Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 264 views

    People vs. Wahiman

    Uploaded by

    Amado Espejo
    Jose Buensuceso was gunned down by two men on a motorcycle. A witness identified one of the assailants as Jorie Wahiman. Wahiman was found guilty of murder by the trial court and ordered to pay damages. The Court of Appeals affirmed this ruling. The Supreme Court ruled that while Wahiman was guilty of murder, the damages awarded needed to be modified. Specifically, the lost earnings calculation was adjusted under the legal formula to ₱9,878,100. Actual damages were removed due to lack of proof, but temperate damages of ₱25,000 were awarded instead. The other damages remained, and exemplary damages of ₱30,000 were added.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    People vs. Wahiman

    Uploaded by

    Amado Espejo
    264 views1 page
    Jose Buensuceso was gunned down by two men on a motorcycle. A witness identified one of the assailants as Jorie Wahiman. Wahiman was found guilty of murder by the trial court and ordered to pay damages. The Court of Appeals affirmed this ruling. The Supreme Court ruled that while Wahiman was guilty of murder, the damages awarded needed to be modified. Specifically, the lost earnings calculation was adjusted under the legal formula to ₱9,878,100. Actual damages were removed due to lack of proof, but temperate damages of ₱25,000 were awarded instead. The other damages remained, and exemplary damages of ₱30,000 were added.

    Original Description:

    PEOPLE vs. WAHIMAN

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Jose Buensuceso was gunned down by two men on a motorcycle. A witness identified one of the assailants as Jorie Wahiman. Wahiman was found guilty of murder by the trial court and ordered to pay damages. The Court of Appeals affirmed this ruling. The Supreme Court ruled that while Wahiman was guilty of murder, the damages awarded needed to be modified. Specifically, the lost earnings calculation was adjusted under the legal formula to ₱9,878,100. Actual damages were removed due to lack of proof, but temperate damages of ₱25,000 were awarded instead. The other damages remained, and exemplary damages of ₱30,000 were added.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    264 views1 page

    People vs. Wahiman

    Uploaded by

    Amado Espejo
    Jose Buensuceso was gunned down by two men on a motorcycle. A witness identified one of the assailants as Jorie Wahiman. Wahiman was found guilty of murder by the trial court and ordered to pay damages. The Court of Appeals affirmed this ruling. The Supreme Court ruled that while Wahiman was guilty of murder, the damages awarded needed to be modified. Specifically, the lost earnings calculation was adjusted under the legal formula to ₱9,878,100. Actual damages were removed due to lack of proof, but temperate damages of ₱25,000 were awarded instead. The other damages remained, and exemplary damages of ₱30,000 were added.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    PEOPLE vs. WAHIMAN G.R. No. 200942. June 16, 2015.

    FACTS:

    Jose Buensuceso, the manager of Stanfilco-Dole, Phils. in Malaybalay City, was gunned down by persons
    riding in tandem on a black motorcycle. A witness identified one of the assailants as herein appellant
    Jorie Wahiman. During trial, the prosecution submitted in evidence the extrajudicial confession of
    appellant taken during the preliminary investigation of the case, admitting to the killing of Buensuceso.
    However, when it was appellant’s turn to testify, he narrated that at the time of the killing, he was at
    Landing Casisang, Malaybalay City attending the birthday celebration of his brother-in-law. RTC Ruling:
    Appellant is guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of murder. The trial court directed Wahiman to
    pay the heirs of the victim the sum of ₱75,000.00 as moral damages, ₱75,000.00 as civil indemnity, and
    actual damages as follows: ₱59,280,000.00 lost earning capacity of the deceased; ₱25,000.00 actual
    damages; no receipt was presented for ₱220,000; ₱1,500.00 Appearance fee; and ₱50,000.00 Attorney’s
    fee. CA Ruling: Affirmed in toto the trial court’s decision.

    ISSUE: WON the damages awarded should be modified. (YES)

    RULING: Regarding the award for lost earnings, the general rule is that there must be documentary
    proof to support indemnity for loss of earning capacity. By way of exception, damages for loss of earning
    capacity may be awarded despite the absence of documentary evidence when (1) the deceased is self-
    employed earning less than the minimum wage under current labor laws, and judicial notice may be
    taken of the fact that in the deceased’s line of work no documentary evidence is available; or (2) the
    deceased is employed as a daily wage worker earning less than the minimum wage under current labor
    laws. Notably, this case does not fall under any of the exceptions. The deceased victim could not be
    considered as a self-employed earning less than the minimum wage; neither could he be considered
    employed as a daily wage worker. However, the Court is inclined to award lost earnings considering that
    the deceased, as testified by his widow, was the manager of Stanfilco-Dole, Phils. in Malaybalay City and
    was receiving a monthly salary of ₱95,000.00. He was 54 years of age when gunned down by appellant.
    This testimony was not objected to by appellant or questioned during cross-examination or on appeal.
    However, the amount of the award for lost earnings must be modified following the formula [2/3 x 80 –
    age] x [gross annual income - necessary expenses equivalent to 50% of the gross annual income]. Thus:
    [2/3 x (80-54)] [(₱95,000 x 12) – 50% (₱95,000 x 12)] = ₱9,878,100.00. In addition, the awards of actual
    damages in the amount of ₱25,000.00 must be deleted for lack of proof; in lieu thereof, temperate
    damages in the amount of ₱25,000.00 is awarded. The awards of civil indemnity in the amount of
    ₱75,000.00, and moral damages in the amount of ₱75,000.00, are in line with prevailing jurisprudence.
    In addition, the heirs of the victim are entitled to exemplary damages in the amount of ₱30,000.00.
    Finally, all damages awarded shall earn interest at the rate of 6% per annum from date of finality of this
    resolution until full payment. Judgment affirmed with modifications. RTC and CA Decision SC decision
    Lost earning capacity: ₱59,280,000.00 Reduced to ₱9,878,100.00 Moral damages: ₱75,000.00
    Maintained Civil indemnity: ₱75,000.00 Maintained Actual damages: ₱25,000.00 DELETED but in lieu
    thereof, temperate damages in the amount of ₱25,000.00 is awarded Appearance fee: ₱1,500.00 Did
    not mention Attorney’s fee: ₱50,000.00 Did not mention Exemplary damages: ₱30,000.00

    You might also like