Drive For Pay of Reel
Drive For Pay of Reel
Drive For Pay of Reel
drive system
Michael L. Eikenberry and Kenneth D. Brink
Packaging ordered a fully digital ac sectional drive for 1. Totally enclosed ac motors in winder drive system
the rebuild of a paper machine and winder scheduled for
late 1989. The winder rebuild was the first U.S. instal-
lation of an ac-driven unwind backstand.
The ac drive was selected because
The ac-drive option was the most advanced drive-control
technology available.
Totally enclosed fan cooled (TEFC) and totally enclosed
air over (TEAO) ac induction motors offered a rugged
and reliable alternative to the dc motors used previously
for machine drive applications. These types of ac motors
do not require ductwork for cooling air.
Most troubleshooting and tune-up work is carried out
in the drive-control room through computer interface
devices.
The ac drive has additional advantages. For example,
the ac braking generator does not have the commutation
problems that plague dc drive motors (brush sparking in
a weak field). When stall tension is held at zero speed in
a dc drive, the commutator is heated unevenly, which could
lead to permanent damage (raised commutator bars). The commonly expressed as the difference per unit of
ac motor does not have this problem. In the dc drive, field synchronous speed.
flux control must be generated in the control system. This
is not necessary in the ac drive, since field flux control s = (nsyn
- n)/n,,
is already in the motor algorithm. Another important
advantage of the ac drives is improved power utilization. where
The ac system typically operates near unity power factor s = slip
and 95% efficiency. Figure 1 is a photograph of the ac
motors used to drive the winder. ns, = synchronous speed
n = rotor speed
Theory of ac-drive motors
In a squirrel-cage machine, when the slip is positive it
A term frequently used in ac-drive technology is “slip.” acts as a motor while at negative slip it acts as a generator.
Slip is defined as the difference in speed between the The waveforms for the stator field and the rotor field are
synchronous speed and the actual rotor speed (1).This is shown in Fig. 2. If the rotor field is lagging the stator
field, then the machine is motoring. Conversely, if the rotor
field is leading the stator field, then the machine is
generating.
~ ~~ ~
is going faster than the magnetic field, the rotor is being squared (speed). This is usually of little significance for
held back, and the machine is generating. Thus, for the braking generators, since the required overload is greatly
ac machine to go from motoring to generating, the reduced a t smaller diameters with low inertia.
frequency of the stator must be reduced. No current Computers have simplified the task of designing ac
reversal or dead band is involved, as is the case in a dc motors to meet the needs of variable-speed drives. With
machine. This is why ac motors provide such smooth the advent of high-speed digital microprocessor control,
operation in unwind applications. When the rotor is at the performance of an ac vector-controlled drive is
synchronous speed, the machine draws a minimum equivalent to or better than the dc drive, with a steady-
current. As the slip increases in either direction, the state speed accuracy of & 0.01%of top speed.
current begins to increase rapidly but smoothly without Scalar-controlled ac drives are commonly used in “stand
any discontinuity. alone”-type applications or for applications requiring less
The torque is proportional to the magnetic flux density accuracy. In scalar control, motor speed is controlled by
in the machine air gap. The torque of an adjustable-speed adjusting the supply frequency. The actual speed of the
ac motor is controlled by controlling the flux density over motor depends on the load, since the slip varies with load.
the operating frequency range. Flux density can be Most modern ac motors are designed to have a low slip,
controlled with vector control. The ac current (fundamen- and as a result there is not much speed change with load
tal) is a vector quantity with two components, a reactive variation (typical slip values are 1-3%).The performance
component and a real component. The reactive component of a drive with scalar control can be improved through
is used to produce the flux, while the real component a variety of techniques, such as output voltage boost a t
produces the torque or power required to overcome the low frequency, slip compensation (usually above 15%of
load. A digital tachometer is required for speed control synchronous speed), torque control (above 10%of synchro-
as well as computation of slip. Flux in our previous dc nous speed), and speed control with tachometer.
drive was controlled by separate shunt-field excitation. Scalar-controlled drives are the ac equivalent of a
Because the machine is a highly inductive load, the voltage-regulated de drive, while vector-controlled drives
impedance increases directly with applied frequency. If are analogous to the accurate speed-regulated digital dc
the machine is to be operated in a constant-torque mode, drive.
the voltage must be increased in proportion to the increase
in frequency to maintain a constant volts per hertz. This Winder specification
constant-torque mode is similar to a dc motor operating
below base speed (variable armature voltage). The winder selected for this installation was the Belwind
If the ac machine operates with a constant voltage while SF manufactured by the Beloit Corp. The winder was
the frequency is increased, the volts per hertz ratio is no constructed to meet the specifications listed in Table I.
longer constant. In this case, the air-gap flux decreases, Table I1 lists the winder drive data, including roll
as does the torque. This mode of operation is known as diameters, RDC (recommended drive capacity) power,
the weak-field mode, and the machine can produce motor and roll rpm, and other electrical motor data.
constant horsepower in this range. A word of caution is
in order concerning the breakdown torque in the constant-
horsepower range. As the flux is reduced, the breakdown
torque is reduced inversely proportional to the flux
iH
I
I
Total -1018 hp
and load. Using this power factor, the -760-kW load application, a 540-kVA TBU was selected. This is 160 kVA
requires an ac input of -776 kVA. With a motor efficiency less than calculated for the worst-case E-stop condition.
of 95% (acting as a generator) and an inverter efficiency The selection was based on the use of a standard TBU.
of 95%,the actual supply requirement drops to -700 kVA. The only way to limit the amount of power returned to
During actual operation, the line supply equipment will the dc bus is to set limits a t each inverter. For this
handle less than -760 kW of power, as this value was application, the braking-generator power limits were set
conservatively calculated using a full parent roll as well a t 160%, while the winder drums were set a t 140%for
as a full set on the drums. Because this is a regenerative motoring and less than 100%for regeneration. The torque
186 April 1991 Tappi Journal
5. Unwind torquekpeed requirements at roll for maximum sheet
ation. Using the same selection criterion as used for the
tension braking generator, a 540-kVA inverter was selected. Both
drums are identical.
8000 Based on an economic analysis, 460-V GTR inverters
were selected for the rider-roll motors and slitters.
’380i -----
-x\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Drive motors
Braking generator
\
\
The build-down ratio for this winder is about 6 to 1, and
so the braking generator has a large speed range. Figure
. ..
\
\
\
4 is a photograph of the braking generator. During normal
\
Conclusion
A mill that produces corrugating medium installed a fully
ac winder drive system, including the first U S . installa-
tion of an ac-driven unwind backstand. Winder perfor-
mance has met or exceeded the mill’s expectations,
indicating that adjustable-speed ac drives can be applied
to production winders.0
Literature cited
1. Cochran, P. L., Polyphase Induction Motors, Marcel Dekker,
N.Y., 1989, p. 62.
2. Winder power requirements, TIS 403-11, TAPPI PRESS,
Atlanta, 1982.
3. Eikenberry, M. L., and Brink, K. D., 1990 Engineering
Conference Proceedings, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, p. 45.
Received for review June 15, 1990.
Accepted Nov. 7,1990.
Presented at the TAPPI 1990 Engineering Conference.