IFM Exchange Rate Arrangements POINT Format Eun Resnick

The Current Exchange Rate Arrangements
Although the most actively traded currencies of the world, such as the dollar, the yen, the pound,
and the euro, may be fluctuating against each other, a significant number of the world's
currencies are pegged to single currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar and the euro, or baskets of
currencies such as the SDR. The current exchange rate arrangements as classified by the IMF are
provided in IMF Annual Report. The classification system used is based on IMF member
countries' actual, de facto arrangements, as identified by IMF staff, which can be different from
the officially announced, de jure arrangements. The system classifies exchange rate
arrangements primarily based on the degree to which the exchange rate is determined by the
market rather than by official government action, with market-determined rates generally being
more flexible. As can be seen from the exhibit, the IMF currently classifies exchange rate
arrangements into 10 separate regimes:
De Facto Classification of Exchange Rate Arrangements

30-Apr-13
No separate
legal 13 7% Mainly very small countries
tender exception: Zimbabwe
Currency board 12 6% Hong Kong
Brunei
Conventional
peg 45 24% Nepal
Qatar, Saudi Arabia
Stabilized 19 10% Pakistan
arrangement Iran
Crawling peg 2 1% Nicaragua
Crawl-like 15 8% Bangladesh, Sri Lanka
arrangement China
Pegged
exchange 1 1%
rate within Tonga
horizontal
bands
Other managed 19 10% Singapore
arrangement Myanmar
Floating 35 18% India, Thailand
Free floating 30 16% Developed Countries
191 100%
1. No separate legal tender:
 The currency of another country circulates as the sole legal tender.
 Adopting such an arrangement implies complete surrender of the monetary
authorities' control over the domestic monetary policy.
2. Currency board:
 A currency board arrangement is a monetary arrangement based on an explicit
legislative commitment:
o to exchange domestic currency for a specified foreign currency at a fixed
exchange rate,
o combined with restrictions on the issuing authority to ensure the
fulfillment of its legal obligation.
 This implies that domestic currency is:
o usually fully backed by foreign assets,
o eliminating traditional central bank functions such as monetary control
and lender of last resort, and
o leaving little room for discretionary monetary policy.
3. Conventional peg:
 For this category the country formally (de jure) pegs its currency at a fixed rate to:
o another currency or
o a basket of currencies, where the basket is formed, for example, from the
currencies of major trading or financial partners arid weights reflect the
geographic distribution of trade, services, or capital flows.
 The anchor currency or basket weights are public or notified to the IMF.
 The country authorities stand ready to maintain the fixed parity through direct
intervention (i.e., via sale or purchase of foreign exchange in the market) or
 indirect intervention (e.g., via exchange-rate-related use of interest rate policy,
imposition of foreign exchange regulations, exercise of moral suasion that
constrains foreign exchange activity, or intervention by other public institutions).
 There is no commitment to irrevocably keep the parity,
4. Stabilized arrangement:
 Classification as a stabilized arrangement entails a spot market exchange rate that
remains within a margin of certain (say 2) percent for certain (say six) months or
more (with the exception of a specified number of outliers or steep adjustments)
and is not floating.
5. Crawling peg:
 The currency is adjusted in small amounts at a fixed rate or in response to changes
in selected quantitative indicators, such as past inflation differentials vis-a-vis
major trading partners or differentials between the inflation target and expected
inflation in major trading partners..
6. Crawl-like arrangement:
 The exchange rate must remain within a narrow margin of' say 2 percent relative
to a statistically identified trend for six months or more (with the exception of a
specified number of outliers), and the exchange rate arrangement cannot be
considered as floating.
 Usually, a minimum rate of change greater than allowed under a stabilized (peg-
like) arrangement is required. Ethiopia is an example.
7. Pegged exchange rate within horizontal bands:

 The value of the currency is maintained within certain margins of fluctuation of at
least ± 1 percent around a fixed central rate
8. Other managed arrangement:

 This category is a residual, and is used when the exchange rate arrangement does
not meet the criteria for any of the other categories.
 Arrangements characterized by frequent shifts in policies may fall into this
category.
9. Floating:
 A floating exchange rate is largely market determined, without an ascertainable or
predictable path for the rate.
 Foreign exchange market intervention may be either direct or indirect, and serves
to moderate the rate of change and prevent undue fluctuations in the exchange
rate
10. Free floating:

 A floating exchange rate can be classified as free floating if intervention occurs
only exceptionally
 The aims of such interventions are to address disorderly market conditions and if
the authorities have provided information or data confirming that intervention has
been limited

IFM Exchange Rate Arrangements POINT Format Eun Resnick

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IFM Exchange Rate Arrangements POINT Format Eun Resnick

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

IFM Exchange Rate Arrangements POINT Format Eun Resnick

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Current Exchange Rate Arrangements

De Facto Classification of Exchange Rate Arrangements

7. Pegged exchange rate within horizontal bands:

8. Other managed arrangement:

10. Free floating:

You might also like