Cired 2019 - 995
Cired 2019 - 995
Cired 2019 - 995
Paper n° 995
Sílvio RODRIGUES Maria Inês VERDELHO Ana Filipa RIBEIRO Luís CORDEIRO
jungle.ai – The Netherlands EDP Distribuição – Portugal EDP Distribuição – Portugal EDP Inovação – Portugal
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Paper n° 995
Paper n° 995
Hyperparameter optimization
Fig. 4 IFT prediction absolute residuals.
The hyperparameters of the ML models were optimized
with a bayesian optimization algorithm. To this end, the The figures below shows real and predicted
library scikit-optimize [13] was employed. A total budget measurements for two different PTs and an automatically
of 200 iterations was used and, among others, the detected oil intervention. The first one shows that our
learning rate and maximum depth of each tree were predictions follow the real measurements reasonably well
optimized. even though the data contains a large outlier. The second
plot shows that our predictions did not predict the real
measurement after the oil intervention. The increased
Auto-scalable computation infrastructure residuals were due to an abnormally high oil ageing rate.
Given the highly computationally demanding nature of This specific PT's load conditions may have been the
the task, an appropriate computation infrastructure was cause for the increased ageing process.
required. A cloud-based distributed cluster computing
engine, internally developed at jungle.ai, was used to
scale and parallelize the training process. Several dozens
of computers were simultaneously used to optimize the
best performing models. This allowed us to iterate over
the results with ease and improve the problem
formulation and test different scenarios.
RESULTS
This section summarises the prediction results of IFT,
dielectric dissipation factor (DDF) or tangent delta (tg(δ))
and acidity. The following plot shows the empirical
cumulative density function (CDF) of the absolute
prediction residuals for the IFT. One can observe that the Fig. 5 Real measurements (in blue), detected intervention (black
ML model performs better for the PTs which nominal vertical line) and forecasted measurements (in red).
powers vary between the 10-20 MVA range than for 50-
100 MVA power range. This performance difference may The figure at the top of the next page shows the
be due to the total sample count for the 10-20 MVA histograms and respective empirical CDFs of the
range being approximately 10-fold higher than for the 50- prediction residuals for IFT, tg(δ) and acidity. The
100 MVA range. This result demonstrates the importance prediction time window ranges between 1-5 years.
of the proposed HF integrating data from different BUs
Paper n° 995
The table below it shows different quantiles of the before an intervention was performed is shown in the
prediction absolute residuals for different prediction time next plot; in red, the corresponding CDF. The plot shows
windows. The values are presented as a percentage of the that one can interpret the KPI as a metric of oil
typical range amplitude of each quantity. The typical degradation, since the samples right before an
ranges amplitude are: 34.32 for the IFT , 0.348 for tg(δ) intervention tend to correspond to high values of the KPI.
and 0.744 for the acidity. As expected the error increases With this plot, we can attribute an actionable meaning to
with longer prediction time windows. It is important to the KPI value, e.g.: “40% of the interventions were
Fig. 7 IFT, tg(δ) and Acidity prediction residuals counts and empirical CDF.
Fig. 6 Residuals for IFT, tg(δ) and Acidity predictions (% of typical range amplitude).
refer that the prediction quality does not heavily performed before the KPI reached a value of 20”.
deteriorate for a five year windows and that actions may
be still be planned based on these.
ACTIONABLE INSIGHTS
The main objective of the proposed HF is to derive
actionable insights from the high accuracy forecasts and
act in accordance to them. In this section, we demonstrate
how we leveraged the predictions of the oil properties,
presented in the previous section, and used them to create
an actionable metric. Fig. 8 CDF and KDE estimated distribution of the KPI values
immediately prior to an oil intervention.
Paper n° 995
REFERENCES
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the colleagues from the
LABELEC laboratory for the useful discussions and
exchange of ideas. We would also like to thank the
different EDP business units for their support, knowledge
sharing and openness. Finally, we would like to thank the
jungle.ai team for their contribution without which these
results would not haven been achieved.