Governance ARLY

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Name: Arly Kurt B.

Torres

Assignment:

1. What does AASC stands for? What is its function?

In the Philippines, the Auditing and Assurance Standards Council (AASC) is the
entity that is responsible for establishing and promulgating generally accepted auditing
standards (GAAS). AASC pronouncements are currently mostly based on the
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board's standards and practice
statements (IAASB). Standards and practice statements specific to each country are
being developed.

The AASC's major goal in adopting IAASB standards and practice statements is to
achieve local GAAS conformity with IAASB pronouncements. This harmonization is
expected to improve the dependability and acceptability of Philippine companies' audited
financial statements. The Preface to Philippine Standards lays out the AASC's goals,
structure, and working methods.

2. What are the four standards that comprise the AASC’s Engagement Standards? 
1. Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs)
2. Philippine Standards on Review Engagements (PSREs)
3. Philippine Standards on Assurance Engagement (PSAEs)
4. Philippine Standards on Related Services (PSRSs)

3. Identify the standards that cover each of the following engagements:

 Audit of historical financial information - Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs)

 Review of historical financial information - Philippine Standards on Review


Engagements (PSREs)
 Assurance engagements dealing with subject matter other than historical financial
information - Philippine Standards on Assurance Engagement (PSAEs)

 Engagements on agreed-upon procedures - Philippine Standards on Related


Services (PSRSs)

a. Define assurance engagement. 

An assurance engagement is defined as an engagement in which a practitioner


expresses a conclusion designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended
users other than the responsible party about the outcome of the evaluation or
measurement of a subject matter against criteria.
b. What are the 2 types of assurance engagement? Provide the definition to each.

a). Reasonable assurance engagements are a type of assurance engagement in which


the practitioner provides reasonable assurance. In these engagements, the practitioner
gathers evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to draw reasonable conclusions.
Once they do so, they conclude that the subject matter conforms in all material respects
with identified suitable criteria.

b). Limited assurance engagements are similar to reasonable assurance engagements.


In these engagements, the practitioner collects sufficient appropriate evidence to draw
limited conclusions. These conclusions are not subject to the same level of regulations
as reasonable assurance engagements. It is different from reasonable assurance
engagements where they draw reasonable conclusions.

c. What are the 5 elements of an assurance engagement? 


The five elements of an assurance engagement are:

o A three-party relationship,
o Appropriate subject matter.
o Suitable criteria.
o Sufficient, appropriate evidence to support the conclusion.
o A conclusion contained within a written report.

d. What are the three-parties involved in an assurance engagement?

The three-parties involved in an assurance engagement are the practitioner, a


responsible party and intended users.

e. Provide at least 5 examples of common subject matter for an assurance engagement.


 Systems and Process
 Financial performance or conditions
 Behavior and Human resource practices
 Financial Information
 Compliance with regulations

f. Provide 4 examples of non-assurance engagements. 


 Bookkeeping and accounting
 Tax services
 Certain management consultancy
 Other management consultancy

You might also like