Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 677 views

    OBLICON - Chapter 1 Problem

    Uploaded by

    Arah
    X spent 150 pesos to buy a lost child food in a mall. The child's mother Y did not consent to this. X is entitled to reimbursement from Y under Article 1160, as X voluntarily took responsibility for Y's abandoned child. Y's jeep bumped and damaged X's parked car. Y is liable for damages to X under Article 1162, as the accident was due to Y's negligence. X has no right to claim compensation from R, the employer of X, for damages caused by Y bumping X's car while X was on business for R. Article 1158 states obligations arise only from law or contract, not assumptions. D borrowed 10,000 pesos

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    OBLICON - Chapter 1 Problem

    Uploaded by

    Arah
    677 views1 page
    X spent 150 pesos to buy a lost child food in a mall. The child's mother Y did not consent to this. X is entitled to reimbursement from Y under Article 1160, as X voluntarily took responsibility for Y's abandoned child. Y's jeep bumped and damaged X's parked car. Y is liable for damages to X under Article 1162, as the accident was due to Y's negligence. X has no right to claim compensation from R, the employer of X, for damages caused by Y bumping X's car while X was on business for R. Article 1158 states obligations arise only from law or contract, not assumptions. D borrowed 10,000 pesos

    Original Title

    OBLICON_Chapter 1 Problem

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    X spent 150 pesos to buy a lost child food in a mall. The child's mother Y did not consent to this. X is entitled to reimbursement from Y under Article 1160, as X voluntarily took responsibility for Y's abandoned child. Y's jeep bumped and damaged X's parked car. Y is liable for damages to X under Article 1162, as the accident was due to Y's negligence. X has no right to claim compensation from R, the employer of X, for damages caused by Y bumping X's car while X was on business for R. Article 1158 states obligations arise only from law or contract, not assumptions. D borrowed 10,000 pesos

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    677 views1 page

    OBLICON - Chapter 1 Problem

    Uploaded by

    Arah
    X spent 150 pesos to buy a lost child food in a mall. The child's mother Y did not consent to this. X is entitled to reimbursement from Y under Article 1160, as X voluntarily took responsibility for Y's abandoned child. Y's jeep bumped and damaged X's parked car. Y is liable for damages to X under Article 1162, as the accident was due to Y's negligence. X has no right to claim compensation from R, the employer of X, for damages caused by Y bumping X's car while X was on business for R. Article 1158 states obligations arise only from law or contract, not assumptions. D borrowed 10,000 pesos

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Santos, Sarah D.

    Law on Obligation and Contracts B-231

    1. X saw at about 1pm in the afternoon a child alone in a shopping mall. The child who strayed
    from Y, his mother, was in tears and appeared very hungry. Out of pity, X took him to
    restaurant to eat for which he spent P150. Y did not give her consent to good deed of X.
    Furthermore, they were on their way home before the child got lost. Is X entitled to be
    reimbursed by Y for the amount of P150?

    Answer: Yes, because According to Article 1160 if a person voluntarily takes charge of
    another abandoned business or property the payment of indemnity to the end that no one
    shall be unjustly benefited at the expense of another. Therefore, Y is responsible for X even
    though she did not consent to her and to prevent an unfair situation for X.

    2. While the car of X was parked by the roadside, it was bumped at the rear by a jeep
    belonging to Y. Only the car of X suffered damage. Under the circumstances, does it follow
    that Y is liable to X for damage?

    Answer: Yes, on the grounds that According to Article 1162 a flaw or demonstration of
    carelessness, which makes harms another. Along these lines, Y is yet obligated for X's
    harm in the vehicle even there is no earlier authoritative connection between the two parties
    X's vehicle was yet annihilated owing to Y's carelessness.

    3. In the same problem, has X the right to ask to indemnify from R, employer of X, on the
    ground that when accident occurred X was then on his way to transact business with a
    client of R?

    Answer: No, X has no right because According to Article 1158 commitments got from
    law are not assumed however should be explicitly resolved in this code or other
    uncommon laws. Thus, X has no legal right to seek compensation from R because there
    is no such legislation.

    4. D (debtor) borrowed P10,000 from C (creditor). On the due date of the loan, D could not
    pay C because he lost to a robber the P10,000 intended for C. In, addition, he suffered
    financial reverses, and he was short of cash even for his current family’s needs. Is D
    legally justified to refuse to pay C?

    Answer: No, because under the Article 1159 Obligations arising from contracts have the
    force of law between the contracting parties and should be complied with in good faith.
    Therefore, in light of the fact that when D credited from C, he entered in voluntary
    arrangement and D was willing then the contract is valid. Along with this lines D has a
    moral obligation to comply to their agreement and has no legal basis to refuse payment to
    C.

    You might also like