A06 - Student Version
A06 - Student Version
A06 - Student Version
Dear student,
Please, read the following indications about the Final Integrated Interview
to know more about the procedure and criteria for the evaluation.
The interview takes place on the 15th day of classes on the regular
program (4 days a week), and on the last day of classes on the
weekend and only Saturdays program.
The interview is in pairs or groups of three. Your teacher will moderate
the interview in a session different from the main one.
While a group of students is in the interview, the others need to be
working on an activity assigned by the Teacher on the main session.
You need to turn on your camera during all the interview.
The interview evaluates your communicative skills and your
knowledge of the structures studied during the month.
The exam consists of 2 communicative tasks. You will work on the
tasks providing detailed and cohesive ideas related to the text in the
last pages of these document.
The interview score is obtained from 3 criteria: Fluency and
Pronunciation, Vocabulary and Grammar use, and Accuracy of ideas
and Task completion.
Your score in the final integrated interview will be sent to the e-mail
address you gave your teacher within 30 minutes of the completion
of all interviews in the class.
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
Communicative task
Example of instructions Not expected response
Expected response
“What do you think about the
author’s position? Would you agree “I couldn’t agree more. First, the author mentions
with him?” that the extinction of animals is inevitable due to
our huge consumption of plastic. We can witness
that in our own town, where many people get rid
of their garbage on the streets every day. Second,
….”
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
3 In general, the student speaks clearly The student uses grammatical structures that The student's performance meets expectations
with few pauses or hesitations. are expected for a student in their level, but for their current level.
Also, there are few pronunciation or there are few noticeable mistakes. Ideas given during the interview are mostly
intonation problems. The student's word choice is ineffective in few cohesive, and specific for their current level.
These problems may interfere with the parts of the interview. There may be few gaps in the ideas, but they
student's expression of ideas at few These mistakes become noticeable and may are not significant.
points of the interview. interfere with the student's expression of ideas
at few points of the interview.
2 In general, the student speaks with some The student uses grammatical structures that The student's performance doesn't completely
pauses or hesitations. are expected for a student in their level, but meet expectations for their current level.
Also, there are some pronunciation or there are some noticeable mistakes. Ideas given during the interview are only
intonation problems. The student's word choice is ineffective in sometimes cohesive, and specific for their
These problems interfere with the some parts of the interview. current level.
student's expression of ideas at some These mistakes become noticeable and There are some significant gaps in the ideas.
points of the interview. interfere with the student's expression of ideas
at some points of the interview.
1 In general, the student doesn't speak The student uses grammatical structures that The student's performance is far from meeting
clearly and there is a considerable are expected for a student in their level, but expectations for their current level.
amount of pauses or hesitations. there is a considerable number of noticeable Ideas given during the interview are mostly
There is also a considerable number of mistakes. disorganized and too general for their current
pronunciation or intonation problems. The student's word choice is ineffective in level.
These problems interfere with the most parts of the interview. There is a considerable number of significant
student's expression of ideas at many These mistakes become noticeable and gaps in the ideas.
points of the interview. interfere with the student's expression of ideas
at many points of the interview.
0 The student does not make efforts to The student doesn't make efforts to use the The student doesn't make any efforts to
speak clearly or to avoid pauses or grammatical structures that are expected for a complete the task.
hesitations. student at their level. Ideas given during the interview are always
There are only few instances where The student's word choice is ineffective during disorganized and too general for their current
pronunciation or intonation are correct. all the interview. level, and there is no effort to avoid
These problems interfere with the All of these mistakes interfere severely with inaccuracies in the ideas given.
student's expression of ideas during all the expression of ideas.
the interview.
4 11-12 points
3 8-10 points
2 5-7 points
1 2-4 points
0 0-1 points
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
READING
Instructions: Read the following text before the Final Integrated Interview. Prepare
to respond questions about information mentioned in this text.
Stories of controversial issues
Adopted from https://www.theguardian.com/ https://toronto.citynews.ca/ https://edition.cnn.com/
https://edition.cnn.com/
Damian Meins could just as easily not have been in the office that Wednesday afternoon.
Retired and working a new job as an inspector
with the San Bernardino health department,
Meins was expecting to be out in the field until
he got last-minute word that he had to come in
to the Inland Regional Center for a meeting.
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
“Finally the last bus came and he wasn’t on it,” Meins says. “It’s really weird because you hold
on to hope even if you know …” She pauses. “Even if you basically know, you hold on to hope
until the very last second.
“There’s obviously the emotional and psychological trauma of trying to deal with the fact that
you no longer have a dad. But there’s also the logistical and practical side of you that thinks: ‘OK
well. What does this mean? Financially is my mom going to be able to live in this house?’ … You
find a different way to live but it takes a long time for things to even feel OK.”
Part of that new life for Meins, her mother and her sister has been as advocates for what she
calls commonsense gun control for things like universal background checks on gun purchases
nationwide. “You kind of wonder with every passing shooting, what will be the proverbial straw
that breaks the camel’s back. They [Congress] have already had two people in their own ranks
shot,” Meins says, referring to Steve Scalise and Gabrielle Giffords.
“But I do feel some optimism that things will change eventually. I don’t think it’s a short path,
but I think it’ll change eventually.”
A Mississauga man has been charged with a hate crime after police allege he made a number
of statements against the Muslim community online. Police would not say what the alleged
comments were, only that they were made through social media over five months. Kevin
Johnston, 45, was arrested on Monday.
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
He was charged with willful promotion of hatred, specifically “communicating statements other
than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group”, in this case,
Muslims. Johnston runs the website Freedom Report, but police would not say whether the
charges are linked to that publication. CityNews spoke to Johnston outside a Brampton court
house after he appeared before a judge on Monday.
“I am the first Canadian in the history of Canada to be arrested under motion M103″ he said,
citing the motion put forth in parliament
to condemn Islamophobia in Canada and
all forms of systemic racism and religious
discrimination.
He was released on his own undertaking, under a number of conditions including not being
allowed within 100 meters of any mosque of Muslim community center in Ontario.
He has also been ordered not to communicate with a Muslim lawyer and two politicians, whose
names are all covered under a publication ban. He was further ordered not to possess firearms
and not to reveal any details of his case to anyone outside of his own legal counsel.
Ontario’s attorney general, who gave consent for the charge to be laid, would not comment on
the case. But he says the government takes hate crimes seriously.
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
“One time after my release, I was being interviewed, and so was my mom. I happened to pass the
room in which the reporter was speaking with her. I heard my mom tell him, ‘Our family used to set
a place at the table for Ray at every Thanksgiving and Christmas.’ To hear that, to think of what
my mom went through, to hear her say, ‘We wondered what he was eating in prison,’ that helped
me realise how I need to do this for her, for my sisters, for all the people who have sat in a courtroom
and been told that they are guilty when they are not.
“There was the time when I was testifying on behalf of Witness to Innocence, and a prosecutor said
to me, ‘You’ve been exonerated. They got the guy who did it. You’re out now. See: the system works.’
I said, ‘Tell my mom the system works.’ He didn’t ask any more questions.
“So, now I’m speaking out for my friends, my family, for all the people who need me to tell my story.
I was a Boy Scout, a postman…I was in the Air Force. If they could do it to me, they could do it
anyone.”
"Vete!"
I froze. I didn't quite know what to say, and I didn't want to believe she was talking to me or the
group of people I had just met. As a third-generation Mexican-American growing up in Los
Angeles, I had never encountered such overt racism. In fact, because my family was long since
assimilated, among my Latino friends I was always considered the "pocho" or "white boy" of the
group. (As I write this, a part of me knows somewhere in L.A., a friend of mine will be proud to
know someone actually considered me Mexican enough to yell "go home" at me.)
My Mexican friends remind me that I am American first, Mexican second and that my English is
better than my Spanish.
"Yes," I tell them. "But I can never walk into a room and be white."
Evidently, to some the brown color of my skin means I'm not even American. My friends and
family tell me what I experienced that night is a microcosm of what is happening to Latinos
across the country. You don't have to look hard to find it. In news stories, in political discourse,
on talk radio, in everyday conversation it seems it has become OK to treat Latinos in a negative
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
and antagonistic way -- whether they are new immigrants or longtime Americans. The anti-
immigration legislation sweeping across the United States has made this plain. People in my
Latino networks say they've noticed the change. And now I understand what they mean.
Like many Americans whose grandparents or parents came here from somewhere else, I live at
the intersection of my two cultures. I eat tacos, but I love cheeseburgers. I go salsa dancing, and
listen to rock n' roll. I speak Spanish and English, and depending on the crowd, sometimes
Spanglish. I love my country and my cultural community. My duality is my reality, just like the
50 million other Latinos in the United States.
I have been luckier than many. Before this incident, the closest I'd ever come to blatant racism
was in junior high. I was in the jazz band and played first trumpet. One day our jazz band teacher
invited in his predecessor, a local legend who had made Eagle Rock High School's jazz program
famous in the 1980s.
The visiting instructor pointed me out and asked me to play him 16 bars of music. I did, but he
quickly interrupted.
"Stop, stop, stop. I don't want to hear any of that mariachi music. This is jazz."
I didn't think anything of it. Instead I felt terrible that the legend standing in front of me didn't
think I was good enough. I went home that night, and like every night, at 6:30 p.m. my family sat
down for dinner to talk about our day.
So I told him. Outraged, the next day he went to my principal and filed a formal complaint. The
legend didn't come back to visit the jazz program again. Weeks later we received a letter in the
mail from him apologizing for his insensitive comments. My family saved the letter.
My father was hypersensitive to ethnic identity and deeply proud of his Latino heritage. The son
of a naturalized immigrant from El Salvador and a Mexican mother from Texas, he grew up in
Los Angeles during a time of racial tension. When I was young he would tell me stories of the
race riots in his high school, violence against people of color, and awful accounts of the struggle
he had to make it as a Mexican-American teen in the 1960s.
He died when I was 17 years old, but one of the phrases he implanted in my mind before he
passed was a statement activist Cesar Chavez made famous:
And now, here I was, at 28, with this stranger yelling at me to "leave." I stood there in the middle
of a damp crowd on a late Atlanta evening, not comprehending, the wind still and the vibrations
of Coldplay's "Yellow" filling the space in the air.
The crowd around us looked in amazement at this woman. Some of them spoke up to her, telling
her she was wrong to talk to us like that. The group of people from Mexico City looked at her in
disgust and, realizing from the look on my face that I must not be accustomed to what I was
hearing, they turned toward me to offer support.
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
One of them, a young man, grabbed my hand and raised it high in the air.
The woman continued to taunt us for some minutes, but when we did not reciprocate her
hatred, she stopped.
The band played a few more songs before ending the set, and the crowd dispersed across the
park into the Saturday evening.
"I don't think you understand who you said that to," I told her. Thinking to myself, I am as
American as you are.
"What," she said laughing. "Are you some kind of celebrity or something?"
No. But like the Mexicans I was standing with, I am a human being. And I am home.
We were contacted by police after they had received reports of multiple dogs running on a
busy road. Once the police had contained the dogs, they saw many more within a barn looking
dirty and unkempt.
One of our inspectors went to the property and saw the terrible conditions that the dogs were
being forced to live in. They described the pens as:
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
the only thing available to the dogs were tubs of dry dog food.
In the pen we found a yellow Labrador and her 10 newborn puppies, one of them had sadly
died. All were laying on a thick layer of wet faeces. The inspector also found a small pen with a
white and brown terrier puppy, who was shaking and clearly terrified.
In a similarly kept pen were eight dogs (poodle and retriever breeds) looking filthy with their
coats matted. A police officer provided water for the dogs via a hosepipe, who all fought to drink
first and huddled around the bucket. Our inspector said it was heartbreaking to watch. Some
dogs were so thirsty they were drinking for over a minute non-stop!
More dogs were contained within a conservatory, the floor was wet with urine and no bedding
could be seen. Several dogs were barking whilst others looked withdrawn. A Bulldog was seen
housed in a metal wire cage with exposed rods pointing in various directions (which could easily
hurt the dog). A second cage contained several small breed dogs - the whole setup was a mess.
There were also two dogs with their litters of puppies found in the living room.
A vet who attended said he had been to the property earlier in the year on the local council's
behalf. He had been there to inspect the property because an application had been made for a
breeding licence. He was appalled by what he saw on the returning visit.
Opening the doors revealed some of the filthiest conditions he had ever seen dogs kept in. The
floor of the out-building was covered in urine and faeces and there were a lot of flies buzzing
about - it hadn't been cleaned out for weeks! No attempt had been made to increase the
exercise area for the dogs or to feed them individually and hygienically - which were all license
conditions discussed with the owner from the vet's previous visit.
A06-FOG-SV-2
STUDENT VERSION
It was clear the man had very little intention of following the license conditions, which had
already been outlined. Failure to meet the requirements meant he had committed offences
under the Animal Welfare Act.
Twenty of the dogs had mild to severe matting to their coats which were filthy. There were 72
dogs and puppies at the property. The labrador and her puppies were removed because their
needs were not being met, which is an offence under section 9 of the Animal Welfare Act.
Our inspector issued multiple warnings and advice notices to bring about improvements in the
environmental conditions. Treatments were also provided for health issues that some of the
dogs had, particularly skin and eye conditions.
After the man had been interviewed, we were still receiving a number of complaints regarding
sick puppies at the property. He had continued with his illegal activity and five months later was
advertising online and offering puppies for sale again. This all being after he had been
summoned to attend court in relation to offences detected during the inspection and before his
first hearing.
A warrant was executed and once again neglected animals were removed. It was clear the man
hadn't learnt from the advice he had previously been given and further offences were made.
A06-FOG-SV-2