Human Acts and Responsibility
Human Acts and Responsibility
Human Acts and Responsibility
Learning Objectives:
At the end of the lesson, the learners are expected to;
a. Define human act, act of man, and responsibility,
b. Distinguish the difference between human act and act of man,
c. Identify the different factors that affects the deliberation of human acts,
d. Classify the twelve stages of human act.
A human act is defined as an act done with full knowledge and full deliberation. Any act
done without full knowledge and full deliberation is called Act of Man. Responsibility is
consequent upon human acts but not acts of man. The degree of responsibility depends on the
degree of knowledge and deliberation. Factors that affects knowledge and deliberation will
therefore affect responsibility.
1. Ignorance
Absence of knowledge affects responsibility and accountability. There are two (2) kinds
of ignorance: vincible and invincible.
Vincible ignorance is the absence of knowledge which due diligence can compel.
Vincible ignorance does not absolve a person completely of responsibility. His
responsibility depends upon the amount of knowledge at the moment he performs the
act.
1. Supine or gross- ignorance occur when scarcely any effort has been exerted.
Ex. A person who does not know the time of the day or the week.
2. Crass- ignorance occurs in a person who ought to know but does not.
Ex. An engineer who does not know strength of materials.
3. Affected- ignorance occurs when a person deliberately refuses to know in order to
give ignorance as an excuse.
Ex. One who refuses to know the law in order to give ignorance an excuse.
Ignorance of the civil law is not an excuse. The knowledge of civil law is obligatory,
otherwise, they would give ignorance of the law as an excuse, and that can spell a breakdown
of law and order.
Civil responsibility is a matter between a citizen and the civil authority, and therefore
some transparence is required.
Moral responsibility is a matter between a person and God who sees whether the
person is vincibly or invincibly ignorant, and therefore ignorance of the moral law can absolve a
person moral responsibility.
2. Concupiscence
An impulsive tendency towards a sensible good or away from a sensible evil.
2 kinds of Concupiscence
1. Antecedent- the characteristic of an act that arises without the command of the will.
An act of antecedent concupiscence is unfree and is therefore an act of man. Here, a
person is exempted from responsibility.
2. Consequent- Consequent concupiscence is a human act. A person incurs full
responsibility for acts under this kind.
3. Fear
This factor can either be antecedent or consequent. The reason is that, a person can act
through fear or out of fear, in which case, he is not free, and therefore not responsible
for his act.
4. Violence
This is the use of force to compel a person to act. It is evident that the acts of violence
done on a person are acts of man and the victim involved is freed from all responsibility.
FREEDOM
Questions:
St. Thomas Aquinas lists twelve (12) stages in every person’s decision to perform a
human act. These twelve stages involve both a person’s intellect and will.
INTELLECT WILL