Article 1231 1261
Article 1231 1261
Article 1231 1261
OBLIGATIONS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ARE EXTINGUISHED:
BY PAYMENT OR PERFORMANCE;
BY LOSS OF THE THING DUE;
BY THE CONDONATION OR REMISSION OF THE DEBT;
BY THE CONFUSION OR MERGER OF THE RIGHTS OF CREDITOR AND DEBTOR;
BY COMPENSATION;
BY NOVATION
OTHER CAUSES OF EXTINGUISHMENT OF OBLIGATIONS, SUCH AS ANNULMENT, RESCISSION, FULFILLMENT
RESOLUTORY CONDITION, AND PRESCRIPTION, ARE GOVERNED ELSEWHERE IN THIS CODE. (1156A)
OF A
ARTICLE 1232
PAYMENT
MEANS NOT ONLY THE DELIVERY OF MONEY BUT ALSO THE PERFORMANCE, IN ANY OTHER MANNER, OF AN
OBLIGATION. (N)
MEANING OF PAYMENT
ARTICLE 1233
A
DEBT SHALL NOT HAVE BEEN UNDERSTOOD TO HAVE BEEN PAID UNLESS THE THING OR SERVICE IN WHICH THE OBLIGATION
CONSISTS HAS BEEN COMPLETELY DELIVERED OR RENDERED, AS THE CASE MAY BE.
(1157)
ARTICLE 1234
IF
THE OBLIGATION HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY PERFORMED IN GOOD FAITH, THE OBLIGOR MAY RECOVER AS THOUGH THERE HAD
BEEN A STRICT AND COMPLETE FULFILLMENT, LESS DAMAGES SUFFERED BY THE OBLIGEE. (N)
NOTE TO SELF
1234
ARTICLE 1235
WHEN
THE OBLIGEE ACCEPTS THE PERFORMANCE, KNOWING ITS INCOMPLETENESS OR IRREGULARITY, AND WITHOUT
EXPRESSING ANY PROTEST OR OBJECTION, THE OBLIGATION IS DEEMED FULLY COMPLIED WITH. (N)
This is another exception to article 1233, and founded on the principle of estroppel.
1235
ARTICLE 1236
THE
CREDITOR IS NOT TO BOUND TO ACCEPT PAYMENT OR PERFORMANCE BY A THIRD PERSON WHO HAS NO INTEREST IN THE
WHOEVER
PAYS FOR ANOTHER MAY DEMAND FROM THE DEBTOR WHAT HE HAS PAID, EXCEPT THAT IF HE PAID WITHOUT THE
KNOWLEDGE OR AGAINST THE WILL OF THE DEBTOR, HE CAN RECOVER ONLY INSOFAR AS THE PAYMENT HAS BEEN BENEFICIAL
TO THE DEBTOR.
(1158A)
1. Debtor
2. Any person who has an interest in the obligation (e.g. guarantor)
3. Third person who has no interest in obligation when there is stipulation he can make payment
CREDITOR MAY REFUSE PAYMENT BY A THIRD PERSON
Creditor should have a right to insist on the liability on the debtor unlike before; the creditor cannot
refuse payment made by the third person.
Creditor is also not compelled to accept payment by a third person whom he dislikes. The creditor
may not desire to have any dealings with the third person (May it be for personal reasons).
The creditor is only making sure, thats why he may not accept payment from a third person.
EFFECT OF PAYMENT BY THIRD PERSON
*Payment/performance may be made by any person not incapacitated, even without the knowledge or
against will of debtor, and although he has absolutely no interest in obligation.
NOTE TO SELF
1. If made without the knowledge or against the will of the debtor payer can recover from
the debtor only insofar the payment has been beneficial to the latter
2. If made with the knowledge of the debtor the payer has rights of reimbursement and
subrogation (to recover what he has paid not necessarily the amount of the debt), and to acquire
all rights of debtor.
ARTICLE 1237
WHOEVER
PAYS ON BEHALF OF THE DEBTOR WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR AGAINST THE WILL OF THE LATTER CANNOT COMPEL
THE CREDITOR TO SUBROGATE HIM IN HIS RIGHTS, SUCH AS THOSE ARISING FROM A MORTGAGE, GUARANTY, OR PENALTY.
(1159A)
RIGHT OF THIRD PERSON TO SUBROGATION
Whoever pays in behalf of debtor is entitles to subrogation, if payment is with consent of latter.
If payment is without knowledge or against will of debtor then third person cannot compel creditor
to subrogate him in the latters accessory rights of mortgage, guaranty, or penalty.
Subrogation can only take place with debtors consent.
Third person who w/o necessity paid under such condition is protected by his right to
reimbursement
Subrogation
Person who pays for debtor is put into shoes
of creditor
Payor acquires not only right to reimburse
what he has paid but also all other rights
creditor could have exercised (credit against
debtor or against third persons guarantors
or possesors of mortgages)
There is no real extinction of obligation, only
change of creditor
Reimbursement
Third person entitled by reason of payment
has merely the bare right to be refunded
(only to extent of article 1236), this is
without right to the guarantees and
securities of original obligation
ARTICLE 1238
PAYMENT MADE BY A THIRD PERSON WHO DOES NOT INTEND TO BE REIMBURSED BY THE DEBTOR IS DEEMED TO BE A
DONATION, WHICH REQUIRES THE DEBTORS CONSENT. BUT THE PAYMENT IS IN ANY CASE VALID AS TO THE CREDITOR WHO HAS
ACCEPTED IT. (N)
This article embodies the idea that no one should be compelled to accept the generosity of another. If
paying the third person does not intend to reimburse then the payment is made into a donation which
requires the debtors consent to be valid.
However if creditor accepts payment, it will be also considered as a donation even without consent of the
debtor.
*Example: D owes C 1php, S paid Ds obligation without intention of being reimbursed. D had previously
accepted Ss generosity. D is not liable to S and Ds obligation is extinguished. If D did not give consent to
the donation, S may reimburse, even id S didnt intend to be reimbursed. The obligation of D to C is
extinguished because the payment is valid to C who has accepted it. D cannot legally refuse to pay S and
insist to pay C.
NOTE TO SELF
ARTICLE 1239
IN
OBLIGATIONS TO GIVE, PAYMENT MADE BY ONE WHO DOES NOT HAVE FREE DISPOSAL OF THE THING DUE AND CAPACITY TO
ALIENATE IT SHALL NOT BE VALID, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ARTICLE
1247
UNDER THE
TITLE
ON
1. Free disposal of thing due thing to be delivered must not be subject to any claim, lien or
encumbrance (mortgage, pledge) of a third person
2. Capacity to alienate person is not incapacitated to enter into contracts and to make the
disposal of a thing due
In obligations to give, payment by one who doesnt have the free disposition of a free thing due and
capacity to alienate is not valid (paid thing can be recovered)
Exception: creditor cannot be compelled to accept payment where the person has no capacity to
make it
ARTICLE 1240
PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE TO THE PERSON IN WHOSE FAVOR THE OBLIGATION
INTEREST, OR ANY PERSON AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE IT. (1162A)
1. Creditor or oblige
2. His successor in interest
3. Any person authorized to receive it
Creditor referred to must be the creditor at time of payment not at time of c0nstitution of obligation
ARTICLE 1241
PAYMENT
TO A PERSON WHO IS INCAPACITATED TO ADMINISTER HIS PROPERTY SHALL BE VALID AS IF HE HAS KEPT THE THING
1.
2.
3.
IF AFTER THE PAYMENT, THE THIRD PERSON ACQUIRES THE CREDITORS RIGHTS;
IF THE CREDITORS RATIFIES THE PAYMENT TO THE THIRD PERSON;
IF BY THE CREDITORS CONDUCT, THE DEBTOR HAS BEEN LED TO BELIEVE THAT THE THIRD PERSON HAD AUTHORITY TO
RECEIVE THE PAYMENT.
(1163A)
Payment to a person unable to manage his property is not valid unless such incapacitated person
kept the thing paid or delivered, or it was benefited by payment.
In absence of benefit, debtor may be made to pay again by the creditors guardian/incapacitated
person himself (when capacity is recovered)
Proof of benefit is obligatory upon debtor who paid
Payment to third person or wrong party is not valid unless it was redounded to benefit of creditor
NOTE TO SELF
The payment made by debtor to third person benefited by creditor is no presumed and must be
established by person in proving this fact
In absence of proof, payment thereof in error and in good faith will not deprive creditor to demand
payment
ARTICLE 1242
PAYMENT
MADE IN GOOD FAITH TO ANY PERSON IN POSSESSION OF THE CREDIT SHALL RELEASE THE DEBTOR.
(1164)
ARTICLE 1243
PAYMENT
MADE TO THE CREDITOR BY THE DEBTOR AFTER THE LATTER HAS BEEN JUDICIALLY ORDERED TO RETAIN THE DEBT
(1165)
In action against debtor that is the creditor of another(during pendency of case), the debtorstranger may be ordered by court to retain the debt until right of plaintiff, the creditor in main
litigation is resolved
Payment made by debtor-stranger shall be invalid id plaintiff wins case and cannot collect from
debtor to whom payment is made (considered to have made in bad faith).
ARTICLE 1244
THE
DEBTOR OF A THING CANNOT COMPEL THE CREDITOR TO RECEIVE A DIFFERENT ONE ALTHOUGH THE LATTER MAY BE OF THE
IN
(1166A)
First paragraph refers to a real obligation to deliver specific thing. A thing different from what is
due cannot be demanded against will of debtor or creditor.
Second refers to personal (negative and positive) obligations. Act to be performed or prohibited
cant substituted against obligees will
ARTICLE 1245
NOTE TO SELF
DATION
IN PAYMENT WHEREBY PROPERTY IS ALIENATED TO THE CREDITOR IN SATISFACTION OF A DEBT IN MONEY, SHALL BE
Law of sales governs because dation in payment may be considered specie of sale: amount of the money
due becomes price of thing alienated
ARTICLE 1246
WHEN
THE OBLIGATION CONSISTS IN THE DELIVERY OF AN INDETERMINATE OR GENERIC THING, WHOSE QUALITY AND
CIRCUMSTANCES HAVE NOT BEEN STATED, THE CREDITOR CANNOT DEMAND A THING OF SUPERIOR QUALITY.
DEBTOR DELIVER A THING OF INFERIOR QUALITY.
TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.
THE
NEITHER
CAN THE
(1167A)
ARTICLE 1247
UNLESS
IT IS OTHERWISE STIPULATED, THE EXTRAJUDICIAL EXPENSES REQUIRED BY THE PAYMENT SHALL BE FOR THE ACCOUNT
OF THE DEBTOR.
WITH
RULES
OF
COURT
SHALL GOVERN.
(1168A)
Extrajudicial expenses are for account of debtor because obligation is extinguished when payment
is made unless otherwise stipulated
Judicial costs statutory amounts allowed to a party to an action for his expenses incurred in the
action
Costs will be paid by the losing party however the court may (for special reasons) adjudge that the
cost may be paid by either party or the payment be equally divided amongst the parties.
No costs against government, unless provided by law
ARTICLE 1248
NOTE TO SELF
UNLESS
THERE IS AN EXPRESS STIPULATION TO THAT EFFECT, THE CREDITOR CANNOT BE COMPELLED PARTIALLY TO RECEIVE THE
HOWEVER,
NEITHER
WHEN THE DEBT IS IN PART LIQUIDATED AND IN PART UNLIQUIDATED, THE CREDITOR MAY DEMAND AND THE DEBTOR
MAY EFFECT THE PAYMENT OF THE FORMER WITHOUT WAITING FOR LIQUIDATION OF THE LATTER.
(1169A)
ARTICLE 1249
THE
PAYMENT OF DEBTS IN MONEY SHALL BE MADE IN THE CURRENCY STIPULATED, AND IF IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DELIVER
SUCH CURRENCY, THEN THE CURRENCY WHICH IS THE LEGAL TENDER IN THE
PHILIPPINES.
THE DELIVERY OF PROMISSORY NOTES PAYABLE TO ORDER, OR BILLS OF EXCHANGE OR OTHER MERCANTILE DOCUMENTS SHALL
PRODUCE THE EFFECT OF PAYMENT ONLY WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN CASHED, OR WHEN THROUGH THE FAULT OF THE CREDITOR
THEY HAVE BEEN IMPAIRED,
IN THE MEANTIME, THE ACTION DERIVED FROM THE ORIGINAL OBLIGATION SHALL BE HELD IN ABEYANCE.
(1170)
Legal tender is the currency which a debtor can legally compel a creditor to accept in payment of a debt
in money when tendered by the debtor in the right amount.
LEGAL TENDER IN THE
PHILIPPINES
Debts in money shall be paid in the currency stipulated, if currency not available then pay in the
currency which is the legal tender in the Philippines.
All coins and notes issued by Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas is legal tender for all debts public or
private
Coins are legal tender amounts not exceeding 50php for denominations 0.25php and above, and in
those amounts not exceeding 20php for denominations 0.10php or less.
All coins and bills above 1php are valid for tenders of any amount
1. Right of creditor to refuse or accept if the payment is not a form of legal tender (checks, bills
of exchange, etc.), the creditor cannot be compelled to accept them, but he may accept without
acceptance producing the effect of payment.
2. Effect on obligation payment by mercantile documents cannot extinguish obligation
a. Until they have been cashed
b. Unless they have been impaired through fault of creditor
NOTE TO SELF
ARTICLE 1250
IN
CASE AN EXTRAORDINARY INFLATION OR DEFLATION OF THE CURRENCY STIPULATED SHOULD SUPERVENE, THE VALUE OF THE
CURRENCY AT THE TIME OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OBLIGATION SHALL BE THE BASIS OF PAYMENT, UNLESS THERE IS AN
AGREEMENT TO THE CONTRARY. (N)
1. Inflation sharp sudden increase of money and/or credit without increase in business
transactions. Inflation causes drop of money, rise of general price level.
2. Deflation reduction in volume and circulation of money or credit resulting in decline of general
price level
BASIS OF PAYMENT IN CASE OF EXTRAORDINARY INFLATION OR DEFLATION
ARTICLE 1251
PAYMENT
THERE
BEING NO EXPRESS STIPULATION AND IF THE UNDERTAKING IS TO DELIVER A DETERMINATE THING, THE PAYMENT SHALL
BE MADE WHEREVER THE THING MIGHT BE AT THE MOMENT THE OBLIGATION WAS CONSTITUTED.
IN
ANY OTHER CASE THE PLACE OF PAYMENT SHALL BE THE DOMICILE OF THE DEBTOR.
IF
THE DEBTOR CHANGES HIS DOMICILE IN BAD FAITH OR AFTER HE HAS INCURRED IN DELAY, THE ADDITIONAL EXPENSES SHALL
BE BORNE BY HIM.
THERE
RULES
OF
COURT. (1171A)
ARTICLE 1252
NOTE TO SELF
HE
WHO HAS VARIOUS DEBTS OF THE SAME KIND IN FAVOR OF ONE AND THE SAME CREDITOR, MAY DECLARE AT THE TIME OF
UNLESS
APPLICATION OF PAYMENT IS MADE BY THE PARTY FOR WHOSE BENEFIT THE TERM HAS BEEN CONSTITUTED, APPLICATION SHALL
NOT BE MADE AS TO DEBTS WHICH ARE NOT DUE.
IF
THE DEBTOR ACCEPTS FROM THE CREDITOR A RECEIPT IN WHICH AN APPLICATION OF THE PAYMENT IS MADE, THE FORMER
CANNOT COMPLAIN OF THE SAME, UNLESS THERE IS A CAUSE FOR INVADING THE CONTRACT.
(1172A)
Application of payments designation of debt to which should be applied the payment made by a
debtor who has various debts of the same kind in favor of the one and the same creditor
REQUISITES OF APPLICATION OF PAYMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1. Debtor has made first choice; he must indicate at time of making payment which debt he is paying.
He cannot reapply that particular payment to another debt. The initial decision of the debtor is
irrevocable unless creditor consents to the change.
2. If debtor does not apply payment, creditor may decide receipt which debt is being paid
3. If creditor did not make application/application not valid, debt which is most onerous to the debtor
shall be satisfied
4. If debts are due of the same nature and burden, payment shall be applied to all of them
proportionately
ARTICLE 1253
IF THE DEBT PRODUCES INTEREST, PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN COVERED.
(1173)
ARTICLE 1254
WHEN THE PAYMENT CANNOT BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRECEDING RULES, OR IF APPLICATION CANNOT BE
INFERRED FROM OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES, THE DEBT WHICH IS MOST ONEROUS TO THE DEBTOR, AMONG THOSE DUE, SHALL BE
DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
IF THE DEBTS DUE ARE OF THE SAME NATURE AND BURDEN THE PAYMENT SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL OF THEM
PROPORTIONATELY.
(1174A)
NOTE TO SELF
If case no application of payment has been made to debtor/creditor, payment shall be applied to most
onerous debt, if all of the same nature and burden, to all of them proportionately
WHEN A DEBT MORE ONEROUS THAN ANOTHER
Debt more onerous if more burden to debtor. Onerous-ment is depended on circumstances, but there are
some rules by the Supreme Court:
1. Interest-bearing debt in more onerous than a non-interest-bearing (even if this may be an older
debt); if two interest-bearing debts, one with a higher rate is more onerous
2. Debt as a sole debtor is more onerous than as a solidary debtor
3. Debts secured by mortgage are more onerous than unsecured ones
4. Obligation with penalty clause is more onerous than one without
WHERE DEBTS SUBJECT TO DIFFERENT BURDENS
If debts are subject to different burdens (e.g. one with penalty, one with mortgage), payment will be
applied to all of them, proportionately
ARTICLE 1255
THE DEBTOR MAY CEDE OR ASSIGN HIS PROPERTY TO HIS CREDITORS IN PAYMENT OF HIS DEBTS. THIS CESSION, UNLESS THERE
IS STIPULATION TO THE CONTRARY, SHALL ONLY RELEASE THE DEBTOR FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE NET PROCEEDS OF THE
THING ASSIGNED. THE AGREEMENTS WHICH ON THE EFFECT OF THE CESSION, ARE MADE BETWEEN THE DEBTOR AND HIS
CREDITORS SHALL BE GOVERNED BY SPECIAL LAWS
(1175A)
Unless there is stipulation to the contrary, assignment does not make the creditors owner of the
property of the debtor
Debtor is then released from his obligation only up to the net proceeds of the sale of the property
assigned; debtor still liable if there is remaining balance
Dation
There is usually only one creditor
Does not presuppose insolvency of debtor
Does not involve all properties of debtor
Creditor becomes owner of the thing given
by debtor
Act of novation
Cession
Several creditors
Debtor is insolvent a time of assignment
Extends to all property of debtor subject to
execution
Creditor only acquire the right to sell the
thing and apply proceeds to their credits
proportionately
Not an act of novation
NOTE TO SELF
ARTICLE 1256
IF THE CREDITOR TO WHOM TENDER OF PAYMENT HAS BEEN REFUSED WITHOUT THE CAUSE TO ACCEPT IT, THE DEBTOR SHALL
BE RELEASED FROM RESPONSIBILITY BY CONSIGNATION OF THE THING OR SUM DUE
CONSIGNATION ALONE SHALL PRODUCE THE SAME EFFECT IN THE FOLLOWING CASES:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
WHEN THE CREDITOR IS ABSENT OR UNKNOWN, OR DOES NOT APPEAR AT THE PLACE OF PAYMENT
WHEN HE IS INCAPACITATED TO RECEIVE THE PAYMENT AT THE TIME IT IS DUE;
WHEN, WITHOUT JUST CAUSE, REFUSES TO GIVE A RECEIPT
WHEN TWO OR MORE PERSONS CLAIM THE SAME RIGHT TO COLLECT
WHEN TITLE OF OBLIGATION HAS BEEN LOST. (1176A)
MEANING OF
1. Tender of payment act (on part of debtor) of offering the credit or amount due to the creditor.
Debtor must show that he has (possession) the thing/money to be delivered at the time of offer.
2. Consignation act of depositing thing/amount due with the proper court when the creditor does
not want or cannot receive it after complying with the formalities provided in the law. Consignation
is always judicial and requires tender of payment.
REQUISITES OF A VALID CONSIGNATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Tender of payment not necessary before debtor can consign thing due with the court
A creditor without legal justification must inform debtor that payment will not be accepted thereby
waives a payment when payment is due
Debtor is then excused from making a formal tender of the money on that date
Debtor does not incur default by failing to make a fruitless tender after notification from the
creditor that money will not be received
1. Tender of payment must comply with rules of payment, the tender, even if valid, does not itself
produce legal payment, unless it is completed by consignation
2. Must be unconditional and for the whole amount
3. It must be actually made. Manifestation of a desire or intention to pay is enough
ARTICLE 1257
IN ORDER THAT CONSIGNATION OF THE THING DUE MAY RELEASE THE OBLIGOR, IT MUST BE FIRST ANNOUNCED TO THE PERSONS
INTERESTED IN THE FULFILLMENT OF THE OBLIGATION.
THE CONSIGNATION SHALL BE INEFFECTUAL IF IT IS NOT MADE STRICTLY IN CONSONANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS WHICH
REGULATE PAYMENT.
(1177)
NOTE TO SELF
Purpose of notice is for creditor to reflect on previous refusal to accept payment because expenses
of consignation shall be charged against him
If the thing consigned is lost, creditor shall bear risk
Consignation to amount to a valid payment, must also comply with the provisions which regulate
payment
Payment should be made in legal tender (no bank checks, commercial documents, etc.)
ARTICLE 1258
CONSIGNATION SHALL BE MADE BY DEPOSITING THE THINGS DUE AT THE DISPOSAL OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITY, BEFORE WHOM
THE TENDER OF PAYMENT SHALL BE PROVED, IN A PROPER CASE, AND THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE CONSIGNATION IN OTHER
CASES.
THE CONSIGNATION HAVING BEEN MADE, THE INTERESTED PARTIES SHALL ALSO BE NOTIFIED THEREOF.
(1178)
Consignation by depositing thing/sum due with proper judicial authority is needed to effect
payment
Tender of payment must be right after consignation
Tender must be proved by debtor in proper case
If tender not required, only prior notice to interested persons of the consignation needs to be
proved
After consignation, interested parties must also be notified (this was held fulfilled by service of
summons upon the defendants together with copy of complaint)
Purpose of second notice is to enable creditor to withdraw thing/sum deposited in case he accepts
consignation
ARTICLE 1259
THE EXPENSES OF CONSIGNATION WHEN PROPERLY MADE, SHALL BE CHARGED AGAINST CREDITOR.
(1179)
ARTICLE 1260
ONCE CONSIGNATION HAS BEEN DULY MADE, THE DEBTOR MAY ASK THE JUDGE TO ORDER THE CANCELLATION OF THE
OBLIGATION.
BEFORE CREDITOR HAS ACCEPTED CONSIGNATION, OR BEFORE A JUDICIAL DECLARATION THAT THE CONSIGNATION HAS BEEN
PROPERLY MADE, THE DEBTOR MAY WITHDRAW THE THING OR THE SUM DEPOSITED, ALLOWING THE OBLIGATION TO REMAIN IN
FORCE.
(1180)
NOTE TO SELF
All requisites of consignation operate as valid payment, therefore debtor can move for cancellation
of obligation by the court
Debtor may withdraw the thing/sum deposited before creditor accepts consignation; before judicial
declaration that consignation was properly made as he is still the owner of the same, obligation
shall remain in force (debtor pays expenses)
ARTICLE 1261
IF THE CONSIGNATION HAVING BEEN MADE, THE CREDITOR SHOULD AUTHORIZE THE DEBTOR TO WITHDRAW THE SAME, HE
SHALL LOSE EVERY REFERENCE WHICH HE MAY HAVE OVER THE THING. THE CO-DEBTORS, GUARANTORS AND SURETIES SHALL
BE RELEASED.
(1181A)
Consignation is for benefit or creditor therefore he may authorize debtor to withdraw deposit after
he has accepted the same/after court issued order to cancel obligation
Creditor-debtor relation still remain as they were before acceptance/cancellation
Creditor shall lose every preference have may have over thing; co-debtors, guarantors, sureties
shall be released
Solidary debtor released from solidary liability, not from shares of obligation because he is still
principal debtors (like guarantors, sureties)
NOTE TO SELF