Injuries in National Olympic Level Judo Athletes: An Epidemiological Study
Injuries in National Olympic Level Judo Athletes: An Epidemiological Study
Injuries in National Olympic Level Judo Athletes: An Epidemiological Study
com
BJSM Online First, published on July 27, 2015 as 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094365
Original article
Original article
South Korea for National Level athletes. Consent was obtained RESULTS
from all subjects and was conducted according to the At the Training Center, there were a total of 782 injuries
Declaration of Helsinki. These athletes were selected to train at recorded during January 2010 until December 2013 (table 1).
the National training centre with an expectation of representing Around 95% of the total injuries occurred while training at the
South Korea at international sporting events such as the World facility. The other 5% of injuries were treated at the training
Championships and Olympic Games. On average, 24 male ath- centre, but only after the athlete returned from competition and
letes and 24 female athletes trained and competed annually at did not receive adequate treatment prior to arriving at the
the centre. The athletes were divided into two groups (light- centre. Men had a total of 379 injuries during that time (181
weight and heavyweight) to compare injury trends between lightweight injuries and 198 heavyweight injuries). Women had
lighter and heavier athletes. The categories were set by dividing a total of 403 injuries (196 lightweight injuries and 207 heavy-
the weight classes in Olympic Judo. Of the 24 males, 10 were weight injuries). When comparing males and females in their
lightweight athletes and 14 were heavyweight athletes. Of the respective weight categories, the OR (95% CI) value was found
female athletes, 11 were lightweight and 13 heavyweight. Elite to be 1.04 (0.78 to 1.37), and the distribution of injury rate in
athletes were divided into Major (top-ranked) or Minor ( pos- the two categories was analogous to each other. Thus, the differ-
sible candidate athletes). Annually, 25–30% of the athletes were ence in this injury rate between sex and weight category was not
in the Major category and most of them were at the facility statistically significant ( p=0.8060). The total injury rate was 4.1
during the 4 year surveillance. The Minor athletes, on average, injuries/year for each athlete. For men, the annual injury rate
stayed for a year at the facility if they did not qualify higher up was 4.0 injuries/male athlete (4.5 for lightweights and 3.5 for
in the ranking. Athletes trained on average 4.5 h per day, 5 days heavyweights). For women, the annual injury rate was 4.2 injur-
a week. Training during this time included strength and condi- ies/female athlete (4.5 for lightweights and 4.0 for heavy-
tioning, and also judo-specific training. The athletes were weights). As each athlete averaged 975 h of training annually,
present at the facility for 10 months (43.3 weeks) in of the year, the injury rate was 4.2 injuries/1000 h of training per athlete at
totalling 975 h of training annually.
Data collection
For this study, an injury was defined as any musculoskeletal Table 1 Body region injuries: men and women
symptom, new or recurring, during their time of stay at the N (%)
training centre, whether it was witnessed, or when the athlete Site Men Women Total
sought medical attention.16 During the athlete’s stay at the train-
Head N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0)
ing centre from January 2010 to December 2013, injuries wit-
Face N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0)
nessed or reported by the elite judo athletes were examined by
Neck/cervical spine 20 (5.3) 24 (6.0) 44 (5.6)
the facilities’ Sports Physician or by an experienced Sports
Head and neck 20 (5.3) 24 (6.0) 44 (5.6)
Physician of an outside hospital. Any athlete who chose to be
examined at an outside hospital still had to report to the train- Shoulder/clavicle 42 (11.1) 38 (9.4) 80 (10.2)
ing staff and receive all physical therapy at the training centre Upper arms N/A (0.0) N/A(0.0) N/A (0.0)
facility. From 2010 to 2011, one physician was in charge of all Elbow 32 (8.4) 27 (6.7) 59 (7.5)
the injury diagnoses. A new physician took over in 2012 and Forearm 4 (1.1) 7 (1.7) 11 (1.4)
was present till the end of this study. After being diagnosed, the Wrist 18 (4.7) 17 (4.2) 35 (4.5)
athletes received treatment from the physical therapists, where Hand 13 (3.4) 11 (2.7) 24 (3.1)
the plan and duration of treatment were recorded. On average, Finger 12 (3.2) 12 (3.0) 24 (3.1)
8.5 physical therapists were at the medical/rehab centre of the Thumb N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0)
facility during the 4 years. Two physical therapists left and were Upper body 121 (31.9) 112 (27.8) 233 (29.8)
replaced by two other therapists during this study period. Data
Sternum/ribs 14 (3.7) 12 (3.0) 26 (3.3)
regarding the site of injury, the athletes’ weight class (light and
Thoracic spine/upper back 29 (7.7) 18 (4.5) 47 (6.0)
heavy), gender and injury grade (grade I=1–3 treatment days,
Abdomen 1 (0.3) N/A (0.0) 1 (0.1)
grade II=4–7 treatment days, and grade III ≥8 treatment
Lumbar spine/lower back 39 (10.3) 46 (11.4) 85 (10.9)
days)17 were extracted and assessed. Injury site was set to the
Pelvic/sacrum/buttock 10 (2.6) 14 (3.5) 24 (3.1)
regions used by the IOC during the London Summer Olympic
Trunk 93 (24.5) 90 (22.3) 183 (23.4)
Games,18 and then subdivided into the head and neck, upper
body, trunk and lower body regions. Hip N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0)
Groin N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0)
Statistical analysis Thigh 26 (6.9) 29 (7.2) 55 (7.0)
Variables examined included gender, weight class, body regions Knee 40 (10.6) 36 (8.9) 76 (9.7)
and injury grade. Injury rate, injury frequency of each body Lower Leg 32 (8.4) 42 (10.4) 74 (9.5)
region, and incidence of injuries were identified. Data were ana- Achilles 2 (0.5) 5 (1.2) 7 (0.9)
lysed using Microsoft Windows SPSSWINN 21.0. The χ2 test Ankle 28 (7.4) 38 (9.4) 66 (8.4)
was used to test the statistical significance of categorical data. Foot/toe 17 (4.5) 27 (6.7) 44 (5.6)
The Poisson Distribution was used to obtain the Z score by Lower body 145 (38.3) 177 (43.9) 322 (41.2)
assessing the statistical significance of data when the average rate
Multiple body locations N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0)
of injury in a fixed interval of time was compared within differ-
N/A N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0) N/A (0.0)
ent groups. To calculate OR and 95% CI values of injury rates
Total 379 (100.0) 403 (100.0) 782 (100.0)
between gender and weight class, logistic regression analysis was
performed. The level of significance in all statistical analyses was Bold typeface denotes sum value of above.
N/A, not applicable.
set at p=0.05.
2 Kim K-S, et al. Br J Sports Med 2015;0:1–7. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094365
Downloaded from http://bjsm.bmj.com/ on July 28, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com
Original article
Figure 1 Injury rates per 1000 h of training in male and female judo DISCUSSION
athletes. In men, the rates were 4.6 for lightweights and 3.6 injuries for The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term injury fre-
heavyweights (z=4.7893, p<0.001). In women, the rates were 4.6 for
quencies and trends among the elite National level judo popula-
lightweights and 4.2 for heavyweights (z=1.9111, p>0.05).
tion of South Korea. To date, there have been very few studies
that have analysed health risks in the elite judo population.
the centre. For men, the injury rate was 4.1 injuries/1000 h of Comparing the results of this study with those of previous
training. When comparing men in their respective weight studies is difficult as the definition of an injury is not standar-
classes, the rates were 4.6 for lightweights and 3.6 injuries for dised, and the methodologies of the study design varied.
heavyweights (z=4.7893, p<0.001). For women, the injury rate However, comparison with previous studies will still provide
was 4.3 injuries /1000 h of training. The comparison of rates in perspectives to injury trends among the elite judo population.
women showed 4.6 for lightweights and 4.2 for heavyweights A previous retrospective study was carried out at the same
(z=1.9111, p>0.05) (figure 1). training centre in South Korea for National Level Athletes from
Almost half of these injuries (47.1%) were grade I injuries November 1996 to December 2000. In total, the study had 172
(1–3 treatment days). Grade II injuries (4–7 treatment days) injuries during that time period. The main difference in data
were 28.6% and grade III injuries (greater than 8 treatment recording between the two studies was that the previous retro-
days) were 24.4%. Injury proportions occurred in the order of spective study only included injuries which required greater
the lower body (44.2%), upper body (29.8%), trunk (20.3%) than 1 clinic visit and/or required a minimum 3 days of treat-
and head and neck (5.6%). Men and women showed similar ment. Therefore, data from the 2010–2013 study was adjusted
trends in body region injuries (figure 2), but this was not statis- by excluding grade I injuries (1–3 days of treatment).
tically significant ( p=0.36). The knee, lower leg, ankle, lumbar Furthermore, only the total men’s and women’s data in this
spine/lower back, shoulder and elbow were the most common study were comparable, as the previous retrospective study did
sites of injury (table 1). not differentiate between weight class or gender.
In tables 2 and 3, regarding the number of injuries athletes During 1996–2000, there were, on average, 28 male and
experienced, women experienced more grade III injuries than female athletes training annually. The injury rate for the 1996–
males ( p=0.0228). However, this was significant only in a com- 2000 study was 1.5 injuries/year for each athlete, whereas with
parison between male heavyweights and female heavyweights the adjustment of the 2010–2013 study, it resulted in 2.2 injur-
( p=0.0041) but not between male lightweights and female ies/year for each athlete. Trends were found to be similar
lightweights ( p=0.6347). Comparison between women in dif- between the two epidemiological studies, although the previous
ferent weight classes also showed that women heavyweights study showed greater injuries to the knee (24.6% vs 10.2%). In
incurred more serious injuries (grade III) than women light- both studies, the order of injury proportion was similar: lower
weights ( p=0.0087). Also, half of all injuries in the female light- extremity (highest injury proportion), upper extremity, trunk,
weight category fell into grade I (similar to the male judo and head and neck (lowest injury proportion).
athletes), whereas only 35% of female heavyweight injuries fell One possible explanation for the decreased knee injury rate
into grade I. Total lightweights also incurred more mild grade 1 but overall increased injury rate in this study is the training
method. Current training methods emphasise more on personal
skill enhancement than previously (learning and attempting new
manoeuvres may broaden the types of injuries an athlete may
experience). Also, an explanation of the increase in injury rate
(from 1.5 to 2.2) may possibly be due to the difference in
recording of the injury and/or a more meticulous data collection
procedure in this study. The lower injury proportion found in
the knee joint (from 24.6% to 10.2%) could be due to prevent-
ive/awareness measures that may have taken place, as knee joint
injuries are more debilitating and also require longer periods of
time off from injury.
Two prior studies on injuries among elite judo athletes were
also compared with this study. The first study was a video ana-
lysis of 124 matches, fought by 83 different judo athletes,
during four international judo tournaments held in 2006 and
2007.19 The second study was of data gathered from the
Figure 2 Comparison of male and female injury percentile at the London Summer Olympic Games.18 The first study only
National Training Center. recorded data during competition, while the second study
Kim K-S, et al. Br J Sports Med 2015;0:1–7. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094365 3
Downloaded from http://bjsm.bmj.com/ on July 28, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com
Original article
Table 2 Women heavyweight and lightweight: injury grade and values of injury region frequency
N (%)
Greater than 8 treatment
1–3 Treatment days 4–7 Treatment days days Total
Site Light Heavy Light Heavy Light Heavy Light Heavy
Head and neck 9 (0.20) 5 (0.10) 2 (0.05) 1 (0.02) 3 (0.07) 4 (0.08) 14 (0.32) 10 (0.19)
Upper body 29 (0.66) 21 (0.40) 16 (0.36) 20 (0.38) 10 (0.23) 16 (0.31) 55 (1.25) 57 (1.10)
Trunk 20 (0.45) 19 (0.37) 15 (0.34) 15 (0.29) 5 (0.11) 16 (0.31) 40 (0.91) 50 (0.96)
Lower body 40 (0.91) 28 (0.54) 23 (0.52) 34 (0.65) 24 (0.55) 28 (0.54) 87 (1.98) 90 (1.73)
Total 98 73 56 70 42 64 196 207
Bracketed values indicate rate of injury according to the number of athletes over 4 years.
Women: 44 lightweights, 52 heavyweights.
recorded injuries during competition as well as training activities In regard to spinal injuries, observance at the training centre
during the 17 days of the Olympic Games. showed that these spinal injuries usually occurred during weight
A third study in England during three Senior Collegiate level training or with extreme rotations of the back while the athlete
judo tournaments in 200520 was also used for comparison. attempted throws. A study on lumbar spondylosis showed that
Although the participants were not all at the elite level, the data judo players were significantly prone (20%) to suffer this type
had good correlation with the previous two International studies. of injury.21 It frequently occurred in athletes with repetitive
All three studies had the injuries occur in the order of upper trunk movements. A biomechanical study by Sairyo et al22 may
extremity > lower extremity > head and neck > trunk. This dif- explain this issue as it defines high stress occurring in the back
fered from the previous two epidemiological studies at the Korea during movements of extension and rotation.
National Training Center, as most injuries happened in the The knee, lower back, elbow and shoulders were the main
Lower extremity and the least in the Head and Neck regions. injured body regions found in our study. After much observa-
Another analysed difference was that injuries in the trunk were tion of the athletes, knee injuries happened frequently second-
very rare in the three studies, with none during the 2006–2007 ary to high valgus stress on the joint. The MCL and ACL were
tournaments, only one recorded during the 2012 London found to be the most common knee ligaments injured in judo
Games, and only two injuries in total (1 male and 1 female) athletes,23 as valgus force was found to be a common mechan-
noted in the trunk during the three senior level tournaments in ism of injury to the MCL24 and ACL.25 Lower back injuries
England. At the training centre, 20% of the injuries were in the were found with extreme rotations and imbalance while
trunk, most notably in the lumbar and thoracic spine. attempting throws. Most of the spinal injuries also occurred
Prior studies on injuries also noted major differences in injury secondary to weight training. Shoulder and elbow injuries fre-
trends when comparing training injuries versus competition quently happened when colliding with the mat on the ground
injuries. Studies during the Summer Olympic Games 2008 and or attempting to defend against an attack. Also secondary to
2012 similarly found that injuries in training and in competition the arm bar manoeuvre, elbow injuries were common. It can
differed significantly in all injury characteristics.4 18 be concluded that areas of the body most likely to come into
Since the most common site and mechanism of injury have contact with an opponent are most likely to sustain an injury
been shown to vary in the literature,20 further studies are in judo.20
needed, especially in the elite athletes, to compare specific Women displayed a higher annual injury rate than males (4.2
injury patterns from competitions versus in training to help vs 4.0), and women also sustained more serious grade III injur-
prevent such injuries from occurring. Also, as practice sessions ies than males. This was significant when comparison was made
are quite longer than competition periods, understanding between women and men in the heavyweight class but not
mechanisms of injury due to muscle fatigue and exhaustion may between women and men in the lightweight class. In fact, the
play a key role in having effective preventive measures. female lightweights had the same injury rate as the male
Table 3 Men heavyweight and lightweight: injury grade and values of injury region frequency
N (%)
Greater than 8 treatment
1–3 Treatment days 4–7 Treatment days days Total
Site Light Heavy Light Heavy Light Heavy Light Heavy
Head and neck 6 (0.15) 8 (0.14) 2 (0.05) 1 (0.02) 1 (0.03) 2 (0.04) 9 (0.23) 11 (0.20)
Upper body 38 (0.95) 30 (0.54) 12 (0.30) 13 (0.23) 9 (0.23) 19 (0.34) 59 (1.48) 62 (1.11)
Trunk 22 (0.55) 25 (0.45) 16 (0.40) 11 (0.20) 9 (0.23) 10 (0.18) 47 (1.18) 46 (0.82)
Lower body 31 (0.78) 38 (0.68) 22 (0.55) 20 (0.36) 13 (0.33) 21 (0.38) 66 (1.65) 79 (1.41)
Total 97 101 52 45 32 52 181 198
Bracketed values indicate rate of injury according to the number of athletes over 4 years.
Males: 40 lightweights, 56 heavyweight.
Original article
Figure 3 Rate of injury by weight class and injury grade according to the number of athletes over 4 years (women: 44 lightweights, 52
heavyweights). Regions of the head and neck/upper body/trunk/lower body.
Figure 4 Rate of injury by weight class and injury grade according to the number of athletes over 4 years (males: 40 lightweights, 56
heavyweights). Regions of the head and neck/upper body/trunk/lower body.
Original article
lightweights. Green also found that the two most serious injuries or even also due to their inability to lose weight and overcome
in his study affected the heavyweight judokas.20 extreme hunger and thirst.
The incidence of injuries was found to be higher in the light- In the NCAA weight certification programme, each athlete
weight class than in the heavyweight class for both males and has to be evaluated for minimum weight at the beginning of the
females (4.5>3.5 in males, and 4.5> 4.0 in females). Total season; this would be used to determine the category the athlete
lightweights also incurred more mild grade 1 injuries than total will be able to compete in during the season.33 These regula-
heavyweights ( p=0.0078). Although the comparison of the rate tions have been successful in the athletes’ weight management
of injuries in male lightweights versus male heavyweights was behaviour,33 and should also be considered in the sport of judo
statistically significant ( p<0.001), but not between female light- globally for the protection of the athletes.
weights and female heavyweights ( p>0.05), this may be a In conclusion, nearly half of all injuries in the elite judo popula-
matter of concern as studies have shown that athletes in the tion were considered minor injuries. Many of the more serious
lightweight category practise more extreme weight-loss behav- injuries seem to occur more frequently among the heavyweights,
iour than athletes in the middle and heavyweight categories.26 especially the female heavyweight athletes. The total number of
In the light of a recent death in 2014 of a middle school female injuries occur at a more frequent level among the lightweight ath-
judo athlete secondary to RWL in South Korea, and multiple letes. The exact cause is unknown, however, as lightweights are
studies showing increased risk of injury due to RWL, what per- found to practise more extreme behaviour of RWL, future studies
centage of injuries in judo can be attributed to this practice of are necessary to establish if this may play a role in causation of
RWL? more injuries. Also, a follow-up biomechanical study of move-
This practice of RWL is prevalent in sports with weight cat- ments among the elite judo population will be necessary for imple-
egories. Studies show that 90% of judo athletes have already mentations of an effective injury prevention programme.
rapidly reduced body weight before a competition, with another
study finding showing 63% reducing weight rapidly on a regular LIMITATIONS
basis.11 27 Many combat athletes have lost weight of up to 5– We were not able to factor in the 1 athlete who left the centre
10%, with many also reporting a greater than 10% reduction of on average annually midseason due to a severe injury or for per-
body weight.11 27 28 60% of judo athletes have also started this sonal reasons. However, every injury that did occur at the train-
practice at an early age (12–15), and patterns also show that ing facility had to be reported and seen within the facilities,
RWL among judo competitors are as inappropriate as those which made for consistent data gathering. Our study also did
reported regarding wrestlers before the NCAA’s weight control not measure energy availability or record RWL practices and
programme.11 This can negatively impact an individual’s growth dynamic weight changes as that would have allowed us to
and development, and the rate of obesity was also found to be address the issues of RWL. Menstrual history was also not
more prevalent in former combat athletes.29 Studies have also recorded, which is a vital medical component for all young elite
shown how RWL can have a negative impact on lean body mass female judo athletes. There are also possibilities that injuries
(LBM), strength and performance.30–33 may have been unreported due to the athletes’ fear of having to
Hydration testing revealed that almost half of the athletes lose time in competition if reported. This is a consistent issue
were seriously hypohydrated on the morning of competition faced regularly among the elite athlete population.
day.8 These deficits are known to negatively affect thermoregula-
tion, cardiovascular function and metabolism.34–36 One study
showed that the likelihood of injury significantly increased as What are the new findings?
the body does not have enough time to recover from the
dehydration.20
Dehydration secondary to RWL also affects the immune ▸ This study provides comprehensive data of injury rates and
system. With reduced water in the blood, circulation of the trends among the elite judo population.
immune system related substances was inhibited. Also, testing ▸ Elite judo athletes average roughly four injuries annually.
of neutrophils revealed cell dysfunction with dehydration.37 ▸ Women athletes, especially the heavyweights, incur more
This may be significant as one in five illnesses during the severe injuries than male athletes.
London SOG resulted in absence from training or competi- ▸ Lightweights incur more injuries than heavyweights in the
tion.18 Infection was the most common cause of illness, and elite judo population.
women in particular had a higher incidence of illnesses com-
pared to the male athletes.18 This factor may play a role in pre-
venting the athlete from achieving their lifelong goal at the
Olympics.18 How might it impact on clinical practice in the near future?
Although weight divisions were initially intended to establish
equality between opponents, the focus today seems to be more
▸ Trainers should be alerted to injuries among the women
about being able to alter their power to weight ratio and gaining
heavyweight judo athletes as there is a higher probability
an advantage by classifying into a lower weight division.8 This
that it could be a serious injury.
strategy may work initially at the lower tiers of competition, but
▸ Most injuries are of minor severity in the elite judo
we question the effectiveness if almost all of the athletes practise
population.
RWL before the tournament and compete with each other.
▸ Although many injuries are minor in nature, the Medical Team
Athletes today may be moving up the ladder of competition not
should be aware that serious long-term injuries do occur, such
just for their physical athletic attributes but also because of their
as in the knee, shoulder, cervical and lumbar spine.
willingness to possibly sacrifice their long-term health. It should
▸ Clinicians should address Guidelines and regulations,
also be considered how many talented athletes fail to achieve
acknowledging the short-term and long-term harm of
success and continue in the sport secondary to their unwilling-
continuous rapid weight loss to the body.
ness to rapidly lose body weight within a short period of time,
6 Kim K-S, et al. Br J Sports Med 2015;0:1–7. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094365
Downloaded from http://bjsm.bmj.com/ on July 28, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com
Original article
Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Leisure Yu, MD, 13 Pocecco E, Ruedl G, Stankovic N, et al. Injuries in judo: a systematic literature
Ph D (Loma Linda, California, USA). His many years in the field of sports medicine review including suggestions for prevention. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:1139–43.
as Team Physician for the US Figure Skating Association and time served in the 14 Franchini E, Del Vecchio FB, Matsushigue KA, et al. Physiological profiles of elite
Special Olympics has given us valuable insight and direction in the improvement of judo athletes. Sports Med 2011;41:147–66.
this paper. 15 Gould D, Maynard I. Psychological preparation for the Olympic Games. J Sports Sci
2009;27:1393–408.
Contributors K-SK with the data obtained, the data were analysed with the team
16 Clarsen B, Bahr R. Matching the choice of injury/illness definition to study setting,
and K-SK was responsible for the review of all the articles mentioned in the
purpose and design: one size does not fit all! Br J Sports Med 2014;48:510–12.
reference section of the paper. K-SK was responsible for writing the paper and
17 Goldberg AS, Moroz L, Smith A, et al. Injury surveillance in young athletes a
discussing with the overseer JKL if any issues were noticed while finalising the
clinician’s guide to sports injury literature. Sports Med 2007;37:265–78.
paper. KJP has been working with the athletes and speaking with them on a
18 Engebretsen L, Soligard T, Steffen K, et al. Sports injuries and illnesses during the
personal level about their injuries. KJP was responsible for the treatment phase of
London Summer Olympic Games 2012. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:407–14.
the injured athletes and recording data obtained as they received treatment. After
19 Pierantozzi E, Muroni R. Judo high level competitions injuries. Medit J Musc Surv
spending many hours by the athletes’ side, KJP was able to obtain and share much
2009;17:26–9.
information with the team regarding the cause and mechanism of injuries incurred
20 Green CM, Petrou MJ, Fogarty-Hover ML, et al. Injuries among judokas during
by the athletes. JKL was responsible for overseeing the whole project and gathering
competition. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2007;17:205–10.
the team to start and finish this article. JKL answered all questions any authors had.
21 Sakai T, Sairyo K, Suzue N, et al. Incidence and etiology of lumbar spondylolysis:
BYK: BYK was responsible for analysing the data and attempting possible
review of the literature. J Orthop Sci 2010;15:281–8.
comparisons to run the statistical tests. With the results of the statistical tests, BYK
22 Sairyo K, Katoh S, Komatsubara S, et al. Spondylolysis fracture angle in children and
gave direction for the best application of the values to be incorporated into the
adolescents on CT indicates the fracture producing force vector: a biomechanical
study. BYK was also in charge of the graphs and tables of the article.
rationale. Internet J Spine Surg 2004;1:Number 2
Competing interests None declared. 23 Majewski M, Habelt S, Steinbruck K. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. 10-year study. Knee 2006;13:184–8.
24 Chen L, Kim PD, Ahmad CS, et al. Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee:
current treatment concepts. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2008;1:108–13.
REFERENCES 25 Koshida S, Deguchi T, Miyashita K, et al. The common mechanisms of anterior
1 Yard EE, Knox CL, Smith GA, et al. Pediatric martial arts injuries presenting to cruciate ligament injuries in judo: a retrospective analysis. Br J Sports Med
emergency departments, United States 1990–2003. J Sci Med Sport 2010;44:856–61.
2007;10:219–26. 26 Oppliger RA, Steen SA, Scott JR. Weight loss practices of college wrestlers. Int J
2 IJF. International Judo Federation. http://www.ijf.org/ (accessed 30 May 2015). Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2003;13:29–46.
3 Lee JH. A Study on Sports Injuries in the Elite Judo and Hockey Athletes. JKSSPE 27 Brito CJ, Roas AF, Brito IS, et al. Methods of body mass reduction by combat sport
2002;6:203–11. athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2012;22:89–97.
4 Junge A, Engebretsen L, Mountjoy ML, et al. Sports injuries during the Summer 28 Steen SN, Brownell KD. Patterns of weight loss and regain in wrestlers: has the
Olympic Games 2008. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:2165–72. tradition changed? Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990;22:762–8.
5 Kujala UM, Taimela S, Antti-Poika I, et al. Acute injuries in soccer, ice hockey, 29 Saarni SE, Rissanen A, Sarna S, et al. Weight cycling of athletes and subsequent
volleyball, basketball, judo, and karate: analysis of national registry data. BMJ weight gain in middleage. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006;0:1639–44.
1995;311:1456–8. 30 Koral J, Dosseville F. Combination of gradual and rapid weight loss: effects on
6 De Lols M, Goldie I. Incidence rate of injuries during sport activity and physical physical performance and psychological state of elite judo athletes. J Sports Sci
exercise in a rural Swedish municipality: incidence rates in 17 sports. Intl Sports 2009;27:115–20.
Med 1988;9:461–7. 31 Koutedakis Y, Pacy PJ, Quevedo RM, et al. The effect of two different periods of
7 McLatchie GR, Davies JE, Caulley JH. Injuries in karate-a case for medical control. weight-reduction on selected performance parameters in elite lightweight
I Trauma 1980;20:956–8. oarswomen. Int J Sports Med 1994;15:472–7.
8 Pettersson S, Berg CM. Hydration status in elite wrestlers, judokas, boxers, and 32 Garthe I, Raastad T, Refsnes PE, et al. Effect of two different weight-loss rates on
taekwondo athletes on competition day. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab body composition and strength and power-related performance in elite athletes. Int
2014;4:267–75. J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2011;21:97–104.
9 Sundgot-Borgen J, Garthe I. Elite athletes in aesthetic and Olympic weight-class 33 Garthe I, Raastad T, Sundgot-Borgen J. Long-term effect of weight loss on body
sports and the challenge of body weight and body composition. J Sports Sci composition and performance in elite athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab
2011;29:S101–14. 2011;21:426–35.
10 Nattiv A, Loucks AB, Manore MM, et al., American College of Sports Medicine. 34 Casa DJ, Armstrong LE, Hillman SK, et al. National athletic trainers’ association
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. The female athlete triad. Med position statement: fluid replacement for athletes. J Athl Train 2000;35:212–24.
Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:1867–82. 35 Allen TE, Smith DP, Miller DK. Hemodynamic response to submaximal exercise after
11 Artioli GG, Franchini E, Nicastro H, et al. The need of a weight management control dehydration and rehydration in high school wrestlers. Med Sci Sports
program in judo: a proposal based on the successful case of wrestling. J Int Soc 1977;9:159–63.
Sports Nutr 2010;7:15. 36 Fogelholm M. Effects of bodyweight reduction on sports performance. Sports Med
12 Soric M, Misigoj-Durakovic M, Pedisic Z. Dietary intake and body composition of 1994;18:249–67.
prepubescent female aesthetic athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 37 Chishaki T, Umeda T, Takahashi I, et al. Effects of dehydration on immune functions
2008;18:343–54. after a judo practice session. Luminescence 2013;28:114–20.
These include:
Notes