Final of Final
Final of Final
Final of Final
TABLE OF CONTENT
ContentsPage
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................. 4
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4
1.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 4
Design data and material property .............................................................................................. 5
CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................................ 8
ROOF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ................................................................................................ 8
2.1 WINDLOAD ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ........................................................................... 8
2.1 Reference wind velocity ........................................................................................................ 9
2.2 Exposure coefficient:........................................................................................................... 10
2.3 External wind pressure ........................................................................................................ 10
2.3.1 External wind pressure coefficient ............................................................................... 13
1|Page
METTU UNIVERSITY
The internal wind pressure coefficient for closed building with internal partition and opening
............................................................................................................................................... 13
2.4 Distribution of wind pressure on roof ................................................................................. 15
2.5 Solid Slab Design for roof................................................................................................... 16
2.5.1 Depth determination ..................................................................................................... 17
2.5.2 Design load calculation ................................................................................................ 21
2.5.3 Moment Analysis .......................................................................................................... 22
2.5.4 Analysis of the irregular shaped slab cantilever on the roof ........................................ 24
2.5.5 Moment adjustment ...................................................................................................... 25
2.5.6 Reinforcement design for roof ...................................................................................... 33
2.5.7 Load Transfer ............................................................................................................... 36
Loads cannot remains on the slab but transferred to the beam in case of shear. The total load
cannot transferred to the beam as a shear and to apply this, the design load is multiplied by
some factors called shear coefficients. Shear coefficients are dependent on the support
condition and Ly/Lx ratio of the panel, which the load transferred ...................................... 36
Load transfer for cantilevers ......................................................................................................... 39
CHAPTER THREE ...................................................................................................................... 40
SLAB DESIGN ............................................................................................................................. 40
3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 40
3.1.1 Computation of Depth for deflection ...................................................................... 40
Reinforcement design ................................................................................................................ 98
Load transfer ............................................................................................................................... 103
Wall Load transfer ................................................................................................................... 109
2|Page
METTU UNIVERSITY
3|Page
METTU UNIVERSITY
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
3.1 1.1 GENERAL
Building structures are solids, which are composed of architectural and structural parts.
Structural engineering is the study of how varies component elements of building act together to
form a supportive structure and transmit forces down to foundation.
4|Page
METTU UNIVERSITY
The structural part of the building supports the body of the building preventing it from any
collapse or failure. Therefore, structural design involves the determination of the different
sections of the skeletal part of the building to make it stable and sustainable throughout its design
life.
A structural design executed in such a way that the building will remain fit with appropriate
degrees of reliability and in an economic way. It should sustain all the actions and influences
during execution and use. Therefore, structural design focuses on structural safety and
serviceability with due durability. It must also optimize the cost expended in building the
structure and maintenance.
This structural design executed based on the Ethiopian Building Code of Practice (EBCS)
prepared in 1995 E.C. This code follows the Limit State design approach. Limit state is a state
beyond which the structure no longer satisfies the design performance requirements. It consists
of two states namely Ultimate Limit and serviceability Limit states. Ultimate Limit states are
conditions related with collapse or states prior to structural failure. Its main concern is the safety
of structure and people. Serviceability Limit states are those associated to conditions beyond
which a structure does not accomplish specified service requirements. It is mainly concerned
about the function of construction works, comfort of people, and appearance.
The prime objective of design is structural safety and serviceability. In case the structure fails, it
must be in such a way it will minimize risks and casualty. It must extend the time for evacuation
of people inside a building. This requirement of structural design accomplished by the principle
called ductility. Ductility allows yielding of steel reinforcement prior to the collapse of the
building. Yielding of steel bars warns the start of failure of a structure or its part. Therefore,
structures design to be reinforced by certain percent to assure ductility mode of failure if it
happens.
This project is G+7 with no basement and mezzanine building is located in Adama town. The
building compartments consist of living rooms, shops, studio etc. Therefore, it designed
according to EBCS 1 to 8, 1995 to fulfill the required functions and services.
The structure was analyzed as space frame using SAP2000 and ETABS 9.6 to collect all the
actions for each structure Finally, the structural members such as roof, stairs, beams, columns,
footings are designed using limit state design approach stated in EBCS published in 1995.
1.2.1 Materials
5|Page
METTU UNIVERSITY
A. Concrete:
i. Class I work
6|Page
METTU UNIVERSITY
f 300
f = = = 260.87Mpa.
γ 1.15
For bar diameter equal to or greater than 16(≥ 16)
f 400
f = = = 347.83Mpa.
γ 1.15
E = 200Gpa
Seismic condition: Adama [Zone – 1]
7|Page
METTU UNIVERSITY
CHAPTER TWO
The characteristics of a roof are dependent upon the purpose of the building that it covers the
available roofing materials and the local traditions of construction and wider concepts of
architectural design and practiceand governed by local or national legislation.
Roofs divided as gable, hip, mansard, flat, butterfly and etc.in the case of our project the roof is
flat.
8|Page
METTU UNIVERSITY
9|Page
METTU UNIVERSITY
The wind pressure acting on the external surface of a structure obtained from:
Cpe: - Is the external pressure coefficient for buildings and individual parts of buildings
bu depend
on the size of the loaded area A.
Loaded are is the area of the structure, which produces the wind action in the section to be
calculated and as per the code Cpe it is given as;
10 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
b = 10.52m
e =min
2h = 2 ∗ 24 = 48m
Ze=h
e=10.52m
11 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Table 2 Area
zone Area(m2)
F1 0.882
F2 0.638
G 10.762
H 39.012
I 253.362
Roofinonedirections.
=3.085m
=1.234m
Cpe=Cpe,10whenA≥10m
12 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
2.5.1 The internal wind pressure coefficient for closed building with internal partition
and opening
Cpi=0.8forpressure
Cpi=-0.5forsuction
Externalwindpressure
We=qrefCe(Ze)Cpe=0.23571*1.236*Cpe=0.2914Cpe
Internalwindpressure
WI=qrefCe(Z)Cpi=.23571*1.236*Cpi=0.2914Cpi
Netwindpressure,Wnet=We - Wi = 0.2914(Cpe-Cpi)
F1 F2 G H I
Cpe -1.876 -1.876 -0.838 -0.7 0.2
Cpi 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
0.2914Cpe -0.54667 -0.54667 -0.24419 -0.20398 0.05828
0.2914Cpi 0.23312 0.23312 0.23312 0.23312 0.23312
Wnet -0.77979 -0.77979 -0.47731 -0.4371 -0.17484
Case 2; when internal pressure coefficient is positive and for zone I negative
Table 5 when internal pressure coefficient is positive and for zone I negative
F1 F2 G H I
Cpe -1.876 -1.876 -0.838 -0.7 -0.2
Cpi 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
0.2914Cp
e -0.54667 -0.54667 -0.24419 -0.20398 -0.05828
0.2914Cpi 0.23312 0.23312 0.23312 0.23312 0.23312
Wnet -0.77979 -0.77979 -0.47731 -0.4371 -0.2914
13 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Case 3; when internal pressure coefficient is negative and for zone I positive
F1 F2 G H I
Cpe -1.876 -1.876 -0.838 -0.7 0.2
Cpi -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5
0.2914Cpe -0.54667 -0.54667 -0.24419 -0.20398 0.05828
0.2914Cpi -0.1457 -0.1457 -0.1457 -0.1457 -0.1457
Wnet -0.40097 -0.40097 -0.09849 -0.05828 0.20398
Case 4; when internal pressure coefficient is negative and for zone I negative
Table 7 When Internal Pressure Coefficient Is Negative And For Zone I Negative
F1 F2 G H I
Cpe -1.876 -1.876 -0.838 -0.7 -0.2
Cpi -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5
-
0.2914Cpe 0.54667 -0.54667 -0.24419 -0.20398 -0.05828
0.2914Cpi -0.1457 -0.1457 -0.1457 -0.1457 -0.1457
-
Wnet 0.40097 -0.40097 -0.09849 -0.05828 0.08742
From all possible alternatives of net wind pressure, select the maximum values from both
positive and negative (suction) pressures;
14 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
wind distribution
wind
Axis A Area(m2) pressure(KN/m2) wind load(KN)
A-1 9.219 -0.77979 -7.18888401
A-2 6.517 -0.77979 -5.08189143
A-4 7.006 -0.77979 -5.46320874
A-5 14.184 -0.77979 -11.06054136
A-6 14.362 -0.77979 -11.19934398
A-7 14.362 -0.77979 -11.19934398
A-8 14.149 -0.77979 -11.03324871
A-9 5.19 -0.77979 -4.0471101
Along Axis-B
wind distribution
Axis B Area(m2) wind pressure(KN/m2) wind load(KN)
B-1 12.71 -0.77979 -9.9111309
B-2 16.051 -0.77979 -12.51640929
B-3 14.249 -0.77979 -11.11122771
B-4 18.241 -0.77979 -14.22414939
B-5 18.015 -0.77979 -14.04791685
B-6 18.241 -0.77979 -14.22414939
B-7 18.241 -0.77979 -14.22414939
B-8 8.787 -0.77979 -6.85201473
B-9 7.343 -0.77979 -5.72599797
15 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Along Axis-C
wind distribution
Axis Area wind pressure(KN/m2) wind load(KN)
C
C-1 4.643 -0.77979 -3.62056497
3.62056497
C-2 7.074 -0.77979 -5.51623446
5.51623446
C-3 7.234 -0.77979 -5.64100086
5.64100086
C-4 10.585 -0.77979 -8.25407715
8.25407715
C-5 10.454 -0.77979 -8.15192466
8.15192466
C-6 10.585 -0.77979 -8.25407715
8.25407715
C-7 4.02 -0.77979 -3.1347558
3.1347558
16 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
But, fyk=300
d≤0.85 (Le/Ba)
D=d1+15mm+10mm/2
D=d1+20mm
d2=d1- Ǿ
Where;
𝐟𝐲𝐤 𝐋𝐞
d≤ [(0.4+0.6( ) ]
𝟒𝟎𝟎 𝛃𝐚
𝐋𝐞
=0.85*
𝛃𝐚
=0.85*3980mm/37.5
= 90.21mm
=0.85*3940mm/35.314
17 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
=94.83mm
=0.85*4040mm/42.5
=80.8mm
=0.85*4040mm/37.5
=91.573mm
=0.85*2930mm/32.77
=80mm
=0.85*1723mm/35.5
=41.25mm
=0.85 *3130mm/37.3
=71.327mm
= 0.85*3980mm/39.6
=85.43mm
=0.85*3940mm/39.9
=84mm
18 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
=0.85*3980mm/39.9
=84.787mm
=0.85*1490mm/12
=105.54mm
=0.85*1490mm/11.92
=106.25mm
=0.85*1640mm/12
=116.16mm
=0.85*1640mm/11.694
=119.2mm
=0.85*3860mm/12
=120.12mm
=0.85*710mm/12
=50.292mm
19 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
=0.85*1260mm/11.094
=96.539mm
=0.85*1260mm/12
=89.25mm
=0.85*1260mm/11.094
=96.539mm
Finally from all depths which are calculated above select the governing one and;
d= 120.12mm
D=140.12mm
20 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
For cantilevers;
Table 12 Depth Determination for Cantilevers
Panel Ly Lx Ly/Lx Ba d(mm) D(mm) description
C1 3.98 1.49 2.671 12 105.54 125.54 One way
C2 3.94 1.49 2.644 12 105.54 125.54 One way
C3 4.04 1.49 2.711 12 105.54 125.54 One way
C4 4.04 1.49 2.711 12 105.54 125.54 One way
C5 4.04 1.49 2.711 12 105.54 125.54 One way
C6 2.93 1.49 1.966 11.92 106.25 126.25 one-way
C7 5.05 1.64 3.079 12 116.16 136.16 One way
C8 3.03 1.64 1.848 11.694 119.2 139.20 one-way
C10 4.14 3.86 1.073 12 120.12 140.12 one-way
C11 1.31 0.71 1.845 12 50.292 70.292 one-way
C12 1.74 1.26 1.381 11.094 96.539 96.539 one-way
C13 3.98 1.26 3.159 12 89.25 109.25 one-way
C14 4.04 1.26 3.206 12 89.25 109.25 one-way
C15 1.74 1.26 1.381 11.094 96.539 116.539 one-way
LL=0.5 KN/m2
LL=0.5 KN/m2
The design load of all panels becomes the same because the roof slab has the same;
service
depth
live load this tends the slab to have the same design load throughout all panels.
21 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Mi=iPdLx2 ,
MXS=αXSPdLx2
MXF=αXFPdLx2
MYS=αYSPdLx2
LY/LX=1.27 to get the value of for both longest and shortest spans of X and Y, we should have
to interpolate for 1.27 between 1.3 and 1.2 according to EBCS 1;
22 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
αXf=0.0415 αyf=0.0279
Mxs=0.0548*8.119KN/m2*3.982=7.048KNm
Mxf=0.0415*8.119KN/m2*3.982=5.337KNm
Mys=0.0365*8.119KN/m2*3.982=4.694KNm
Myf=0.0279*8.119KN/m2*3.982=3.584KNm
By following this procedure all moments are computed and tabulated as follow;
The design load (8.119 KN/m2) is the same for all panels but their difference is only in;
For panels
Panel Ly/Lx Lx2 αxs αxf αys αyf Mxs Mxf Mys Myf
S1 1.27 15.84 0.0548 0.0415 0.0365 0.0279 7.048 5.337 4.694 3.588
S2 1.28 15.523 0.0533 0.0419 0.0365 0.0279 6.717 5.281 4.6 3.516
S3 1.25 16.32 0.044 0.0335 0.032 0.024 5.83 4.439 4.24 3.18
S4 1.25 16.32 0.044 0.0335 0.032 0.024 5.83 4.439 4.24 3.18
S5 1.25 16.32 0.05 0.0375 0.039 0.0290 6.625 4.969 5.168 3.843
S6 1.723 8.585 0.0860 0.0643 0.047 0.036 5.994 4.482 3.276 2.509
S7 1.723 15.84 0.0395 0.03 0.0395 0.03 5.08 3.858 5.08 3.858
S8 1.27 9.8 0.0508 0.0381 0.039 0.03 4.042 3.031 3.103 2.387
S9 1.04 15.84 0.0392 0.0295 0.036 0.0274 5.041 3.794 4.63 3.524
S10 1.04 15.523 0.0325 0.0244 0.032 0.024 4.978 3.705 4.537 3.453
S11 1.01 15.84 0.0325 0.0244 0.032 0.024 5.08 3.781 4.63 3.524
S12 1.01 15.84 0.0445 0.0336 0.0437 0.0331 5.723 4.321 5.62 4.257
23 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
M=pl, = 0.8108
𝑀1 𝐿1
= = 0.8108
8108
𝑀2 𝐿2
Figure 3Yield line of cantilever
M1=0.8108M2
. .
θ1= =1.75θ2= =0.57
. .
Winternal = MθL
. ∆ . ∆
= +
. .
=1.788M1∆+6.77M
+6.77M2∆
=1.788*0.8108M2∆+6.77M2∆
24 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
=8.22 M2∆
WExternal=∫∫qA∆ =q∆ [((1.3*2.28*2/3) + (1.83*2.28/2) + (1.3*1.58/2)]
= q∆ [1.976+2.0862+1.027]
=5.0892 q∆
=59.844 ∆
WE=WI
8.22 M2∆=59.844 ∆
M2= 7.28KNm
M1=0.8108M2
=0.8108*7.28KNm
=5.03KNm
MD = ( )
B/n S1 and S7
ML=5.08kNm
. .
Ms=4.694kNm ∆M= *100= 7.598% < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj= = 4.887kNm
B/n S2 and S3
25 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
ML=6.717kNm
. .
Ms=5.83kNm ∆M= *100= 13.205% < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj= = 6.274kNm
B/n S3 and S4
ML=5.83kNm
. .
Ms=5.83kNm ∆M= *100= 0% < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj=5.83kNm
B/n S4 and S5
ML=6.625kNm
. .
Ms=5.83kNm ∆M= *100= 12% < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj= = 6.228kNm
B/n S5 and S6
ML=6.625kNm
. .
Ms=5.994kNm ∆M= *100=9.525% < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj= = 6.31kNm
B/n S7 and S8
ML=5.08kNm
. .
Ms=4.042kNm ∆M= *100= 20.433% >20%,
.
S7 S8
3.98 3.13
26 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
k =0.251 k =0.319
Madj= 5.08-0.44*1.038=4.623kNm or
B/n S8 and S9
ML=4.63kNm
. .
Ms=4.042kNm ∆M= *100= 12.7% < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj= =4.336kNm
ML=4.978kNm
. .
Ms=4.63kNm ∆M= *100= 6.991% < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj= = 4.804kNm
ML=4.978kNm
. .
Ms=4.63kNm ∆M= *100= 6.991% < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj= = 4.804kNm
ML=4.6kNm
27 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
. .
Ms=4.537kNm ∆M= *100= 1.37% < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj= = 4.569kNm
ML=5.62kNm
. .
Ms=4.63kNm ∆M= *100= 17.616 % < 20%, so take the average
.
Madj= = 5.125kNm
ML=5.80kNm
. .
Ms=4.24kNm ∆M= *100= 26.897% > 20%
.
∆M>20% the unbalanced moment is distributed based on stiffness without any carry over
Md = [ML- ( )]
∆M = ( )*100 k=
S11 S3
3.98m 4.04m
k= , =0.251 k= , =0.2475
. .
Madj= 5.8-0.504*1.56=5.01KNm or
28 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
ML=5.723
. .
Ms=4.24 ∆M= *100= 29.8 % > 20%
.
∆M = 5.723-4.24=1.483
S12 S4
3.98m 4.04m
k= , =0.251 k= , ==0.2475
. .
The adjustment is carried out using moment adjustment coefficients in accordance with the
provision of EBCS.
For S1 no need of adjustment why because the support moment increased rather than decreasing
this implies there is no moment flow to the field.
29 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Mxf=5.337kNm
Myf=3.588kNm
For S2 Ly/Lx=1.28
∆Mx=6.717-6.274=0.443kNm ∆My=4.6-4.569=0.031kNm
Cx1=0.362 Cy1=0.3528
Cx2=0.3276 Cy2=0.1424
For S3;Ly/Lx=1.25
Mxf=4.439kNm
Myf=3.18kNm
For S4 Ly/Lx=1.25
Mxf=4.439kNm
Myf=3.18kNm
For S5 Ly/Lx=1.25
Cx=0.3585 Cy=0.3528
30 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
∆Mx=6.625-6.31=0.315kNm
Mxfadj=0.3585*0.315+0.3528*0.315+4.969kNm=5.193kNm
For S6 Ly/Lx=1.723
Mxf=4.482kNm
Myf=2.509kNm
For S7 Ly/Lx=1.723
Cx1=0.362 Cy1=0.3528
Cx2=0.3276 Cy2=0.1424
For S8 Ly/Lx=1.27
Mxf=3.031kNm
Myf=2.387kNm
For S9 Ly/Lx=1.04
Cx=0.2936 Cy=0.3776
∆My=4.63kNm -4.336kNm=0.294kNm
31 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Cx=0.2834 Cy =0.3794
∆My=4.978kNm-4.804kNm =0.174kNm
For S12;Ly/Lx=1.01
Cx2=0.2834 Cy2=0.3794
For cantilevers no need of support moment adjustment. Mostly cantilevers has maximum amount
of moment than the moment encountered from side slab panels. Making adjustment between
these maximum moment differences creates;
high moment reduction from the cantilever side and
high increment in the panel side
32 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
This completely disrupt the moment, to control this disruption the maximum moment is selected
and reinforcement is provided.
33 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
S11 mys 5.125 120 0.00167 0.031 118.085 166.370 471.839 c/c300
34 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
C10 mxs 6.445 130 0.00167 0.034 127.774 193.355 405.988 c/c300
C11 mxs 5.081 130 0.00167 0.027 128.252 151.867 516.901 c/c300
C12 mxs 6.445 130 0.00167 0.034 127.774 193.355 405.988 c/c300
C13 mxs 6.445 130 0.00167 0.034 127.774 193.355 405.988 c/c300
C14 mxs 6.445 130 0.00167 0.034 127.774 193.355 405.988 c/c300
C15 mxs 6.445 130 0.00167 0.034 127.774 193.355 405.988 c/c300
35 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Loads cannot remains on the slab but transferred to the beam in case of shear. The total load
cannot transferred to the beam as a shear and to apply this, the design load is multiplied by some
factors called shear coefficients. Shear coefficients are dependent on the support condition and
Ly/Lx ratio of the panel, which the load transferred
In transferring the unfactored live load and dead load, transferred separately.
=0.44*0.5KN/m2*3.98m
=0.876KN/m
=0.36*0.5KN/m2*3.98m
=0.716KN/m
=0.44*8.119KN/m 2*3.98m
=14.218KN/m
Vxd =0.36*8.119KN/m2*3.98m
=11.633KN/m
36 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
=0.349*0.5KN/m2*3.98m
=0.784KN/m
=0.349*8.119KN/m 2*3.98m
=11.277KN/m
=0.437*0.5KN/m2*3.94m
=0.861KN/m
=0.351*0.5KN/m2*3.94m
=0.692KN/m
=0.437*8.119KN/m 2*3.94m
=13.979KN/m
Vxd =0.351*8.119KN/m2*3.98m
=11.228KN/m
=0.348*0.5KN/m2*3.94m
37 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
=0.685KN/m
=0.348*8.119KN/m 2*3.94m
=11.132KN/m
In Tabular form:
For panels
Table 16 load transferring for regular shaped panels
Pd
Panel Ly/Lx Shear Coefficient (LL) Pd (DL) Lx VLL VDL
S1 1.27 βVxc = 0.44 0.876 14.218
βVxd = 0.360 0.5 8.119 3.98 0.716 11.633
βVyc = 0.349 0.784 11.277
βVyd = - - -
S2 1.28 βVxc = 0.437 0.861 13.979
βVxd = 0.351 0.5 8.119 3.94 0.692 11.228
βVyc = 0.348 0.685 11.132
βVyd = - -
S3 1.25 βVxc = 0.404 0.816 13.251
βVxd = - 0.5 8.119 4.04
βVyc = 0.33 0.667 10.824
βVyd = -
S4 1.25 βVxc = 0.4 0.808 13.120
βVxd = - 0.5 8.119 4.04
βVyc = 0.33 0.667 10.812
βVyd = -
S5 1.25 βVxc = 0.48 0.970 15.744
βVxd = - 0.5 8.119 4.04
βVyc = 0.36 0.727 11.810
βVyd = 0.24 0.482 7.872
38 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
39 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
CHAPTER THREE
SLAB DESIGN
3.2 INTRODUCTION
There are two types of slabs based on the load transferring mechanisms. These are one
way and two-way slabs. If Ly/Lx>2 one-way and Ly/Lx≤2 two way where Ly is longer
span and Lx is shorter span.
One-way slab transmit their load in one direction while two-way slabs resist applied load
in two directions.
These types of slabs are composed of rectangular panels supported at all four edges by
beams and are stiff enough to be treated as unyielding.
The reinforcement bar, in one-way slab, main steel is provided along with short span only
and the load is transferred to two opposite supports and in two-way slab, main steel is
provided in both directions.
40 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Material used
c-25
s-300
But, fyk=300
𝑑 ≥ 0.4 + 0.6 ∗ ×
𝑑 ≥ (0.4 + 0.45) ×
𝑑 ≥ (0.85) ×
41 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
S12 partial 4040 3980 1.01 Two Way 39.9 84.79 104.8
C1 cantilever 3980 1490 2.67 One Way 12 105.54 125.5
C2 cantilever 3940 1490 2.64 One Way 12 105.54 125.5
C3 cantilever 4040 1490 2.71 One Way 12 105.54 125.5
C4 cantilever 4040 1490 2.71 One Way 12 105.54 125.5
C5 cantilever 4040 1490 2.71 One Way 12 105.54 125.5
C6 cantilever 2930 1490 1.96 One Way 11.92 106.25 126.3
C7 cantilever 5050 1640 3.08 One Way 12 116.17 136.2
C8 cantilever 3030 1640 1.847 One Way 11.694 119.21 139.2
C9 cantilever 3130 1780 1.76 One Way 11.52 131.34 151.3
C10 cantilever 2320 1780 2.32 One Way 12 126.08 146.1
Support Ly Lx
Panel condition (mm) (mm) Lx/Ly Slab type Ba d(mm) D
S1' Partial 5050 3980 1.27 Two Way 41.5 81.5 101.5
S2' Partial 5050 3940 1.28 Two Way 41.7 80.3 100.3
S3' Interior 5050 4040 1.25 Two Way 42.5 80.8 100.8
S4' Interior 5050 4040 1.25 Two Way 42.5 80.8 100.8
S5' partial 5050 4040 1.25 Two Way 37.5 91.6 111.6
S6' End span 5050 2930 1.723 Two Way 32.8 76.0 96.0
S7' partial 3980 3980 1.723 Two Way 38.7 87.4 107.4
S8' end span 3980 3130 1.27 Two Way 37.3 71.3 91.3
S9' end span 4140 3980 1.04 Two Way 39.6 85.4 105.4
S10' end span 3980 3940 1.01 Two Way 39.9 83.9 103.9
S11' end span 4040 3980 1.01 Two Way 39.9 84.8 104.8
S12 partial 4040 3980 1.01 Two Way 39.9 84.8 104.8
C1' cantilever 3980 1490 2.67 One Way 12.0 105.5 125.5
C2' cantilever 3940 1490 2.64 One Way 12.0 105.5 125.5
C3' cantilever 4040 1490 2.71 One Way 12.0 105.5 125.5
C4' cantilever 4040 1490 2.71 One Way 12.0 105.5 125.5
C5' cantilever 4040 1490 2.71 One Way 12.0 105.5 125.5
C6' cantilever 2930 1490 1.96 One Way 11.9 106.3 126.3
C7' cantilever 5050 1640 3.08 One Way 12.0 116.2 136.2
C8' cantilever 3030 1640 1.847 One Way 11.7 119.2 139.2
42 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
C9' cantilever 3130 1780 1.76 One Way 11.5 131.3 151.3
C10' cantilever 2320 1780 2.32 One Way 12.0 126.1 146.1
Ly Lx
Panel TYPE Lx/Ly Slab type Ba d(mm) D
(mm) (mm)
S1 Partial 5050 3980 1.27 Two Way 41.50 81.52 101.5
S2 Partial 5050 3940 1.28 Two Way 41.70 80.31 100.3
S3 Interior 5050 4040 1.25 Two Way 42.50 80.8 100.8
S4 Interior 5050 4040 1.25 Two Way 42.50 80.8 100.8
S5 partial 5050 4040 1.25 Two Way 37.50 91.57 111.6
S6 End span 5050 2930 1.723 Two Way 32.77 76 96
S7 partial 3980 3980 1.723 Two Way 38.70 87.42 107.4
S8 end span 3980 3130 1.27 Two Way 37.30 71.33 91.3
S9 end span 4140 3980 1.04 Two Way 39.60 85.43 105.4
S10 end span 3980 3940 1.01 Two Way 39.90 83.93 103.9
S11 end span 4040 3980 1.01 Two Way 39.90 84.79 104.8
S12 partial 4040 3980 1.01 Two Way 39.90 84.79 104.8
C1 cantilever 3980 1490 2.67 One Way 12.00 105.54 125.5
C2 cantilever 3940 1490 2.64 One Way 12.00 105.54 125.5
C3 cantilever 4040 1490 2.71 One Way 12.00 105.54 125.5
C4 cantilever 4040 1490 2.71 One Way 12.00 105.54 125.5
C5 cantilever 4040 1490 2.71 One Way 12.00 105.54 125.5
C6 cantilever 2930 1490 1.96 One Way 11.92 106.25 126.3
C7 cantilever 5050 1640 3.08 One Way 12.00 116.17 136.2
C8 cantilever 3030 1640 1.847 One Way 11.69 119.21 139.2
C9 cantilever 3130 1780 1.76 One Way 11.52 131.34 151.3
C10 cantilever 2320 1780 2.32 One Way 12.00 126.08 146.1
C11 cantilever 2320 1780 2.32 One Way 12.00 126.08 146.1
C12 cantilever 2320 1780 2.32 One Way 12.00 126.08 146.1
C13 cantilever 2320 1780 2.32 One Way 12.00 126.08 146.1
43 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
C14 cantilever 2320 1780 2.32 One Way 12.00 126.08 146.1
C15 cantilever 2320 1780 2.32 One Way 12.00 126.08 146.1
Note: Unit weight for RC slab 𝛾=25 KN/m3 for C-25 Concrete.
Live load for different functions based on EBCS-1
Room functions and their furnishing materials
Table 22 room functions and the corresponding finishing materials
44 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Shop D D1 5 KN/m2
Corridor C C3 5 KN/m2
Since an individual panel might have different purpose (function) and finishing material, we
might encounter different live load and dead load in a single panel. In such cases, we used the
maximum value as a governing dead load or live load for that panel.
𝑃𝐷 = 1.3𝐷. 𝐿 + 1. 6𝐿. 𝐿
Design Dead Load and Live Loads for each Panel
45 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Pd =1.3DL+1.6LL
=1.3*5.61+1.6*5=15.3KN/𝑚
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 2, 3 (S2, S3): partition wall:
. ∗ .
=1.18KN/𝑚
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 4 (S4): partition wall:
. ∗ .
= 0.23𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
46 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 5 (S5): partition wall:
. ∗ .
=0.242𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
=1.3*5.852+1.6*5 = 15.61𝐾𝑁/𝑚
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 6 (S6): partition wall:
. ∗ .
=0.39𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6
=0.25𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For panel 8(S8): partition wall:
. ∗ .
= 0.23𝐾𝑁/𝑚
47 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For panel 9 (S9): partition wall: = 0.31𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For panel 10 (S10): partition wall: = 0.23𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For panel 11 (S11): partition wall: = 0.26𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For panel 12 (S12): partition wall: = 0.18𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
48 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 1.51𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For C2: Partition wall: = 5.37𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 1.76𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For C3: Partition wall: = 5.31𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 1.75𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
49 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For C4 & C5: Partition wall: = 4.6𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 1.51𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For C6: Partition wall: = 7.26𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 2.38𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For C7: Partition wall: = 4.28𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 1.41𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
50 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For C8: Partition wall: = 7.04𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 2.31𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For C9: Partition wall: = 3.73𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 1.226𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For C10: Partition wall: = 3.87𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 1.27𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
51 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
2
panel Function dead load LL (KN/m2) Governing (KN/m2)Pd'= (KN/m )
S1 Shop 5.61 5 5 15.29
S2 Shop 6.33 5 5 16.23
S3 Shop 6.33 5 5 16.23
Shop 5 5
5.84 15.59
S4 Corridor 5
Shop 5 5
5.852 15.61
S5 Corridor 5
Shop 5 5
6.095 15.92
S6 Corridor 5
Shop 5 5
5.86 15.62
S7 Corridor 5
Shop 5 5
5.84 15.59
S8 Corridor 5
Shop 5 5
5.92 15.70
S9 Corridor 5
Shop 5 5
5.84 15.59
S10 Corridor 5
Shop 5 5
5.87 15.63
S11 Corridor 5
Shop 5 5
5.79 15.53
S12 Corridor 5
C1 Shop 11.72 5 5 23.24
C2 Shop 12.74 5 5 24.56
C3 Shop 12.66 5 5 24.46
C4 Shop 11.361 5 5 22.77
C5 Shop 11.361 5 5 22.77
C6 Shop 15.25 5 5 27.83
C7 Shop 12.19 5 5 23.85
C8 Shop 14.96 5 5 27.45
C9 Shop 10.566 5 5 21.74
C10 Shop 10.75 5 5 21.98
52 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
1.3*5.61+1.6*5=15.3KN/𝑚
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗
For panel 2 (S2); partition wall glass:
. ∗ .
=0.318KN/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 3 (s3): partition wall: . ∗ . =
= 0.637𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
53 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
1.3*5.61+1.6*5=15.3KN/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
1.3*5.61+1.6*5=15.3KN/𝑚
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 6 (S6): partition wall:
. ∗ .
= 1.339𝐾𝑁/𝑚
54 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
=1.3*5.61+1.6*5=15.3KN/𝑚
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 8(S8): partition wall:=
. ∗ .
=4.703𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
( ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 9 (S9): partition wall: = 0.234𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 10 (S10): partition wall:
. ∗ .
=2.587𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
55 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For panel 11 (S11): partition wall:
. ∗ .
=1.213𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
=1.3*5.61+1.6*5=15.3KN/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For C2: partition wall: = . ∗ . =1.404KN/m
56 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For C4: partition wall: = . ∗ . =1.404KN/m
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Since S1-S6 have the same load, they have the same partition wall they have the same dead load
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For C7: Partition wall: . ∗ . 5.46𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ ( . ∗ . ∗ ∗ . ∗ / )
For C8: Partition wall: = . ∗ . =9.35𝐾𝑁/𝑚
57 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ . ∗ . ∗ /
For C10: Partition wall: = 3.87𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
( . ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
Plastering: = 1.27𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
58 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
In tabular form
dead load 2
Pd'= (KN/m )
panel Function LL (KN/m2) Governing (KN/m2)
S1' Shop 5.61 5 5 15.29
S2' Shop 5.928 5 5 15.71
S3' Shop 6.247 5 5 16.12
S4' Shop 5 5
5.61 15.29
Corridor 5
S5' Shop 5 5
5.61 15.29
Corridor 5
S6' Shop 5 5
6.949 17.03
Corridor 5
S7' Shop 5 5
5.61 15.29
Corridor 5
S8' Shop 5 5
10.313 21.41
Corridor 5
S9' Shop 5 5
5.844 15.60
Corridor 5
S10' Shop 5 5
8.197 18.66
Corridor 5
S11' Shop 5 5
6.823 16.87
Corridor 5
S12' Shop 5 5
5.61 15.29
Corridor 5
C1' Shop 7.011 5 5 17.11
C2' Shop 7.011 5 5 17.11
C3' Shop 7.011 5 5 17.11
C4' Shop 7.011 5 5 17.11
C5' Shop 7.011 5 5 17.11
C6' Shop 7.011 5 5 17.11
C7' Shop 12.19 5 5 23.85
C8' Shop 14.96 5 5 27.45
C9' Shop 10.566 5 5 21.74
C10' Shop 10.75 5 5 21.98
59 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
RC slab = 4 KN/𝑚
= 2.551 KN/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
60 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
61 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
( . ∗ . ∗ . )∗ / )
For panel 10 (S10): Partition wall: = = 0.953𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
62 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
63 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
( . ∗ . ∗ . )∗ / )
For C7: Partition wall: = = 4.276𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
. ∗ ∗ . ∗ /
Cement screed: = 0.75𝐾𝑁/𝑚
. ∗ .
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
=4.289𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
64 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
( . ∗ . ∗ . )∗ / ) ( . ∗ ∗ . ∗ . ∗ / )
For C12, C15: Partition wall: =
. ∗ .
= 3𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
=6.317𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
= 6.335𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL
= 3𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Pd: 1.3DL+1.6LL
65 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
In tabular form
Table 26 2nd -7th floor load calculation
2
panel Function DL LL(EBCS) LL (KN/m2) PD (KN/m )
S1 living room 7.627 2 2 13.12
S2 Shop 8.161 5 2 13.81
S3 Shop 8.161 5 2 13.81
Shop 7.464 5
S4 Corridor 5 17.70
Shop 8.31 5
S5 Corridor 5 18.80
Shop 8.372 5
S6 Corridor 5 18.88
S7 Shop 7.9 5
Corridor 5 18.27
S8 Shop 7.27 2
Corridor 2 12.65
S9 Shop 5.63 2
Corridor 2 10.52
S10 Shop 6.563 2
Corridor 2 11.73
S11 Shop 7.513 2
Corridor 5 12.97
S12 Shop 6.724 2
Corridor 5 11.94
C1 Shop 6.753 4 4 15.18
C2 Shop 11.74 2 2 18.46
C3 Shop 11.889 2 2 18.66
C4 Shop 11.74 2 2 18.46
C5 Shop 13.29 2 2 20.48
C6 Shop 7.31 2 2 12.70
C7 Shop 9.886 2 2 16.05
C8 Shop 12.62 2 2 19.61
C9 Shop 5.47 5 5 15.11
C10 Shop 5.47 5 5 15.11
C11 Shop 9.759 4 4 19.09
C12 Shop 8.47 4 4 17.41
C13 Shop 11.787 2 2 18.52
C14 Shop 11.805 2 2 18.55
C15 Shop 8.47 4 4 17.41
66 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Case I: Moment Calculation for Two way slab using coefficient method
The first stage of design is to determine support and span moments for all panels.
The support and span moments are calculated as
𝑀𝑖 = 𝛼𝑖𝑃𝑑𝐿𝑥2 , EBCS-2, 1995, Page 108
Where Mi=Design moment per unite width of reference
𝑀 =𝛼 ∗ 𝑃𝑑 ∗ 𝐿𝑥
𝑀 =𝛼 ∗ 𝑃𝑑 ∗ 𝐿𝑥
𝑀 =𝛼 ∗ 𝑃𝑑 ∗ 𝐿𝑥
𝑀 =𝛼 ∗ 𝑃𝑑 ∗ 𝐿𝑥
αxs=0.0548, Mxs=15.3*3.982*0.0548=13.28KNm
αxf=0.0415, Mxf=15.3*3.982*0.0415=10.06KNm
αys=0.0365, Mys=15.3*3.982*0.0365=8.846KNm
αyf=0.0279, Myf=15.3*3.982*0.0279=6.762KNm
αxs=0.0533, Mxs=15.54*3.962*0.533=12.86KNm
67 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
αxf=0.0419, Mxf=15.54*3.962*0.0419=10.11KNm
αys=0.0365, Mys=15.54*3.962*0.0365=8.744KNm
αyf=0.0279, Myf=15.54*3.962*0.0279=6.73KNm
αxs=0.044, Mxs=16.32*3.132*0.044=11.16KNm
αxf=0.0335, Mxf=16.32*3.132*0.0335=8.5KNm
αys=0.032, Mys=16.32*3.132*0.032=8.12KNm
αyf=0.024, Myf=16.32*3.132*0.024=6.09KNm
Intabular form
68 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
69 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
For C1 Pd=23.236KN/m2
Lx=1.49
M=(Pd*LX2)/2=23.236KN/m2/2.22=25.79KNm
For C2 Pd=24.562KN/m2
Lx=1.49
M=(Pd*LX2)/2=24.562KN/m2/2.22=25.26KNm
For C3Pd=24.5KN/m2
Lx=1.49
M=(Pd*LX2)/2=24.5KN/m2/2.22=27.20KN/m
For C3 Pd=22.7KN/m2
Lx=1.49
M=(Pd*LX2)/2=22.7KN/m2/2.22=25.20KN/m
In tabular form
Table 28 first floor left cantilever moment calculation
Pd
Panel Lx Ly/Lx (KN/m2) Lx2 M
C1 1.49 2.67 23.236 2.22 25.79
C2 1.49 2.64 24.562 2.22 27.26
C3 1.49 2.71 24.5 2.22 27.20
C4 1.49 2.71 22.7 2.22 25.20
C5 1.49 2.71 22.7 2.22 25.20
C6 1.49 1.96 27.852 2.22 30.92
C7 1.64 3.08 23.87 2.69 32.11
C8 1.64 1.847 27.45 2.69 36.92
C9 1.78 1.76 21.74 3.17 34.46
C10 1.78 2.32 21.971 3.17 34.82
70 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
αxs=0.0548, Mxs=15.3*3.982*0.0548=13.28KNm
αxf=0.0415, Mxf=15.3*3.982*0.0415=10.06KNm
αys=0.0365, Mys=15.3*3.982*0.0365=8.846KNm
αyf=0.0279, Myf=15.3*3.982*0.0279=6.762KNm
αxs=0.0533, Mxs=15.706*3.962*0.533=12.99KN
αxf=0.0419, Mxf=15.706*3.962*0.0419=10.22KNm
αys=0.0365, Mys=15.706*3.962*0.0365=8.90KNm
αyf=0.0279, Myf=15.706*3.962*0.0279=6.80KNm
αxs=0.044, Mxs=16.122*3.132*0.044=11.6KNm
αxf=0.0335, Mxf=16.122*3.132*0.0335=8.83KNm
αys=0.032, Mys=16.22*3.132*0.032=8.44KNm
αyf=0.024, Myf=16.22*3.132*0.024=6.33KNm
In tabular form
71 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
72 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Lx=1.49m
Pd=17.114KN/m2
M=17.114*1.492/2=18.996KNm
Table 30 cantilever moments for first floor right
73 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
74 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
For cantilever
Table 32; moment calculation for 2nd-7th cantilever slabs
B/n S1 and S7
75 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
B/n S2 and S3
Ml=12.86 KNm Ms=11.16 KNm
. .
∆M= *100%= 13.22 < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 12.01KNm
B/n S3 and S4
Ml=11.2 KNm Ms=11.16 KNm
. .
∆M= *100%= 0.34% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 11.18 KNm
B/n 4 and S5
Ml=12.74 KNm Ms=11.2 KNm
. .
∆M= *100%= 12.09% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 11.97 KNm
B/n S5 and S6
Ml=12.74 KNm Ms=11.67 KNm
. .
∆M= *100%= 8.399% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 12.205 KNm
76 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
B/n S7 and S8
Ml=8.932 KNm Ms=7.762 KNm
. .
∆M= *100= 13.02% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 8.347 KNm
B/n S8 and S9
Ml=9.7 KNm Ms=7.762 KNm
. .
∆M= *100%= 19.979% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 8.731 KNm
77 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
∆M = 11.55-8.14=3.41
S12 S4
3.98m 4.04m
k= , =0.251 =0.2475
. .
12.01=0.85 KN.m
∆M’=12.86-12.01=0.85
Cx=0.3672, CY =0.3528 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.28
Mxf=10.11
Myf=6.73
78 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Mxdf=10.11+0.3672*0.85=10.42 KNm
Mydf=6.802+0.3328*0.85=7.03 KNm
For S3
No need of adjustment since the support moment increase in all direction
For S4
11.18=0.02 KN.m
∆M’=11.2-11.18=0.02
Cx=0.3585, CY =0.357 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.25
Mxf=8.58
Myf=6.11
Mxdf=8.58+0.3585*0.02=8.587 KN.m
Mydf=6.11+0.3357*0.02=6.117 KN.m
For S5
∆M’=12.74-11.2=1.54 KN.m
Cx=0.3585, CY =0.357 by interpolation uusing Ly/Lx = 1.25
Mxf=9.55
Myf=7.38
Mxdf=9.55+0.3585*1.54=10.11 KN.m
Mydf=7.38+0.3357*1.54=7.93 KN.m
79 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
For S6
No need of adjustment since the support moment increase in all direction
For S7
Mx’=8.932-8.347=0.585 KN.m
∆My’=8.932-8.89=0.042 KN.m
Cx1=0.38, CY1=0.28, Cx2=0.28, CY2=0.38 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1
Mxf=6.804
Myf=6.804
Mxdf=6.804 + (0.28*0.042) + (0.38*0.585) = 7.04 KN.m
Mydf=6.804 + (0.28*0.585) + (0.38*0.042) = 6.98 KN.m
For S8
No need of adjustment since the support moment increas
increase in all direction
For S9
∆M’=9.7-7.762=1.938 KN.m
Cx=0.3704, CY =0.256 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.04
80 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Mxf=8.06
Myf=7.46
Mxdf=8.06+0.3704*1.938=7.956 KN.m
Mydf=7.46+0.256*1938=8.778 KN.m
For S10
No need of adjustment since the support moment increase in all direction
For S11
And
∆Mx’=9.66-9.63=0.05 KN.m
∆My’=9.78-8.95=0.83 KN.m
Cx1=0.3776, CY1=0.274, Cx2=0.283, CY2=0.379 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.01
Mxf=7.43
Myf=7.935
Mxdf=7.43 + (0.3776*0.83) + (0.283*0.05) = 7.76 KN.m
Mydf=7.28 + (0.274*0.83) + (0.379*0.05) = 7.49 KN.m
For S12
And
∆Mx’=11.78-10.72=1.06 KN.m
9.831=1.719 KN.m
∆My’=11.55-9.831=1.719
Cx1=0.378, CY1=0.274, Cx2=0.283, CY2=0.379 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.01
Mxf=9.947
81 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Myf=8.85
Mxdf=9.947 + (0.378*1.06) + (0.283*1.719) = 9.947 KN.m
Mydf=8.85 + (0.274*1.06) + (0.379*1.719) = 9.633 KN.m
B/n S2 and S3
Ml=12.995
Ms=11.576
. .
∆M= *100= 10.91% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 12.285 kNm
B/n S3 and S4
Ml=11.576
Ms=10.987
. .
∆M= *100= 5.1% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 11.281 kNm
B/n S4 and S5
Ml=12.485
82 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Ms=10.987
. .
∆M= *100= 12% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 11.736 kNm
B/n S5 and S6
Ml=12.576
Ms=12.485
. .
∆M= *100= 0.729% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 12.53 kNm
B/n S7 and S8
Ml=10.657
Ms=8.746
. .
∆M= *100= 18% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 9.703 kNm
B/n S8 and S9
Ml=10.657
Ms=9.685
. .
∆M= *100= 10% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 10.171 kNm
83 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Ml=11.44
Ms=9.62
. .
∆M= *100= 15.9% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 10.53 kNm
∆M>20% the unbalanced moment is distributed based on stiffness without any carry over
Md = (ML − )
∆M = ( )*100
k=
∆M = 10.555-8.419=2.136
S11 S3
3.98m 4.04m
84 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
k= , =0.251 =0.2475
. .
∆M = 11.391-7.99=3.401
S11 S4
3.98m 4.04m
k= , =0.251 =0.2475
. .
∆M’=8.846-8.795=0.051 KN.m
CY=0.146, Cx=0.329 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.27
Mxf=10.058
85 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Myf=6.762
Mydf=6.762+0.051*0.146=6.769 KN.m
Mxdf=10.058+0.329*0.051=10.075 KN.m
For S2
12.285=0.71 KN.m
∆M’=12.995-12.285=0.71
Cx=0.3672, CY =0.3528 by interpolation usin
using Ly/Lx = 1.28
Mxf=10.215
Myf=6.802
Mxdf=10.215+0.3672*0.71=10.479 KN.m
Mydf=6.802+0.3328*0.71=5.062 KN.m
For S3
11.281=0.295 KN.m
∆M’=11.576-11.281=0.295
Cx=0.3585, CY =0.357 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.25
Mxf=8.814
Myf=6.314
Mxdf=8.814+0.3585*0.295=8.92 KN.m
Mydf=6.314+0.3357*0.295=6.419 KN.m
86 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
For S4
No need of adjustment since the support moment increase in all direction
For S5
11.736=0.749 KN.m
∆M’=12.485-11.736=0.749
Cx=0.3585, CY =0.357 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.25
Mxf=9.364
Myf=7.241
Mxdf=9.364+0.3585*0.749=9.632 KN.m
Mydf=7.241+0.3357*0.749=7.508 KN.m
For S6
12.53=0.046 KN.m
∆M’=12.576-12.53=0.046
Cx=0.464, CY =0.269 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.723
Mxf=9.403
Myf=5.265
Mxdf=9.403+0.464*0.046=9.424KN.m
Mydf=5.265+0.269*0.046=5.637 KN.m
For S7
No need of adjustment since the support moment increase in all direction
For S8
87 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
9.703=0.954 KN.m
∆M’=10.657-9.703=0.954
Cx=0.364, CY =0.354 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.27
Mxf=7.993
Myf=6.294
Mxdf=7.993+0.364*0.954=8.34 KN.m
Mydf=6.294+0.354*0.954=6.632 KN.m
For S9
No need of adjustment since the support moment increase in all direction
For S10
and
∆Mx’=11.44-10.53=0.91 KN.m
9.633=0.793 KN.m
∆My’=10.426-9.633=0.793
Cx1=0.378, CY1=0.274, Cx2=0.283, CY2=0.379 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.01
Mxf=8.518
Myf=7.935
Mxdf=8.518 + (0.378*0.91) + (0.283*0.2793) = 9.086 KN.m
Mydf=7.935 + (0.274*0.91) + (0.379*0.793) = 8.485 KN.m
For S11
88 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
9.479=1.706 KN.m
∆M’=10.555-9.479=1.706
Cx=0.283, CY =0.379 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.01
Mxf=7.856
Myf=7.322
Mxdf=7.856+0.283*1.706=8.161KN.m
Mydf=7.322+0.379*1.706=7.73
2+0.379*1.706=7.73 KN.m
For S12
And
9.704=1.686 KN.m
∆Mx’=11.39-9.704=1.686
10.505=0.885 KN.m
∆My’=11.39-10.505=0.885
Cx1=0.378, CY1=0.274, Cx2=0.283, CY2=0.379 by interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.01
Mxf=8.87
Myf=8.725
Mxdf=8.87 + (0.378*1.686) + (0.283*0.885) = 9.758 KN.m
Mydf=8.725 + (0.274*1.686) + (0.379*0.885) = 9.522 KN.m
89 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
B/n S2 and S9
Ml=10.272
Ms=6.786
. .
∆M= *100= 19.48% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 8.529 kNm
B/n S2 and S3
Ml=15
Ms=13.02
.
∆M= *100= 13.2% < 20%, so take the average
.
.
Madj= = 14.01kNm
B/n S3 and S4
Ml=13.02
Ms=12.713
. .
∆M= *100= 2.357 < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 12.866 kNm
90 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
. .
∆M= *100= 10.266% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 8.238 kNm
B/n S4 and S5
Ml=15.341
Ms=12.713
. .
∆M= *100= 20.38 > 20%, need adjustment
.
∆M=15.341-12.713=2.624
4.04 4.04
K=0.247 k=0.247
DF =0.5 DF=0.5
Adjusted moment=15.341-(2.624*0.5)=14.027
B/n S7 and 8
Ml=8.44
Ms=6.298
91 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
. .
∆M= *100= 25% > 20%, need adjustment
.
∆M=8.44-6.298=2.41
3.98 3.13
k=0.52 k=0.251
DF =0.67 DF=0.33
Adjusted moment =8.44-067*2.41=7.49KNm
B/n S8and S9
Ml=6.757
Ms=6.298
. .
∆M= *100= 7% < 20%, so take the average
.
. .
Madj= = 6.53 kNm
92 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
. .
∆M= *100= 1.47 % > 20%
.
. .
Madj= = 7.574 kN
kNm
Myf=5.795KNm
Mxf =8.62KNm
For S2
Since the moment is decrease in both direction so it need adjustment in both direction
Ly/Lx=1.28
∆Mxs=0.99
∆Mys=1.001
Cx1 = 0.3386 Cx2=0.3276
Cy1 = 0.3528 Cy2=0.357
Mxf= (0.3386*0.99) + (0.3276*1.001) +11.792=12.455KNm
93 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Ly/Lx=1.27
∆Mxs=0.154
∆Mys=0.486
Cx1 = 0.315 Cx2=0.3276
Cy1 = 0.1535 Cy2=0.1427
∆Mys=0.415 KNm
By interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.28
Cx=0.3315
CY =0.1535
Mxf=9.679
94 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Myf=6.934
Mxf=9.679+0.3315*0.415=9.819
9.679+0.3315*0.415=9.819 KNm
Myf=6.934+0.1535 *0.415=6.997 KNm
For S5
Since the support moment decrease in both direction Mxs support so Mxs field need
adjustment by the large change of Mxs
∆Mys=1.314 KNm
By interpolation using Ly/Lx = 1.25
Cx=0.3585
CY =0.357
Mxf=11.505
Myf=8.899
Mxf=11.505+0.3585*1.314=11.976 KNm
Myf=8.899+0.357 *1.314=9.368 KNm
For S6
Since the adjusted moment is increase in all direction no need of field, foment adjustment
For S7
Since the moment is decrease in both direction so it need adjustment in both direction
95 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Ly/Lx=1.723
∆Mxs=8.44-8.011=0.429KNm
8.011=0.429KNm
∆Mys=8.44-6.298=2.142KNm
Cx1 = 0.38 Cx2=0.28
Cy1 = 0.28 Cy2=0.380
For S9
Since the support moment decrease in Mys support so Mys field need adjustment
Ly/Lx=1.04
∆Mys=0.2295KNm
Cx = 0.3704
Cy = 0.256
Mxf= (0.3704*0.2295) + 5.37=5.95KNm
Myf=
f= (0.3704*0.2295) + 5.157=5.243KNm
96 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
For S10
Since the support moment decrease in Mys support so Mys field need adjustment
Ly/Lx=1.01
∆Mys=0.0675KNm
Cx = 0.3776
Cy = 0.274
Mxf= (0.274*0.0675) + 5.089=5.107KNm
Myf= (0.3776*0.0675) + 5.174=5.199KNm
For S8
Since the adjusted moment is increase in all direction no need of field, foment adjustment
For S12
Since the support moment decrease in Mys support so Mys field need adjustment
Ly/Lx=1.04
∆Mys=0.2295KNm
Cx = 0.3704
Cy = 0.256
Mxf= (0.3704*0.2295) + 5.37=6.355KNm
Myf=
yf= (0.3704*0.2295) + 5.157=6.271KNm
97 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
All the reinforcement is design in a tabular form for all slabs as follow
I) for first floor left
98 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
99 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
100 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
101 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
102 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
LOAD TRANSFER
The live and dead Loads on the slab does not remains on the slab. Transferred to the beams in
case of shear force. The total load cannot transferred to the beam as shear. This is maintained by
the use of shear coefficients. Shear coefficients are dependent on the span ratio and support
condition of the panels. For the cantilevers the load is transferred in terms of reactions. Because
the load is assumed as to transferred in one direction for one-way cantilevers.
Shear
Panel Ly/Lx Coefficient Pd (LL) Pd (DL) Lx VLL VDL
S1 1.27 βVxc = 0.44 8.756 9.824
βVxd = 0.194 5 5.61 3.98 3.861 4.331
βVyc = 0.349 6.945 7.792
βVyd = - - -
S2 1.28 βVxc = 0.437 8.610 9.986
βVxd = 0.351 5 5.8 3.94 6.915 8.021
βVyc = 0.348 6.856 7.952
βVyd = - -
S3 1.25 βVxc = 0.404 8.161 9.467
βVxd = - 5 5.8 4.04
βVyc = 0.33 6.666 7.732
βVyd = -
103 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Shear Pd
Panel Ly/Lx Coefficient Pd (LL) (DL) Lx VLL VDL
S1 1.27 βVxc = 0.44 8.756 9.824
βVxd =
0.360 5 5.61 3.98 7.164 8.03801
βVyc =
0.349 6.945 7.792
βVyd = - - -
S2 1.28 βVxc = 0.437 8.61 10.207
βVxd =
0.351 5 5.928 3.94 6.915 8.198
βVyc =
0.348 6.856 8.128
βVyd = - -
S3 1.25 βVxc = 0.404 8.161 10.196
βVxd = - 5 6.247 4.04
βVyc = 0.33 6.666 8.329
βVyd = -
S4 1.25 βVxc = 0.4 8.06 9.066
βVxd = - 5 5.61 4.04
βVyc = 0.33 6.666 7.479
βVyd = -
S5 1.25 βVxc = 0.48 8.686 10.879
βVxd = - 5 5.61 4.04
βVyc = 0.36 7.272 8.159
βVyd = 0.24 4.848 5.439
S6 1.723 βVxc = 0.566 8.292 11.524
105 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
βVxd =
0.322 5 6.949 2.93 4.72 6.556
βVyc = 0.4 5.86 8.144
βVyd = 0.26 3.81 5.294
S7 1 βVxc = 0.365 7.264 8.15
βVxd =
0.295 5 5.61 3.98 5.871 6.587
βVyc =
0.365 7.264 8.15
βVyd =
0.295 5.871 6.587
S8 1.27 βVxc = 0.434 6.792 14.009
βVxd = - 5 10.313 3.13
βVyc = 0.36 5.634 11.621
βVyd = 0.24 3.756 7.747
S9 1.04 βVxc = 0.376 7.482 8.745
βVxd =
0.257 5 5.844 3.98 5.015 5.978
βVyc = 0.36 7.164 8.373
βVyd = -
S10 1.01 βVxc = 0.363 7.151 11.724
βVxd = - 5 8.197 3.94
βVyc = 0.36 7.092 11.627
βVyd = 0.24 4.728 7.751
S11 1.01 βVxc = 0.364 7.244 9.885
βVxd =
0.243 5 6.823 3.98 4.836 6.599
βVyc = 0.36 7.164 9.776
βVyd = -
S12 1.01 βVxc = 0.404 8.04 9.02
βVxd =
0.263 5 5.61 3.98 5.234 5.872
βVyc = 0.4 7.96 8.931
βVyd = 0.26 5.174 5.805
For cantilever
106 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
Shear
Panel Ly/Lx Coefficient Pd (LL) Pd (DL) Lx VLL VDL
βVxc = 0.44 3.502 13.360
βVxd = 0.360 2.866 10.928
βVyc = 0.349 2.780 10.590
S1 1.27 βVyd = - 2 7.627 3.98 - -
βVxc = 0.437 3.443 13.413
βVxd = 0.351 2.766 10.773
βVyc = 0.348 2.742 10.681
S2 1.28 βVyd = - 2 7.79 3.94 -
βVxc = 0.404 3.260 12.710
βVxd = -
βVyc = 0.33 2.664 10.386
S3 1.29 βVyd = - 2 7.953 3.9
βVxc = 0.4 3.232 12.060
βVxd = -
βVyc = 0.33 2.666 9.950
S4 1.3 βVyd = - 2 8.116 3.86
βVxc = 0.48 8.686 14.440
βVxd = -
βVyc = 0.36 7.272 12.086
S5 1.31 βVyd = 0.24 2 8.279 3.82 4.848 8.057
βVxc = 0.566 8.292 13.884
βVxd = 0.322 4.720 7.900
βVyc = 0.4 5.860 9.812
S6 1.32 βVyd = 0.26 2 8.442 3.78 3.810 6.778
βVxc = 0.365 2.905 11.480
βVxd = 0.295 2.350 9.280
βVyc = 0.365 2.905 11.480
S7 1.33 βVyd = 0.295 2 8.605 3.74 2.350 9.280
S8 1.34 βVxc = 0.434 2 8.768 3.7 2.720 9.880
107 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
βVxd = -
βVyc = 0.36 2.250 8.190
βVyd = 0.24 1.502 5.460
βVxc = 0.359 2.860 9.210
βVxd = 0.283 2.250 7.262
βVyc = 0.345 2.750 8.850
S9 1.35 βVyd = - 2 8.931 3.66
βVxc = 0.333 2.624 10.660
βVxd = -
βVyc = 0.33 2.600 10.570
S10 1.36 βVyd = - 2 9.094 3.62
βVxc = 0.333 5.004 9.960
βVxd = -
βVyc = 0.33 4.960 9.867
S11 1.37 βVyd = - 2 9.257 3.58
βVxc = 0.387 3.080 10.360
βVxd = 0.263 2.094 7.040
βVyc = 0.384 3.060 10.276
S12 1.38 βVyd = 0.252 2 9.42 3.54 2.006 6.740
Foe cantilever
108 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
3.4
3.5 WALL LOAD TRANSFER
Load of the wall, which exist on the axis of the beam transfer directly to the beam as a weight.
=Length*height*thickness*γhcb
109 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
2.72 0.006 23
Glass
cantileve 2.72 0.02 23
1.35 1.55 1.090
r plastering
0 0 0
wall
cantileve 2.72 0.1 14
1.35 1.55 5.496
r plastering
axis 2.72 0.02 23
14 wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n D-E 3.05 5.05 6.111
plastering
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n D-E 3.36 5.05 6.732
plastering
axis 2.72 0.02 23
16 wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n E-F 3.56 3.98 9.051
plastering
2.72 0.02 23
wall
axis 2.72 0.2 14
b/n E-F 3.56 3.98 9.051
17 plastering
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.2 14
axis plastering
b/n E-F 1.36 1.56 8.058
19 2.72 0.02 23
ceramic
2.72 0.006 23
wall
cantileve 2.72 0.2 14
1.46 1.66 8.899
r plastering
2.72 0.02 23
Glass
axis D
2.72 0.02 23
b/n 14-15 2.48 4.04 0.768
plastering
0 0 0
Glass
b/n 16-17 3.64 4.04 1.127
2.72 0.02 23
110 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
plastering
0 0 0
Glass
2.72 0.02 23
b/n 17-18 2.79 4.04 0.864
plastering
0 0 0
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 12-13 2.32 3.13 7.500
plastering
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.2 14
plastering
b/n 13-14 0.74 4.14 2.473
2.72 0.02 23
Glass
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.2 14
plastering
b/n 14-15 1.5 3.98 2.136
2.72 0.02 23
axis E
Glass
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.1 14
b/n 15-16 1.3 4.04 2.031
plastering
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 17-18 3.64 4.04 9.117
plastering
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 18-19 1.73 2.93 5.974
plastering
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.2 14
axis F b/n 11-17 20.86 23.26 9.074
plastering
2.72 0.02 23
111 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
length of the
location height(m) thickness(m) γ(KN/m3) length beam load
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 0 5.05 0
wall
axis 1
2.72 0.2 14
b/n B-C
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.37 3.98 3.483
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.53 1.73 8.9486
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 3.27 5.05 6.5519
axis 2
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.53 1.53 10.118
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n B-C
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.99 3.98 5.0592
axis 3
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.58 1.78 8.9815
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 3.05 5.05 6.1111
axis 4
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.36 1.56 8.8212
wall
axis 5 b/n A-B
2.72 0.2 14 2.4 5.05 4.8087
112 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
plastering
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n B-C
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.99 3.98 5.0592
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.006 23 0.62 1.36 3.8142
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 2.89 5.05 5.7905
wall
2.72 0.2 14
axis 7 b/n B-C
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 0.74 3.98 1.8813
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.36 1.56 8.8212
wall
2.72 0.2 14
axis 9 cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.006 23 1.36 1.56 7.2941
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.45 1.65 8.8919
wall
2.72 0.1 14
b/n 1-2
plastering
axis A 2.72 0.02 23 1 3.98 1.5855
wall
2.72 0.1 14
plastering
b/n 4-5
2.72 0.02 23
ceramic
2.72 0.006 23 1.67 3.94 2.3035
b/n 5-6 wall 1.67 4.04 2.2465
113 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
2.72 0.1 14
plastering
2.72 0.02 23
ceramic
2.72 0.006 23
wall
2.72 0.1 14
plastering
b/n 6-7
2.72 0.02 23
ceramic
2.72 0.006 23 1.79 2.93 3.3201
wall
2.72 0.2 14
plastering
b/n 2-3
2.72 0.02 23
ceramic
2.72 0.006 23 2.77 3.13 8.1795
wall
axis B
2.72 0.1 14
b/n 4-5
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 0.8 3.98 1.2684
wall
2.72 0.1 14
b/n 5-6
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 0.8 4.04 1.2496
wall
0.9 0.1 14
b/n 1-6
plastering
0.9 0.02 23 17.22 19.22 1.8707
axis C
wall
0.9 0.1 14
b/n 6-7
plastering
0.9 0.02 23 2.74 4.04 3.67
114 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
) ) ) beam
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering 10.39
2.72 0.02 23 1.53 1.49 0
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n B-C
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 0.95 3.98 2.415
wall
0.9 0.1 14
cantilever
plastering
0.9 0.02 23 0.49 0.69 1.483
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.33 1.53 8.796
wall
2.72 0.2 14
axis 2 b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 3.65 5.05 7.313
wall
2.72 0.1 14
b/n B-C
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 2.3 3.98 3.647
wall
2.72 0.2 14
axis 3 b/n B-C
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 3.58 3.98 9.101
wall
Cantilever 2.72 0.2 14
1 plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.36 1.56 8.821
wall
2.72 0.2 14
axis 4 b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 3.05 5.05 6.111
wall
2.72 0.1 14
cantilever 2
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.16 1.26 5.810
115 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever 1
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.36 1.56 8.821
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 2.66 5.05 5.330
wall
axis 5
2.72 0.2 14
plastering
b/n B-C
2.72 0.02 23
ceramic
2.72 0.006 23 3.58 3.98 8.314
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever 2
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.06 1.26 8.512
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever 1
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.36 1.56 8.821
wall
2.72 0.2 14
axis 6 b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 3.31 5.05 6.632
wall
2.72 0.1 14
cantilever 2
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.26 1.26 6.310
wall
2.72 0.1 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 2.19 1.56 8.859
wall
axis 7 2.72 0.1 14
b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 2.21 5.05 2.762
wall
b/n B-C 2.72 0.2 14
plastering 3.58 3.98 9.101
116 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
2.72 0.02 23
wall
2.72 0.1 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.36 1.56 5.501
axis 8
wall
2.72 0.1 14
b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.28 5.05 1.599
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.36 1.56 8.821
axis 9
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n A-B
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 3.31 5.05 6.632
wall
2.72 0.2 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.45 1.55 9.466
axis A
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 1-2
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 2.81 5.05 5.630
wall
2.72 0.1 14
cantilever
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.45 1.65 5.546
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 2-3
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.74 3.13 5.625
axis B
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 3-4
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 3.74 4.14 9.141
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 4-5
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.87 3.94 4.802
117 | P a g e
METTU UNIVERSITY
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 5-6
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.73 4.04 4.333
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 6-7
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 3.64 4.04 9.117
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 1-2
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 2.1 3.98 5.339
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 2-3
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.55 3.13 5.011
axis C
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 3-4
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 1.5 4.14 3.666
wall
2.72 0.2 14
b/n 6-7
plastering
2.72 0.02 23 2.015 4.04 5.047
118 | P a g e