Role of Craniosacral Therapy For Chronic Pain
Role of Craniosacral Therapy For Chronic Pain
Role of Craniosacral Therapy For Chronic Pain
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNG:
Aim of study was to review the effectiveness of craniosacral therapy for chronic pain
patients with any clinical conditions. The objective of the study was to review the scientific
basis of craniosacral therapy as a therapeutic approach in chronic pain patients.
METHODOLOGY:
Systemic review was conducted from the articles searched from PubMed, Science
direct, Google scholar and the Cochrane library electronic database and relevant websites and
professional organizations.
RESULT:
In the present study, data collection was done from 21 articles and few relevant
websites, which were selected on the basis of inclusion criteria. Many of the articles
concluded that effectiveness of CST in improving problems has not been proven scientifically
and few articles concluded that CST produce a major difference in decreasing pain.
CONCLUSION:
The present study concluded that craniosacral therapy is effective in patients with
chronic pain following any clinical conditions, but require further research study.
KEYWORDS:
INTRODUCTION
CHRONIC PAIN:
Treatment can be complex and difficult. While there are guidelines to direct
management of chronic pain associated with specific disorders such as cancer, osteoarthritis,
fibromyalgia or neuropathic pain, often there is no obvious cause for pain that persists despite
treatment.[1] Chronic pain disorders are the leading global cause of disability and are still
increasing in prevalence. Low back and neck pain, headache and migraine considerably affect
all age groups from the beginning of adolescence to middle-aged and older adults.[3]
It is complex and depends on its origin, being different for nociceptive, neuropathic,
visceral and mixed (e.g., cancer) pain. Acute nociceptive pain arises from activation of
nociceptors in the periphery by noxious stimuli (e.g., mechanical pressure, heat, cold or
chemicals) that damage or threaten to damage tissue. Afferent nociceptive signals can be
altered by a descending or modulatory system originating from several regions of the central
nervous system, including the somatosensory cortex, hypothalamus, periaqueductal gray
(PAG), pons, lateral tegmental area and nucleus raphe magnus. Activation of these
descending pathways promotes an analgesic effect (descending inhibition) effected and
modulated by various neurotransmitters, including noradrenaline and serotonin.[1]
Arthur J. Barsky and Jonathan F. Borus indicated that the symptoms common to the
functional somatic syndromes include fatigue, weakness, sleep difficulties, headaches,
muscle aches and joint pain, problems with memory, attention, and concentration, nausea and
other gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety, depression, irritability, palpitations and racing
heart, shortness of breath, dizziness or light-headedness, sore throat and dry mouth are highly
prevalent in the population in general.[2]
Beside the huge impact of chronic pain on the quality of life, another relevant issue is
the relation between pain and mortality: a 2009 work cohort record linkage study suggests
that severe chronic pain is associated with increased risk of mortality, independent of
sociodemographic factors.[5]
Knowing that chronic pain and disability are not only influenced by somatic
pathology, but also by psychological and social factors, multidisciplinary interventions for
chronic pain have become more accepted in various comprehensive approaches and have
rapidly increased in number over the last few decades.[8] There is evidence that pain
Physical therapy modalities include pain relieving modalities like hot and cold packs,
ultrasound, short wave diathermy, low frequency currents (TENS, diadynamic currents,
interferential currents), high voltage galvanic stimulation, laser and neurostimulation
techniques like deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation along with
manual therapy. Commonly used physical agents in physiotherapy are heat, electricity, light,
sound, and cold. Most of these agents are used to improve the lymphatic and blood
circulation to the area due to a local vasodilation effect and possible muscle relaxation.[6]
LASER; Traction; Manual therapy like massage, myofascial release, joint mobilization;
Relaxation therapy and Mirror therapy are another physical therapy agent that can be used in
the treatment of pain.
The rationale for physiotherapy in chronic pain stems from evidence of the beneficial
effects of exercise on tissue healing, function and mood coupled with the belief that activity
avoidance and resultant deconditioning contribute to ongoing pain by encouraging a negative
cycle of decreasing function and increasing pain.[11]
CRANIOSACRAL THERAPY:
CST is used for different clinical conditions, in adults as well as in children. CST is
used for a wide variety of diseases, including migraines and headaches, chronic neck and
back pain, stress and tension-related disorders, motor-coordination impairments, infant and
childhood disorders, brain and spinal cord injuries, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia,
temporomandibular joint disorder, scoliosis, central nervous system disorders, learning
These techniques are based mainly on the study of anatomic and physiologic
mechanisms in the skull and their relation to the body as a whole, which includes a system of
diagnostic and therapeutic techniques aimed at treatment and prevention of diseases.[17]
Mechanism of CST:
A Brain and Nervous system operate the body functions. Craniosacral therapy helps
in maintaining the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A pulse through the fluids
proceeds through the entire craniosacral system, from the sutures in the skull to the spinal
cord. Every day our body gets affected by a certain amount or level of stress, and sometimes
the changes occur, it tightens the tissues and also alter the craniosacral system. The alteration
of the craniosacral system causes tension around the spinal cord and the brain which
ultimately leads to restrictions.
In the craniosacral theory, fascial restrictions within the craniosacral system lead to
abnormal, arrhythmic motion of the cerebrospinal fluid. This craniosacral rhythm is
assessable by palpation and quantifiable by encephalogram, myelogram, and magnetic
resonance imaging. There is also growing evidence for fascial involvement in pain
chronification. Studies have shown increased activity of fascial nociceptors within restricted
connective tissue, which can contribute to remodelling processes of inflammation and
fibrosis, increased tissue stiffness, muscle tension, and chronic pain.[15] An important
component of craniosacral mobility is referred to as the primary respiratory mechanism
(PRM), which manifests as palpable motion of the cranial bones, sacrum, dural membranes,
central nervous system and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).[18]
It is a mechanism because all the constituent parts are interrelated and work together
as a unit and will affect each other correspondingly.[13]
This can be assessed by a gentle palpatory touch noting fascial restriction or cranial
pulse irregularities which will be felt as an alteration in the normal fluid flow. Assessment is
by palpation with hands placed anywhere on the body but principally at the cranium or
sacrum.[13]
The most common side effect is mild discomfort during treatment which is often
temporary and will fade within 24 hrs. There are certain individuals who shouldn’t use CST
and is contraindicated for them. These include people who have severe bleeding disorders, a
diagnosed aneurysm and a history of recent traumatic head injuries, which may include
cranial bleeding or skull fractures.
The therapy is very gentle. It is not a process of intervention in order to ‘fix’ anything.
The therapist intervenes only gently to facilitate the body’s innate ability to correct any mal-
alignment and misfunction within its systems.[13] It is not about realigning head bones.
This therapy consists of applying very mild manual traction on cranial bones in
flexion or extension stages of the craniosacral cycle. The aims were to contribute to re-
establishing the normal movement of cranial bones and to intervene in the autonomic nervous
system by releasing bone and membranous restrictions.[19]
The CST method is for the therapist to place their hands on the bones and use them as
“handles” to ever-so-gently stretch the underlying membranes.[20] CS therapists use “release”
and “pumping” manipulation to produce motion in that particular body area. Such physical
manipulations purport to direct blood flow and eventually more movement in that particular
area.[21]
Palpation of the cranium theoretically allows the examiner to perceive the rhythmic
impulse resulting from the widening and narrowing of the skull at rates described variously as
10 to 14 cycles per minute, 6 to 12 cycles per minute, or 8 to 12 cycles per minute. Multiple
attempts have been made to demonstrate interrater reliability of this craniosacral rhythm.[22]
Proponents of CST have reported that between 5 to 10 g of force applied across a cranial
suture can assist with normalizing suture movement and intracranial rhythm.[23]
First, Upledger (2003) claimed that CST can never be validly tested in a scientific
way, with standard controls over internal and external validity, under what he calls
“laboratory conditions.” His assertions about the CS therapist “blending” with the patient,
using the patient’s “inner wisdom” and “inner physician” to shape the therapeutic regime for
that particular client suggests that the therapy technique will vary per patient and thus a
controlled study of the CST methodology is unattainable. In fact, Upledger wrote, “It seems
to me that the only studies that can be done to validate the efficacy of (CST) are clinical
outcome studies that do not dictate the protocol”. In his opinion, “it’s the outcome that
counts, whether you understand the process or not”.[21]
Craniosacral therapy is a gentle, potent and safe treatment. This is true healing as
craniosacral therapy allows the release of all physical and emotional disturbances together. It
is deeply relaxing and allows patients to focus attention on their own inner resources at the
same time as the release of physical restrictions.[13]
AIM
AND
OBJECTIVE
AIM:
Aim of the study was to review on the effectiveness of craniosacral therapy for
chronic pain following any clinical condition.
OBJECTIVE:
The Objective of this research was to review critically the scientific basis of
craniosacral therapy as a therapeutic intervention for patients with variety of clinical
conditions that causes chronic pain.
REVIEW
OF
LITERATURE
1. Heidemarie Haller; Gustav Dobo; Holger Cramer (2021) conducted study on the use
and benefits of Craniosacral Therapy in primary health care: A prospective cohort
study. The study concluded that CST is used for preventive and therapeutic purposes
to improve personal resources and to treat a wide range of physical and mental
symptoms in all age groups from infants to older adults. The utilization of CST may
provide a promising additional treatment option for primary care patients who are
interested in complementary therapies. As for the health-care providers and
insurances, supporting the use of CST might not only improve patient health but also
reduce costs. Further trials using randomized controlled designs are needed to confirm
the exploratory study results in different patient populations.[12]
2. Heidemarie Haller; Romy Lauche, et al (2020) conducted study on Craniosacral
therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials. The study concluded that this meta-analysis suggests significant and
robust effects of CST on pain and function, which are not exclusively explainable by
placebo responses or effects due to non-specific treatment mechanisms. More RCTs
strictly following CONSORT are needed to further corroborate the efficacy,
comparative effectiveness, and safety of CST in patients with chronic pain
conditions.[3]
3. Salduker et al (2019) conducted study on Practical approach to a patient with chronic
pain of uncertain etiology in primary care. The study concluded that Chronic pain,
especially where there is no obvious biological cause, may be associated with
considerable suffering and despair. However, with an individualized biopsychosocial
management plan, it is usually possible to relieve at least some of the pain and
improve function and quality of life. Managing pain takes time and needs to be done
in partnership with the patient. Careful communication is essential to manage
expectations, encourage a healthy lifestyle and to explain why some medications need
to be stopped or changed. Nevertheless, with a little extra effort, the systematic
approach described in this article can be extremely rewarding for both health care
providers and their patients.[1]
4. Parul Sharma and Vinika Chaudhary (2018) conducted study on The Therapeutic
Approach for Pain. the study concluded that Physiotherapy must be started as early as
possible to minimise pain, stiffness, contractures and deformities. Ergonomic
broad biopsychosocial view is required for applying effective exercise therapy for
patients with chronic pain, and can be provided in primary, secondary or tertiary care.
This accounts for physical therapists working in the field of musculoskeletal pain,
neurology, pediatrics, internal medicine and geriatrics.[7]
11. Dilini Rajapakse et al (2014) conducted study on Presentation and management of
chronic pain. The study concluded that Chronic pain in children and young people
remains an entity which is often poorly recognised, evaluated and managed leading to
unnecessary distress and poor health outcomes. In addition to the significant cost to a
child’s quality of life, the economic burden of chronic pain in young people in the UK
was estimated in 2005 to be approximately £8000 per child per year. Progress in the
development and investigation of novel treatments for childhood chronic pain remains
slow in comparison with other chronic health problems.[11]
12. Edzard Ernst (2012) conducted study on Craniosacral therapy: a systematic review of
the clinical evidence. The study concluded that very few RCTs of CST exist. Most of
these trials are seriously flawed. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to suggest
that CST has therapeutic effects beyond placebo.[16]
13. A. Jäkel; P. von Hauenschild (2012) conducted study on A systematic review to
evaluate the clinical benefits of craniosacral therapy. The study concluded that the
review revealed the paucity of CST research in patients with different clinical
pathologies. CST assessment is feasible in RCTs and has the potential of providing
valuable outcomes to further support clinical decision making. However, due to the
current moderate methodological quality of the included studies, further research is
needed.[18]
14. Guillermo A. Mataran-Pe narrocha et al (2011) conducted study on Influence of
Craniosacral Therapy on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life in Patients with
Fibromyalgia. The study concluded that the present study shows that craniosacral
therapy improves the quality of life of patients with fibromyalgia, reducing their
perception of pain and fatigue and improving their night rest and mood, with an
increase in physical function. Our craniosacral therapy protocol also reduces anxiety
levels, partially improving the depressive state. This manual therapy modality must be
considered as a complementary therapy within a multidisciplinary approach to these
METHODOLOGY
Study Design:
The project was designed as a systemic review of craniosacral therapy for patients
with chronic pain.
Search Strategy:
PubMed, Science direct, Google scholar and the Cochrane library electronic database
were searched for articles from 1984-2021. Search terms included 'craniosacral', 'cranial
bones', 'chronic pain', 'craniosacral rhythm' and 'cerebrospinal fluid'. Also, a fugitive literature
search was conducted of relevant websites and professional organizations.
Inclusion Criteria:
Articles were included if they reported RCTs of CST for any human condition. Study
also includes craniosacral interventions and health outcomes. Pathophysiology of craniosacral
system and chronic pain is also included. All the articles were selected on the basis of
inclusion criteria.
RESULT
In the present study, data collection was done from 24 articles and few relevant
websites, which were selected on the basis of inclusion criteria. Out of 24 articles, 3 articles
were based on meta-analysis, 1 case study, 13 systemic review, 3 randomized sham control
trial, 1 retrospective survey, 1 quasi experimental study, 1 pilot study and 1 prospective
cohort study.
DISCUSSION
The review of study is on Craniosacral Therapy for Chronic Pain. In the present study
data collection was done from 24 articles and few relevant websites. Out of which most of the
articles proved that there are no major side effects of CST on chronic pain patients but its
effectiveness in improving problems have not been scientifically proven, so further research
is needed.
Few articles proved that CST is very effective in chronic pain patient, physically as
well as emotionally. They have also proven the improvement in quality of life in chronic pain
patients with different conditions.
Jäkel, P. von Hauenschild did a systematic review to evaluate the clinical benefits of
craniosacral therapy. The study concluded that the paucity of CST research in patients with
different clinical pathologies. CST assessment is feasible in RCTs and has the potential of
providing valuable outcomes to further support clinical decision making. However, due to the
current moderate methodological quality of the included studies, further research is
needed.[18]
Brian Isbell and Sue Carroll did a study on the effectiveness of craniosacral treatment
which proved that patients treated in the craniosacral teaching clinics felt that their symptoms
improved.[24] Also, one pilot study on the effects of craniosacral therapy upon symptoms of
post-acute concussion and post-concussion syndrome, which proved that CST is a low-risk
conservative treatment option for post-concussion syndrome and is worthy of further clinical
study.[25]
CONCLUSION
The present study concluded that craniosacral therapy is effective in patients with
chronic pain following any clinical conditions, but require further research study. It also
concludes that the amount of force to produce craniosacral movement and rhythm varies in
patients with chronic pain.
REFERENCES
1. Salduker, S., Allers, E., Bechan, S., Hodgson, R. E., Meyer, F., et al. (2019). Practical
approach to a patient with chronic pain of uncertain etiology in primary care. Journal
of Pain Research, 2651-2662.
2. Crofford, L. J. (2015). Chronic Pain: Where the body meets the brain. Transactions of
the American clinical and Climatological Association, 167-183.
3. Haller, H., Lauche, R., Sundberg, T., Dobos, G., & Cramer, H. (2020). Craniosacral
therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
5. Raffaeli, W., & Arnaudo, E. (2017). Pain as a disease: an overview. Journal of Pain
Research, 2003-2008.
6. Sharma, P., & Chaudhary, V. (2018). The Therapeutic Approach for Pain.
International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 12414-12418.
7. Nijs, J., Smeets, R., & Bishop, M. (2015). Exercise therapy for chronic pain:
Retraining mind and brain. Physiotherapy , e19-e20.
11. Rajapakse, D., Liossi, C., & Howard, R. F. (2014). Presentation and management of
chronic pain. Arch Dis Child, 474-480.
12. Haller, H., Dobos, G., & Cramer, H. (2021). The use and benefits of Craniosacral
Therapy in primary health care: A prospective cohort study. Complementary
Therapies in Medicine.
14. Green C., Martin C., Bassett K., & Kazanjian A. (1999). A systematic review of
craniosacral therapy: biological plausibility, assessment reliability and clinical
effectiveness. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 201-207.
15. Haller, H., Lauche, R., Cramer, H., Rampp, T., Saha, F. J., Ostermann, T., & Dobos,
G. (2016, May). Craniosacral Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain: A
Randomized Sham-controlled Trial. Clin J Pain, 32, 441-449.
16. Ernst, E. (December 2012). Craniosacral therapy: a systematic review of the clinical
evidence. Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies, 197-201.
18. Jäkel A. & Hauenschild P. v. (2012). A systematic review to evaluate the clinical
benefits of craniosacral therapy. Complementary Therapies In Medicine, 456-465.
20. Kratz, S. V. (2009). Craniosacral Therapy: Helping Improve Brain Function. The
Autism File, 106-110.
22. Downey, P. A., Barbano, T., Kapur-Wadhwa, R., Sciote, J. J., Siegel, M. I., &
Mooney, M. P. (2006). Craniosacral Therapy: The Effects of Cranial Manipulation on
Intracranial Pressure and Cranial Bone Movement. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports
Physical Therapy, 845-853.
23. Flynn, T. W., Cleland, J. A., & Schaible, P. (2006). Craniosacral Therapy and
Professional Responsibility. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 834-
836.
24. Isbell, B., & Carroll, S. (2007). Clinical outcome research at the University of
Westminster Polyclinic. British Naturopathic Journal, 10-13.
25. Kratz, S. V., & Kratz, D. J. (2021). Effects of CranioSacral Therapy upon Symptoms
of Post-Acute Concussion and Post-Concussion Syndrome: A Pilot Study. Journal of
Bodywork and Movement Therapies.