Effective Area For Masonry: M.A. Hatzinikolas H. Morstead
Effective Area For Masonry: M.A. Hatzinikolas H. Morstead
Effective Area For Masonry: M.A. Hatzinikolas H. Morstead
M.A. Hatzinikolas
H. Morstead
EFFECTIVE AREA FOR MASONRY
Introduction
The purpose of this technical note is to call attention to the variations in the
load resisting areas of masonry. External loads applied to masonry result in two basic
types of stresses, namely:
a) normal stresses
b) shearing stresses
Normal stresses basically result from vertical loads and/or bending moments. Shearing
stresses are commonly the result of lateral loads.
The level of stress, either normal or shearing, is a function of the applied
loads and the effective area. The effective area, in turn, is influenced by the type of
construction and the type of masonry units used.
As a result of the testing procedures used in evaluating strength of masonry,
the allowable stresses for plain masonry as given in Table 5 of the C.S.A. Standard
S-304-1977 "Masonry Design and Construction for Buildings"
2.
are based on the net cross-sectional area for compressive stresses resulting from
axial loads, and on the net section for all other types of stresses.
Standard S-304 "Masonry Design and Construction for Buildings", is based on the net
cross-sectional area. The shear strength is based on the net section for plain
masonry and the net cross-sectional area for reinforced masonry.
The two very important parameters in masonry
design, - Net Cross-Sectional Area and Net Section, -
are defined as follows:
32 in.
In the above calculations the face shell and the web thicknesses of the masonry
units were taken to be 1.25 in.
a) Plain Masonry
Flexural stresses are resisted by the net section, that is, by the mortar
and the grouted cores (where applicable) .
In the case of two core blocks this area is the face shell only if
running bond type of construction is used. For stack bond the flexural stresses
are resisted by the net cross-sectional area. This discrepancy arises because of
the misalignment of the webs in running bond, whereas in stack bond the webs
line up, thus increasing the area resisting bending stresses (stack bond fully
bedded type of construction.) Plate 1 illustrates the concept of web
misalignment.
b) Reinforced Walls
EFFECTIVE FLANGE
t
EFFECTIVE FLANGE
WIDTH � WALL HEIGHT x WIDTH <. 12 x t1 + t2
I- I-
:c :c
(!) Q
jjj LI.I
:c :c
_J _J
. _J _J
c( c(
:=: :=:
*.
EFFECTIVE FLANGE FLANGE
WID;H < WALL- HEIGHT X
1- 1-
:c :c
(!) (!)
jjj jjj
:c :c
:
_J _J
_J _J
c(
:=:
a) Plain Masonry
concrete blocks.
Table 2 is applicable to running bond type of construction and
Table 3 is applicable to stack bond construction and fully mortar bed types
of construction.
11.
TABLE 3 Net Area for Shear Calculations, For Stack Bond Type of Construction
(2 Core Concrete Block Units, Full Mortar Bedding)
. 2 /'
Net Section in. in.
It should be noted that for stack bond type of construction the effective
area for shear calculations is the same as the effective area for axial stress
calculations, that is, the net cross-sectional area. Note that there is no difference in
effective areas for running and stack bond and face shell mortar bedding.
b) Reinforced Masonry
For shear calculations in reinforced shear walls the effective areas are the
same as those given in Table 1.
It should be noted that only walls in the direction of the lateral force are
effective in resisting the resulting shearing stresses.
In grouted core construction shear is resisted by the grouted core plus the
surrounding mortared area and the cross webs. Figure 4 shows the effective area
for shear stress in grouted core construction.
15.
(a) Effective area for shear along the wall in grouted masonry.
(ACI recommendation)
REFERENCES