Active Pixel Sensors Seminar Report: Harikumar.K. E7B, 16
Active Pixel Sensors Seminar Report: Harikumar.K. E7B, 16
Active Pixel Sensors Seminar Report: Harikumar.K. E7B, 16
SEMINAR REPORT
HARIKUMAR.K.
E7B, 16
INTRODUCTION
The interline architecture extends this concept one step further and masks
every other column of the image sensor for storage. In this device, only one pixel
shift has to occur to transfer from image area to storage area; thus, shutter times
can be less than a microsecond and smear is essentially eliminated. The
advantage is not free, however, as the imaging area is now covered by
opaque strips dropping the fill factor to approximately 50 percent and the
effective quantum efficiency by an equivalent amount. Modern designs have
addressed this deleterious characteristic by adding microlenses on the surface
of the device to direct light away from the opaque regions and on the active
area. Microlenses can bring the fill factor back up to 90 percent or more
depending on pixel size and the overall system's optical design.
The CMOS active pixel image sensors have performance suitable for
many applications including robotics and machine vision, guidance and
navigation, automotive applications, and consumer electronics such as video
phones, computer inputs, and home surveillance devices.The solid state CMOS
image sensor technology being developed at the NASA Jet Propulsion
Laboratory(JPL) is a 2nd generation ultra low power monolithic APS that
incorporates
On-Pixel amplification
Noise reduction
Improved digital control features
Larger size
The APS imager is produced with the same commercially available CMOS
device fabrication process used for microcontroller and memory chips. This
allows the on-chip integration of the following
Detector Array element
On-Pixel amplifier
Timing and control circuit
High speed analog signal chain circuits
Multiplexers , ADCs, etc
Active Pixel Sensors use single +3.3V/5V power supply and features small
pixels with wide dynamic range.
APS PIXEL DESIGN
The schematic of the pixel design and the read out circuit is shown in the
fig. The pixel unit cell is shown within the dotted outline. The imaging structure
consists of a photogate (PG) with a floating diffusion output (FD) separated by a
transfer gate(TX). The pixel unit cell also contain a reset transistor (MR), the input
transistor of the in-pixel source follower (MIN) and the row selection transistor
(MX). The readout circuit which is common to an entire column of pixels
includes the load transistor of the first source follower (MLN). It also consists of the
two sample and hold circuits for storing the signal level and the reset level.
Sampling both the reset and signal levels permits correlated double sampling
(CDS) which suppresses reset noise from the floating diffusion node of the pixel,
and noise and threshold variations from the source-follower transistor within the
pixel.
Each sample-and-hold circuit consists of a sample-and-hold switch (MSHS
or MSHR) and capacitor (CS or CR) and a column source-follower (MP1 or MP2)
and column selection transistor (MY1 or MY2) to buffer the capacitor voltages
and to drive the high capacitance horizontal bus at higher readout speeds. The
load transistors of the column source-followers (MLP1 and MLP2) are common to
the entire array of pixels. P-channel source-followers are used in the column
circuit to compensate for the level shifting of the signal due to the n-channel
source followers within the pixels.
OPERATION
The rail voltages VDD and VSS are set at 5 V and 0 V, respectively. During
the signal integration period [Fig. 2(a)], photo-generated electrons are
integrated and stored under the surface channel photogate PG, which is
biased at 5 V. The reset transistor MR is biased at 2.5 V to act as a lateral
antiblooming drain, allowing excess signal charge to flow to the reset drain. The
rowselection transistor MX is biased off at 0 V. Following signal integration, an
entire row of pixels are read out simultaneously.
The reset and signal levels are read out to separate chanells utilizing the
correlated sampling to reduce the kTc noise, 1/f and fixed pattern noise. The
sensor is read out in parallel one row at a time. The signal from the pixel is the
difference between the potential on the floating node before and after the
photo charges are transferred to it. These two potentials are stored at
thebottom capacitors sequentially by using the 2 sample and hold circuits. The
voltages on the capacitances are differentially read out to produce a voltage
proportional to the photo charge.
First, the pixels in the row to be read out are addressed by enabling row
selection switch MX. Then the floating diffusion output node of the pixel (FD) is
reset by briefly pulsing the reset gate of MR to 5 V. This resets FD to
approximately 3.5 V [Fig. 2(b)]. The output of the first source-follower is sampled
onto capacitor CR at the bottom of the column by enabling sample-and-hold
switch MSHR. Then, PG is pulsed low to 0 V, transferring the signal charge to FD
[Fig. 2(c)]. The new output voltage is sampled onto capacitor CS by enabling
sample and hold switch MSHS [Fig. 2(d)]. The stored reset and signal levels are
sequentially scanned out through the second set of source-followers by
enabling column address switches MY1 and MY2. The entire sequence of
activities are shown in the figure given below.
Operation of CMOS APS (a) signal integration, (b) reset, (c) signal charge
transfer, and (d) signal readout.
ADVANTAGES OF CMOS APS OVER CCD IMAGE
SENSORS
Speed : an area in which CMOS arguably has the advantage over CCDs
because all camera functions can be placed on the image sensor.
On Chip Processing and compactness: CMOS APS has on-chip integrated
circuitry which helps to realize various functions at reduced cost and size.
CCD with its specialized fabrication process is quite expensive.
Less power Consumption : APS systems based on CMOS technology
consumes 100X less power than CCD systems. As a result such sensors are
preferred for systems like mobile phones, laptops, etc where power
consumption is a major factor. For the same pixel throughput, CCD
systems require about 2.5W of power whereas CMOS systems require only
20-50mW of power which provides longer battery life.
Responsivity : It is the amount of signal the sensor delivers per unit of input
optical energy. CMOS imagers are marginally superior to CCDs, in
general, because gain elements are easier to place on a CMOS image
sensor. Their complementary transistors allow low-power high-gain
amplifiers, whereas CCD amplification usually comes at a significant
power penalty.
Windowing: One unique capability of CMOS technology is the ability to
read out a portion of the image sensor. This allows elevated frame or line
rates for small regions of interest. This is an enabling capability for CMOS
imagers in some applications, such as high-temporal-precision object
tracking in a subregion of an image. CCDs generally have limited abilities
in windowing.
Anti-blooming: the ability to gracefully drain localized overexposure
without compromising the rest of the image in the sensor. CMOS
generally has natural blooming immunity. CCDs, on the other hand,
require specific engineering to achieve this capability
NOISE
P=2CcolFrMΔVcolVdd + 4αCloadFrMΔVoutVdd
Where
α:Parameter that indicates the number of operation level
The MAPS helps in the detection of charged particles with 100% efficiency and
a few micron spatial resolution. These new devices are extremely promising for future
high precision vertex detectors as they provide solutions with a very low material
budget and with high resolution at relatively low cost due to their fabrication in a
standard submicron CMOS technology. Vertex Detectors are particle detectors
designed to provide high-precision (typically 5 to 20 micrometers) measurements of
points along the trajectories of charged particles.