PhIL CONSUMERS VS SOE

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Philippine Consumers Foundation, Inc. vs.

Secretary of Education, 153 SCRA 622

Facts: The DECS, as recommended by the Task Force on Private Higher Education
and through respondent Secretary issued Dep Order No. 37, a modification of  a
previous Department Order, authorizing the 10% to 15% increase in school fees.
Petitioner opposed and alleged in a petition that said order was issued without any legal
basis arguing that authority of DECS to regulate school fees does not always include
the power to increase the same.

Sec. 57 (3) of BP Blg. 232 (The Education Act of 1982), vests the DECS with the power
to regulate the educational system; and Sec. 70 of the same act grants the DECS the
power to issue rules which are likewise necessary to discharge its functions and duties
under the law.

The respondent Secretary maintains that the increase in tuition and other school fees is
urgent and necessary.

Issue: WON the fixing of school fees through department order by DECS is a valid
delegation of legislative power.

Held: Yes. Power granted to the educational department to regulate the educational
system includes the power to prescribe school fees. In the absence of a statue stating
otherwise, this power include the power to prescribe school fees. No other government
agency has been vested with the authority to fix school fees and as such, the power
should be considered lodged with the DECS.

You might also like