Ead 536 Fieldwork D Darden

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

CAMPUS SAFETY

Clinical Field Experience D

Protecting the Welfare and Safety of Students and Staff

Mia Darden

Department of Education, Grand Canyon University

EAD 536

Dr. Anderson

July 14, 2021


CAMPUS SAFETY
2
Emergency Plan

I interviewed an administrator on a continuation school campus. There are a few

factors that impact the emergency plan at the school, including the student population

size, retention rate, the grade level, and the size of the facility. This plan is different than

a traditional school setting because there are only twelve teachers on campus and one

hundred-fifty students, which is less than the local elementary schools. As a high school,

the only legal requirement is to provide two fire and earthquake drills per year. The

school combines these into one inclusive drill each semester, in order to minimize

distractions from the classroom. Additionally, there hasn’t been policy formed by the

district, but the school is encouraged to complete at least one type of lockdown drill every

or every other year. By this age, all students have experienced all the typical safety drills,

so the safety plan is utilized simply to remind students of procedures they’ve followed

their entire lives. The goal of the drills is to provide them on a rotating system so they

occur on different days and different times of day each time. Sometimes, the drill will

occur at break. Sometimes, it will occur right before school begins. Additionally, the

principal works with local authorities whenever possible to have community support for

lockdown drills. Officers will sometimes come on campus to check class compliance

with lockdown procedures.

Safety Procedures

Besides the typical drills that take place, the campus has a greater threat of

emotional or physical violence. This plays a large role in campus safety procedures.

Because it is a continuation school, the students who are in the local gangs and have
CAMPUS SAFETY
3
gotten out of incarceration attend the school. Because gang members combine on

campus and students with a history of violence are present, there is a greater risk of

fighting and emotional harm done to other students, which is a greater threat than an

earthquake or fire. For example, last week the principal was part of handling a gang

attack that took place on campus. A new gang member from a neighborhood challenged

an opposing gang member to a fight in the bathroom. Three supporting friends held the

bathroom door closed during the fight so administration couldn’t physically enter the

bathroom to break up the fight. One of the students sustained a head injury. The

procedure for dealing with this was to kick both students out of the school, because both

volunteered to fight. Additionally, the three assisting boys were suspended for the rest of

the summer session. The principal filled out an incident report and reached out to both

sets of parents. She also had a medical professional check on the student with the head

injury. There are procedures in place to limit these events, but with an entire campus of

conflicting students, fights arise occasionally. One procedure to limit fighting is the use

of video cameras and campus supervisors. Also, the students aren’t allowed to shut the

bathroom door and only one student is allowed in the restroom at a time. This was how

the fight was indicated to staff. The principal noted that she is working with the district

and the local police department to be assigned a School Resource Officer full time to

assist with physical safety of students. She believes this will limit instances in the future.

PSEL Standard 5 and 8

This fieldwork relates to PSEL Standard 5. A, which states that effective leaders,

“Build and maintain a safe, caring, and healthy school environment that meets that the
CAMPUS SAFETY
4
academic, social, emotional, and physical needs of each student,” (NPBEA, 2015).

School safety doesn’t simply apply to physical well-being, which should undoubtedly be

a priority for an administrator. Additionally, the principal at this site takes the time to

know each student on her campus by name, their backgrounds, and any threats to or from

them. This allows her to assess dangers to students on campus from parents, community

members and other students.

This fieldwork also relates to PSEL Standard 8. J, which states that effective

leaders, “Advocate publicly for the needs and priorities of students, families, and the

community,” (NPBEA, 2015). This relates to the principal’s work to employ a campus

resource officer to the school. She has been advocating for the position to be contracted

through the district in collaboration with the local police department because she has

evaluated the dangers to the campus and on campus and determined that additional

supervision and support is the appropriate way to maintain safety. The principal will

continue to advocate for this need as students continue to notice that with the current

student population makeup, there isn’t an officer, but there is one at the local high-

income school that has fewer safety concerns.


CAMPUS SAFETY
5
Reference

National Policy Board for Educational Administration (2015). Professional

Standards for Educational Leaders 2015. Reston, VA: Author.

You might also like