PRITHIVIRAJAN ISO WORKBOOK Final
PRITHIVIRAJAN ISO WORKBOOK Final
PRITHIVIRAJAN ISO WORKBOOK Final
PARTICIPANT WORKBOOK
www.bsc-icc.com
This material is for the personal use of a student attending a course presented by BSCIC.
No part of the materials may be reproduced, stored electronically, or transmitted in any form or by any
means without the prior written consent of BSCIC.
1) This Workbook shall be given to you on the first day and shall be taken back at the end of each day before
you depart & finally compiled on day 5 before the test begins.
2) This workbook dully filled ones shall, be used for your continuous assessment on every day. Please ensure
that you submit this workbook to the tutor(s), for daily continuous assessment at the end of each day.
3) On the last day, please return back the course feedback forms (dully filled in by you – for our reference and
improvements) and the CQI-IRCA written answer papers for the course.
Mohamed Hussain
YOUR PARTNER’S NAME
M.sc Chemistry
Qualifications
He was a part of his company’s ISO audit team and he knows the outline of
the standard not in detail, So, I can score him 02.
Mapping
# Description OH&S # OH&S TERMS
Terms
1 person or group of people that has its own functions
with responsibilities, authorities and relationships to 16 1 PERFORMANCE
achieve its objectives
2 extent to which planned activities are realized and
planned results achieved 07 2 OBJECTIVE
3 effect of uncertainty 20 3 REQUIREMENT
4 adverse effect on the physical, mental or cognitive
condition of a person 10 4 INCIDENT
5 information required to be controlled and maintained
by an organization and the medium on which it is 13 5 CONSULTATION
contained
6 measurable result 01 6 HAZARD
7 determining the status of a system, a process or an
activity 11 7 EFFECTIVENESS
8 recurring activity to enhance performance SAFETY
14 8 CONDITION
9 seeking views before making a decision 05 9 WORKPLACE
10 person or group of people who directs and controls INJURY AND ILL
an organization at the highest level 19 10 HEALTH
11 result to be achieved 02 11 MONITORING
12 occurrence arising out of, or in the course of, work
that could or does result in injury and ill health 04 12 OH&S OBJECTIVE
13 place under the control of the organization where a DOCUMENTED
person needs to be or to go for work purposes 09 13 INFORMATION
14 systematic, independent and documented process
for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it CONTINUAL
18 14 IMPROVEMENT
objectively to determine the extent to which the
audit criteria are fulfilled
15 need or expectation that is stated, generally implied
or obligatory 17 15 CONFORMITY
16 ORGANIZATION
17 REQUIREMENT
18 AUDIT
19 TOP
MANAGEMENT
20 RISK
RISK RATING
Occurrence Scale X Severity Scale OCCURENCE SCALE SEVERITY SCALE
Layout Improvement
Chances of Broken glass
Proper Housekeeping
3 Physical 4*3=12 ER, RI&MR
Trainings
PPE
Adjustable Workstation
Layout Improvement
4 MSD due to Poor Posture Physical 5*3=15 RI&MR
Trainings
RISK RATING
FACTOR SCALE FACTOR SCALE
Risk
Hazard Type Elemination
Rating
Hazard P-Phisical (ER) / Reduce
# Activities in Production (Occura Proposed Action
Details C-Chemical Impact (RI)
nce X
B-Biological /Mitigate (MR)
Secerity)
1
Competent scaffolder
Using Elevated Platform
Lanyards and safe tag
Safety Harness
Working at height Physical 3*4=12 Safety Helmet RI&MR
MEWP
Competent and trained person
Competent scaffolder and safe tag
Safety Harness and Lanyards
Work at height Physical 3*5=12 RI&MR
Safety Helmet
Safety Boots
Hydraulic Jack
Not allowed at roadside/worksite
Physical 2*5=10 RI&MR
Improper Lifting PPE(Hand gloves and Safety
Helmet)
Electrical Work at
4 Height
Read the OH&S Apex Documented Information of Industrial Gases Company Context of the Organisation
[including Scope] and identify those issues which do not comply with the requirements of the standard (up
to specific sub-clause) with reference to chapter & page number of the Apex Documented Information.
04 As per 4.3, the scope is not documented properly. Issue 1 February 2018 Page 6 ISO 45001:2018(E) 1 Scope
Page 01
Read the OH&S Apex Documented Information of Industrial Gases Company Leadership and Worker
Participation and identify those issues which do not comply with the requirements of the standard (up to
specific sub-clause) with reference to chapter & page number of the Apex Documented Information.
Read the OH&S Apex Documented Information of Industrial Gases Company Planning and identify those
issues which do not comply with the requirements of the standard (up to specific sub-clause) with reference
to chapter & page number of the Apex Documented Information.
2 There is no determination of legal and other requirements because the planning Chapter G page 6.1.3
should be adhering to latest applicable legal and other requirements. No10 determination
of legal
requirements
and other
requirements
3. There is no planning action so that no prioritization of risk control Chapter G page 6.1.4 Planning
No10 action [a]
4. There are no objectives discussed and not able to set a time frame for its review Chapter G page 6.2.1 O.H.S
to continuous improvement process no 11 Objective [b]
2. There is no proof of training record such as induction training and Chapter H and Page No12 7.2
training matrix, training schedule with respective actual and expected Competence
date information to ensure the competency of all workers including [b,c,d]
sub-contractors
3. There is no proof of awareness training regarding the OH&S policy, Chapter H and Page No12 7.3
identifying dangerous hazards and their occurrence which is life Awareness[e,f]
threatening, Incident or accident Reporting procedure, workplace rules
and regulations, site emergency contact numbers. There is no
documented evidence of awareness training.
4. There is no policy of communication channels for identifying the Chapter H and Page No12 7.4.1 General
process of communication.
5. There is no explanation of way of communication to group of people Chapter H and Page No12 7.4.1
General[d]
6. There is no evidence of inspection, safety manual, Training records, Chapter H and Page No12 7.4.2
safety operating procedure, Codes of practices and MSDS. Internal[a],
7.4.3
7. There is no evidence of format for creating and updating of Chapter H and Page No13 7.5.2
documented information for its review and continuous improvement
8. There is no evidence of process regarding the storage of files for Chapter H and Page No13 7.5.3[b]
backup and recovering the data for further updating process.
2. There is no proof evidence that risk assessment is carried out against the Chapter I, Page 8.1.2
performed work-related activities in order to eliminating hazards and risk NO:15
3. There is no proper document proof regarding method of management and no Chapter I, page 8.1.3
evidence are found to explain the consequences of united changes which No:15
may have to review the policy, objectives as well as planning and risk
assessment
4. There is no proper evidence of material safety data sheets regarding the Chapter I, page 8.1.4
procurement products, risk assessment and method of statement, contractor No:15
license, worker
5. There is no proper evidence of induction training to outsourcing contractors Chapter I, page 8.1.4.3
No:15
6. There is no proper evidence of training plans with its actual date and Chapter, page No:16 8.2[c,d,f]
expected date and there is no documented information for communication to
various level of workers evaluating the performance of delivered training at
planned intervals.
Read the OH&S Apex Documented Information of Industrial Gases Company Performance Evaluation and
identify those issues which do not comply with the requirements of the standard (up to specific sub- clause)
with reference to chapter & page number of the Apex Documented Information
2. There is no proof of evident that ensuring the auditor competent level Chapter J, Page No: 17 9.2.2[a,b,d]
such as registration card to ISO audit association and experience. There is
no proof of internal audit documented information for set an priority time
scale on its outcomes and further communication to other level of
workers.
3 There is no proof of previous management review, internal and external Chapter J, Page No: 17 9.3[a,b]
issue for provide a control measure
4 There is no proof of circular regarding management review outcomes Chapter J, page NO:18 9.3[d]
5. There is no proof of reviewing the OHS policy and objectives for Chapter J, page NO:19 9.3[g]
continual improvement
02. There is no proper evidence of reporting procedure for various level of Chapter K, 18 ISO 10.2 (b)
organization and their time scale.
03. There is no KPI to check the effectiveness Chapter K, 19 ISO 10.3 (E)
04. There is no evidence of conducting the Management Review Meeting. Chapter K, 19 ISO 10.3 (C)
05. There is no previous year data for setting the benchmark such as near miss, Chapter K, 19 ISO 10.2 (F)
non-conformity, incident rate.
06. There is no risk assessment revision and the Hierarchy of controls the risks Chapter K, 19 ISO 10.2 (C)
are not implied. (D)
Read the following cases and identify whether the statement is a fact or Inference. Also give reasons in
case of your judgment for an inference.
1) Walker was doing an experiment (in lab) on biological changes in humans, when they tell lies. Walker was
surprised to see the results of one test and wanted to inform the professor of her university but the telephone
lines were dead. No mobile connectivity. Walker thought that since the weather was very rough when arrived at
the lab in the morning, looked out of the window and was surprised to see dark clouds and realized that it might
be raining. Took rain coat & test report and went out of the Laboratory and rushed towards the car, to reach the
professor.
2) The swimming pool safe guard was beside the swimming pool and suddenly found that one boy fell into the pool
(slipped on the edge). The guard jumped into the pool to rescue the boon approaching the boy he realized that
the boy knew swimming and he swim him to one side and started smiling. The guard also smiled but suddenly the
boy said “help” and fainted. He was taken out of the pool and given artificial respiration by the guard and boy
came to senses. The guard insisted for medical checkup by duty doctor and taken immediately for checkup.
Considering the OH&S Apex Document of Industrial Gases Company, prepare an Audit Plan, as per following
guidelines:
1. Total man days = Calculate audit duration from IAF MD5 Table for 50 employees or take Four (minimum)
[One Man day = 08.00 hrs with Half an hour Lunch Break) or use audit duration as given by tutor.
2. Use all the personnel in your group as auditors (you can use auditor – 1, 2, or A & B etc.) as references,
rather than actual names.
3. Avoid if possible two people going for same process area audit.
4. Cover one Installation site also in the audit plan as they do execution as well.
5. The audit plan shall contain basic information as under:
a) The start time of each process area and the auditor allotted for that specific process area.
b) Allot 5 minutes as auditor’s brush up time in middle for effective smooth continuity and effective
audit, for information sharing and judgment on audit proceedings.
c) You can do this in two ways…one plan accommodating all process areas and auditors or separate plan
for each auditor, with distributing the process areas.
6. Assume that all Non- Conformities raised in Stage 1 audit have been completed and closed.
MAKE THE AUDIT PLAN IN ROUGH ON THE NEXT PAGE & AS A GROUP ON THE FLIP CHART(S)
THE GROUP LEADER TO MAKE A PRESENTATION OF THE EXERCISE FROM THE FLIP CHART
For Tutor: Tutor to Scan the flip charts and send to the BSCIC. In case Scanning is not possible send photographs.
Criteria Requirements of ISO System Policies & Procedures, Audit Implementation Guide.
45001:2018. Documentation:
Legal Requirements,
Organization Policies &
Procedures.
Team Leader: Sandeep Opening
Audit Start Date 28/09/2020 10:00am
Meeting
Team Mathi, Prithivi, Shivy, Closing
Audit End Date 29/09/2020 06:00PM
Member: Baabu. Meeting
Audit Schedule
Considering the ISO 45001:2018 standard and OH&S Apex Document of Industrial Gases Company, and using the
organization structure, prepare an Audit Checklist for three process areas (functions/departments), allotted to your
group by the Tutor.
Note: As you are aware, the word “SHALL” means “MANDATORY” and all the requirements after shall are action
points to be verified in an audit. Take this as a tip in preparing Audit Checklist
Make the audit checklists in rough on the next page & as a group on the flip chart(s).
Each Group to make check lists for 3 Department allotted by tutor on three separate flip charts.
The group leaders to make a presentation of the exercise from the flip chart
Tutor guidance: In a training course, tutor should preferably ensure that all departments Industrial Gases Company
are covered in Ex 13 for making check list and in Exercise 15 for conducting role play. The eight departments to be
covered are (in order of priority): Production, Installation, Maintenance (including Utilities), HR (including Admin),
Purchase, Transportation & Dispatch, MR, Top Management and Sales and Marketing i.e. If the batch has only four or
five delegates, two groups will be made and each group will cover 3 departments, If the batch has 6 or more delegates,
then three groups will be formed and each group will cover 3 departments each. If the batch has 12 or more delegates,
then four groups will be formed and each group will cover 3 departments each.
4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of workers and other interested parties
6.1.2.2 Assessment of OH&S risks and other risks to the OH&S management system
8 Operation
8.1 Operational planning control
8.1.1 General
8.1.1 Does your organization plan, implement and control the
processes (see 4.4) needed to meet the requirements of
the OH&S management system and to implement the
10 Improvement
10.1(General) How do you determine and select opportunities for
improvement and implement any necessary actions to
achieve intended outcomes of your OH&S management
system?
Issue 1 Rev 01 Apr.18 Page 30 of 54
Participant Workbook
ISO 45001:2018 Lead Auditor Training Course
Please read the following cases and judge as under – please note you are an auditor assessing this situation, that
means you are standing there in the case and performing interview while auditing.
1. If you think there is a sufficient objective evidence of nonconformity then complete the Non-conformity notes
provided in top part of the Non-Conformity Note and categorize the same as “Major” or “Minor”.
2. If you think there is not sufficient objective evidence of nonconformity then state the reasons in the section
“Comments” for not classifying it as Non-conformity. In this section, also state what must be further
investigated as an “Audit Trail” before concluding your decision wither it is conforming or non-conforming.
(Audit Trail is the sequence of probing to establish C or NC – can be forward trail or backward trail).
Questions in this section are designed to test student’s ability to analyse audit situations, evaluate audit evidence and
apply knowledge of the audit criteria correctly.
Students are also required to demonstrate their ability to write a well- constructed nonconformity statement that
describes clearly the weakness or failure of the management system, the audit evidence and the requirement(s) of the
standard.
Note to marker:
To raise a nonconformity report when there is not sufficient audit evidence should be penalized and markers
should normally award zero mark.
To complete an audit investigation where there is sufficient evidence to report nonconformity can often be
supported and be given marks, normally up to a maximum of 7 marks from a possible 10 marks.
To be awarded marks a student must state clearly their reason for thinking there is not yet sufficient evidence to report
the findings as a nonconformity and describe the investigation they would follow to determine conformity or
nonconformity; including audit trails and audit evidence they would seek and for what purpose, quoting relevant ISO
45001 clause numbers.
Exceptionally, where there was some obvious ambiguity in the description of the audit situation or the student
demonstrates logical argument, knowledge of the subject and the answer shows an ability to make a reasoned judgement
leading to a clear determination of conformity or nonconformity marks up to the maximum available may be given.
Typical solutions for nonconformities follow a standard method of presentation: i.e. failure in the system (3 marks for
identifying the failure), audit evidence (3 marks for identifying the audit evidence) and requirements (1 mark for
identifying the ISO 45001 clause and requirement). Alternative structure or presentation of the nonconformity by a
student is acceptable provided these three components of the nonconformity are clearly present and the distribution
of marks adhered to.
For each of the following 4 cases, conclude the degree of compliance by performing audits and
give your judgment in the form of non-conformities.
Incident 1
Following is the hazard analysis (Document: WER Ver. 3.4) done by one company. Audit this analysis and come
out with your output – Non-conformities if they are there:
OCCURRENCE SCALE SEVERITY SCALE
FACTOR SCALE FACTOR SCALE
Daily 5 Minor Illness(1 Day) 1
Weekly 4 Illness for 2-3 Days 2
Monthly 3 Critical Illness – needing Hospitalization 3
Half-Yearly 2 Physical Disability 4
Yearly 1 Injury Leading to Death 5
RISK FREQUEN
HAZARD PREVENTIVE ACTION
DISCRIPTION OF (Occurren CY OF
HAZARD CLASIFICATI (Cause 100% removal / REGULATORY REQUIREMENT
HAZARD ce X THE
ON Control to reduce)
Severity) ACTION
TG - NUMBER 21 (Personal
Occurrenc
e = Daily Protective Equipment) =
ALL THE RESPIRATORY
Severity =
SKIN / TIME IN
Minor WEARING FACE MASK PROTECTION of
2. AIR RESPIRATORY SIGNIFICANT PRODUC
DIESES
Illness (Control to reduce only)
TION ENVIRONMENTAL
RISK PROTECTION & SAFETY
FLOOR
RATING = 5 SECTION OF LOCAL
X 3 = 15
REGULATIONS
Point of
Point of Operation:
Operation:
GUARD THE BLADE
CONTACT WITH
ENTIRELY EXCEPT THE
THE MOVING
POINT OF OPERATION-
BLADE MAY
PROPERLY ADJUST THE
OCCUR -SEVER
BLADE GUIDE & THE
FINGERS
UPPER SAW SO THAT IT
In running nip
RAISES & LOWERS WITH
Points:
THE BLADE
CLOTHING, HAIR
Occurrenc In running nip Points: _ TG - NUMBER 16 (Personal
OR HANDS MAY
e = Daily FULLEY ENCLIOSE HE Protection Equipment) =
BE CAUGHT BY & ALL THE
Severity = PULLEY MECHANIZM
PULLED INTO THE TIME IN HEARING PROTECTION of
Minor Kickbacks
3. INJURY FEED ROLLS OR
Illness
SIGNIFICANT PRODUC ENVIRONMENTAL
USE PROTECTIVE
THE PULLEY TION PROTECTION & SAFETY
RISK CLOTHING, EYE GLASSES
MECHANISM FLOOR SECTION OF Local
RATING = 5 ETC.
Kickbacks :
X 3 = 20 Flying Chips : Regulations
STOCK CAUGHT
MAKE SURE THE SAW
BY THE BLADE
INCLUDES A TENSION
MAY BE THROWN
CONTROL DEVICE TO
BACK AT THE
INDICATE THE ACTUAL
OPERATOR
Flying Chips : BLADE TENSION & ALSO
USE PROTECTIVE
WOOD CHIPS &
CLOTHING, EYE GLASSES
SPLINTERS MAY BE
ETC.
THROWN BACK AT
(Control to reduce only)
THE OPERATOR
Requirement (WHY):
Hazard shall be properly identified to assess the risks
Control of risk shall be implemented and established
Communication of risks shall be communicated to the workers to understand the tisk.
Comments:
Personnel – people or worker who might be harmed has not been identified
There is no proper implementation of Hierarchy of Controls
Action to be taken-
Proper training shall be provided to operator and worker towards safe operation of bend saw machine
The organization shall maintain and retain documented information towards its legal requirement and
calibration record of the machine.
Incident 2
Following is the hazard analysis done by one company. Audit this analysis and come out with your
output – Non-conformities if they are there:
All Hazard with reference to welding work has not been identified
Assessment of Risk from identified Hazard has not been performed
Process- Identification of Hazard like Electric Shock, Exposure to UV & IR radiation, inappropriate
use of face Shield etc. has not been Consider
Personnel- the welder is holding the Face Shield with his hand which is not a safer way for welding
work
Document- Assessment of Risk from identified Hazard has not been performed according to the
document ABC Version 1.2
Requirement (WHY):
Welding work should be organized considering all Safety precautions.
Risk Assessment should be carried out to check the effectiveness of Existing control
Legal and other requirement not Identified in hazard analysis
Comments:
Risk Assessment should be carried out to check the effectiveness of Existing control
Incident 3
In the following case, identify any non-compliance exists or not:
““ In a scaffolding design carried out by a scaffold designing company, for a construction company,
constructing an Oil Tank at the storage yard of Oil & Gas company, HSE requirements for the
guardrails were not considered. The legal requirements were not confirmed from the client by the
scaffolding company while preparing the design. The local regulation (Local regulation code of
construction Safety Practice shown as below:
Requirement (WHY):
Toe board to top rail not less than 95cm
Toe board height 15cm required
Maximum distance Posts 240cm required.
Top rail, Mid Rail, & Toe board distance not more than 47cm
Auditor Auditee Date
Sandeep & Baabu scaffold designing 28/09/2020
company
Comments:
• Scaffolding Design Shall Be as per OH&S standard.
• The organization shall establish implement and maintain process for elimination of hazards and
reduction of OH&S risk
The organization shall ensure that outsourcing arrangement are consistent with legal requirement.
Incident 4
In Local Regulation code of construction safety practice Rev.008 para 7.4 states following for 8
hours :
The OHSAS Manual PQP Ver. 2.5 Dt. 20/05/2008 of a logistic company states as following in store yard
operation, as below:
In case of any Near miss / injury / ill health, please fill up incident report (Part -1) and hand over to
supervisor / safety officer on duty. In case you are not in a position to record, take help from any one
(including supervisor / safety officer) and ensure that adequate communication is done to the safety
officer and also recommend (if feasible), the improvements required for such incident not to recur
again.
In accordance with para 5.1 manual lifting load. The max load lifting by personnel Is 25 kg and weight
more than 25 kg to be lifted by fork lift or trolleys.
In accordance to serial 1 to serial 7 at para 5.1 manual load lifting safety precaution logistic
company& standard
In accordance with standard para 6.1.2.2a&b regard to process not listed
Requirement (WHY):
The implementation of OH&S as per standard of OH &S manual of the logistic company
Process Deficiencies- The load lifting is observed to higher than permitted load as per standard OH&S manual provided by
company
Person Deficiency: The knowledge of person about precaution are not as re standard OH&S manual provided by company
Documents: The Document related to person Details body weight and health not found as per standard
Preventative Measures to be implemented (For non-repetitive of same incidence as per ISO 6.1.2.3& 6.1.3 with regards to
risk opportunity and process
A) Process Deficiencies: The load lifted must be as per OH&S Manual instruction laid as per para 5.1
B) Person Deficiency: Every person selected for weight lifting job must be briefed about the process and safety precaution
as per standard OH&S manual provided by company
C) Documents: the detail of personnel such as body weight and health Status shall be maintained in lifting Log Book of the Day
as per OH&S manual provided by company
Group Exercise –
Exercise 15 Role Play – Interview Process 450 Min. for Role Play
30 Minutes for presenting audit findings
20 Minutes for Tutor Review
Role play for Stage 2 audit of Industrial Gas Company will be conducted after Stage 1 audit already done. It is
assumed that the company has taken corrective actions on all NC’s of Stage 1 audit including scope.
Teams will be same as made for the exercise on Checklist # 14 – Each Team will audit for the specific 3 functions
allotted by tutor.
Tutor will act as Auditee.
Conduct the role play involving each team so that all get a chance for the LIVE AUDIT. And record at least 2 NC of
each function i.e. total 4 NCs.
The group (s) which are not auditing shall observe the other group while auditing and present their observations
and findings at the end of each role play.
Questions in this section are designed to test student’s ability to analyse audit situations, evaluate audit evidence
and apply knowledge of the audit criteria correctly.
Students are also required to demonstrate their ability to write a well- constructed nonconformity statement that
describes clearly the weakness or failure of the management system, the audit evidence and the requirement(s)
of the standard.
Note to marker:
To raise a nonconformity report when there is not sufficient audit evidence should be penalized and
markers should normally award zero mark.
To complete an audit investigation where there is sufficient evidence to report nonconformity can often
be supported and be given marks, normally up to a maximum of 7 marks from a possible 10 marks.
To be awarded marks a student must state clearly their reason for thinking there is not yet sufficient evidence to
report the findings as a nonconformity and describe the investigation they would follow to determine conformity or
nonconformity; including audit trails and audit evidence they would seek and for what purpose, quoting relevant
ISO 45001 clause numbers.
Exceptionally, where there was some obvious ambiguity in the description of the audit situation or the student
demonstrates logical argument, knowledge of the subject and the answer shows an ability to make a reasoned
judgement leading to a clear determination of conformity or nonconformity marks up to the maximum available
may be given.
Typical solutions for nonconformities follow a standard method of presentation: i.e. failure in the system (3 marks
for identifying the failure), audit evidence (3 marks for identifying the audit evidence) and requirements (1 mark
for identifying the ISO 45001 clause and requirement). Alternative structure or presentation of the nonconformity
by a student is acceptable provided these three components of the nonconformity are clearly present and the
distribution of marks adhered to.
Write NCRs for any two NC’s for the three functions in the prescribed format (i.e. Total of 6 NC’s) on subsequent
pages
Documented information on Risk and opportunities has not been provided by the company
Document- According to Apex manual there is no record of information on risk and opportunity ( Apex page 11)
Requirement (WHY):
IGC Shall maintain and retain documented information on Risk and opportunities, which shall be reviewed and
updated by the authority
The organization has not established any process to emphasize the participation of non – managerial workers
Process- Requirement for participation of non – managerial workers to determine the mechanisms for their
consultation and participation
Document – Apex page no.11 , clause5.4e 1
Requirement (WHY):
The organization Shall emphasize the participation of non – managerial workers for identifying hazard and assessing
risk and opportunity
There is no evidence Whether the risk assessment is carried out against the work-related activities
Requirement (WHY):
According to ISO 45001:2018 Standard the organization criteria for the assessment of OH&S shall be documented
and retained
Requirement (WHY):
Safety Induction program shall be implemented for the contractors regularly to have process control
No record of inspection, safety manual, Training records, safety operating procedure, Codes of practices and MSDS were found
Requirement (WHY):
According to ISO 45001: 2018 Standards the organization Shall provide the resources needed for maintenance of
OH&S System
Resources - inspection, safety manual, Training records, safety operating procedure
Requirement (WHY):
The organization Shall ensure into account Diversity aspects when considering its communication needs.
Exercise 16 Audit Report- Stage 1 Document Review Group Exercise – 60 Minutes for Report
Preparation
20 Minutes for the Reports Presentation
10 Minutes for Tutor Feedback
Based on the audit done and findings recorded, please prepare Audit Report as below:
ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: Avenue 10 C Industrial Area, City XYZ, Gujarat State- 360024, India
Contact Person: Mr. Robert Position: General Manager Projects and MR (OHS)
Alternate Contact Person: Position:
Registration Scope: PRODUCTION AND TRADING OF INDUSTRIAL AND SPECIALTY GASES
No. of Employees: 50-60 No. of Shifts: Day
Company’s Key Documented Information Reference:
Apex Manual Industrial Gases Company Issue:01 Feb 2018
Management Standard: ISO 45001:2018
Assessment Type: Audit
Assessment Commencement Date: Assessment Completion Date: 29/09/2020
28/09/2020
Assessment Team:
Name Status
Mr.Sandeep – Audit Team Leader
Mr.Mathi- Audit Team Member
Mr.Mathi - Audit Team Member
Mr.Shivy - Audit Team Member
Mr.Baabu- Audit Team Member
Mandays : 02
Nonconformities raised during Assessment
NCR Ref. No. 01 02 03 04
Minor/Major Minor Minor Minor Minor
Nonconformities raised during last visit
NCR Ref. No. 01 02 03 04
Closed/Open open open open open
NA
The external and internal issues of the OSH system have identified and the stake holder’s comments are taken in
to consider while implementing the system.
The organization meet the requirements of the ISO standards and monitoring procedures are available, workers
are considered, stake holders are considered and investors are considered while developing the context of the
organization.
Following external & internal issues were verified that are relevant to its purpose that affects its ability to achieve
the intended outcomes of its OH&S management system:
Internal issues External Issues
Employees Demand of Interested Parties
Performance Weather Conditions
OH&S Legal and Other requirements
Knowledge & Skills Technological
OH&S
POLICY (5.2)
Organization has implemented safety culture to reduce the occupational related illness, injury. But thee is no proper
identification of hazards, even the risk rating is not evaluated properly for the identified hazards.
The organization policy has been developed, but the document is not approved by the top management shows the commitment
of top management inconsistence (5.2.f)
Risk rating has not properly mentioned in the assessment and also the identification of hazards are not
considered.
There are no objectives that are discussed and not able to set a time frame for its review to continuous
improvement process
Even though there are concerns raised on the grounds of proper identification of significant risk, opportunities,
Correct methodology for risk rating were not evident
IGC has established OH&S objectives at relevant functions, levels in order to maintain and continually improve the
OH&S management system and OH&S performance.
The OH&S objectives has been consistent with the OH&S policy; measurable or capable of performance evaluation;
taken into account applicable requirements; results of the assessment of risks and opportunities; the result of
consultation of workers and where they exist, workers’ representatives be monitored; be communicated; be
updated as appropriate.
COMPETENCE (7.2):
Competency assessment has done but task based training and assessment is not done.
Competency of personnel doing risk assessment is not mentioned
Verified that organization has determined the necessary competence of workers doing work under its control that affects
OH&S performance and its ability to fulfil its legal and other requirements.
COMMUNICATION (7.4):
INTERNAL COMMUNICATION:
Internal communication is done through display of OH&S policies at prominent places and available through data
boards, training courses/ workshops, circular on notice board, any other relevant information etc. All workers can
inform their OH&S suggestions/ concerns verbally or by writing. HR shall ensure feedback within 14 working days
on action taken.
EXTERNAL COMMUNICATION:
External Communication with interested parties is done through all the types of communication channel
available.
There is no proof of worker’s consultation and participation documents such as safety committee, site tours,
Toolbox talk Near miss report.
Retention period of the document is not mentioned in the manual. Records of conducting training is not available. Revision
history of the document is not available in the document and the also the top management is not approved the document.
Master document control form is available to track the document, nevertheless the document number is not mentioned in
the manual. The organization has the provision to track the documents, unauthorized access in its place.
IGC is providing emergency planned response training to all the staff and also the mock exercises are conducted to response
such situations. The drill exercises evaluation record ins not available and also debriefing documents are not available to
improvise the process.
Functionalities based KPI are not available. PPM schedule and calibration of the equipment is available.
Internal audit has implanted and the audit findings are discussed in the management review meeting
IGC monitors, measures, analyse and evaluate its performance in terms of requirements, methods, criteria,
results and action required to validate the results of product, health and safety requirements.
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
DOCUMENT No. DOCUMENT TITLE
IGC/CP-05 Monitoring and measurement
IGC/F-17 OH&S Monitoring measurement and action Plan
IGC/CP-13 Management review & Continual Improvement
IGC analyses and evaluates appropriate data and information arising from monitoring and measurement. The
results of analysis shall be used to evaluate:
a) Conformity of Health and safety requirements.
b) Key performance indicators of the OH&S system.
c) The performance and effectiveness of the OH&S Management System.
e) If planning has been implemented effectively.
f) The effectiveness of actions taken to address risks and opportunities in Health and safety, requirements.
g) The performance of external providers.
As the organization has reporting the Near miss and its is a good sign though, There is no proper incident reporting procedure
No procedure for improving the continual improvement of the procedure. The organization failed to address the opportunities to improve
the OHS system considering the review of policy and procedures including the SOPs.
IGC has established OHS management system in the organization in a effective manner. Over all the audit assessment has be
satisfied and all the sections in the standards has been compiled. There are few areas which requires attention to improvise
the safety culture in the organization. Especially in the hazard management and the risk rating standard, the organization
needs to be concentrated more to identify the hazards and the hierarchy of controls should be established. Also, we
recommend, the organization has to involve their department supervisors and HODs to participate in the ISO 45001 training
to understand the standards to implement effectively in the organization which will increase the IGC’s work culture and also
rise the organizational effectiveness among the stakeholders.
There are few NCs identified and IGC has taken this in a positive way to improve the safety culture in the organization.
NC04 No procedure for improving the continual improvement of the procedure. ISO 45001:2018 Standard
The organization failed to address the opportunities to improve the OHS Clause 10.2
system considering the review of policy and procedures including the SOPs.
Subsequently this Assessment Report Pack along with your satisfactory Corrective Action Plan and objective evidences
(if applicable) shall be reviewed independently with in BSCIC. Once the recommendations are found as sound, BSCIC
will be pleased to issue a Certificate of Registration. This will come along with the BSCIC Logo and Accreditation Mark.
The conditions for use of BSCIC Logo and Accreditation Mark have been stipulated and the same will be provided to
you.
BSCIC believes in value added partnership with its clients, and we will be pleased to revisit your company for the
Surveillance Assessments for a visit every Year for 2 Manday per visit.
Activity NA
2. This assessment is based on random samples therefore nonconformities may exist which have not been
identified.
5. Team recommends a Limited Supplementary Assessment for --- Manday(s) or a full Re-assessment for -----
Manday(s). The same could be conducted by ----/----/ ------ , upon satisfactory corrective action plan submitted
by client to BSCIC’s Chief Executive-------- NA
6. Client to inform their readiness to BSCIC’s Chief Executive for the further assessment as in 4 above so that the
same could be satisfactorily planned & conducted.
Leadership
MR or a resource assigned by top
management for responsibility and
authority as per clause 5.3 (a) to (b)
Planning, Aspect and Impact,
Compliance Obligations, Risks and
Opportunities
Marketing and Sales
Design & development of products
and services
Control of externally provided
processes, products and services
Production and Service provision
Performance Evaluation /
Monitoring and Measuring
resources
HR and Admin
Management Review
QMS Documented Information &
Changes
Internal Audits
Complaints Management
Previous NCR & Corrective Actions
Use of BSCIC Logo & Marks
Re-assessment (Tick )
Legal (OH&S specific)
Notice: 1. Fill the areas as per the client activities and processes. Mandatory fields are already mentioned.
2. Assessor to please in boxes indicating a full plan. This is required to be updated upon each Surveillance
Assessment.
The onsite Registration Assessment of M/S Industrial Gases Company was completed.
BSCIC through its Team Leader / Lead Auditor confirms the Confidentiality of the information received, Observed
and Reported by the Team BSCIC.
Team Leader / Lead Auditor by signing this sheet confirm the Non Conflict of Interests with the Organization.
This report and its full contents are completely understood and accepted.
Signed for & on behalf of BSCIC Signed for on behalf of the client
Name: Name:
Date: Date:
++++++++++++++++++
Based on the audit done and findings recorded, please prepare Audit Report as below:
ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: Avenue 10 C Industrial Area, City XYZ, Gujarat State- 360024, India
Contact Person: Mr. Robert Position: General Manager Projects and MR (OHS)
Assessment Type:
Mandays :
Nonconformities raised during Assessment
Areas Assessed :
Leadership and worker participation, Resource assigned by Top Management for 5.3 (a) & (b), Planning /
Risks and Opportunities, Requirements for Products and Services (Customer Related Processes), Control of
Externally Provided Processes, Products and Services (Supplier, Storage, Warehousing Dispatch/ Logistic &
Delivery Related), Production and Service Provision, Installation Activity, Performance Evaluation /
Monitoring and Measuring Resources, HR / Training Processes, Emergency Preparedness and Response,
Hazards/ Risks and Legal requirements and other requirements.
**Disclaimer - Auditing & its conclusion is based on a sampling process of the available information**
The organization meet the requirements of the ISO standards and monitoring procedures are available,
workers are considered, stake holders are considered and investors are considered while developing the
context of the organization.
Although it acknowledges that ISO 45001:2018 does not require its organizational context to be
maintained as documented information, it maintains and retain; in addition to this document, the
following documented information to describe its organizational context:
1. Analysis of daily performance, strategies, legal requirements and other requirements commitments.
2. Analysis of technology.
3. Technical reports from technical experts and consultants.
4. Minutes of meetings (Management and review minutes), process maps and reports etc.
IGC shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that affect its
ability to achieve the intended outcomes of its OH&S management system.
Planning
When planning for the OH&S Management System, IGC consider the issues referred to its context as
well as internal and external stakeholders, the requirements referred to interested parties and the
scope of its OH&S management system and determine the risks and opportunities that need to be
addressed to give assurance that the OH&S management system can achieve its intended results,
prevent or reduce undesirable effects and achieve continual improvement.
IGC has taken into account:
A. hazards;
B. OH&S risks and other risks;
C. OH&S opportunities and other opportunities;
D. legal requirements and other requirements
IGC has planned actions to address:
A. Risks and Opportunities
B. Legal requirements and other requirements
A. Response to emergency situations
Requirements identified in Cl 4.2
Support
The IGC has determined and provided the resources needed for the establishment, implementation,
maintenance and continual improvement of the OH&S management system.
The IGC shall:
a) determine the necessary competence of workers that affect or can affects the performance
b) ensure that workers are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, or
experience;
c) where applicable, take actions to acquire and maintain the necessary competence, and
evaluate the effectiveness of the actions taken;
d) retain appropriate documented information as evidence of competence.
The IGC shall ensure that workers doing work under the IGC’s control are aware of:
a) the OH&S policy and OH&S objectives;
b) their contribution to the effectiveness of the OH&S management system, including the
benefits of improved OH&S performance;
c) the implications and potential consequences of not conforming to the OH&S management
system requirements;
d) incidents and the outcomes of investigations that are relevant to them;
e) hazards, OH&S risks and actions determined that are relevant to them;
f) the ability to remove themselves from work situations that they consider present an
imminent and serious danger to their life or health, as well as the arrangements for protecting them
from undue consequences for doing so.
IGC communication process:
Takes into account legal requirements and other requirements
Ensures that OH&S information communicated is consistence with information generated
Ensures all OH&S communications are reliable
Ensures that all relevant communications are responded
Operation
The IGC shall plan, implement, maintain and control the processes needed to meet the requirements
for the OH&S MS, and to implement the actions determined in Clause 6, by:
a) establishing operation criteria for the processes
b) implementing control of the processes in accordance with the criteria;
c) maintaining and retaining documented information to the extent necessary to have
confidence that the processes have been carried out as planned;
d) adapting work to workers.
The hierarchy of controls in IGC for OH&S risks will be:
Elimination
Substitution
Engineering Controls
Administrative Control
Use of PPE
The IGC has establish a processes for the implementation and control of planned temporary and
permanent changes that impact OH&S performance.
Improvement
IGC shall determine opportunities for improvement and implement necessary actions to achieve the
intended outcomes of its OH&S management system.
When an incident or a nonconformity occurs, IGC shall:
a) react in a timely manner to the incident or nonconformity and, as applicable:
1) take action to control and correct it;
2) deal with the consequences;
b) evaluate, with the participation of workers and the involvement of other relevant interested
parties, the need for corrective action to eliminate the root causes of the incident or nonconformity, in
order that it does not recur or occur elsewhere, by:
1) investigating the incident or reviewing the nonconformity;
2) determining the cause(s) of the incident or nonconformity;
3) determining if similar incidents have occurred, nonconformities exist, or if they
could potentially occur;
c) review existing assessments of OH&S risks and other risks, as appropriate (see 6.1);
d) determine and implement any action needed, including corrective action, in accordance
with the hierarchy of controls (see 8.1.2) and the management of change (see 8.1.3);
e) assess OH&S risks that relate to new or changed hazards, prior to taking action;
f) review the effectiveness of any action taken, including corrective action;
g) make changes to the OH&S management system, if necessary.
IGC shall retain documented information as evidence of:
— the nature of the incidents or nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken;
— the results of any action and corrective action, including their effectiveness.
IGC shall communicate this documented information to relevant workers, and, where they exist,
workers’ representatives, and other relevant interested parties.
ASSESSMENT COMMENTARY
Positive Issues
1) Involvement of top management is there; their wiliness is much positive.
2) No accident till now.
3) Legal requirements are properly fulfilled.
4) Effective SOPs at different areas.
Opportunities for further improvements:
1) Involvement of people to be needed.
2) Require improvement in training area.
Observations:
1) Document control has some scope of improvement
Subsequently this Assessment Report Pack along with your satisfactory Corrective Action Plan and objective evidences
(if applicable) shall be reviewed independently with in BSCIC. Once the recommendations are found as sound, BSCIC
will be pleased to issue a Certificate of Registration. This will come along with the BSCIC Logo and Accreditation Mark.
The conditions for use of BSCIC Logo and Accreditation Mark have been stipulated and the same will be provided to
you.
BSCIC believes in value added partnership with its clients, and we will be pleased to revisit your company for the
Surveillance Assessments for a visit every Year for 2 Manday per visit.
Activity NA
2. This assessment is based on random samples therefore nonconformities may exist which have not been
identified.
5. Team recommends a Limited Supplementary Assessment for --- Manday(s) or a full Re-assessment for -----
Manday(s). The same could be conducted by ----/----/ ------ , upon satisfactory corrective action plan submitted
by client to BSCIC’s Chief Executive-------- NA
6. Client to inform their readiness to BSCIC’s Chief Executive for the further assessment as in 4 above so that the
same could be satisfactorily planned & conducted.
Leadership
MR or a resource assigned by top
management for responsibility and
authority as per clause 5.3 (a) to (b)
Planning, Aspect and Impact,
Compliance Obligations, Risks and
Opportunities
Marketing and Sales
Design & development of products
and services
Control of externally provided
processes, products and services
Production and Service provision
Performance Evaluation /
Monitoring and Measuring
resources
HR and Admin
Management Review
QMS Documented Information &
Changes
Internal Audits
Complaints Management
Previous NCR & Corrective Actions
Use of BSCIC Logo & Marks
Re-assessment (Tick )
Legal (OH&S specific)
Notice: 1. Fill the areas as per the client activities and processes. Mandatory fields are already mentioned.
2. Assessor to please in boxes indicating a full plan. This is required to be updated upon each Surveillance
Assessment.
The onsite Registration Assessment of M/S Industrial Gases Company was completed.
BSCIC through its Team Leader / Lead Auditor confirms the Confidentiality of the information received, Observed
and Reported by the Team BSCIC.
Team Leader / Lead Auditor by signing this sheet confirm the Non Conflict of Interests with the Organization.
This report and its full contents are completely understood and accepted.
Signed for & on behalf of BSCIC Signed for on behalf of the client
Name: Name:
Date: Date:
++++++++++++++++++
Review the closure submitted by auditee and judge whether this closure is acceptable or not, for the below three
cases.
NON CONFORMITY NOTE - 1