International Nosology Heritable Disorders of Connective Tissue, Berlin, 1986
International Nosology Heritable Disorders of Connective Tissue, Berlin, 1986
International Nosology Heritable Disorders of Connective Tissue, Berlin, 1986
INTRODUCTION
The heritable disorders of connective tissue have proven to be very heterogeneous
and problems have arisen concerning syndromic boundaries, nomenclature, and classifica-
tion. In an attempt to resolve these dilemmas, a group of experts participated in a
Workshop held during the 7th International Congress of Human Genetics, Berlin, in
September, 1986. The program for this Workshop had been drawn up at a planning
meeting held in 1985 at the Ciba Foundation, London (Beighton, Hollister, Pope,
Pyeritz).
At the Workshop, overviews were given of the uses and limitations of nosology
(McKusick), diagnostic criteria (Pyeritz), and practical issues in biochemical and
molecular diagnosis (Hollister). Invited speakers then gave brief comments on the current
Received for publication June 24, 1987; revision received August 3, 1987.
Address reprint requests to Prof. Peter Beighton, MRC Unit for Inherited Skeletal Disorders, Department of
Human Genetics, University of Cape Town, Medical School, Observatory 7925,Cape Town, South Africa.
status of the nosology of specific categories of inherited connective tissue disorders and
made recommendations for possible modification.
The Workshop was followed by two closed committee meetings at which the
participants attempted to reach agreement on syndromic definition and a standardized
nomenclature. The final proposals, with brief comment where relevant, form the subject of
this communication.
GENERAL COMMENTS
1. This “Berlin Nosology” is not intended to intrude upon or cut across the existing
Paris Nomenclature for constitutional disorders of the skeleton [Maroteaux et al., 19861.
Inevitably, there is some overlap, but wherever possible this has been avoided.
2. In some conditions current problems revolve around diagnostic criteria or
syndromic boundaries, while in others nomenclature and classification are the main issues.
For these reasons, the style of presentation in this article is not necessarily uniform.
3. Some heritable connective tissue disorders can be subclassified on a clinical basis
or through biomolecular abnormalities; in others the basic defect is still unknown. The
nosology represents a synthesis of these factors, based on current knowledge, and future
modification is foreseen. The Committee plans to meet at regular intervals for updating.
4. A number of conditions, including heteroglycanoses, overlap syndromes and tight
joint syndromes were also discussed at the Workshop and Committees. There was general
consensus that disorders in these categories were outside the scope of this document.
5. Key references are provided for each disorder. The catalogue of inherited
disorders “Mendelian Inheritance in Man” [McKusick, 19861 and the classical mono-
graph “Heritable Disorders of Connective Tissue” [McKusick, 19721 are additional rich
sources of references and information. Other relevant reviews have been published by
Byers [ 19831, Maroteaux et al. [ 19863, and Pope and Nicholls [ 19871.
6. Where relevant the numbers allocated to entities in “Mendelian Inheritance in
Man” [McKusick, 19861 have been cited in the titles of the disorders mentioned in this
nosology.
7. A need for a register of researchers, projects, and affected persons was recognized
and a subcommittee has been established under the chairmanship of Dr. Reed Pyeritz. A
report on conclusions and proposals is appended.
Cardinal manifestations
Skin-hyperextensible with soft, velvety, doughy texture
Dystrophic scarring
Easy bruising
Joint hypermobility
Connective tissue fragility
EDS 1 Cardinal manifestations in severe degree
EDS I1 Cardinal manifestations in mild degree
EDS 111 Marked articular hypermobility
Moderate dermal hyperextensibility
Minimal scarring
EDS IV Variable stigmata
Severe bruising, hyperpigmentation and/or scarring
Thin skin with prominent venous plexus
Vascular rupture
Colonic perforation
Characteristic facial appearance
EDS V Cardinal manifestations in moderate degree
X-linked inheritance
EDS VI Cardinal manifestations in severe degree
Eye involvement (microcornea, scleral perforation, retinal detachment)
Scoliosis
EDS VII Cardinal manifestations with marked articular hypermobility
Short stature
Micrognathia
EDS VIII Cardinal manifestations in moderate degree
Aggressive periodentitis, gingival recession, early tooth loss
EDS X Cardinal manifestations but skin texture normal
Petechiae
Striae distensae
Platelet aggregation defect corrected by fibronectin
586 Beighton et al.
4. FAMILIAL ARTICULAR HYPERMOBILITY SYNDROME (14790)
Excludes:
EDS group of disorders, notably EDS I11 (Hypermobile type) and VII (Arthrochalasis
multiplex congenita)
Skeletal dysplasias with joint hypermobility, notably the Larsen syndrome
Cardinal manifestations
Generalized articular hypermobility, with or without subluxation or dislocations
No skin involvement
4- 1 Familial articular hypermobility, uncomplicated type AD/AR
4-2 Familial articular hypermobility, dislocating type (formerly EDS AD
XI, familial joint instability syndrome)
(The basic defect in these disorders is unknown.)
6. CUTISLAXA
Excludes:
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (syn. cutis hyperelastica)
BerlinNosology 587
7. PSEUDOXANTHOMA ELASTICUM
Cardinal changes:
Skin-yellow infiltrated lesions, maximal in the flexures
Eyes-angioid streaks, retinal hemorrhage
Cardiovascular-calcification of the media of medium-sized arteries, with progressive
occlusion and occasional rupture
7- 1 fseudoxanthoma elasticum (fXE)-AD form (probably heterogeneous) (17785)
7-2 Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (fXE)-AR form (probably heterogeneous) (26480)
Elastic fibres are characteristically fragmented and calcified in skin biopsy specimens but
the basic defect is unknown.
1 1. OSTEOCENESIS IMPERFECTA
Information concerning biochemical and molecular defects in 01 is accumulating rapidly
but a nosology based on a synthesisof these factors, together with clinical and genealogical
data is not yet possible. The current classification of 01 on a basis of clinical and
radiological changes is given below.
01 type I Osseous fragility (variable from minimal through AD (16620)
moderately severe), distinctly blue sclerae (at all (heterogeneous)
ages), presenile hearing loss
BerlinNosology 589
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Gillian Shapley for typing the manuscript with her usual enthusiasm and
efficiency. This research was supported by grants from the South African Medical
Research Council, the Mauerberger Foundation, the Harry Crossley Foundation, and the
University of Cape Town Staff Research Fund.
590 Beighton et al.
REFERENCES
Byers PH (1983): Inherited disorders of collagen biosynthesis: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, The Marfan syndrome,
and osteogenesis imperfecta. Clin Med 9(12):141.
Maroteaux P (1 986): International Nomenclature of Constitutional Diseases of Bones with Bibliography.
BD:OAS XXII(4):1-54.
Maroteaux P, FrCzal J, Cohen-Solal L (1986): The differential symptomatology of errors of collagen
metabolism: A tentative classification. Am J Med Genet 24219-230.
McKusick VA (1972): “Heritable Disorders of Connective Tissue,” 4th ed.St Louis: CV Mosby, pp 61-223.
McKusick VA (1986): “Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Catalogs of Autosomal Dominant, Autosomal Recessive
and X-linked Phenotype,” 7th ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pope FM, Nicholls AC (1987): Molecular abnormalities of collagen in human disease. Arch Dis Child
62:523-528.
1. MARFAN SYNDROME
Hall JG, Pyeritz RE, Dudgeon DL, Haller JA Jr (1984): Pneumothorax in the Marfan syndrome: Prevalence
and therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 37500-504.
Maumenee IH (1981): The eye in the Marfan syndrome. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 79:68&733.
Pyeritz RE, McKusick VA (1979): The Marfan syndrome: Diagnosis and management. N Engl J Med
3W772-777.
Pyeritz RE (1986): The diagnosis and management of the Marfan syndrome. Am Fam Physician 34(6):83-94.
Sisk HE, Zahka KG, Pyeritz RE (1983): The Marfan syndrome in early childhood: Analysis of 15 patients
diagnosed less than 4 years of age. Am J Cardiol52:353-358.
2. STICKLER SYNDROME
Blair NP, Albert DM, Liberfarb RM, Hirose T (1979): Hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmopathy of
Stickler. Am J Ophthalmol88:876-888.
Francoman0 CA, Le P-L, Lieberfarb R,Streeten ER, Pyeritz RE (1 987): Linkage of the Stickler syndrome to
COL2Al. Genomics (in press).
Hall JG (1974): Stickler syndrome presenting as a syndrome of cleft palate, myopia and blindness inherited as a
dominant trait. Bergsma D (ed). New York Alan R. Liss, Inc., for The National Foundation-March of
Dimes. BDOAS X( 18):157-171.
Herrmann J, France TD, Spranger JW, Opitz JM, Wiffler C (1975): The Stickler syndrome (Hereditary
arthro-ophthalmopathy). New York Alan R. Liss, Inc., for The National Foundation-March of Dimes,
BD:OAS XII(2):76-103.
Opitz JM, France TD, Herrmann J, Spranger JW (1972): The Stickler syndrome. N Engl J Med
286546-547.
Stickler GB, Belau PG, Farrel FJ, Jones JD, Pugh DG, Steinberg AG, Ward LE (1965): Hereditary progressive
arthrc-ophthalmopathy. Mayo Clin Proc 40433455
3. EHLERS-DANLOS SYNDROME
EDSI-III:
Beighton P, Price A, Lord J, Dickson E (1969): The variants of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis
28:228.
Beighton P (1970): “The Ehlers-DanlosSyndrome.” London: Wm Heinemann Ltd.
EDS IV:
Pope FM, Martin GR, Lichtenstein JR, Penttinen R, Gerson B, Rowe DW (1975): Patients with Ehlers-Danlos
syndrome type IV lack type 111 collagen. Prcc Natl AcadSci (USA) 72131.11316.
Pope FM, Martin GR, McKusick VA (1977): Inheritance of Ehlers-Danlos type 1V syndrome. J Med Genet
14:200-204.
Pope FM, Nicholls AC, Jones PM, Wells RS, Lawerence D (1980): EDS IV (acrogeria): New autmomal
dominant and recessive types. J K Soc Med 73:180-186.
Pyeritz RE, Stolle CA, Parfrey NA, Myers JC (1984): Ehlers-Danlos syndrome IV due to a novel defect in type
111 procollagen. Am J Med Genet 19:607-622.
Stolle CA, Pyeritz RE, Myers JC, Prockop DJ (1985): Synthesis of an altered type I11 procollagen in a patient
with type IV Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Biol Chem 260:1937-1944.
EDS V
Beighton P (1968): X-linked recessive inheritance in the Ehlers-Danlossyndrome. Br Med J 3:409-413.
BerlinNosology 591
Beighton P, Curtis D (1985): X-linked Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type V: The next generation. Clin Genet
27:472478.
EDS VI:
Beighton P (1970): Serious ophthalmological complications in the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Brit J Ophthal
54:263-267.
Krane S M (1982): Hydroxylysine-deficient collagen disease: A form of Eiders-Danlos syndrome type VI. In
Akeson WH (ed): “Symposium on Heritable Disorders of ConnectiveTissue.” Am Acad of Ortho Surg.
St Louis: CV Mosby, pp 61-81.
Pinnell SR, Krane SM, Kenzora JE, Glimcher MJ (1972): Heritable disorder with hydroxylysinedeficient
collagen: Hydroxylysine-deficient collagen disease. N Engl J Med 286: 1013-1020.
EDS VII:
Cole WG, Chan D, Chambers GW, Walker ID, Bateman J F (1986): Deletion of 24 amino acids from the pro
1(I) chain of type I procollagen in a patient with the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VII. J Biol Chem
261 5496-5503.
Eyre DR, Shapiro FD, Aldridge G F (1985): A heterozygous collagen defect in a variant of the Ehlers-Danlos
syndrome type VII. J Biol Chem 260: 1 1322-1 1329.
Steinmann B, Tuderman L, Peltonen L, Martin GR, McKusick VA, Prockop DJ (1980): Evidence for a
structural mutation of procollagen type 1 in a patient with the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, type VII. J Biol
Chem 25538874893.
EDS VIIF
Hollister DW (1982): Clinical features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIII and IX. In Akeson WH (ed):
“Symposium on Heritable Disorder of Connective Tissue.’’ St Louis: CV Mosby, pp 102-1 13.
Nelson DL, King RA (1981): Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIII. J Am Acad Dermatol5:297-303.
EDS X:
Arneson MA, Hammerschmidt DE, Furcht LT, King RA (1980): A new form of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
JAMA 2U144-147.
6. CUTlSIAXA
Beighton P (1972): The dominant and recessive forms of cutis laxa. J Med Genet 9216-222.
Fitzsimmons JS, Fitzsimmons EM, Guibert PR, Zaldua V, Dodd KL (1985): Variable clinical presentation of
cutis laxa. Clin Genet 28:284-295.
Goltz RW, Hult AM, Goldfarb M, Gorlin RJ (1965): Cutis laxa. Arch Dermatol92:373-387.
Weir EK, Joffe HS, Blaufuss AH, Beighton P (1977): Cardiovascular abnormalities in cutis laxa. Eur J Cardiol
5:255-261.
Brown FR 111, Holbrook KA, Byers PH, Steward D, Dean J, Pyeritz RE (1982): Cutis laxa. Johns Hopkins Med
J 150148-153.
7. PSEUWXANTHOMA ELASTICUM
Goodman RM, Smith EW, Paton D, Bergman RA, Siege1 CL, Ottesen OE, Shelley WM, Pusch AL, McKusick
VA ( 1 963): Pseudoxanthoma elasticum, a clinical and histopathological study. Medicine 42:297-334.
Pope FM ( I 974): Autosomal dominant variants of pseudoxanthoma elasticum. J Med Genet 11:152-157.
Pope FM (1974): Two types of autosomal recessive pseudoxanthoma elasticum. Arch Dermatol 110:209-212.
Pope FM (1975): Historical evidence for the genetic heterogeneity of pseudoxanthomaelasticum. Br J Dermatol
92493-509.
Viljoen DL, Beighton P, Mabin T,Woods K, Saxe N, Bonafede P (1984): Pseudoxanthoma elasticum in South
Africa: Genetic and clinical implications. S Afr Med J 66:813-816.
8. EPIDERMOLYSIS BUL.MSA
Anton-Lamprecht I, Hashimoto I (1976): Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica dominans (Pasini): A primary
structural defect of the anchoring fibrils. Hum Genet 32:69-76.
Bauer EA, Eisen AZ (1978): Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: Evidence for increased collagenase as a
genetic characteristic in cell culture. J Exp Med 148:1378-1387.
Briggaman RA, Wheeler CE (1 975): Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica recessiva: A possible role of anchoring
fibrils in the pathogenesis. J Invest Dermatol 65:203-211.
Heagerty AHM, Kennedy AR, Gunner DB, Eady RAJ (1986): Rapid prenatal diagnosis and exclusion of
epidermolysis bullosa using novel antibody probes. J Invest Dermatol 86603405.
Gedde-Dahl T Jr, Anton-Lamprecht I (1983): Epidermolysis bullosa. In Emery AEH, Rimoin DL (eds):
“Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics,” Vol 1. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Winship I (1986): Epidermolysis bullosa in South Africa. S Afr Med J 69:743-746.
1 1. OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA
Beighton P, Versfeld GA (1985): On the paradoxically high relative prevalence of osteogenesis imperfecta Type
I11 in the Black population of South Africa. Clin Genet 27:39&404.
Levin LS, Brady JM, Melnick M (1980): Scanning electron microscopy of teeth in autosomal dominant
osteogenesis irnperfecta: Support for genetic heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet 5189-199.
Paterson CR, McAllison S, Miller R (1983): Heterogeneity of ostwgenesis imperfecta type I. J Med Genet
20:203-205.
Sillence DO, Senn A, Danks DM (1979): Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet
16:101-116.
Sillence DO, Barlow KK, Garber AP, Hull JG, Rimoin DL (1984): Osteogenesis imperfecta type 11. Delineation
of the phenotype with reference to genetic heterogeneity.Am J Med Genet 17:407423.
Sillence DO, Barlow KK, Cole WG, Dietrich S, Garber AP, Rimoin DL (1986): Osteogenesis imperfecta Type
111. Delineation of the phenotype with reference to genetic heterogeneity.Am J Med Genet 23:821-832.
Sykes B, Ogilvie D, Wordsworth P, Anderson J, Jones N (1986): Osteogenesis imperfecta is linked to both type I
collagen structural genes. Lancet 2:69-72.
Tsipouras P, B$rresen A-L, Dickson LA, Berg K, Prockup DJ, Ramirez F (1984): Molecular heterogeneity in
the mild autosomal dominant forms of osteogenesis imperfecta. Am J Hum Genet 36:1172-1179.
Wallis G, Beighton P, Boyd C, Mathew CG (1986): Mutations linked to the pro-cu 2(I) collagen gene are
responsible for several cases of osteogenesis imperfecta type I. J Med Genet 23:411-416.