Election Review - XLII

Robert B. Sklaroff, M.D., F.A.C.P.
Medical Oncology/Hematology  Telephone: (215) 333-4900

Smylie Times Building - Suite #500-C  Facsimile: (215) 333-2023
8001 Roosevelt Boulevard  [email protected]
Philadelphia, PA 19152-3041 August 2, 2021
To: Distribution [Politicians, Media, Potentially-Interested Persons]

Re: Pennsylvania “Forensic Audit” of 2020 POTUS Election [PART XLII] – [“Double-Speak”]
{https://tinyurl.com/y7jth747}
In yesterday’s Memo [PART XL - https://tinyurl.com/nx4569s], it was noted that some PA State

Senators reportedly feel a fiscal-angel is needed [“We need someone who will commit millions of
dollars to foot the bill for the audits.”] to overcome Gov. Wolf’s suppression of any oversight, and
that the only remedy available is a meaningless gesture [“I’m told the senate’s next move is to
block the secretary’s official appointment in September over this issue.”] This is the posture that
a RINO/GOPe adopts instead of actively opposing an obvious power-grab, to wit:
The major roadblock to the audit may be insurmountable. Wolf acting Secretary
of State decertifying the voting machines if an audit is conducted is outrageous
but I’m told legal and would cost [each of PA’s 67 counties] millions of dollars.
Republican county commissioners have begrudgingly refused to do audits now bc
of this.
Overnight, it was learned that an op-ed had been published [https://tinyurl.com/7zkcujpc] on

JULY 29, 2021 that explicitly had addressed this legal concern [“Evolving Past Hypocrisy – Public
Officials Open the Gateway to Liberty’s Destruction”] composed BY PHILL KLINE; FTA:
And now today we have the Pennsylvania Department of State threatening local
election officials who choose to participate in a legislative audit of the election.
The Department issued a directive on July 9, demanding boards of elections
refuse any third-party access to examining the election “system or system
components.”
In context, the Pennsylvania Department of State, whose only power to manage

elections comes through authority granted to it by the state legislature, is
ordering local election officials to refuse cooperation with the state legislature.
“Such access by third parties undermines chain of custody requirements and
strict access limitations…jeopard[izing] the security and integrity of the systems”
came the official word.
Such claims are particularly stunning for two reasons.
First, the order violates a key requirement that elections must be transparent in
order to be free and fair. Pennsylvania’s unelected secretary of state is denying
the elected leaders of the state access to election information.
Second, the Department entered into an unprecedented contract with the
private nonprofit organization Rock the Vote, allowing the group front-end access
to Pennsylvania’s electronic poll books during the 2020 election. Rock the Vote,
in turn, licensed that access to more than 60 politically-left activist organizations
who were able to electronically manipulate voter registration rolls before and
during the election.
Taken together, the Pennsylvania Secretary of State is allowing private leftist

organizations improper electronic access to sensitive personal data while denying
access to the people’s representatives.
Elected officials often engage in hypocrisy such as these cases. It seems to be a

part of the human condition.
We are now, however, witnessing the left’s evolution past hypocrisy to

doublespeak, born of doublethink. George Orwell defines doublethink in 1984 as
“holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting
them both.”
This can only be accomplished if truth is atomized in relativism such that the only
source of present relevant truth is the state, and the truth is thereby malleable
by the state to achieve its aim of “progress.”
Accordingly, we now have intolerance in the name of tolerance, cultural

hegemony in the cause of diversity, and an assault upon those who criticize
government in the cause of liberty. The ends justify the means, and any excessive
application of the power of the state is justified because the state is the only
arbiter of truth and fact.
Any nation desiring the full expression of individual liberty premised on the
recognition of the intrinsic value of all persons must be populated by individuals
willing to fight to protect the freedom of those with whom they disagree.
America will only reach the fullness of her “audacious claims” if Americans love
freedom more than they hate political opponents. The path to totalitarianism is
always paved by trading freedoms for political expediency, leading the populace
(which holds the true power in our Constitutional Republic) to become the
handmaidens of hypocritical public officials.
It would seem that, instead of rolling-over-and-playing-dead, this threat must be challenged. Eh?
“Someone” should confront Corman, the Dybbuk, with the prior demands (double-committee
activation subpoena-ing 67 counties ASAP) along with a request for clarification of his official
reaction [beyond the Epoch Times quote] to this affront, to wit, whether it is to be LITIGATED.
[To clarify a prior reference, know that the PA-GOP’s attorney is Amistad attorney & strategist
Tom King whose pending litigation (Butler v. Wolf) addresses the capacity of state governors to
promulgate unilateral executive orders. I spoke with him a month ago, and he seems to “get it.”]

Election Review - XLII

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Election Review - XLII

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Election Review - XLII

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Robert B. Sklaroff, M.D., F.A.C.P.

Medical Oncology/Hematology  Telephone: (215) 333-4900

To: Distribution [Politicians, Media, Potentially-Interested Persons]

In yesterday’s Memo [PART XL - https://tinyurl.com/nx4569s], it was noted that some PA State

Overnight, it was learned that an op-ed had been published [https://tinyurl.com/7zkcujpc] on

In context, the Pennsylvania Department of State, whose only power to manage

Such claims are particularly stunning for two reasons.

Taken together, the Pennsylvania Secretary of State is allowing private leftist

Elected officials often engage in hypocrisy such as these cases. It seems to be a

We are now, however, witnessing the left’s evolution past hypocrisy to

Accordingly, we now have intolerance in the name of tolerance, cultural

You might also like