Should Monetary and Fiscal Policymakers Try To Stabilize The Economy?
Should Monetary and Fiscal Policymakers Try To Stabilize The Economy?
Should Monetary and Fiscal Policymakers Try To Stabilize The Economy?
Left on their own, economies begin to fluctuate. When households and businesses scale back
on investment, overall demand for goods and services falls. A contraction of this magnitude
has little economic value to society. Workers who lose their employment as a result of falling
aggregate demand would choose to live. The advancement of macroeconomic theory has
shown to policymakers how to lessen the severity of economic volatility. The economic
slump is a waste of money, and people who are laid off would rather have been making
quality products and selling them for a profit. It is a boom-bust phenomenon, and there is no
need for humanity to struggle through the booms and busts of the cycle.
In theory, monetary and fiscal policy should be used to balance the economy, but in reality,
both policies face significant challenges. Many reports find that monetary policy reforms
have no impact on aggregate demand until around six months after they are implemented. A
big reform in fiscal policy will take years to propose, approve, and execute. Very many,
politicians attempting to balance the economy unwittingly escalate economic volatility, as
seen in the 1930s, the authors argue. The authors conclude that policymakers must anticipate
the economic circumstances that will prevail as their decisions take place, which is difficult
to predict. The author concludes that policymakers can unintentionally amplify rather than
minimise the severity of economic fluctuations. The economists argue that all of history's big
economic fluctuations, including the Great Depression, can be traced back to destabilising
legislative decisions, such as those implemented by the United States government in the
1920s and 1930s.
As John Maynard Keynes wrote The General Theory of Employment and Money in the
aftermath of the Great Depression, the 1930s were the greatest economic crisis in US history.
Since then, analysts have maintained that the primary issue during recessions is insufficient
aggregate demand. When the central bank lowers interest rates, it lowers the cost of credit to
fund construction schemes such as new plants and higher house costs, which directly
contributes to aggregate demand. The Fed cannot lower interest rates and people would rather
save their cash than sell it at a negative interest rate. Turning to monetary policies to
maximise the government's capacity to slash taxes is the most important weapon for boosting
the economy. The central bank cannot limit the amount of money spent by the government
unless it raises the number of individuals who are unable to purchase it. The government is
unable to reduce its spending on basic products and services, which raises demand for
government-issued goods. The more customers who purchase it, the more money it spends.
Tax reductions have a major impact on both overall demand and aggregate supply. One of
Kennedy's main economic initiatives was a tax cut, which was finally signed into law by
President Johnson in 1964. When Reagan became president in 1981, he also signed major tax
cuts into law. With increased aggregate supply, the output of goods and services will rise
without increasing the rate of inflation. It is unclear if the government will spend money
wisely and prudently during recessions.