Tig Welding Process Parameters Optimization For Stainless Steel Materials Using Regression Analysis
Tig Welding Process Parameters Optimization For Stainless Steel Materials Using Regression Analysis
Tig Welding Process Parameters Optimization For Stainless Steel Materials Using Regression Analysis
systematic investigation of the process gas flow rate, and root gap. Each process
parameters on Bead Width, Bead Height, parameter is assessed at two levels (with
Heat Input, Transverse Shrinkage, Area of one trial on each specimen). Trails are
Penetration, and Tensile Strength[3]. Few
reachers like T Mohandas, G conducted, and the response characteristics
Madhusudhan Reddy, Mohammad Naveed are studied for distortion and tensile
.et.al.,.He worked on the optimization of strength.
weld bead geometry on the Tig welding
2.2.EXPERIMENTAL PLAN
process. But very few investigations were
carried at optimizing the process parameter
of SMAW[4]. User Esme, Melih
Bayramoglu, Yugut Kazancoglu, Sueda
Ozgun, .et.al. presents that the Taguchi
method is a powerful statistical tool that
yields optimized parameter values
For features of the design response. Using
Orthogonal array coupled with Meticulous
experimental design a standard or S/N
analysis of results using Taguchi
techniques gives optimum parameters with
the minimum amount of experimentation
[5]. The purpose of regression testing is to
ensure that changes such as those
mentioned above have not introduced new
faults. One of the main reasons for
regression testing is to determine whether
a change in one part of the software affects
other software parts. Standard regression
testing methods include re-running
previously completed tests and checking
whether program behavior has changed
and whether fixed faults have re-emerged.
Regression testing can be performed to test
a system efficiently by systematically
selecting the appropriate minimum set of
tests needed to cover a particular 3. EXPERIMENTAL WORK
adequately. Therefore, in most software 3.1.WORKPIECE MATERIAL
development situations, it is considered
good coding practice. When a bug is AISI type 316l stainless steel is
located and fixed, record a test that used in the current experiment, with many
exposes the bug and re-run that test advantages such as low thermal
regularly after subsequent changes to the conductivity, high corrosion resistance,
program and improved stability at elevated
temperatures, and is also used in various
2.1.DEFINITION OF PROBLEM
industries, including electronics, medical
In this investigation, an attempt was made equipment, home appliances, automotive,
to determine the optimum process and advanced tube industry. It has
parameters TIG on SS316L plates. Process excellent characteristics for shaping and
parameters considered are weld current, welding
Melting Thermal %
point conductivity Elongation
1 Level-1 80 1 8
2 Level -2 90 2 10
Welding Output
parameter levels
Trial
Distorti Tensile
No
on strengt
A B C
h
Fig 3.3 standard specimen for tensile
1 80 1 8 0.7 203 test
2 80 2 10 1.5 196
4.RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS:
3 90 1 10 0.9 224
4 90 2 8 0.7 213 The experiment was performed on
material grade SS 316L with experiment
architecture (DOE). Using a dial gauge
and the universal test unit, the output
factors are absorbed.Table 3.3 the input
Table 3.3 Experimental results for the
parameters that are taken for
weld bead geometry experimentation and results. Fig 4.1 shows
the tensile strength values, and in fig: 4.2
shows the distortion values of the
experiments.
215
210
205 Tensile strength
200 (MPa)
195
190
185
180
1 2 3 4
The Table 3.3 shows the values of the Table 4.2 Comparison of experimental
input parameters that were obtained as and model equation for tensile strength
optimum experimental values. These
values were used in the confirmation tests, The linear regression equation for
and the error percentage was calculated by distortion:
comparing them with the model
experimental values.
Distortion = Bo + B1* I+ B2 * RG + B3*
FR
Exp. Current Root Gas Tensile Distortion
No (Amps) Gap(Mm Flow Strength (Mm)
) (L/Min) (Mpa)
Bo, B1, B2, B3are constants. I, RG, and FR
are the input parameters.
3. 80 1 10 224 0.9
References:
Conclusions:
1. Study of type 316L stainless steel TIG
The following findings are made after welding with MoO 3 powder Article
performing the experiments and evaluating Jul 2011 Kuang Hung TsengKo Jui
the experimental outcomes. The regression Chuang
analysis has been successfully employed
for optimizing the process parameters of
Tungsten Inert Gas Welding of steel 2. The effect of activating fluxes on 316L
plates. It has been shown that the stainless steel weld joint characteristic
regression analysis provides a systematic in TIG welding using the Taguchi
and efficient methodology for searching method ArticleE. Ahmadi Alireza
the welding process parameters with Ebrahimi
optimal weld structures. 3. TIG welding with single-component
fluxes Article Mar 2000J MATER
PROCESS TECH Paulo J. Modenesi
Eustaquio Roberto Apolinario Iaci
Parameters of the welding process Miranda Pereira
are chosen as study factors, such as
welding current, root gap, and gas 4. Performance of activated TIG process
flow rate. Using DOE, the process in austenitic stainless steel welds
parameters are selected.