphology included noun forms of
singulars and plurals, with five cases, and three genders. Old English personal pronouns have
been retained, and have transferred into New English, more of their morphological variations
than any other form class. Modern English developed when Caxton established his printing
press at Westminister in 1476. New English is a derivative of the dialect of medieval London.
His first book using movable type was printed about 1450 and was printed on rag paper.
Gutenbergs invention made movable type practical because he could produce any quantity of
letters and words and place the timespan in a frame. He used rag paper in his printings.

Verba (2004) clarifies that beginning as a language isolated from the remainder of the
Germanic semantic region, it has been working for over a thousand years and a half; and
there can be followed a few periods inside its history. There is a custom of perceiving the Old
English time frame , the Middle English , and New English fifteenth century onwards , the
confining occasions being Anglo-Saxon Conquest - the Norman Conquest; The Norman
Conquest - the development of the print machine, and the finish of the War of the Roses. As a
rule, in this region of periods they recognize a subperiod - Early New English, the period
between the fifteenth and mid-seventeenth century - the time of Renaissance in the English
culture, the one which is spoken to by various works of the works of art of English writing
and theory. Every one of the periods is set apart by a lot of explicit highlights of phonology,
language structure and jargon, and might be additionally characterized in these terms. Henry
Sweet characterized them as The Period of Full Endings, the Period of Leveled Endings and
the Period of Lost Endings.

His grouping is self-assertive to Home degree - valid, in the Old English time frame any
vowel could be found in the consummation, and most of the grammatical features are
associated with different words in the sentences by methods for endings. All things
considered, not all Indo-European (endings of the inconsistent grammatical features are found
in the language of the period, the standards are fundamentally improved as contrasted and ,
state, (Latin or even with the Gothic syntax; the time of leveled endings .as a general rule
contains the leveled vowel in the completion, and yet heaps of •endings were at that point
lost; the time of lost endings - present-day language, |W we know, isn't absolutely without
endings, for a portion of the paradigmatic I cultivates are as yet made by methods for
endings, scant as they are ( Verba, 2004).

Scheler (1997,p 74) in Lass (2006) clarifies that one of the most evident contrasts between
Old English and Present Day English is the expansion in acquired lexis. This enormous scope
getting reflects both the different unfamiliar contacts of the period and the developing
requests made on the advancing standard language. Kastovsky (2011) In Early Modern
English we discover Negative and inquisitive sentences without "do" as helper, keeping up
the Middle English"- es/ - eth" and "thou/you" varieties, and still once in a while including
any "extended" type of the action word with an angle differentiation. The finish of the period
can't be identified with any occasion of outer history. The spread of English into the New
World, which started in the seventeenth century, made new lingos there yet had no inward
impact on London's standard language; neither did the loss of Scotland's composed standard.
In any case, by 1700 additionally the short vowels had arrived at their cutting-edge esteems,
and the syntactic standards were immovably settled.

Graddol (1997) First, albeit various speakers, networks or open areas might be influenced in
an unexpected way, there will be changes to the language itself and English will be
influenced by quantitative changes, for example, quantities of speakers, the extent of the
world's logical diaries distributed in English, or the degree to which the English language is
utilized for PC based correspondence. We might have the option to recognize a portion of the
evident 'drivers' of progress – the conditions which seem to urge individuals to learn English
or to surrender their folks' language for English – however the manner in which such reasons
for change cooperate with one another makes forecast of the course and degree of progress
incredibly unsafe. The development and decrease of local speakers of a language is a
moderately long-haul change which can be observed and somewhat gauge. Changes in the
quantity of individuals learning English as an unknown dialect, be that as it may, might be
shockingly unpredictable. Dialects other than English are representing an expanding extent of
the traffic and substance of the Internet. It isn't only the example of riches which is changing,
yet in addition neediness which is being rebuilt.
Baugh and Cable (2002) means that populace of the less evolved nations is relied upon to
develop from 4.9 billion out of 2000 to 8.2 billion out of 2050, while the more evolved
nations will hold at 1.2 billion.3 India is required to supplant China as the world's most
crowded country in 50 years, with an associative development in Hindi and Bengali, as of
now among the best five dialects on the planet. The one segment reality that can be expressed
with assurance is that the extent of the total populace in the monetarily evolved nations will
shrivel during the following 50 years in examination with the extent in the by and by creating
nations. In certain nations English is an unbiased language among contending indigenous
dialects, the foundation of any of which would stir ethnic jealousies. The autonomous
conditions of the previous Soviet Union are probably not going to proceed with endeavors to
make Russian a typical language all through that tremendous locale, and the nearness of a
bound together Germany will fortify the significance of the German language, which as of
now figures noticeably as a language of business in the nations of Eastern Europe. The
development of Spanish, as of Portuguese, will come predominantly from the quickly
expanding populace of Latin America, while the development in English will be generally
outstanding in its utilization all through the world as a second language .
References

Baugh, A., C, and Cable, T., (2002) A History of the English Language. Routle: London.
Retrieved from file:///Users/mac/Desktop/History%20of%20English%20Language
%20/541a3058a469bde11893419a6d970540-original.pdf
Graddol, D., (1997) The Future of English? The British Council : UK Retrieved from
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/pub_learning-elt-future.pdf
Kastovsky, D., (ed) (2011) Studies in Early Modern English. Mouton de Gruyter : Berlin.
Retrieved from
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Studies_in_Early_Modern_English/tgOIC9dwLmIC?
hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%E2%80%A2+What+are+their+main+differences+between+Old,
+Early+and+Modern+English+language&pg=PA261&printsec=frontcover
Lass. R, (ed) (2006) The Cambridge History of the English Language. Cambridge University
Press: United Kingdom. Retrieved from
https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Cambridge_History_of_the_English_Lan/CCvM
bntWth8C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=
%E2%80%A2+What+are+their+main+differences+between+Old,
+Early+and+Modern+English+language&pg=PA332&printsec=frontcover
Lauralee, B., (1999) A History of the English Language : Past changes Precipitate Worldwide
Popularity. Retrieved from
https://linguistics.byu.edu/classes/Ling450ch/reports/english2.html
Nevalainen, T., and Traugott, E.C., (2012) The Oxford Handbook of The History of English.
Oxford University Press: New York Retrieved from
https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Oxford_Handbook_of_the_History_of_En/r543
DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=approaches+to+Old,
+Early+and+Modern+English+language&printsec=frontcover
Taavitsainen, I., Nevalainen, T., Pahta,P., and Rissanen, M (2000). Placing Middle English
in Context. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin: NewYork retrieved from
https://books.google.com/books?
hl=en&lr=&id=qw7BW1YVUDUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA7&dq=Periodization+of+english+histor
y&ots=_UbB_hYADx&sig=3TQajIRsrTNoUaiXTASL5hOzKLs#v=onepage&q=Periodizati
on%20of%20english%20history&f=false
Verba, L., (2004) History of the English Language. Retrieved from
https://library.udpu.edu.ua/library_files/400177.pdf

You might also like