Meaning, Purpose and Problems of Cost Benefit Analysis Meaning
Meaning, Purpose and Problems of Cost Benefit Analysis Meaning
Meaning, Purpose and Problems of Cost Benefit Analysis Meaning
Meaning:
A cost benefit analysis is done to determine how well, or how poorly, a planned action
will turn out. Although a cost benefit analysis can be used for almost anything, it is most
commonly done on financial questions. Since the cost benefit analysis relies on the addition of
positive factors and the subtraction of negative one to determine a net result, it is also known as
running the numbers.
In many models, a cost-benefit analysis will also factor the opportunity cost into the decision-
making process. Opportunity costs are alternative benefits that could have been realized when
choosing one alternative over another. In other words, the opportunity cost is the forgone or
missed opportunity as a result of a choice or decision. Factoring in opportunity costs allows
project managers to weigh the benefits from alternative courses of action and not merely the
current path or choice being considered in the cost-benefit analysis.
By considering all options and the potential missed opportunities, the cost-benefit analysis is
more thorough and allows for better decision-making.
Direct costs would be direct labor involved in manufacturing, inventory, raw materials,
manufacturing expenses.
Indirect costs might include electricity, overhead costs from management, rent, utilities.
Intangible costs of a decision, such as the impact on customers, employees, or delivery
times.
Opportunity costs such as alternative investments, or buying a plant versus building one.
Cost of potential risks such as regulatory risks, competition, and environmental impacts.
An analyst or project manager should apply a monetary measurement to all of the items on
the cost-benefit list, taking special care not to underestimate costs or overestimate benefits. A
conservative approach with a conscious effort to avoid any subjective tendencies when
calculating estimates is best suited when assigning a value to both costs and benefits for a cost-
benefit analysis.
Finally, the results of the aggregate costs and benefits should be compared quantitatively to
determine if the benefits outweigh the costs. If so, then the rational decision is to go forward with
the project. If not, the business should review the project to see if it can make adjustments to
either increase benefits or decrease costs to make the project viable. Otherwise, the company
should likely avoid the project.
The principles of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) are simple:
One of the problems of CBA is that the computation of many components of benefits and
costs is intuitively obvious but that there are others for which intuition fails to suggest methods
of measurement. Therefore some basic principles are needed as a guide.
3. Time matters: COBA can take account of the economics of time – known as discounting.
This is important when looking at environmental impacts of a project in the years ahead
At the heart of any investment appraisal decision is this basic question – does a planned
project lead to a net increase in social welfare?
o Stage 1(a) Calculation of social costs & social benefits. This would include calculation of:
Tangible Benefits and Costs (i.e. direct costs and benefits)
Intangible Benefits and Costs (i.e. indirect costs and benefits – externalities)
This process is very important – it involves trying to identify all of the significant costs &
benefits.
o Stage 1(b) - Sensitivity analysis of events occurring – this relates to an important question -
If you estimate that a possible benefit (or cost) is £x million, how likely is that outcome? If you
are reasonably sure that a benefit or cost will ‘occur’ – what is the scale of uncertainty about the
actual values of the costs and benefits?
o Stage 2: - Discounting the future value of benefits – costs and benefits accrue over time.
Individuals normally prefer to enjoy the benefits now rather than later – so the value of future
benefits has to be discounted
o Stage 3: - Comparing the costs and benefits to determine the net social rate of return
o Stage 4: - Comparing net rate of return from different projects – the government may have
limited funds at its disposal and therefore faces a choice about which projects should be given
the go-ahead.
CBA has its origins in the water development projects of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The
Corps of Engineers had its origins in the French engineers hired by George Washington in the
American Revolution. For years the only school of engineering in the United States was the
Military Academy at West Point, New York.
In 1879, Congress created the Mississippi River Commission to "prevent destructive floods."
The Commission included civilians but the president had to be an Army engineer and the Corps
of Engineers always had veto power over any decision by the Commission.
In 1936 Congress passed the Flood Control Act which contained the wording, "the Federal
Government should improve or participate in the improvement of navigable waters or their
tributaries, including watersheds thereof, for flood-control purposes if the benefits to
whomsoever they may accrue are in excess of the estimated costs." The phrase if the benefits to
whomsoever they may accrue are in excess of the estimated costs established cost-benefit
analysis. Initially the Corps of Engineers developed ad hoc methods for estimating benefits and
costs. It wasn't until the 1950s that academic economists discovered that the Corps had
developed a system for the economic analysis of public investments. Economists have influenced
and improved the Corps' methods since then and cost-benefit analysis has been adapted to most
areas of public decision-making.